Everyone's favorite almost truther asked, "was the Mossad essentially being subcontracted by the CIA to work in the United States on spying, which would be illegal?"

I think the hijackers were brought into this country by people working under the control of well placed criminal elements within the military/industrial/political communities and that they were told that they were needed to test the commercial and civil avaition system against 'terrorist' threats. Thus they were sent to flight schools, sent on commercial flights in groups and ordered to behave suspiciously to test the awareness of industry personnel (James Woods recollection of 9/11 hijackers on pre-9/11 flights) and even ordered to seek the use of crop dusting aircraft from government offices (Atta) while making threatening references.

Then on 9/11, they were probably told that as part of a hijack training execise that they were to remove flight crews from the flight decks of the 9/11 planes, which were then placed under the control of pre-installed pilotless navigation systems and crashed into targets that day.

Quite possibly, the vice president and a small number of others ensured that military intercepts did not happen that would interefere.

Late April-Mid-May 2000: Atta Leaves Numerous Clues While Seeking Crop-Dusting Airplane Loan

Mohamed Atta reportedly has a very strange meeting with Johnelle Bryant of the US Department of Agriculture (incidentally, one month before the official story claims he arrived in the US for the first time). According to Bryant, in the meeting Atta does all of the following:

He initially refuses to speak with one who is “but a female.”

He asks her for a loan of $650,000 to buy and modify a crop-dusting plane.

He mentions that he wants to “build a chemical tank that would fit inside the aircraft and take up every available square inch of the aircraft except for where the pilot would be sitting.”

He uses his real name even as she takes notes, and makes sure she spells it correctly.

He says he has just arrived from Afghanistan.

He tells about his travel plans to Spain and Germany.

He expresses an interest in visiting New York.

He asks her about security at the WTC and other US landmarks.

He discusses al-Qaeda and its need for American membership.

He tells her bin Laden “would someday be known as the world’s greatest leader.”

He asks to buy the aerial photograph of Washington hanging on her Florida office wall, throwing increasingly large “wads of cash” at her when she refuses to sell it. [ABC News, 6/6/2002]

After Bryant points out one of the buildings in the Washington photograph as her former place of employment, he asks her, “How would you like it if somebody flew an airplane into your friends’ building?”

He asks her, “What would prevent [me] from going behind [your] desk and cutting [your] throat and making off with the millions of dollars” in the safe behind her.

He asks, “How would America like it if another country destroyed [Washington] and some of the monuments in it like the cities in [my] country had been destroyed?”

He gets “very agitated” when he isn’t given the money in cash on the spot.

Atta later tries to get the loan again from the same woman, this time “slightly disguised” by wearing glasses. Three other terrorists also attempt to get the same loan from Bryant, but all of them fail. Bryant turns them down because they do not meet the loan requirements, and fails to notify anyone about these strange encounters until after 9/11. Government officials not only confirm the account and say that Bryant passed a lie detector test, but also elaborate that the account is consistent with other information they have received from interrogating prisoners. Supposedly, failing to get the loan, the terrorists switched plans from using crop dusters to hijacking aircraft. Other department employees also remember the encounter, again said to take place in April 2000. The 9/11 Commission has failed to mention any aspect of Johnelle Bryant’s account. [Washington Post, 9/25/2001; ABC News, 6/6/2002; London Times, 6/8/2002] Compare Atta’s meeting with FBI Director Mueller’s later testimony about the hijackers: “There were no slip-ups. Discipline never broke down. They gave no hint to those around them what they were about.” [CNN, 9/28/2002]

allowed to travel freely throughout the U.S. & even take flying lessons after they had been ID'ed by the Able Danger program??? (How could they even have been allowed to purchase airline tickets for 9/11??? Weren't they under surveillance? Weren't their names on watch lists?)