A Very Short, Very Simple, Common Sense 9/11 Proof that Can Not Be Disproved

A Very Short, Very Simple, Common Sense 9/11 Proof that Can Not Be Disproved

I think this proof is dead solid and it is so simple. Nobody has been able to come up with any legitimate argument that the proof is not absolutely solid and valid. My thinking is most people are never going to believe the truth even when presented with so very many things that make it so obvious that the official story is absolutely not true. This stupidly short and simple indisputable proof all by itself is all that is needed. Forget all the books, studies, published papers, videos etc., that take a lot of time to watch and read. (They are all excellent but nothing has quite done the trick to reach a critical mass to get something done.) Most people will not take the time to watch and read anyway simply because of the time it takes. Besides, how many times are we going to show WTC7 IMPLODING! Also, people will always come up with some sort of argument saying something like I don't believe that, I think this is what happened. Or they will cut off any discussion by saying, Oh, they wouldn't do that! Or, You don't believe that do you! Or, you believe in conspiracy theories!!

Bottom line, we can throw everything else aside and if the proof cannot be disproved -- and I say it can't be and it hasn't been -- then in such a simple way it presents an absolute proof that cannot be denied even forgetting everything else. Forget the explosions, the squibs, and whatever, the proof relies on none of that. It is based on just ONE THING(!) that is proven by observation. You have videos and you can time the fall of the roofline for a measured distance giving the rate of fall at free fall acceleration: 9.8 m/s/s. Even NIST realized they could not keep denying it. Combine that with the intuitively obvious that even NIST admits it understands, a building CAN'T fall at FREE FALL acceleration if there is ANY structural resistance! So throw everything else away and let the deniers argue with ... Isaac Newton!

Isaac Newton would have been a 9/11 truther!

This very short, very simple proof, is ALL that is required to prove 9/11 was an inside job/false flag event. I say it is absolutely solid and cannot be disproved. I have yet to find anyone that can disprove it. If anyone thinks it can be disproved, show me how.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is the governmental agency that "studied" the collapse of World Trade Center building 7 (WTC7). They produced their UNscientific final report in 2008 after trying for six years to figure out a way to explain away the virtually perfect symmetrical collapse of WTC7 into its own footprint. Their "investigation" was UNscientific. They did not take into account the evidence pointing directly to the collapse being a controlled demolition. If they had, it would have been a short investigation leading to the correct conclusion.

The proof shows logically that WTC7 was a controlled demolition. I finished by tying the collapse of WTC7 together with the other events of 9/11 to prove 9/11 was an inside job/false flag event.


The short, simple 9/11 proof goes like this:

I. Given that a crumpling or naturally collapsing building absorbs energy making free fall impossible (David Chandler, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth);

II. And Given that NIST agrees: Free fall is impossible in a building crumpling or collapsing naturally due to structural resistance (Shyam Sunder, NIST);

III. Therefore, NIST understands that it requires no structural resistance for a building to free fall.

IV. Given that NIST showed WTC7 was in free fall;

V. And Given that the only way free fall can occur is to remove all structural resistance at once and that can only be done with a controlled demolition;

VI. Therefore, the free falling WTC7 was a controlled demolition.

(The following follows logically from the above):

Given that it takes at least weeks to plan and prepare a building like WTC7 for a controlled demolition; and given that there is no reason to believe anyone other than "insiders" could have carried out the advanced preparation and actual execution of the controlled demolition of the secure WTC7 ("CIA Building"); therefore the controlled demolition of WTC7 was carried out by "insiders."

Given that WTC7 was brought down on 9/11; and given that there could be no reason to demolish WTC7 other than to be included with the other events on 9/11; therefore, "insiders" also planned and executed the other events on 9/11, i.e., 9/11 was an inside job/false flag event.


Note: I came up with nothing new. David Chandler and Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth have been saying the same thing for a long time. I simply reduced it all to the shortest and simplest form to be given to anyone. No need to debate or argue with anyone about all of the many other things that show the official story to be absolutely ludicrous. Just give them the proof and say, disprove it. And even if you do not know anything about 9/11, you can still say to anyone that you have the proof 9/11 was an inside job/false flag event…

(I invite anyone to try to disprove this proof. And please, if anyone knows how I could better write the proof, please let me know. I seek no recognition for this.)


Now, if I have not made myself perfectly clear let me say this:

This is what I am trying so damn hard to say: This stupidly short and simple proof that takes only a FEW SECONDS(!) to read and understand is PROOF!! PROOF IS PROOF!! ABSOLUTE PROOF!! IS ABSOLUTE PROOF!!


So, let’s make good use of this little proof…


You got it? Is that clear enough? :)

We don't need to try to prove things every which way; left and right, up and down, inside out. That has not worked well enough. I understand this may not make much of a difference either but this is a simple new angle and it can’t hurt to try. There are so many ways to prove the official 9/11 story cannot be true but that has not gotten us far enough. We are running out of options, if we haven’t run out already, to fully expose 9/11 well enough to convince enough people to reach a critical mass to force something to be done. I think this proof can maybe do that in the shortest simplest terms. I say we all take it and run. We are running out of time. It can’t hurt to try. So let’s try it starting now. This little proof would fit nicely in a full page ad in the New York Times. That might be a good place to start.

David Watts

This article was addressed to

This article was addressed to the 9/11 truth movement and could be altered slightly to be given to anyone. Also, I wanted to send this directly to David Chandler as well as have it posted here. I made contact with David several years ago but no longer know how to contact him. Would 911blogger please forward this to him and let me know that you did. Thank you.

As an aside, this formatting is driving me crazy. I tried every way I could including adding blank lines and using the paragraph tags from the text editor to add an extra blank line between paragraphs so it was easier to read. I know there must be a way but maybe it is an age thing...

I suspect

You realize it's not about science when you are trying to convince people who are relying on emotion. There is a subset of people who understand F=ma intuitively, and sure, you can use freefall, or even the dv/dt of WTC1/2 since it's just as good to someone who gets that. Or (I have had very good results with) the seismic signals[1].

Regarding the formatting, you can insert hard newlines with a unicode whitespace char like ( ) (that's not a normal space, it's U+2003 AKA "em space"). Sorry about the formatting issue, I'll put that on the TODO. I inserted one where your first br's are for you.

From the rules: "Post useful (sourced) information and commentary" so you should include a link to David Chandler's series[2] and NIST's docs (I'm being kinda lazy too linking to 911e) [3].

[1] http://www.911encyclopedia.com/wiki/index.php/World_Trade_Center_Seismic_Signal

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rkp-4sm5Ypc

[3] http://www.911encyclopedia.com/wiki/index.php/World_Trade_Center_7_Demolition_Acceleration


Thanks for your reply and the links.

In my first comment I asked that someone forward this to David Chandler. But please don't. I was able to find his em address and I sent it to him.

I guess what I am trying to say

I guess what I am trying to say is can this stupidly short and simple proof that takes only a few seconds to read and understand be used somehow effectively by the truth movement? And I did not really mean forget everything else but can it be used at least in conjunction with everything else? And if time is short when trying to get our point across to someone, it could be used as kind of a quickie proof.

Chandler Chimes In

(Via Facebook) David Chandler "True, of course. For more detail see my recent series of articles on Medium.com. Four parts are currently posted. Start with:"


Hey, thanks for the link. I will read his series.