Below link opens a new window....

http://blip.tv/file/306082/

Best wishes

Straight Through The Heart

Finally, someone with a balanced
mind, professionally skilled,
world-class educated, and
with proper maturity explains
the matter correctly ... rather
than ranting, agitating, associating
a hidden agenda, political discourse
of a Bush attack to 911 truth.

Really good presentation.

I am curious where this presentation ( or other presentations by richard gage) can be obtained on dvd. Does anyone know which website it can be purchased from?

Could it be possible to test any animals that lived near the towers for proof that there was a controlled demolition? Is there any substance which might be found in forensic or veterinary analysis which can be attributed to this? If so, how long does this substance or substances remain in the body? Can we also use this same analysis on people, both alive or dead?

Why is it that I have seen that the maximum capacity of these buildings on a normal business morning is 10k people PER BUILDING, but we only hear about 3k or so perishing, and many, many people are still reported as "missing"? Is this true, that the two towers could hold this demo capacity, and, if it is, why is no one from the national polity questioning the official numbers on the death toll? If this is true, does this mean the death toll is more around the tens of thousands?

Those are just off the top of my head.

This was a good video presentation. Highly credible. Very professional.

for this to be available on DVD. Let us know as soon as it is.

Here is a neat trick to capture streaming video to one's hard drive. This works on a Mac, I'm not sure how you would go about this on a PC. Use Safari and start the video. Open the activity window, it's in the Window pull down menu at the top of your screen. Notice the file that is starting to stream. It's the biggest file that is measured in MB as opposed to KB. When the file has finished streaming, select it and then hold down the option key and double click the file. It will begin to download to your hard drive and you can watch it's progress in the Downloads window. If it's a Flash file it will have the suffix .flv. You can convert this to DVD format so that you can watch this on your TV. VisualHub is a good program that can accomplish this. Using Toast, you can then make a disk image to keep as a master file that you can use to burn multiple copies if you so desire. Please note that this method is meant to capture files that are posted on the internet and are therefore in the public domain. It is by no means intended to capture copyrighted information and one should use prudence and discretion as to what you are downloading.

I actually study these issues professionally. There are alot of things about structures that are not explained in this video. And many other issues that are not explained objectively. First off, he started by comparing wood structures and steel. These are two completely different kinds of structural failures during a fire. Wood crumbles and collapses piece by piece and falls down like we see in the movies. Steel though, completely fails and basically goes from 100% strength, to 0% strength. It does not heat up and bend out of shape, then fall. It stays stiff, hit's it's failure temperature, and collapses.

He keeps bringing examples of smaller structures to give a tangibility to the common person. What is hard to grasp is the magnitude of forces in these events. There is no tangibility. I am sorry but unless you have some experience in the field, it is very very difficult to understand how these things work. And even if you are experienced, it is very difficult to view a 24"x24" piece of steel as "weak". Think of this, an earthquake creates so much force that a wall of concrete can easily be pulverized and reduced to dust. When a "10 story" building collapses, a 24"x24" Steel column stays strong and is bent (or fails) to one side, pushing the building and creating asymmetry. This is because that column still has structural value while the collapse is taking place. In this case, when the collapse happens, that column has ZERO structural value. So, you should think of the steel column as "not even existing" the second it breaks. Also in this magnitude of an event, the structure is viewed as a whole. So when a part of the whole breaks, the whole system breaks. When a portion of the system fails (or one steel column), the forces are instantly transfered to the "remaining" structure (which cannot support the load) and therefore causes the instant failure of the "whole". In this structure, the building skin has the sole purpose of stopping shear forces, which is wind or sway left and right... not vertical forces. So when calculating assume zero vertical strength from the skin. And you might say "well it is steel and concrete and it has to..." but you are not correct. Like I said, an event of this magnitude basically makes it's support ZERO.

Ok and the "charge blasts" of smoke and fire (or whatever) he talks about is completely out of wack. If you put a ketchup packet on the ground and step on it.. what happens? ketchup shoots out the sides. So if you have a fire inside a floor, then the floors above collapse on it... what happens? fire and smoke start blasting out of any weaknesses in the building skin. This means they will explode out through glass, and down though chambers (such as stairwells and elevator shafts). It also means that 600,000# pieces of steel and 1/100th of a # bone fragments can be shot out of the building due to the pressure of the floors above squishing down. Now the 15 storys collapsing prior to the stories below collapsing, I'm not sure on that. I can guess that it was just due to heat traveling up, and when the initial floor failed, the weakness of the upper floors caused them to fail before taking out the structure below?

Now, lets think of these "charges". So somehow, over the course of what.. years? terrorists (domestic or foreign) placed thousands and thousands of explosive charges inside every 3 floors of each building? Anticipating that:

1. The Terrorist could fly a Jumbo Jet precisely into the floor that they had planted the initial charges
2. The Jet blasting into the building, or fire after that, didn't set ANY OF these charges off?

Oh, anyone think that the reason the pieces of steel were in 30'-0" sections is because they were installed as 30'-0" sections!!!

but to the point. I have studied this collapse and the "theory" (as he puts it) can be proven true. And actually, it isn't that difficult to prove that the fire caused failure. I have had 3 different courses where 3 different teachers (one Chinese, one German and one Armenian) explained in detail how the collapse took place. And two of the 3 actually said that they had heard the conspiracy theory's and they were crap.

And I stress again, this is not a house falling down or a 20 story building or a 30 story building. This is an event of major magnitude. All the structural forces are at phenominal values. This makes their effect on the structure amazing! the simple pressure of the collapse could generate enough heat to melt a ball of steel. I can go on all day about the absurd statements he made but I won't. Basically I will say this to end:

the reason scientist and engineers have not been moved by this video, is because they watched it and knew it wasn't true