Support 911Blogger


David Ray Griffin: Review of "September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor"

Review of "September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor".  A documentary by Massimo Mazzucco.

David Ray Griffin

There have been several good films and videos about 9/11. But the new film by award-winning film-maker Massimo Mazzucco is in a class by itself.

For those of us who have been working on 9/11 for a long time, this is the film we have been waiting for.

Whereas there are excellent films treating the falsity of particular parts of the official account, such as the Twin Towers or WTC 7, Mazzucco has given us a comprehensive documentary treatment of 9/11, dealing with virtually all of the issues.

There have, of course, been films that treated the fictional official story as true. And there are films that use fictional stories to portray people’s struggles after starting to suspect the official story to be false.

But there is no fiction in Mazzucco’s film – except in the sense that it clearly and relentlessly exposes every part of the official account as fictional.

Because of his intent at completeness, Mazzucco has given us a 5-hour film. It is so fascinating and fast-paced that many will want to watch it in one sitting. But this is not necessary, as the film, which fills 3 DVDs, consists of 7 parts, each of which is divided into many short chapters.

These 7 parts treat Air Defence, The Hijackers, The Airplanes, The Pentagon, Flight 93, The Twin Towers, and Building 7. In each part, after presenting facts that contradict the official story, Mazzucco deals with the claims of the debunkers (meaning those who try to debunk the evidence provided by the 9/11 research community).

The Introduction, reflecting the film’s title, deals with 12 uncanny parallels between Pearl Harbor and September 11.

The film can educate people who know nothing about 9/11 (beyond the official story), those with a moderate amount of knowledge about the various problems with the official story, and even by experts. (I myself learned many things.)

Mazzucco points out that his film covers 12 years of public debate about 9/11. People who have been promoting 9/11 truth for many of these years will see that their labors have been well-rewarded: There is now a high-quality, carefully-documented film that dramatically shows the official story about 9/11 to be a fabrication through and through.

This is truly the film we have been waiting for.
 


Availability: The film is freely available to the world at:

1. The film-maker's own website, complete with detailed index

2. On Youtube

3. ReOpen911's website for the french version


 
September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor

 


 

This is without a doubt one

This is without a doubt one of the best if not the best films I've seen that acts as an overview of the September 11th attacks and the impossibility of the official evidence for the U.S Governments claims of what happened and who committed the crimes. And I have seen a 9/11 truth video or two in my time.

The research, the editing, the narration, the inclusion of debunkers claims. ect. Never a dull moment. Or 5 hours.

Jeremy Rhys’

Jeremy Rhys’ "AlienScientist", breaking down some of his highlight of "NPH" film.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tbt8yYu5L0M

Erik Larson critique

It would be interesting, if David Ray Griffin had addressed this:

Critique of David Ray Griffin’s 9/11 Fake Calls Theory by Erik Larson
http://911blogger.com/news/2011-02-10/critique-david-ray-griffin-s-911-fake-calls-theory

It would be interesting, what Massimo Mazzucco would say about Larson arguments.
Did Mazzucco overtake some of Griffins interpretation, which were debunked by Erik Larson?
Is Larson still moderator and active here, at all?