9-11 NEW WORLD RISING FINAL CUT NOW ON GOOGLE VIDEO

Get a High Quality DVD@
www.newworldrisingmovie.com

And Tune in to The Global Reality Show
6-7pm Central Monday-Thursday
@ www.tnrlive.com
Hosted by Josh Reeves
Director of 9-11 New World rising

Building 7, windows blown out, error in CD plan

The clip with wtc 7 before it collapses is highly interesting [app. at mark 27.40 in the video]. There are two layers of the building where all windows (clearly!) have been blown out. What could do this? Gas? - yes, but were there gaspipelines in the building? Dieselfumes from the tanks (and pipelines?) in the building? If theese can be excluded [can they? - please comment!], and it therefore must have been plantet explosives, the theory that the CD went wrong at first (and was resumed 7 hours later) -a theory mentioned by, among others, Paul Zarembka [Video, Reprehensor's blog, 10/04/2007] - looks quite likely. As I have argued before, this scenario would explain the fact that WTC 7 was brought down so late.

Thomas

actually just heat from a fire

that is hot enough (cant remember but think it is between 1250-1300F) will blow windows out.

That is what happened in 1975 when the 11th floor of one of the Towers caught fire in the middle of the night without sprinklers which burned WAY hotter and longer than on 9/11.
No structural damage was done, no beams/columns or trusses needed to be replaced the floor was refurbished and that was that.
The fire was hot enough to break the windows out, MUCH hotter than on 9/11.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_1975_fire.html

Sounds plausible.

Yes, I admit that that sound plausible. The error-in-CD-plan theory still appears plausible to me as an explanation of certain facts, (though this particular observation (broken windows) isn't relevant evidence in that regard).

Dan Abrams, MSNBC was there

Dan Abrams, who now has a show on MSNBC, was there when it happened:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4RSMHHgHXk

interestingly, that is not what he compared tonight's implosion of a casino in New Jersey to ,rather "like something you see in movies"

Hello Ali aka Danish

Nice to see a fellow countryman here :-).

Thomas

ja, det' kanon du!

ja, det' kanon du!

Great!

You know, I've seen the "collapse" of the towers hundreds of times now, and every single time I watch it I can't help but wonder how can anyone see it and believe that it was the fire and the impact of the airplanes and not controlled demolition that destroyed those buildings.
Also, no matter how many times I watch it it still hurts like hell and i can't help but ask myself "am I dreaming? did it actually happen?" It's just to big... so hard to understand.

"911 was an Inside Job"

Yes, massive materials erupting, exploding, projected upwards &

sideways, mushrooming, shock waves rippling downwards at free-fall speeds, micro-particles of dust everywhere like a volcano, etc.

Denial

"You know, I've seen the "collapse" of the towers hundreds of times now, and every single time I watch it I can't help but wonder how can anyone see it and believe that it was the fire and the impact of the airplanes and not controlled demolition that destroyed those buildings."
And yet a powerful denial factor aka cognitive dissonance enables a large portion of the populace to accept the official explanation without to much mental gymnastics. Lalalala (hands over ears) I'm not listening.

9-11 NW RISING is a thumbs up!

Gosh, I hate it when I have to watch something to the end! While 9-11 NW RISING could use a touch of pruning, it is defnitely worthwhile! It's a good contribution.

I applaud the inclusion of the Wolfowitz and Rockefeller segments which are the film's best moments. The take on the Rockefeller bio and the reading of all the organizations that David Rockefeller backs, makes the point! It leaves little question Rockefeller is an internationalist (read NWO).

Wolfowitz's comments at West Point in the months prior to 9-11 are clearly the most significant! What is that? In hindsight, it seems obvious he's laying the psychological foundation for the event!

While I coughed heartedly when Kissinger said Bush could go down as a " seminal President," it adds significance that the Middle East is viewed by the elitists as key to change in the international order and an opportunity. And, as Lou Dobbs said of these international agreements to facilitate trade but would include the Iraq war as falling under the same sentiment, represents an assault on America by the elite.

...don't believe them!

Bogus white flashes

Either this film is:

a) completely incompetent at identifying these alleged "white flashes" as in the source file and the individual frames,

or

b) a complete fraud where white flashing light shows were inserted to dazzle the gullible.

I am not among the gulllible.

Rating: 1.

inserted huh? denial is not

inserted huh? denial is not just a river

Excellent content

(A bit off topic) We just started up a video-hosting website (eclipptv.com) and I think this would be great to post on that site. We are starting to get a lot of traffic from music and politcal videos. I have posted a number of 9/11 truth videos and am getting positive feedback. The people going to this site haven't been exposed to 9/11 truth so it's a great opportunity to get new people to look at the evidence willingly. Even if you want to post a small portion with an advertisement to go to your site, It would be positive exposure.

The gullible never think they are gullible

these white flashes have been addressed numerous times by many 9/11 truthers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0vq-r0NM4g

many Firemen and Police saw bright white & orange flashes in the 2 towers also.

Your rating is -1

The gullible never think they are gullible

The gullible never think they are gullible and the brainwashed are the last to know!

The film attempts to show

The film attempts to show the flashes exhibited in the Landmark 2006 Demolition are also in the North Tower. But if true why is the South Tower still standing? Isn't the purpose of the cutter charges (white flashes) to destabilize the structure and initiate the collapse? If so then those flashes do not correlate to the Landmark Demolition as the structure remains standing well after the clip with the 'flashes'

Not sure if this is put out there by the makers of the film to spur discussion of the flashes, which is interesting, but as the lead for a 80+ minute video, this is not a strong lead IMO.
--
Truth Revolution: The Eleventh of Every Month

Well, then AS I SAID, the film is "incompetent" at presenting it

It's like a grammar schoolyard in here.

The people who made this film show what appear to be inserted white flashes in a dizzying panning of blurriness -- repeatedly. They make no attempt to show where in the original broadcast footage these alleged flashes were taken from.

They leave no way to investigate the claim, other than to take it on FAITH that they are reliable, because they tell you they are part of the 9/11 movement.

This is useless data. It's propaganda for the already converted. I would not show or recommend this to anyone.

Try analyzing the video like grownups. Then get back to me, or don't.

FINAL CUT but not "LOOSE CHANGE FINAL CUT" ?

John A MITCHELL
Herblay France ,

I viewed this video which I found not so bad. Interesting the David Rockefeller angle but it was not LOOSE CHANGE FINAL CUT !

When will we have the true "LOOSE CHANGE FINAL CUT" ? and on Google ?

Yours

John

Watched the movie here last night...

Was entertaining. Seemed more like "Blair Witch Project" than a real Whodunit murder mystery expose. Not enough science. Too much hype. No mention of Fema's discovery of evaporated/sulfidated steel members from Towers 1 or 2 and #7. Not enough mention of alot of things that are decisive, such as metallurgical factoids (temperature of steel melting or weakening etc).

Two thumbs down. One Star.

THIS is the final cut?

Clumsily edited. Relies too heavily on lengthy news media coverage (and an episode of THE LONE GUNMEN) without adequate integration.

And this stuff about Rockefeller and Kissinger almost comes out of nowhere. Yes, there are important and fascinating things to be said of those two, but their connection to 9/11, so far as can be told, is pretty peripheral. The filmmaker should've stayed on track much more. (And if he wants to do a Rockefeller-and-Kissinger documentary, he should do a Rockefeller-and-Kissinger documentary -- not try to piggyback a short about that onto a feature documentary about the WTC on 9/11.)

Sounds plausible.

Yes, I admit that that sound plausible. The error-in-CD-plan theory still appears plausible to me as an explanation of certain facts, (though this particular observation (broken windows) isn't relevant evidence in that regard).