Sixteen Years After 9/11, The American Public Deserves Answers, Not Secrecy

Source: Tampabay.com

By Bob Graham and Dan Christensen, special to the Tampa Bay Times
Monday, July 10, 2017 3:34pm

Sixteen years is a long time to expect the American public to wait to know who was behind 9/11, the most significant act of terror in modern U.S. history. Unfortunately, the wait continues because of the resistance of federal agencies to openness, the over-classification of information and the weakness of the Freedom of Information Act.

Vast numbers of investigative and intelligence documents related to 9/11 remain classified. The FBI alone has acknowledged it has tens of thousands of pages of 9/11 reports that it refuses to make public. To make matters worse, agencies withholding information tell what are essentially lies to make their actions seem as acceptable as possible.

For example, the FBI repeatedly has said its investigation of a Saudi family who moved abruptly out of their Sarasota home two weeks before 9/11 — leaving behind their cars, clothes, furniture and other belongings — found no connections to the attacks. Yet statements in the FBI's own files that were never disclosed to Congress or the 9/11 Commission say the opposite — that the Sarasota Saudis had "many connections" to "individuals associated with the terrorist attacks on 9/11/2001."

Trust in government today is near historic lows. Recent polls by Gallup and the Pew Research Center found that only 20 percent of Americans trust Washington to do what's right. When the people think government isn't listening to them, or giving them the respect of knowing what it is doing, it feeds into that undercurrent and denies the public the opportunity to be part of the discussion about what we should be doing.

Last summer's release of the long-hidden "28 pages" from Congress' Joint Inquiry into 9/11 and FBI records obtained by Florida Bulldog amid ongoing FOIA litigation indicate that much about Saudi Arabia's role in supporting the 9/11 hijackers remains classified. If the public knew the role the kingdom played in 9/11, would the United States be selling them $350 billion in sophisticated military equipment?

The Freedom of Information Act is intended to be how classified materials are unearthed. But as it is currently written and has been generally interpreted by the courts, most recently by Miami federal Judge Cecilia Altonaga in Florida Bulldog's lawsuit against the FBI, the frequently trivial concerns of agencies trump the fundamental democratic principle that Americans deserve to know what their government is doing in their name.

The problem is illustrated by Altonaga's June 29 order denying the public access to an FBI PowerPoint titled "Overview of the 9/11 Investigation." The judge agreed with the FBI that much information, including classified pages about who funded the attacks, was exempt from FOIA disclosure because it might disclose law enforcement "techniques and procedures," even though the overview doesn't discuss those techniques and procedures. Altonaga ruled without holding a trial at which agents could be cross-examined in open court on the facts that supported the FBI's claims.

For instance, the FBI withheld a photo taken by a security camera around the time of the attacks in 2001. The FBI argued, and the judge agreed, that the camera's location could be deduced by viewing that photographic evidence. It is a trivialization of FOIA to use its exemptions to protect the location of a security camera 16 years ago.

The "techniques and procedures" exemption should not be used as a rationale for the nondisclosure of the image in the photograph. The camera didn't give the American government information to avoid 9/11. Why are we covering up for this failed system 16 years later?

The classification process today is driven by the agency that's trying to withhold the information. No disinterested third party is involved that would be free from the motivation of burying ineptitude, or worse, by the agency holding the material.

The government hasn't always had such a tightfisted approach to records. During the Civil War, amid Northern discontent as the war grew increasingly bloody, President Abraham Lincoln instituted a policy that every diplomatic message received or sent would regularly be made public. Lincoln believed such extreme openness was needed so people could see how the Union was conducting foreign policy, particularly whether Spain, France or England were going to recognize the Confederacy as a sovereign nation, a potentially crippling blow.

Acting in the face of extreme crisis, Lincoln demonstrated an early belief in the value of open records to keep the public informed and supportive. The president, the FBI and other agencies would be wise to follow President Lincoln's example. Congress would be wise to reform FOIA so it serves its intended purpose.

Bob Graham was chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee and co-chairman of Congress's Joint Inquiry into the terrorist attacks. He served as Florida's governor from 1979-87. Dan Christensen is an award-winning investigative reporter and the founder and editor of Florida Bulldog, a nonprofit news organization. They wrote this exclusively for the Tampa Bay Times.

Is this an option?

ISCAP
https://www.archives.gov/declassification/iscap/mdr-appeals.html

Maybe not. Pretty complicated rules.

So how credible is this guys?

Yea YourNewsWire is 100%

Yea YourNewsWire is 100% actual fakenews junk click-bate, they create fake stories which sound true but never have an actual source. Tricked me a few times as well lol!

YourNewsWire

Unfortunately, yournewswire isn't a credible site. The work is done by a single employee with the help of some contractors. While his work seems to be largely fictional, it does pick up on undercurrents in the reading population. This article--while apparently completely false--does probably reflect a lot of interest by the public in this subject.

So...

We have a former Senator who was the co-chair of the Joint Congressional Inquiry into 9/11, and a respected journalist, posting on a respected (12 Pulitzer Prizes) news outlet's site that "vast numbers of investigative and intelligence documents related to 9/11 remain classified. The FBI alone has acknowledged it has tens of thousands of pages of 9/11 reports that it refuses to make public. To make matters worse, agencies withholding information tell what are essentially lies to make their actions seem as acceptable as possible," and NO news outlet is willing to report on it as of this date.

Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia.

(No subject)

I must be...

Better at googling than the news.

Prbbably..

.. because Putin didn't write it.

(No subject)

This is a keeper.

-

A front page you SHOULD have seen, but didn't...

A front page you SHOULD have seen, but didn't...

The above...

Photos I posted are just something I've been farting around with. What passes for "newsworthy" these days is a joke, and I was trying to make a point.

Jon, I like the graphcis!!

Thanks.

I posted this elsewhere...

Remember that story of U.S. Led Forces using White Phosphorus in Raqqa? Whatever happened to that story? Whatever happened to that story that was reported on by one news outlet in this country (the 12 Pulitzer Prize winning paper, the Tampa Bay Times) that said "vast numbers of investigative and intelligence documents related to 9/11 remain classified. The FBI alone has acknowledged it has tens of thousands of pages of 9/11 reports that it refuses to make public. To make matters worse, agencies withholding information tell what are essentially lies to make their actions seem as acceptable as possible?" Whatever happened to that story that broke today that said "MISSING pages from a heavily censored internal FBI report on 9/11 contain explosive information on Saudi Arabia’s role in the 2001 terrorist attack, according to a group of investigative journalists?"

I made this picture of Jan saying "Russia, Russia, Russia," for fun, but there is NO DOUBT in my mind that Russia is a big distraction.

(No subject)

Links?

Would be nice to have a source link for some of these graphics and this one in particular that we can more easily pass around on social media sites.

Any Imgur.com links or other familiar hosting sites?

Right mouse click...

On the image to the get the image location. That's what I did in order to post them here.

https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/20294431_10154620811157461_7629972810967252717_n.jpg?oh=7281c325a3cc71502071...

Here's another link...

Never used that...

Or any image site to store images.

Jon is right about the "right click"

Put the mouse on the image, then right click. (Sometimes you have to pretend you are going to copy the image as in copy-n-paste)

After the right click, the menu appears.
Click "Properties".
The URL for the image will show under properties.

A new one...

The possibility SHOULD NOT be ignored.

I think we ALL agree that 9/11 was EXTREMELY convenient for the Bush Administration considering what they wanted to do. The question is, did they do nothing and hope and pray that something like 9/11 would happen, or, did they prefer to have insurance and take steps to insure the success of the attacks? The argument that "they would never" has been shown to be invalid time and time again. Is there information to suggest the latter? I think if we are honest with ourselves, the answer to that is yes (what do all of the lies, inconsistencies and omissions mean). Could we be wrong? I think if we are honest with ourselves, the answer to that is also yes. Should the possibility be ignored? Should the possibility be taken seriously? The possibility should ABSOLUTELY NOT be ignored.

I don't think...

They are the praying kind. Maybe for photo-ops.

(No subject)

What's Left?

What's a left handshake? Is this what criminals do when making a sinister bargain?

It's supposed...

To be a symbol for people coming together.

This story...

Has YET to be covered by any news outlet.

(No subject)

(No subject)

(No subject)

This might be my favorite image in 2017...

From 1996...

 

For shits and giggles...

I figured it couldn't hurt to try. :)