Rep. Alan Grayson denied access to censored pages from 9/11 report

"The U.S. House Intelligence Committee has denied a Florida congressman’s request for access to 28 classified pages from the 2002 report of Congress’ Joint Inquiry into the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

"Rep. Alan Grayson, D-Orlando, told he made his request at the suggestion of House colleagues who have read them as they consider whether to support a proposed resolution urging President Obama to open those long-censored pages to the public.

“Why was I denied? I have been instrumental in publicizing the Snowden revelations regarding pervasive domestic spying by the government and this is a petty means for the spying industrial complex to lash back,” Grayson said last week, referring to National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden".


Not the first time...

I don't know anything about Alan Grayson, but I'm assuming is beyond control. That he works outside of the acceptable script. Much like Cynthia McKinney did.

If they have nothing to hide....

There are many who, when "justifying" the illegal and unconstitutional spying programs by government agencies, will utter the following sentiment: "If you got nothing to hide, then you should have nothing to be afraid of".

* * * *

The elected and appointed officials of our federal government take an oath of office before undertaking their constitutional duties:

"Do you solemnly swear that you will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that you will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that you take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that you will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which you are about to enter: So help you God"?

It appears, from earlier commentary released by the joint sponsors of HR428, that "there was an element of foreign state involvement in the execution and financing of the 9/11 attacks". That "foreign state" is clearly Saudi Arabia and its élite. It appears that (a number of) federal employees, from the topmost positions in government and downwards, and within various agencies and departments, have been "protecting and harboring" an enemy state and its senior officials, by refusing to release this information contained in the 28 redacted pages.

If they have nothing to hide, and nobody to protect, then release this material.


It appears that Continuity of Government was activated on 9/11, and recall that Cheney (a key player in COG since its inception) was "at an undisclosed location" for what seemed like months after 9/11. As disturbing as the events of the day were I don't think any level headed leader in the military nor the administration actually thought that the events of 9/11 were a threat to wipe out the current government (unlike nuclear attack, the fear of which we are told, gave rise to COG) . Except, perhaps, the high perps in the government. Hell, Rumsfeld went ahead with regular briefings during the attack, and he was the acting head of the NMCA. I would suggest that Cheney was laying back and taking advantage of COGs secure communication lines until the high perps were sure they were gonna get away with their treason (the anthrax portion of the attack fell apart rather quickly and they had to patch up the narrative - the 'lone nut'). The ruling class has shared interests they pursue, but it also has factions vying for control.

As important as these 28 redacted pages likely are, they feel like a 'limited hangout' to me. They may be a gold mine, a fall-back position, or the deep state showing a little leg. At this point and with what we already know, it's pretty clear that elements within US, SA, Israel and Pakistan were involved. The towers were blown, so these other details appear to be elements of the cover up of the trail, or false trail, to the patsies.

Here's a related good read from Peter Dale Scott:

Speak to the hand.

The 'spying Industrial Complex' lashing back' at Mr Grayson will be given X amount of 'aid and sanctuary' by the very Government Mr Grayson is part of. One way or another. He could maybe try get some congressional support to back Tony Szamboti's efforts to present evidence in courts of criminal Justice of the Fraud found in the creatioNIST report . That would be fun.

Anyway. The question isn't even this. Altho important.

It is more the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Investigation finding major flaws and Fabrications in testimony - drawn from Torture actually defined as 'Human Experimentation - that give the 911 Commission Report its BASE narrative

The 911 Commission , as we long know, is an untested THEORY... well. Its been tested by the experts in the 911 truth sector and found so completely corrupt it redefines the word, but, in any 'authority system' sense, its narrative remained untested, uncorroborated and protected by States Secrets Privilege.

BUT, here we have a finding. a clear line is drawn between the official account - the Commission report - and the information it relied upon to create it. And the findings are that the information was not only Flawed, but it many cases, outrightly Fabricated. With direct connect back to CIA HQ. Right at the same moment the odious Rumsfeld was directing the Commission to not ask for any direct primary source interaction with the men in custody being tortured. . Zubaydah for one. Ibn Shaykh al-Libi another.

So the question for Mr Grayson and any others left in the pit not corrupted into silence, is, which parts of the 911 Commission report are FAKE.

Go for the Saudis, sure. But don't forget who controlled THEM.

Astute Summation Remo!


Remedy For Grayson

Alan Grayson doesn't need to see the 28 pages himself. Jones, Massie, Graham and Lynch, among others, have already read and understood what's written.

All Alan Grayson has to do is interview them.

Let's envision that Alan Grayson were to gain access tomorrow. Then what? Will he simply join the others who refuse to speak the truth?

Surely the ones who previously accessed the pages have discussed the contents with others. All they have to do is let Grayson into their little clubhouse.

One of these days the 28 pages will magically dissolve. What will be the remedy at that point?

This chorus doesn't require the emperor's signature before they can sing.

Just imagine the kind of

Just imagine the kind of questions one COULD ask good ol Jeb Bush if his presidential train keeps going..Sarasota Saudis...the 28 pages naming Saudi Arabia as one of the state sponsors of September attacks..Bandar having cigars on 9/11 with his brother. Should stop him in his Oval office tracks. Then again he had to anticipate that subject matter coming up in a debate or interview right?

And what about

And what about Jeb's seizing the records from Rudi Dekkers' flight school in Venice, Fla., within 24 hours of the 9/11 attacks, then having them flown to Washington aboard a military cargo plane?

By the way, does anyone know the whereabouts of those records now? Did the Congressional inquiry or the 9/11 Commission inquire into them?

Flight school records

Do you have a link to that story?

PAGE 31.

Page 31.
'Welcome to Terrorland.' Daniel Hopsicker :
"The FBI took all our files, everything. They loaded the files right outside this window," said Treanor, indicating a parking lot outside the station, "into two Ryder trucks, then drove them right onto a C - 130 military cargo plane at the Sarasota airport, which took off for Washington with Jeb Bush aboard."

What I found

The online references I found all seem, one way or another, to link back to this piece by Hopsicker from December 2002:

Upon re-reading, it sounds as though the report was actually that it was the FBI that ordered the seizure of records, with Jeb Bush reportedly accompanying those same records in person on their flight to Washington. Also discussed in this interview:

At the end of this piece by Sander Hicks from February 2004, Tom McNulty, one of the Venice police detectives who was involved, would neither confirm nor deny Jeb Bush's involvement:

(Recent references online indicate that McNulty is currently the Chief of Police in Venice.)

I do not have a copy of Hopsicker's 'Welcome to Terrorland,' and so cannot say whether this info was also included there. (Edit: But now I see remo has provided a quote--thanks!)

And then there's this unexplained anomaly:

On Friday, September 7, 2001, Florida Governor "Jeb" Bush signed Executive Order No. 01-261 which states, in part:

"I hereby delegate to The Adjutant General of the State of Florida all necessary authority, within approved budgetary appropriations or grants, to order members of the Florida National Guard into active service, as defined by Section 250.27, Florida Statutes, for the purpose of training to support law-enforcement personnel and emergency-management personnel in the event of civil disturbances or natural disasters and to provide training support to law-enforcement personnel and community-based organizations relating to counter drug operations. This Executive Order shall remain in full force and effect until the earlier of its revocation or June 30, 2003." This Florida EO places the Florida National Guard, a unit of the Federal U.S. Army, in control of all Florida law enforcement (State FDLE, County Sheriffs, and local PDs) and the Florida Emergency Management Agency (Florida's FEMA) under federal FEMA control.


This measure has been inaccurately described by many commentators as a "state of martial law", and hence easy to debunk. merely on semantic terms, thus conveniently rendering the issue moot. But what exactly was the purpose of this Executive Order, signed just 4 days prior to 9/11? There was no impending Hurricane Katrina like "natural disaster" forecast for Florida. President Bush was due to visit Florida a couple of days afterwards, but presidents travel all over the nation without governors issuing "emergency measures". If Jeb continues his dynastic presidential mission, a couple of questions re. this executive order (avoiding the term "Martial law") could be sharply fired in his direction. Let's see how he responds.....

Disclosure agreements?


Weren't those who have read the 28 pages subjected to non-disclosure agreements? Not allowed to take notes or copies? Interviewing them, I don't believe, is an option.

But your right in the sense of so what. If he did read the 28 pages today, what difference would it make? It's not like he is going to come out the next day and tell all he read about in a news conference or give testimony in open congress. And even if he did, what recourse would have against SA? Maybe take the Chase way out, pay a big fine and admit nothing.

Saudi Arabia / Patsies

Most people widely accept that these 28 pages pertain to Saudi involvement, while some speculate that Israel might also be mentioned. We won't know for sure until they're declassified. But one thing is certain: 9/11 was not a Muslim attack that was allowed to happen. The evidence for controlled demolition of buildings which included the Office of Emergency Management in B7, rules this out. So, the Saudi connection concerns the patsies. Securing, financing and framing patsies for a false flag.

Furthermore, both 9/11 and the anthrax attacks seem to have been carried out by the same perpetrators. The anthrax letters connect them explicitly. "9/11.. This is Next." ..ending with "Death to America, Death to Israel."
Muslims are framed as the attackers and Israel is framed as the victim. We know the anthrax attacks were a false flag since the anthrax was the Ames strain from Ft. Deitrick. And we know that Jerome Hauer warned the White House to take Cipro in advance of the attacks. So the same guy with ties to the OEM is also tied to the Cipro warning. We need to take a hard look at both the CIA and Mossad as it concerns these 2 operations. And if the 28 redacted pages focus on Saudi Arabia, another 28 pages could be produced from the massive case connecting Israel to 9/11.

Seen and Unseen

Nice assessment, it is terse and succinct. Why are we seeing this kind of push back, I wonder? Are there pressures on the government that we aren't seeing? During the Vietnam war we saw a lot of dissent in the way of draft resistance, protests, and sabotage in the U.S. or what is now referred to as "The Homeland" about which even Slate said: "It's a creepy, morale-sapping word" and "let's drop it." What we didn't see, quite as clearly, was the soldier's revolt, happening "in country" as it were. Many historians suggest that a quiet mutiny took place,without a rumble, in the rank and file military in Vietnam and that this is the sine qua non to understanding the unraveling of U.S. involvement there. Maybe something is going on and we aren't seeing it.

NOTE: I don't endorse wikispooks

I don't endorse wikispooks. It's a mishmash of bs, real info. But a lot of linked info on this particular issue is in one place. WashingtonsBlog covers some of this as well as other credible sources in a piecemeal way.

28 Pages

On Saturday, on January 3, 2015, on CNN in an interview with Michael Smerconish, Bob Graham stated that he had read the 28 pages but could not comment on them as they were classified.

Then almost beyond belief he told everyone exactly what was in the 28 pages.

from Jan 3rd 2015 CNN Interview

SMERCONISH: I hope you get resolution before the 2016 cycle begins. But if you don't, this ought to be an issue for the presidential campaign where in a debate forum, they are asked, will you release those 28 pages? I hope it happens now on President Obama's watch.

Senator Graham, I don't want to get too far in the weeds on this though I have read up on the subject. Is this all about a deal that was made between the Wahhabi extremists and the Saudi family to buy peace in that country? Is that the origin as far as you can tell of this issue?

GRAHAM: Yes. And I think that has real implications for the United States because Saudi Arabia has been the principle supporter financially and otherwise of these extremist movements. Al Qaeda, al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, al Shabaab, the al Qaeda franchise in Somalia and now is are all the products of Saudi's desire and commitment to its clerical leadership to extend this extreme form of Islam.

And our failure to call the Saudis to account I think has contributed to their feeling of impunity, that we can do whatever we want to do because the Americans even under the most severe provocation are not going to respond.