although honor , and integrity seemed to always mean more in Japan. Thank you Mr. Fujita !

Helps.

I do think that if Ed Haas has a tape, he should post it.

"There's no mystery here," said FBI spokesman Rex Tomb.
"They could add 9/11 on there, but they have not because they don't need to at this point. . . . There is a logic to it."

"Staff writer Sari Horwitz contributed to this report."
She's a 2 times Pulitzer-winner ! That's some heavy artillery the Washington Post has on staff to contribute .
Just the fact that they ran this story makes me a bit suspicious. Could it just be some sort of psy-op/dis-info ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Listen carefully now : DO NOT DESTROY OIL-WELLS" Dubya

http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2002_hr/092002hill.html

"Within two weeks after the September 11 attacks, the FBI prepared an analysis of Bin Ladin's responsibility as part of the State Department's development of a "White Paper" that could be shared with foreign governments. That analysis relied, at least in part, on the connection between the attack on the USS Cole investigation and al-Mihdbar and al-Hazmi:

"Even at this early stage of the investigation, the FBI has developed compelling evidence which points to Usama Bin Ladin and al-Qa'ida as the perpetrators of this attack. By way of illustration, at least two of the hijackers met with a senior al-Qa'ida terrorist, the same al-Qa'ida terrorist which reliable information demonstrated orchestrated the attack on the USS Cole and who was involved in the planning of the East Africa Embassy Bombings."

October 4, 2001: British Prime Minister Tony Blair Presents Case for Al-Qaeda 9/11 Involvement
British Prime Minister Tony Blair publicly presents a paper containing evidence that al-Qaeda is responsible for the 9/11 attacks. [Los Angeles Times, 10/4/2001; Los Angeles Times, 10/5/2001] Secretary of State Powell and other US officials had promised on September 23 that the US would present a paper containing such evidence. [Los Angeles Times, 9/24/2001] However, the US paper is never released (see September 23-24, 2001). Apparently, the British paper is meant to serve as a substitute. [New Yorker, 5/27/2002] It begins, “This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Osama bin Laden in a court of law.” Nevertheless, it continues, “on the basis of all the information available [Her Majesty’s Government] is confident of its conclusions as expressed in this document.” [BBC, 10/4/2001] In his speech, Blair claims, “One of bin Laden’s closest lieutenants has said clearly that he helped with the planning of the September 11 attacks and admitted the involvement of the al-Qaeda organization” and that “there is other intelligence, we cannot disclose, of an even more direct nature indicating guilt” of al-Qaeda in the attacks. [CNN, 10/4/2001; Time, 10/5/2001] There has been no confirmation or details since of these claims. Even though most of the evidence in the British paper comes from the US, pre-attack warnings, such as the August 6, 2001 memo (see August 6, 2001) to Bush titled “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US,” are not included. In fact, Blair’s paper states, “incorrectly, that no such information had been available before the attacks: ‘After 11 September we learned that, not long before, bin Laden had indicated he was about to launch a major attack on America.’” [New Yorker, 5/27/2002]

Have the Bin Laden tapes purported to take responsibility for the 9/11 attacks ever been authenticated? By the CIA, or others? As Blair's document states, the evidence they have "does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Osama bin Laden in a court of law."

I would like to see the evidence.

This also helps.

he is trying to engage in the dialogue for 911 Truth to draw open a discussion in the DIET.

I am sure he has a multitude of attack points he can use. This is just a taste.

He is a Senior Politician, he knows what he is going up against.

The MSM is NEVER going to be on our side.

We will have to CIRCLE them and FORCE the issue.

No matter what we say or do - MSM smear and discredit campaigns are part of their marching orders from their Neo-Con masters. They will never give us an inch until they face the FURY of the General Population.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it