Three Judges “Astonished” At Now Seeing The Collapse of Building 7 (14 years later) March 15, 2015

Three Judges “Astonished” At Now Seeing The Collapse of Building 7 (14 years later)
March 15, 2015 by Dalia Mae 47 Comments

In the interview above, after the court case, Harrit says,

“We got the opportunity, for once, to present a video of World Trade Centre 7 collapsing, in court, … at that time I recognised a state of astonishment among the three judges…. I understand, as usual, that none of them had heard or seen the collapse of Building 7 before.”

“I’m just an ordinary, very ordinary retired scientist from the University of Copenhagen who just can’t stand (when) the fundamental laws of Galileo and Sir Isaac Newton are not respected in the public domain.”

The former Prime Minister of Australia, Malcolm Fraser, was also unaware that a third building had collapsed on September 11, 2001 (when I interviewed him last year). Regardless of the outcome of this libel case, the collapse of this Building 7 has been deliberatedly “kept” from the public.

According to Mike Young’s report, Journalist Søren K. Villemoes seemed confident coming out of the courtroom after a four-hour long court drama in the Eastern High Court in Copenhagen. He writes that Harrit’s witness, a professor of theoretical physics Per Hedegård from the University of Copenhagen’s Niels Bohr Institute could have over complicated the issue.

In Denmark libel is a crime, as defined by Article 267 of the Danish Criminal Code, with a penalty of up to six months in prison or a fine. It is hard to win a libel case, and this “crackpot” case will be decided upon in four weeks.

ya don't say?

Thanks Niels for getting their attention in this way!!

Niels! What a great guy!

Harrit has done so much for the cause! I admire the hell out of him.

Well done, Niels!

I sense that vindication in court for you, which I hope goes your way! - will also be vindication for Galileo -- who observed that which was most unpopular in his day.

But Galileo was correct in his observations, and so are you.

Great that you were able to show in court the rapid fall of WTC7. Indeed, it fell with free-fall acceleration (first measured by Galileo) for over 100 feet, as even NIST finally admitted.

Niels Harrit on Danish live

Niels Harrit on Danish live DR3 TV show "Monte Carlo på DR3" this night from 11:45

Niels Harrit made all the improtant points, and did very well, as usual.
The two host said they from now on officially are convinced the 911 attacks was an inside job, of some sort.

I noted that the WTC7 collapse video was shown only once. Some one in the production know this is dangerous material.

The DR channel 3 is targeted young adults around 20-40 years, and the show is some what popular.

Mr. Harrit is doing weel these days. This is very good.

Danish explosives expert interviewed on the day after 9/11

Niels Harrit is continuing to do great work for the 9/11 truth movement. Bravo!

On September 12, 2001, another Dane--the explosives expert Bent Lund--was quoted in the Danish newspaper Berlingske Tidende, stating that he thought that a ton of explosives must have been used to cause the Twin Towers to collapse. He said that, based on what he'd seen on television, he believed there must have been more explosives in the buildings than could have been carried on the aircraft that hit the towers. He said he wondered if there had been charges under the buildings.

The original of the article (in Danish) is here, and a Google translation of the article is here.


Thanks Neils!

The cartooNISTs of Pinocchio Sunder.

Mr. Harrit.
You 'are no 'ordinary' man.
Ordinary men go off to supper and quietly close the door on free fall 911. Sleep their way thru endless wars built on the lies of 911. The torture. The rape of countries.

Ordinary men go to the movies. Watch batman and robin. Watch "Amercian Assassi...excuse me;Sniper. Amercian Sniper'.
And feel the rush.

You have taken on the agnotology of modern amercian power projection. You are a real man. Not an ordinary man at all.

Lateral Explosive Projections

Here's a video exposing a fraudulent documentary called 'Missing Evidence - 9/11 Secret Explosions in the Towers,' which used fraudulent animation of the towers coming down. This video superimposes actual footage showing what really happened.

Pressure upon the judges....

I wonder what (political) pressure will be brought to bear upon the 3 judges who are reviewing the evidence prior to making their decision? In other words, will "elements within certain agencies and organizations" use their reach and power to coerce and threaten the panel to "make the judgement against Nils Harrit, or else"?

I know this sounds cynical (even paranoid), but in the case of 9/11 and the management of its aftermath, it appears that the authorities are prepared to go to any lengths to promote their story and prevent the truth from escaping via the mainstream - all the way from lying, threats, false accusations of crimes, terminating careers and possibly even assassinations. The list of people affected in such fashion is long and gets more so.

The perpetrators of 9/11 were prepared to kill thousands on the day, and so by logical extension there is nothing to stop them from doing whatever they please to maintain their version of events in popular history. They are experts in the techniques of mass psychological manipulation, and they are and remain unanswerable and unaccountable to we the public.

Neils Harrit is a very brave soul and is doing the right thing. We all salute you.

Dr. Harrit from the

Dr. Harrit from the widely-read Politiken (an English translation can be read here);