We Were Lied To About 9/11 - Episode 9 - Michael Springmann

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6stXb7DwJU

J. Michael Springmann was a civil servant at the Commerce Department’s International Trade Administration as well as a diplomat in the State Department’s Foreign Service, with postings to Germany, India, Saudi Arabia, and the Bureau of Intelligence and Research in Washington, D.C. The published author of several articles on national security themes, he is now an attorney in private practice in the Washington, D.C. area. In addition to a J.D. from American University in Washington, D.C., he holds undergraduate and graduate degrees in International Affairs from Georgetown University and Catholic University, both in the Nation’s Capital.

Magazines which have published his articles include Covert Action Quarterly, Unclassified, Global Research, Global Outlook, OpEdNews, The Public Record, and Foreign Policy Journal.

In June 2004, the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee granted him its Pro Bono Attorney of the Year award.

If you are on twitter...

And if you want to... with honey, not vinegar, try to give a little nudge to Jonathan Kay, the author of "Among The Truthers," to be on my show. He is @JonKay Thanks. He has already once declined.

I corresponded with...

Shayna Steinger. The consular official in Jeddah Saudi Arabia who gave 12 of the alleged hijackers visas that should have been turned down, who gave incorrect testimony to two different investigations, who was NOT mentioned in the 9/11 Report, and who was promoted throughout the State Department after 9/11.

I told her that I would not post our correspondence online. I asked her this question...

Hello Ms. Steinger... could you please tell me what in this is incorrect if anything? Thank you for your time.

http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=shayna_steinger_1

She told me none of it was true, though she did admit to issuing the visas. She would not elaborate on which parts were untrue. She spent about 4 paragraphs using psychoanalytical babble, and treated me like a "conspiracy theorist."

I sent her the question before my interview with Michael in the hopes that she could elaborate on the issue. She did not respond until after the interview.

Social Security Numbers

Are SS numbers required for visas? If not, can you obtain a SS# using a visa as ID?

What REALLY happened on 9/11

The aircraft that hit the south tower was not, and could not possibly have been, UA Flight 175, piloted by a oomplete novice, at 150 knots over Vmo, 88 knots over Vd, and the buildings were blown up with explosives initiated from around the impact areas with the building hit lower and at the higher rate of speed blown up first, (although hit second) which in turn "sold" the destruction of the other tower about a half hour later.

THE plane even ACCELERATED in near level flight near sea level, at Vmo + 150 knots (148 KCAS to be precise). This is absolutely and utterly impossible unless engine power/performance was greater, by orders of magnitude (3X+?) than that on a standard, unmodified Boeing 767. That's a fact.

For more, see: http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/2lbvgv/the_911_smoking_gun_ntsb_radar_report_at_590_mph/

And: https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/2kn63y/nasa_dryden_aerospace_projects_director_declares/

It's hard, physical evidence, not conjecture or some sort of tangential, convoluted dot-connecting excercise in futility.

As soon as we're all on the same page in this regard, then everyone will come to know what really happened.

Play it safe with the LIHOP nonsense and whathaveyou, and all we get, all the people get, is some sort of limited hangout or a whole web of information forming a confusing tapestry hung over the murderous hoax, however well intended and voluminous the presentation of that information.

Does this information in some way discredt A&Efor9/11Truth's evidence proving CD? Hardly. To the contrary, it's essential to understanding CD and the nature of the murderous hoax of 9/11.

911Blogger, Jon Gold, please take note, while considering the data with an open mind. Thank you. And no this has nothing to do with the no-planer bullshit, but everything to do with the self evident proof of CD of the twin towers.