Recent Headlines

Carlyle, Kissinger, SAIC and Halliburton: A 9/11 Convergence
Investigate Waste, Fraud & Abuse at NIST
Entire February 2010 Issue of the American Behavioral Scientist Devoted to State Crimes Against Democracy: The Case of 9/11/2001
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Taboo News and Corporate Media by Peter Phillips
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for U.S. until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

Blogads

Loose Change: An American Coup DVD

User login

RSS Feeds

Web Stuff

This site best viewed with Firefox

Afghanistan 2001 Invasion - Who were we really after ?

( Home » Blogs » NJcpaTOM's blog » Afghanistan 2001... )
Entries in this section are created by individual users who register with this site and are largely unmoderated. Content in this section should not be interpreted as being supported by 911blogger.com, or by any other members of this site, and should only be viewed as a posting of the individual who created it. Please contact a team member if you notice a post which violates our general rules.
Submitted by NJcpaTOM on Thu, 08/30/2007 - 3:13pm

There is a current news report "U.S.: Military alone can't beat Taliban" by Chris Brummitt, AP writer at the link below.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070830/ap_on_re_as/afghanistan_taliban;_ylt=AjMXUTNm4cfk0mDIq3aXwMpbbBAF

The source of the information included in the article is from Maj. Gen. Robert Cone, a top U.S. commander who noted that most insurgencies end with a political solution.

The article states in part: "Hundreds of former members of the hard-line Taliban regime, including a sprinkling of former senior commanders and officials, have reconciled with the government since they were ousted from power in the U.S.-led invasion in 2001."

Am I wrong in believing that we were originally told that we invaded Afghanistan chasing Osama Bin Laden and his Saudi Arabian hijackers, er, Al-CIAda?

»
»

"we"? in Afghanistan?

"we"? in Afghanistan?

Our unelected rulers wanted:

- Bagram airbase (geopolitics a.k.a. empire)
- pipeline (geopolitics a.k.a. empire)
- weapons testing (our arms manufacturers)
- testing the psyche of locals and "allies" (blackmail)

Do you think they tell us the true number of maimed and killed?

Submitted by u2r2h on Thu, 08/30/2007 - 7:41pm.