Support Independent Journalism!
9/11 Blogger receives no foundational or corporate support other than from the ads below. We depend on your support. Help us cover the news and improve the site by becoming a monthly donor.
Down Payments As Low As $0 877-432-5626
"If and when the 28 redacted pages of the Joint Congressional Inquiry are released, and people in our Government try to use those pages as an excuse to go to war with Saudi Arabia (which I don't think they can do since Saudi Arabia owns a large portion of this country), we will need to make sure the whole history of the relationship between Saudi Arabia and those two hijackers in San Diego is known, that the whole history of the CIA seemingly protecting those two hijackers in San Diego is known, that one of the first things Bush did when he came into office was to tell the alphabet agencies to "back off" the Saudis and the Bin Ladens, that we have protected Saudi Arabia's support for terrorism since long before 9/11, that the Bush Family, George Tenet and Prince Bandar were really good friends (money connected to those two hijackers in San Diego came from the Bandar family), that George W. Bush and Bandar were talking about the need for "decisive action" in Iraq in the months before 9/11, that Bandar said Saudi intelligence was following most of the hijackers "with precision," that Philip Zelikow and Prince Bandar both belong to the Aspen Strategy Group, that the Consulate in Jeddah where some of the hijackers got their Visas was the same consulate used in the 80's to bring "terrorists" to the U.S. to train for the Afghanistan/Russia War, that the VIsa Express Program, a program used by some of the hijackers to get visas, applied only to Saudi Arabia and was started months before 9/11. Stuff like that…" ~ Jon Gold
I've seen the movie before somewhere. When Kean and Hamilton are calling for release of the 28 pages, "Take evasive action...It's a trap!"
Are a disgrace. They know damn well what they've actively participated in, and they surely know that the official story narrative 9/11 Commission Report is a lie from beginning to end.
If the 28 redacted pages are released to the public, what's to guarantee that the original text remains verbatim? If it has been changed, censored/re-redacted, or altered in any way, who is going to know any better, outside of people who cannot say anything on account of their 'national security' (!!!) oath? The parties responsible for maintaining secrecy on this (and so much related) material have a track record of lying, fabricating, dissembling and every imaginable kind of deception known to humankind, especially when the treasonous butts of senior officials are on the line.
Campaign Mounts to Declassify 9/11 Report’s References to Alleged Saudi Involvement