More Propoganda :Bhutto Murder Closes Anti-Terror War Cycle Bush Launched after 9/11

Interesting propoganda from Israelite Intelligence Source: Debka.com
Looks like the War Agenda is Still On. Thanks to the Amazing and Always Useful Al-Qaeda.
"...Al Qaeda left its fingerprints – but typically no trace of the perpetrators........". 911 Bloggers know better. Your valued comments and analysis please.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://debka.com/article.php?aid=1325

DEBKAfile Analysis: Bush presidency started with 9/11, winds down with al Qaeda’s most disastrous assault on the Western war on terror – the 27/12 murder of Benazir Bhutto

December 29, 2007, 10:45 PM (GMT+02:00)

The assassination of Benazir Bhutto, Washington’s chosen linchpin-to-be in Islamabad, was an unmitigated disaster for America’s war on al Qaeda and its jihadist allies in the key Pakistan-Afghan arena. The 27/12 murder closed a cycle sent spinning by al Qaeda’s 9/11 assault on America in the early days of President George W. Bush’s first term. It has left him clutching at thin air.

This single act of violence hit the West as US-led NATO forces suffer one setback after another in Afghanistan and Taliban and a Qaeda are in control of more than 75 percent of the country. It has done more harm than all the evil wrought against US forces by al Qaeda’s ace commander in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in the two years before he was slain.

Al Qaeda left its fingerprints – but typically no trace of the perpetrators. To this day, the master plotters who launched 19 suicide killers against America on Sept. 19, have not been caught, any more than those who engineered the 2004 Madrid rail bombers or the 2005 London transport attacks. The string-pullers of the Bhutto assassination may never come to light.

For now, Western counter-terror agencies are on tenterhooks for a Osama bin Laden message promised in the next 24-48 hours, in which al Qaeda promises he will divulge its steps for salvaging “Iraq’s Muslim Caliphate,” an oblique reference to US military gains.

Bin Laden is expected to make some reference to Pakistan as well, since al Qaeda’s strategists do not see their jihad in terms of separate fronts, but as a single interlinked arena stretching across several regions.

Furthermore, they try never to gamble on a chancy target. Their spadework is lengthy and thorough, consisting of long surveillance to seek out chinks in Western armor, the exploitation of its blunders, advance intelligence-gathering and a strike that leaves no tracks.

Benazir Bhutto was easy prey. Pakistan’s army and Inter-Service Intelligence are rife with Taliban and al Qaeda sympathizers. For more than a year, US secretary of state Condoleezza Rice bargained with President Pervez Musharraf on terms for a power-sharing deal that would bring the opposition leader back from her eight-year exile into heart of Islamabad politics.

No great strategic brain was needed to spot the glaring weakness in putting all of America’s eggs for reforming Pakistan’s political and military shortcomings into one basket. The same fallacy mars Rice’s Palestinian strategy: if Mahmoud Abbas is disposed of like Bhutto, US plans for the Eastern Mediterranean go up in smoke like its Asian arena.

Ahead of the Bhutto assassination, al Qaeda prepared follow-up actions in Iraq and Gaza.

Two major steps are revealed here by DEBKAfile’s counter-terror sources:

1. The Fatah al-Islam commander Shaker al-Abessi was transferred to Iraq to spearhead a new offensive. Al Abessi commanded the four-month Fatah al-Islam confrontation with the Lebanese army from the Badr al-Nahr camp near Tripoli in the summer of 2007. The Lebanese army saved the day and the northern provinces from falling into the hands of this al Qaeda offshoot, only after the US stepped in with assistance and an infusion of weapons. Even then, it took a battle of wits between Adm. William Fallon, chief of US Central Command, and al-Abessi to beat him.

Even then, al Qaeda had the last word: On Dec. 12, Brig. Gen. Francois el-Hajj, the Lebanese officer who worked with Adm. Fallon, was assassinated.

Meanwhile, al Qaeda, hoping to build al-Abessi into a second al-Zarqawi, has sent him to establish the “Iraq Front,” a new body for recouping the organization’s trounced forces and turning the tables on the US army. His plan to transit the Syrian-Iraqi border with his top men shows how fragile and uncertain are Washington’s gains in securing joint Syrian-US control of the border.

2. A large body of the Fatah al-Islam rank and file was transferred from Lebanon to the Gaza Strip, apparently by sea. This week, they were in the thick of the Hamas-Jihad Islami missile and mortar offensive against Israel.

By these two steps, al Qaeda established support structures for its next two offensives in a region ranging from Afghanistan in the east to the Mediterranean in the west.

Osama bin Laden’s momentum after Benazir Bhutto was murdered might have been slowed had the Americans reacted rapidly with a combined US-Pakistan military assault on al Qaeda and Taliban strongholds in Pakistan and Afghanistan, on a scale comparable to the post-9/11 campaign. But neither army was ready. The day before the murder, Washington laid plans to boost its special forces presence in Pakistan in the course of 2008.

In an interview to the Voice of America, Adm. Fallon said: “What we’ve seen in the last several months is more of a willingness to use their regular army units along the Afghan border.” He added: …”and this is where I think we can help a lot in providing the kind of training and assistance and mentoring based on our experience with insurgencies recently and with the terrorist problem in Iraq and Afghanistan.”

This belated plan will have to be re-examined in the anti-Musharraf, anti-US climate prevailing in Pakistan after the Benazir Bhutto tragedy.

By pushing for elections to be held on Jan. 8 as scheduled, Secretary Rice is making the same mistake as before, when her democratic urge raised up the terrorist Hamas in a Palestinian election two years ago. Musharraf his holding his horses, waiting for Bhutto’s party to meet Sunday, Dec. 30, and decide whether to run or join the boycott declared by the rival Nawaf Sharif. Monday, the election commission convenes for its decision. This process cannot be foisted on Islamabad without risking increased violence directed against the president as an “American puppet.”

Musharraf was already on a downward slope before Bhutto’s death and his army was falling back in the war on Islamist extremists. DEBKAfile’s sources foresee this process accelerating and opening the way to the takeover by Taleban and al Qaeda of more parts of Pakistan.

Given this prospect, anxiety over the fate of Pakistan’s estimated 50-60 nuclear warheads is more acute. The Pentagon’s assurance Friday that Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal is secure under the control of the military would become meaningless if that military turns against the United States. An American operation to pluck that arsenal from terrorist clutches might be fought off by that same military.

In these circumstances, however badly they are needed for the war against al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Iraq, US special forces will need to be permanently deployed within speedy reach of Pakistan’s nuclear stocks. A single bullet (or blast) has switched the spotlight on the world’s most dangerous nuclear threat from Iran to Pakistan.

Double Talk On Bhutto & Pakistan

It was reported that the White House approved of Bhutto's emergence in Pakistan as a force for 'democracy', in the face of Musharaf's crackdowns on the population.

Yet Musharaf and the ISI under his direction, have been financially supported by the U.S. intelligence community for decades.

And Bhutto was a threat to Musharaf. So why would the White House have been supportive of her emergence there?

If there is an act of nuclear terror in the western world, the device will be of Pakistani origin in my opinion. (An act to be blamed on Al Qaeda - whoever that is.)

The Pakistan situation makes no sense - it is the heart of militant Islam, yet is heavily funded by the U.S. government, who continues to warn the west of the threat of militant Islam. (Cave dwelling foot soldiers wearing no shoes, living half a world away - with those fortunate enough to, carrying 25 year old AK 47's at best.)

Pakistan worth watching!

It is hard to interpret what is meant or intended with the reintroduction of Bhutto into Pakistan politics?

Bhutto may have been under the impression she was to be the beneficiary of any shift in the political scene, but the puppetmasters had something else in mind?

I suspect, with the quick attempt on her life after returning, Bhutto's death was by design to stir up civil unrest in Pakistan. I believe, Musharraf has reached the end of his usefulness and is, in fact, no longer favored by the western powers. Bhutto's security e-mail to Blitzer fingering Musharraf smells of it. Cheney's dissatisfaction with the result of his visit in March is a clue.

We can rest assured with the rapidity of recent events makes Pakistan worth watching for further developments. My guess Musharraf will steadily lose control of the country. Where it leads from there who knows?

Further, we've got special forces going into the country and it'll be interesting to watch any references to Paksitan's nuclear arsenal! Al Qaeda is a bogus threat and any reference should be read as the result of covert ops by the United States.

Another factor worth mentioning is the British colonial ties to Pakistan. The Brits are even more treacherous and insure Pakistan remains in an uproar! It's their intent to balkanize the entire middle East.

I agree, with the below, Pakistan may be the locus of generation of a world war! Any nuclear question would certainly raise the bar. U.S. and Britain playing with fire!

...don't believe them!

War is the Health of the State

Somebody needs to manage these wars for maximum profitability,

From a business point of view, keeping the threat of war and terror alive will further the business goals and plans of major military industrial financial and media contractors. God forbid if FOX has no more news to cover.

Every new crisis leads to new bills in Capitol Hill, new budget allocations in the hundreds of billions for Pentagon special requirements.

One wonders how much was spent on the Iran-Nuclear fiasco. It took 4yrs for them to admit some of the truth in the NIE. but the tax dollars have already been appropriated.

The Pakistan scenario helps fuel the Terror Cold War- further energizing the need for more tax payer billions.

"The Pakistan situation makes no sense - it is the heart of militant Islam, yet is heavily funded by the U.S. government, who continues to warn the west of the threat of militant Islam"

Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, UAE, Pakistan etc are all defacto US Military-Industrial-Complex client states.

Militant Islam is one of the biggest enablers of business development for the Carlyle Groups, the Bin Ladin Groups of the world.

For every shot fired, every building pulverized, from the undertaker to the arms dealer, to the insurance companies who increase their terrorists risks premiums, to the new broadcasters who boost their ratings, somebody is making money.

For those who deal in blood money, investing billions in Pakistan and Al-Qaeda in the late 70's and 80's has paid big dividends.

All we need to do is to follow the money.

Who profits from chaos in South Asia, the Middle East and perhaps a nuclear 911.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Disinformation intelligence

There is no question that there are extremist elements in the Muslim world who are extremely dangerous, just as there are extremist elements in the Jewish and Christian worlds. Each of these factions feel justified to use any weapons and strategies available to advance their particular agendas or goals, including disinformation intelligence and deceit.
This bit of propaganda is just one more guided disinformation missile from one side directed at their particular enemies.
As long as there are alternative sources of information questions will remain, in this case just as in the case of 9/11.
The following story from the CTV doesn't specifically absolve Al Qaeda but it does cast enough suspicion on Musharraf to demand an independent international investigation.
The ironic thing is that all the same people who would support an investigation into Bhutto's assassination, are the same ones who scoff at the idea of an investigation in to 9/11.

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20071228/bhutto_emai...

Edit.
MUST WATCH this (smoking gun) video from BBC channel 4
http://205.234.134.46/node/13174

"The ironic thing is that

"The ironic thing is that all the same people who would support an investigation into Bhutto's assassination, are the same ones who scoff at the idea of an investigation in to 9/11."

EXACTLY!

Happy New Year People.

It is one to watch.

"There is no question that there are extremist elements in the Muslim world who are extremely dangerous, just as there are extremist elements in the Jewish and Christian worlds. Each of these factions feel justified to use any weapons and strategies available to advance their particular agendas or goals, including disinformation intelligence and deceit."

No question. It is the Hegelian Dialectic at work again.

For those who are not aware pls check out : Antony Sutton on "Left" versus "Right" and the Hegelian dialectic in American politics

http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_sutton.html

"The operational history of The Order can only be understood within a framework of the Hegelian dialectic process. Quite simply this is the notion that conflict creates history.

From this axiom it follows that controlled conflict can create a predetermined history. for example: When the Trilateral Commission discusses "managed conflict", as it does extensively in its literature, the Commission implies the managed use of conflict for long run predetermined ends - not for the mere random exercise of manipulative control to solve a problem.

The dialectic takes this Trilateral "managed conflict" process one step further. In Hegelian terms, an existing force (the thesis) generates a counterforce (the antithesis). Conflict between the two forces results in the forming of a synthesis. Then the process starts all over again. Thesis vs. antithesis results in synthesis.
...

For Hegelians, the State is almighty, and seen as "the march of God on earth." Indeed, a state religion.

...

We trace the extraordinary Skull and Bones influence in a major Hegelian conflict: Naziism vs. Communism. Skull and Bones members were in the dominant decision-making positions -- Bush, Harriman, Stimson, Lovett, and so on -- all Bonesmen, and instrumental in guiding the conflict through use of "right" and "left." They financed and encouraged the growths of both philosophies and controlled the outcome to a significant extent. This was aided by the "reductionist" division in science, the opposite of historical "wholeness." By dividing science and learning into narrower and narrower segments, it became easier to control the whole throught the parts."

Check out :

1) http://www.antonysutton.com/
2) http://www.trineday.com/index.html
3) America's Secret Establishment : http://www.trineday.com/paypal_store/product_pages/ASE.html

This Secret Establishment is Global now and has many secret members in the Middle-East and Central Asia.

It is all about managed conflicts.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Propaganda

I'm sure Bush is delighted. His support of Masharraf is obvious and Musharraf wanted Bhutto out. He not only tried to keep her from coming back to Pakistan, but he arrested her when she protested emergency rule. Let's hope the Pakistani people see through the "Al-Qaeda" guise and go after Musharraf on this one. There needs to be a thorough independent investigation on how she died and why hospital officials lied and who told them to come up with the lever story. With the evidence that came out yesterday the headlines should be screaming "massive cover up" over cause of Bhutto's death. All eyes need to be on Pakistan as I believe one of the possible outcomes is the start WWIII.

I wouldn't assume things are so simple

While Musharraf certainly cooperates with the covert American agenda, he is not a total puppet. Let's not forget that Manuel Noriega and Saddam Hussein were CIA pets for a long time before they spun out of control.

It appears to me that Bhutto was being used by the USA as tool to stabilize Pakistan and check Musharraf's (and the Pakistani military/intelligence) power, so he (they) had her assassinated.

But the alternative that this was an American-directed conspiracy to destabilize Pakistan and hence expand this bogus war certainly is reasonable.

The illogical reasoning

in your third paragraph is the only one that makes sense to me. Sad.

What? / CFR Pres. Richard Haass on Musharraf

"Illogical reasoning ... makes sense to [you]"... umm... what?

Try watching this video of Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Pres. Richard Haass explaining the problems with Musharraf:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8949114648714562270

It seems clear that the CFR wants Musharraf checked as Haass specifically mentions "power sharing" in the video. So, apparently Bhutto was an American tool that Musharraf nixed.

Thanks for the link on Haass

It's an interesting few minutes with Brian Williams. CFR Richard Haass looking to new leadership in Pakistan. There you go, it's what you can expect! The nuclear football is starting to make me feel like Alex Jones!! I want to start ranting about this excuse for foreign affairs that we're experiencing!

...don't believe them!

MP3 Audio Clip - GOP CFR Candidate Chucklebee

Monday December 31, 2007
Is GOP CFR Candidate Hucklebee A Closet Truther? . . . From The Power House Sunday Morning Newspeak Extravaganza Meet The Press . . And Yes Taken Badly Out Of Context (1 minute)

* source = http://www.msnbc.com
-----------------------------------

More MP3 Audio Clips >

Is Huckabee CFR?

Is Huckabee CFR?

Do Ducks Quack?

http://thenewamerican.com/node/6728

He cut a deal and then the media valves were turned on for him.

Why Major Elections Are Mostly Meaningless

The whole game is rigged and has been for some time.

Except for Ron Paul and maybe Kucinich, the vast majority of both fields are comprised of CFR members(Huckabee and Thompson), CFR spouses and cousin of a CFR member and current VP Cheney (Obama), wife of an ex-prez and Bilderberger (both Clintons), multi-millionaires (Edwards and Guilliani) or offspring of elitist figures (Romney and McCain)

And now as an attempt in my view, to undermine a Ron Paul independent candidacy in the event he loses the Republican race, NYC mayor and billionaire (and CFR member if I'm not mistaken) Michael Bloomberg is considering an independent candidacy (probably at the direction of CFR brass) and is getting advice from Henry Kissinger on foreign policy (assassinations, toppling foreign governments - just kidding ... but then again ...)

Has anyone else noticed how CFR big-wig Fred Thompson has indicated several times that his heart is really not into the race and that he doesn't expect to win?

Then why is he in?!

(Probably because CFR brass compelled him to in order to supplement the field with additional controlled candidates and create an appearance of a real process containing a variety of choices.)

The previous election was Skull & Bones George W. Bush vs. his cousin and fellow Skull & Bones member John Kerry.

Before that, it was George W. Bush (son of an ex prez and CIA director) vs. Al Gore (son of an ex U.S. senator.)

Hey, with competition like that, ummm, who needs competition?

Nothing like a rigged game, both teams (parties) and the referee (voting machines).

If I didn't care so much, I'd just leave the country and never come back.

Keep up the great work, Mr. Monaghan!

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

"Al Qaeda left its

"Al Qaeda left its fingerprints – but typically no trace of the perpetrators."

Wrong.

No where in this Debkafile is there anything that corroborates this statement of "Al Qaeda left its fingerprints". Nothing. Not one fact or shred of evidence to indicate Al Qaeda had anything to do with this assassination.

This earmarks this Debkafile piece as propaganda.

Also, so far I have found nothing anywhere to indicate this allegation is true.

Is there anything to back up this charge that Al Qaeda was involved (other than statements from those who would obviously prefer the spotlight of blame be shifted away from them)?

Another fake bin Laden video coming our way?

"[...] Western counter-terror agencies are on tenterhooks for a Osama bin Laden message promised in the next 24-48 hours, in which al Qaeda promises he will divulge its steps for salvaging 'Iraq’s Muslim Caliphate,' an oblique reference to US military gains."

Oh, I hope that's another of their videos of a CGI-generated bin Laden -- this time, presumably, he'll be taking credit for Bhutto's assassination.

Pretty good for a dead guy. It's like the 1981 Hollywood movie *Looker*, where a corporation freely uses, in its commercials, CGI of professional models it's murdered:

http://www.amazon.com/Looker-Albert-Finney/dp/B00005JP4N/ref=sr_1_1?ie=U...

Actually, in that older movie the CGI models looked more realistic than the fake bin Laden in that last video.

Good Humor!

They better serve up another fake video in quick order with Spurlock's "Where in the world is Osama bin Laden?" movie to premiere at the Sundance Festival in a couple of weeks!

...don't believe them!

Bhutto, Frost and the murder of Bin Laden

By now, people may be aware that back in november, Bhutto was interviewed by david Frost for Al-jazeera, in which interview, Ms Bhutto said in passing Omar Sheik had murdered Osama Bin Laden. Did she mispeak and mean Daniel Pearl, or did she not?
You can see it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIO8B6fpFSQ
Its at 6.10 in this video.

BUT also the BBC version has bee edited to remove this claim:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_7070000/newsid_7075800/7075843.s...

You can learn more here:
http://existentialistcowboy.blogspot.com/2007/12/bbc-censored-benazir-bh...
Ive written to the BBC to complain. Please do so as well, people

Stop spreading disinformation

Bhutto intended to say the name Daniel Pearl, since Omar Sheik is notoriously known to have "murdered" him. Sheik's been locked up since February 2002.

Bhutto misspoke. It happens. She's gone on record many times shortly before and after the David Frost interview to say that bin Laden was alive.

____________________
"If I had just paid $20 million for the NIST report, I'd be asking for a refund!... The trouble with the NIST Report is that it isn’t even science because it's not capable of being verified or negated!"
-Dr. Frank Greening

References?

I think it is highly unlikely that Bhutan mistakenly used Osama Bin Laden's name when she meant Daniel Pearl. They way she did so, pausing between the words "Osama" and "Bin Laden", clearly shows this no slip of the tongue either.

Where are these records of Bhutto correcting herself?

Here's 3. Two Shortly before Frost's interview and 1 a day after

June 2007...

Mush's toppling, not a nightmare for West: Bhutto
9 Jun 2007 (The Times Of India)
"If the Taliban are eliminated, or if their poster-boy Osama bin Laden is caught, the international cries for restoration of democracy will only deepen"
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/World/The_United_States/Mushs_topplin...

Oct 2007...

Bhutto Would Let U.S. Target Bin Laden
Pakistan Opposition Leader Benazir Bhutto Would Accept U.S. Aid in Targeting Osama Bin Laden
Oct 1, 2007 (AP)
"If there is overwhelming evidence, I would hope that I would be able to take Osama bin Laden myself without depending on the Americans,"
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=3676687

November 3, 2007, a day after the David Frost interview...

CNN NEWSROOM
Benazir Bhutto Reacts To State Of Emergency; Crisis Of Violence In Pakistan
Aired November 3, 2007
"I don't think General Musharraf personally knows where Osama bin Laden is, but I do feel that people around him are many who are associated with the earlier military dictatorship of the '80s."
http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0711/03/cnr.06.html

How many more should I post before you realize that Bhotto simply misspoke?

____________________
"If I had just paid $20 million for the NIST report, I'd be asking for a refund!... The trouble with the NIST Report is that it isn’t even science because it's not capable of being verified or negated!"
-Dr. Frank Greening

Thanks for the references.

Thanks for the references. They certainly do discredit the idea that Bhutto sincerely believed that OBL is dead. However, I still am not convinced that Bhutto simply misspoke.

We also have to consider that Bhutto was a lying politician and that she has lied regarding OBL for political reasons. It could be that Bhutto simply varied her statements regarding OBL with the target audience. Her audience for the "OBL was murdered" statement was the Al Jazeera-English channel. I suppose that a significant fraction of that audience are non-arabic speaking muslims.

So, it is possible her statement was meant to counter the idea apparently held in mainstream Pakistan (and likely the muslim world) that OBL is a CIA tool (claiming he is dead makes it less of an issue):

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3368244650015594982

Buddy, she misspoke

Bhutto is on record shortly before AND AFTER the David Frost interview acknowledging that bin Laden is alive.

One day after the Frost interview on November 3, 2007, Bhutto was asked by CNN anchor Fredricka Whitfield if she blamed General Pervez Musharraf for helping to produce safe havens in Pakistan, where "Osama bin Laden, the most-wanted terrorist in the world, just might be taking refuge?"

Bhutto's answer to this was...

"I wouldn't like to go so far as to blame General Musharraf directly, but I would certainly say that many people in his administration and his security apparatus responsible for internal security make me feel very uneasy. And I believe that tribal areas of Pakistan could not have become safe havens without collusion of some of the elements in the present administration. And this is why I believe that regime change is very important."

Bhutto was then asked by Whitfield...

"Do you think General Musharraf knows where Osama bin Laden is?"

Bhutto's response...

"I don't think General Musharraf personally knows where Osama bin Laden is, but I do feel that people around him are many who are associated with the earlier military dictatorship of the '80s. That military dictatorship formed the Iran Mujahideen. The Mujahideen subsequently became Al Qaeda and Taliban. So I believe that break has not been made between the supporters and sympathizers of the Mujahideen and thereby, of the Taliban and Al Qaeda that is necessary. We need an administration and a security apparatus that does not have people with links to the Iran Jihad of the '80s."

FULL INTERVIEW:
http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0711/03/cnr.06.html

Nothing in there about bin Laden being murdered by some dude that's been locked up since February of 2002.

@ brianct

Sorry for jumping on you for "spreading disinformation".

You are correct that the BBC censored Bhutto's statement about bin laden being "murdered". Why they chose to do that is anyone's guess. However, it still doesn't change the fact that Bhutto misspoke.

When I originally saw the Frost interview with Bhutto, I thought is was strange that she would say bin Laden had been murdered - like many others, but I decided to research it a bit and found that the day after her interview with Frost, she acknowleged that bin Laden was alive. I'm not personally saying he's alive. I personally think he's long bin dead. And I believe the official version of 9/11 is complete BS and all that. But this Bhutto thing... it's an innocent mistake on Bhutto's part and is being blown WAY out of proportion on blogs like 911Blogger and other message forums and websites like Prison Planet.

The BBC thing has some potential of being 'News Worthy', but in the end they'll just say something like "We made a decision to edit out Mrs. Bhutto's statement that bin Laden was murdered by Omar Sheikh , because it was discovered after the interview that Mrs. Bhutto simply misspoke. Following the interview Mrs. Bhutto explained to us that she meant to say the name 'Daniel Pearl', since Omar Sheikh was the person blamed for murdering Pearl in 2002. In fact, Mrs. Bhutto appeared on CNN a day after BBC's interview and acknowledged that bin Laden was alive."

If this issue is pursued to a level where the BBC cannot just ignore it any longer, maybe they'll also issue an apology for the confusion and for not explaining why they chose to edit out Bhutto's bin Laden statement on their website.

Then what?

IF you or anyone else thinks an apology is worth pursuing, more power to you.

But it's not going to change the fact that Bhutto misspoke and really meant to say Daniel Pearl. It's not going to change the fact that she went on teevee the very next day to promote the idea that bin Laden was still alive and a threat.

This can all be pointed out by the BBC and they'll probably provide plenty of evidence that Bhutto made it crystal clear before she was killed that she believed OBL was alive and well. And this will only reinforce the OBL fairytale that he's still a threat.

____________________
"If I had just paid $20 million for the NIST report, I'd be asking for a refund!... The trouble with the NIST Report is that it isn’t even science because it's not capable of being verified or negated!"
-Dr. Frank Greening

I beg to differ as there is a reasonable alternative explanation

Benazir Bhutto let slip a dangerous truth at an inopportune time. The next day Musharraf declares a state of emergency and shuts off all non-state controlled media, effectively limiting which media talk to her. Five days later he puts Bhutto under house arrest, directly controlling which journalists get to interview her.

Bin Laden's first messages after 9/11 were clear denials of responsibility for the attacks.

Saeed Sheikh is then used to silence the misbehaving patsy in late 2001 or early 2002 and then gives himself up to his masters at the ISI for protection in February 2002.

There is more than one report of a bin Laden funeral around this time.

All subsequent bin Laden audio's and video's support the U.S. myth of 9/11 and are highly questionable.

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed now takes the blame for Daniel Pearl and eventually Saeed Sheikh quietly gets released again.

I think this conjecture is just as likely as a not-so-simple slip of the tongue. In the context of the Frost interview it seems quite clear to me that Bhutto is carefully implying that the ISI/"al Qaeda" nexus was involved in the bombing they were discussing. In this context it makes perfect sense that she would let slip a significant fact like the assassination of bin Laden. Why did she carefully mention Hamza bin Laden and not OBL when discussing possible perpetrators? Additionally, Bhutto's statements after Nov. 2 are ambiguous non-denial denials. If there is a clear correction of the record by Bhutto, I have yet to see it or read it.

In my opinion this is worth pursuing a bit more to see where it leads.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

Well enjoy following that white rabbit all you like, LW

But I'm personally not going to follow you, or anyone else traveling down that hole, who is bent on trying to make Bhutto's slip of the tongue something more than it obviously wasn't. She absolutely acknowledge that bin Laden was alive during her interview with CNN the day after her interview with the BBC's David Frost. If you or anyone else wants to deny that fact, that's up to you. But I personally can't take you or anyone else seriously who believes she did not. She obviously supported the idea that bin Laden was alive in that interview, and also failed to mention anything about him being "murdered", and that is exactly what the BBC will say if they are pressed on this issue, and so will everyone else in the mainstream media.

____________________
"If I had just paid $20 million for the NIST report, I'd be asking for a refund!... The trouble with the NIST Report is that it isn’t even science because it's not capable of being verified or negated!"
-Dr. Frank Greening

No need to follow me, stallion4

I analyze the CNN statement (and the others) on the other thread.

I think it is more likely than not a slip of the mind, rather than the tongue; meaning a truth she did not intend to speak publicly yet, and then tried to gracefully back away from; or a fatal tactical error she was unable to turn to her advantage.

Unfortunately, the only thing truly obvious right now is that Bhutto is quite dead.

Time will tell where the truth is and I am very patient. I think we are all going to learn a heck of a lot more about south Asian deep politics then most of us ever wanted to know.

Human beings are irrational by nature, this makes human relations illogical, by definition.

(hopefully, if it is a white rabbit, she's wearing a purple collar)

I hope that you and yours are well.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

New video shows Benazir Bhutto shot contradicting the "official"

New video shows Benazir Bhutto shot contradicting the "official" story

http://www.channel4.com/player/v2/player.jsp?showId=10619