Disinformation is not a problem in the 911 Truth movement?

PUH-LEEZE!!!!

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR GIVING ME THE BIGGEST LAUGH I HAVE HAD IN A VERY LOOOOOOOONG TIME!

JohnA;

Disinfo by Fox News and the MSM is a problem. They broadcast disinfo to the masses who don't check up facts on the Net. The MSM also knows themselves that the info is BS.

"Disinfo" by 9/11 Truth activists is not broadcasted to the masses, it is posted on the Net where people can check facts. Plus these misguided activists actually believe what they are saying and are probably in love with their own theories.

Here, let's do a test....

Galileo says mini-nukes took down the towers.

Anyone believe me?

Of course the mini-nukes theory has never been backed up with radioactive data, so that's why 0% of the public (rounded off) believes this theory.

Just like on many other boards, there should be a daily allotment of vote points, and a clearer statement about the intended purpose behind the up/down vote function.

I often see so many down votes drive posts into collapse that I wonder if certain people are using multiple handles to unfairly wield clout. I have posed these questions to SBG and GW. Meanwhile, soundbite it, and put your thought on the headline...they hate that!!

----
Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief, Analyst, Correspondent, Principle Investigator, Forensic 9/11ologist

To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men. — Abraham Lincoln

Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny. — Robert Heinlein

"There's WAY too much self-importance in the 9/11 Truth and Justice Movement."

There are way too many personal attacks and irrelevant commentary on individuals within the 9/11 truth movement. 9/11 truth should eclipse any other issue within the movement. Honest critique of ideas are valuable, personal attacks and pointless insults are not.

"Realistically, the levels of true disinformation are probably extraordinarily low in this movement."

I disagree. First of all, the difference between disinformation and misinformation is irrelevant if both cause equal harm to our movement. Misinformation is equal in its effect to disinformation. In fact, I believe misinformation is a far worse and damaging problem than disinformation. Furthermore, the official story of 9/11 is disinformation which means that the subject of disinformation is a vital and essential topic of 9/11 discussion. The opinion that disinformation is "extraordinarily low in this movement" misses the mark by a long shot, since the very PURPOSE of our movement is to expose the disinformation of the official story of 9/11. We cannot avoid the subject of disinformation.

"In fact, I would feel very comfortable betting a large amount of money that there are zero."

It's a matter of opinion, and no one can know. My opinion is different than yours. What we can observe are false claims, destructive behavior, and ad-hominem commentary.

“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."

Lookie what Webbie's planning tonight with his best mate Captain May:

Captain May wrote:

To: Portland Nuclear Inquest
,
Ghost Troop
From: Captain May
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [Portland-Nuclear-Inquest] Webster Tarpley & Captain May: Interview, 9/27 (Thursday)

Dear Mr. Tarpley,

I would be happy to discuss these pseudonymic "Colonel Jenny Sparks" and her disinfo efforts against those of us who were trying to make the public aware of Operation Noble Resolve's danger to Portland. 10 minutes should be plenty of time for this. I hope that you will be exploring other areas of hard disinformation activities, such as those aiming at compromising The Kennebunkport Warning.

Best regards, Captain May.

PS: I found an interesting blog entry on the KW matter, which includes the well rendered editorial cartoon you recommended: http://winterpatriot.blogspot.com/2007/09/over-top-march-of-berlet-briga...

Webster Tarpley wrote:

Captain May --

Could we get you on the radio tomorrow Thursday between 9 and 10 eastern = 6 and 7 pacific to give a concise summary in about ten minutes of the intervention of "Col. Jenny Sparks" as saboteur against the Portland Oregon group? Because of the time constraints we would have to stick closely to this issue.
If you can make it, please send me a good stable land line phone number, not cordless, and Gensis will call you.
Enclosed a lampoon of the Berlet brigade.
WGT
________________________________________

You gotta wonder why he's so obsessed if we're so wrong....

______________________________________
Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

>>"Col. Jenny Sparks" as saboteur
>>"Colonel Jenny Sparks" and her disinfo efforts

You appear to be engaged at the frontlines, Colonel. Keep up the good work. Sad that even just yesterday someone was unwittingly posting a Capt Eric May diatribe on here, but it appears that many were educated in the process. The work goes on . . .

Thanks.

Let's have a shout out for To everyone else who helped!!!!!!!!!!

They're easy to remember--they're called agents, too!:-)
______________________________________
Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

>>"Col. Jenny Sparks" as saboteur
>>"Colonel Jenny Sparks" and her disinfo efforts

You appear to be engaged at the frontlines, Colonel. Keep up the good work. Sad that even just yesterday someone was unwittingly posting a Capt Eric May diatribe on here, but it appears that many were educated in the process. The work goes on . . .

Thanks.

Hey doughnut, do yourself a favor and read my paper on disinfo again. You know, the part that talks about ad-hominems--the third level of disinformation? Or better yet, re-read the post you responded to where I said there was too much pointless insults and irrelevant personal commentary within the 9/11 truth movement!

realise that whomever the real disinfo agents are you are doing exactly what they want you to do.

but, I have mostly ignored the personal attacks against me. I am not one of the people who gets into many fights on 911blogger, and its because I agree with exactly what you have said. There are users here who's sole purpose on this site appears to be to insult people and bait other users into starting fights.

"An agent provocateur (plural: agents provocateurs, French for "inciting agent") is a person who secretly disrupts a group's activities from within the group. Agents provocateurs typically represent the interests of another group, or are agents directly assigned to provoke unrest, violence, debate, or argument by or within a group while acting as a member of the group." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_provocateur

You can bet your life it happens at 911blogger--screw the paranoia pills.

It's very obvious you don't know what you're talking about.

If I'm remembering correctly, I pointed out some obvious problems with it, and you dismissed them out of hand.

But they were glaring errors and omissions.

And if you are now seriously calling me a "disinfo agent", then you have completely lost it.

----
Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief, Analyst, Correspondent, Principle Investigator, Forensic 9/11ologist

To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men. — Abraham Lincoln

Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny. — Robert Heinlein