>>David Brancacio from NOW

No one at NOW or any other PBS program will ever embrace 9/11 questions when what they first come across when they start to look into the claims are missile at the Pentagon, no hijackers at all, no passengers, drones, etc.

Look at this site that comes up on page 1 of a google for "conspiracy theories 9/11" -

http://ourworld.cs.com/mikegriffith1/refute.htm

It's primarily easy refutations of the Pentagon claims.

The hard stuff is nonexistent. The easy bunk is the first thing that average people like your dentist or your uncle or your insurance agent will come across. That's why we have such a massive uphill battle -- the easiest to refute claims are front and center to turn people off as soon as they look. It works.

The people at PBS care about their credibility and will have nothing to do with transparent nonsense.

The strong stuff is no where to be found while the missile at the Pentagon -- meaning we just "disappeared" all the passengers = nutcasery -- controls everything.

David Brancacio, Bill Moyers, and Michael Moore aren't going to help us one iota on 9/11 truth. Any more than Charlie Rose is going to have David Ray Griffin as a guest on his PBS program.

These guys are all media gatekeepers. Since at least the first three are in some ways pretty far to the left, they nicely fit the description -- a term coined by others -- of left gatekeepers. Are they CIA operatives? Are they just doing what they need to do to maintain their media careers? Or are they just blind to reality?

I have no idea. But I can guarantee they'll never lift a finger to help publicize 9/11 truth until the movement has grown so overpowering that it'd be way too late for them to do it any good anyhow.

the MSM. First, CIA Director George Tenet's admission to Larry King on his CNN program that they knew "multiple, spectacular" attacks were coming and informed Condi Rice. A quick search for those subjects will bring you to the transcript.

I would imagine that if you took the top expert in that type of work and gave him the assignment of bringing these buildings down with explosives, I would bet that he could do it."-Saturday, February 27, 1993-John Skilling, Head Structural Engineer WTC

http://dotheordersstillstand.blogspot.com/

yep, along with the Discovery Channel as well. they had a "special" recently with Gerald Posner spewing his lies throughout. i wonder why all the sudden emphasis on debunking JFK? probably has something to do with that study that came out recently proving multiple shooters that recieved next to no attention in the MSM. its all fear, just like this History Channel hit-piece is pure fear on the part of the media who have failed us and see people waking up to that fact in large part because of 9/11 and the perps who remain free.

Study Led By Former FBI Scientist Says Multiple Shooters In JFK Assassination

John Solomon
Washington Post
In a collision of 21st-century science and decades-old conspiracy theories, a research team that includes a former top FBI scientist is challenging the bullet analysis used by the government to conclude that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in assassinating President John F. Kennedy in 1963.

The "evidence used to rule out a second assassin is fundamentally flawed," concludes a new article in the Annals of Applied Statistics written by former FBI lab metallurgist William A. Tobin and Texas A&M University researchers Cliff Spiegelman and William D. James.

"If the assassination fragments are derived from three or more separate bullets, then a second assassin is likely, as the additional bullet would not be attributable to the main suspect, Mr. Oswald."

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2007/170507multipleshooters.htm

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

including the minetta testimony
unfortunately david ray brought up voice morphing

yes, but CD and the Pentagon were treated in a predictably unfair and woefully incomplete manner(Steven Jones was almost non-existent) along with everything else that was presented. Jim Miegs was treated as an expert during the entire show. if i had to guess i would say the "debunkers" or "experts" as they were called got about 70% of the airtime while the 9/11 truth crowd got about 30. Griffin got a few ok shots in and Steven Jones got maybe 2 sentences. Alex Jones wasnt allowed to present much evidence at all. they played a lot of emotionally manipulative cards including showing a family member saying "its like a dagger" and ending the show with someone saying "its corrosive" etc. it was basically a disaster and it wasnt the fault of anybody questioning the Pentagon or pointing out the demolition of the towers or WTC7 as the media controls the narrative and would ignore us altogether, including the Pakistan evidence if we as a movement completely ignored CD and the Pentagon. but thats not why you asked right? its because you didnt really see it? if thats the case you didnt miss much.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

They're telling viewers how to think.
They're presenting the "experts" after they show the "conspiracists".

The great thing is they gave 2 hrs of airtime to 9/11 Truth and a lot of talk about Loose Change!

This so-called documentary will definitely backfire and be a win for 9/11 truth.

"Our country's founders cherished liberty, not democracy."
-Ron Paul

So CD was 'covered'? Or maybe it was just trashed with a couple of strawman arguments, which is more what i would expect...