Support 911Blogger


PART 7: Legislators, Pundits & 9/11 Controlled Demolition Questions

.
.

Federal legislators and pundits are asked questions about the 9/11 controlled demolition evidence on C-SPAN's program, "Washington Journal".

Video includes:

*Tom Ridge (former DHS Secretary) responds to WTC dust evidence..

*Loretta Sanchez (D-CA) gives an excellent, candid answer to a question about Building 7, encourages C-SPAN callers to keep pushing.

*Josh Rogin of the Daily Beast tells a caller it's not the job of the press to litigate what happened on 9/11.

*Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) is asked about the United States government's loss of credibility for looking away from the Building 7 issue.

This is Part 7 in a series.

To call C-SPAN's Washington Journal program:

Democrats: 1-202 585-3880

Republicans: 1-202-585-3881

Independents: 1-202-585-3882

It is on live every day at 7AM -10AM EST

Previous videos in this series are listed below:

Part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnVZovV5dyw

Part 2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-kBXM4dygc

Part 3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqWmOUUHeY0

Part 4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RryusiAHm8s

Part 5

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCLpELlZr9g

Part 6

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43ELbMo4D1o

John McCain questioned in April (before part 1):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7bIgiu-BXg

At 36:53

Sanchez: 'I would be surprised if there weren't some rogue elements within some of these agencies....I would say that that's more probable than not.'

Yes, she was candid.

Cognitive Dissonance Exposed...

TRANSCRIPT AND SOURCES: http://www.corbettreport.com/?p=8926

Thank you

I just want to say "Thank you Andrew Steele!". I love these posts, very informative as to the potentially organized and certainly dismissive attitude of most Goverment officials without even bothering to check the facts. Like the complete BS claim, I have heard more than once on these CSPAN shows, that the 9/11 commission report explains satisfactorily why Building 7 fell.

Excellent callers and questions...

I like how the caller puts forth a very well worded question and leaves the air hanging for this supposed intelligent representative to answer. But inevitably the host chimes in and breaks the awkward silence with, "oh this caller is part of an organized group" bullshit to ease the transition and to help the guest either not answer or get his thoughts together and lie better. Hosts should just let the question hang in the air and see how the person responds naturally after being challenged so bluntly and so effectively by these great questioners. Never stop.

To call C-SPAN's Washington Journal program:
Democrats: 1-202 585-3880
Republicans: 1-202-585-3881
Independents: 1-202-585-3882
It is on live every day at 7AM -10AM EST

I also liked how that Representative from California Dana Rohrabacher at 4:29 admits he hasn't checked into WTC Building 7 and admits to "explosions that are happening" - http://youtu.be/MJ6P6IcNKds?t=4m29s

just watched part 7

awesome! Lorreta Sanchez seems intelligent and reasonable for a change.

Hillary laughs off question...

Luke Rudkowski asks Hillary Clinton why she supported Al Qaeda in Libya and Syria. During her tenure as Sec of State the U.S. was providing financial and military aid to Al Qaeda affiliated groups in Syria & Libya. When asked for an explanation Hillary laughs as if supporting Al Qaeda is funny.

"Without use the words 'Conspiracy Theories (or Theorist)"

I would love it if, when people call in, if they can ask if someone can answer without using those words.

"Sir, without using the words CT, can you answer why building 7..."