and embarrassing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgE-hGNy2W0 Interesting and scary stuff. I disagree with some of it--e.g. the idea that we need to get beyond the physics of the WTC collapses. In fact, the physics of the collapses is and will remain important. (Additionally, I oppose some of what Dawson says in other videos.) However, my search of the Bergen Record, in my comment above, was not only in honor of Christopher Bollyn; it was done, originally, at a previous time, to check on a statement from Dawson about "bomb-sniffing dogs." Dawson's statement--which I'd heard from others for years--was indeed true! The bomb-sniffing dogs in Sept 12, 2001, A8, The (Bergen) Record *did* react as if they'd smelled explosives on the dancing Israelis and/or their van and/or belongings. There are other articles from The Record, too, about Israelis/vans and 9/11 from between about Sept 11-14.

Another example of the value of mining for info from someone with whom one sometimes disagrees: Dawson, above, makes good points on the timeline for the George Washington Bridge explosives incident versus the dancing Israelis timeline. The latter were apprehended at a different place and an earlier time of day (i.e. the two groups were not conflated). Some nighttime scenery here helps emphasize this (approx 1:56) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rTkYOhiefRs. Of course, newsfolk via Kerik later denied explosives, but I tend not to believe them, due to the specificity of the amount of explosives claimed to be apprehended, plus all the other corroborating stuff on Israelis and vans from that fateful day.

Old stuff, I know. But, as friend once said, "truth, especially, must be repeated." http://patriotsquestion911.com/media.html#GFord

Just for the record, though I can't speak for others such as Bollyn, I am anti-psychopath. Adolf Hitler was among the worst psychopaths in world history. Anyone defending him, is defending a psychopath. Those who committed 9/11 were psychopaths. and anyone who defends them, is himself or herself defending psychopaths.

I suppose someone doing that justifies it by rationalizing that it's for some higher cause. I put them in the same boat as those whose defend old slavery in the American South, and those who defend Hitler, saying he needed to wipe out the Jews. Slavery was and is unacceptable. Hitler was and is unacceptable. Obfuscating evidence re: 9/11 pertaining to individual Americans, Israelis, or Saudis, who may have participated, is unacceptable. It is also unconscionable.