Support 911Blogger


Justin Martell Questions White House Press Secretary Dana Perino on Bush Administration's Actions Regarding 9/11 Investigations

Here is the video. First, I'd like to thank Jon Gold for his help in creating this video, as his guidance has proved to be invaluable. The sources appear long enough for viewers to see the headline and source so that they can verify it if so inclined. Below the video are my comments to Perino:

Dana,

Thank you for the suggestion of checking my sources. If you take the time to read those articles, you will see that both sides of the aisle had issues with the way the Bush Administration dealt with the investigations of 9/11. Also, the people that were most affected by that day also had several issues with their conduct as well. With regard to your predecessors Ari Fleischer, Scott McClellan, and Tony Snow, if you could set up interviews for me with each of them, I would be more than happy to discuss this information. However, with regard to the last article cited in this video clip entitled, "9/11 - the big cover-up?", it is from September 2007, so I would also like to request another interview with you when you have the time. The recent news concerning Philip Zelikow from NYTimes Reporter Phil Shenon, to quote the September 11th Advocates, brings into question "the veracity of the entire Commission’s report." It also resulted in them calling for an entirely new investigation. In fact, that is the only article cited in this video that is not considered "mainstream". The reason for this is because what is considered "mainstream", did not bother to cover their request. This is not spin. This is a request by those most affected by that day to finally learn the who, how, and why of 9/11 so they can have some much deserved justice and solace.

It is true, we have not been attacked since September 11th, 2001, and thank God for that. However, as a result of that day, we have started two wars that are still going on, and thousands have been killed. We have changed our entire way of life here in America in the name of "Security". If that day is not what we were led to believe, then we need to know about it, and we need to know about it now.I hope this letter finds you in good spirits, as well as in good health. I also look forward to our next interview.

Regards,
Justin Martell

Student Scholars for 9/11 Truth
www.sst911.org

Nice job Justin...

And Eric. It was my pleasure.


Why isn't Dick Cheney in prison?

Great job!

I keep watching this

impressive work guys!

If I was allowed to vote I

If I was allowed to vote I would. Excellent job using their words against them. That's the way it is done.

/////////////////////////////////
Great minds ... think for themselves.

WHAT?

........Was that an answer? Is it just me or when the questions were asked , did you see total fear in her eye's? Check your sources? We have. That's why we know the official fairy tale is Bulls**t.
Thanks Jon for the video.

Thank...

Justin and Eric. ;)


Why isn't Dick Cheney in prison?

She's A Professional Spin Doctor

She advised the questioner to consider their sources.

I advise the viewer to recognize who her employer is.

She seemed to declare ignorance being new to the job, then later confidently implied that certain information sources were in error.

Like most 'climbers' in the human food chain, there may be little she won't do to secure and advance her position, including lie.

She's a Vacuu-Brain With Skills

She didn't even know what the Cuban Missile crisis was, but she knows how to deflect. Guess that why they hired her.

don't you get it.... she

don't you get it.... she wasn't even working in the White House when the Cuban Missile Crisis happened.

She knows nothing of anything that happened prior to her hire

Get your sources straight... there is a lot of spin produced by people with differing views from hers..... post hire
___________________
Together in Truth!

:)

Good one.

9/11 Truth ends the 9/11 Wars

Don't take this the wrong way...

....because it's not remotely meant as criticism or Monday Morning Quarterbacking, because you couldn't predict how she would answer (her casting doubts on the "sources" and their "spin", from "the other side", whoever that is... Democrats? Give me a break), but it would've been really great if you all had had paper copies of all those mainstream news articles that you all switch to so effectively, to hand to her in person on video.

Just a thought for future interactions.

Again, nice job.

9/11 Truth ends the 9/11 Wars

I agree...

From now on, people should prepare packets of information to hand out relevant to the scripted questions they ask.


Why isn't Dick Cheney in prison?

Excellent prep and delivery.

Just a reminder that you are addressing a creature of the Inner Party. Perino is not just another whore to power; she is the ideal citizen of Oceania.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuWTAgz_NSc&feature=related

That Helen Thomas is the only "journalist" in the room to ask this obvious question is far scarier than the lies of the apologist.

“On the altar of God, I swear eternal hostility against all forms of tyranny over the mind of man."--Thomas Jefferson

Everybody notice...

What she does when he mentions Zelly and Rove at 1:37?


Why isn't Dick Cheney in prison?

Smirks and shakes her head

She is willfully ignorant. We should chip in to buy her a copy of Philip Shenon's latest book.

Since September 11

we have done all of the attacking . . we killed over a million people . . . we started the Iraq War with something we called Shock and Awe which is a terrorist attack by definition.

In the movie "The Control Room", when the bombs started hitting Bagdad, the Al Jezzera reporters stated, "Here comes the democracy".

Super work Justine. She gave

Super work Justine. Notice how she says that terrorist attacks had been prevented yet will not provide any evidence. Why doesn't the White House tell us what attacks were prevented. She also gave a veiled threat to your future as a Journalist (like we need the mainstream anymore). She didn't answer any of the questions. These people are blatant, they don't even to pretend to be covering up anymore.

This is great, Justin! It's

This is great, Justin! It's bound to be a cult classic in future years after the truth has been exposed . . .

Justin. You are amazing!

I get nervous calling in to the radio, when nobody's even looking at me.
You stayed on point, you covered a huge amount of ground, and she partially surrendered.
The bipartisanship stance (hey look.. our criminality was supported by the corrupt opposition, too!) is a fallback position and a deflection.
You're in the game at the highest level and you're playing for keeps. EXCELLENT JOB!!
Did you hear her tone with "does anybody else have a question?". (Somebody throw me a rope, please? Where's Jeff Gannon?)

Truly awesome.

When you get the time, could you give some of us your tips on preparing for such a shining moment?
Much Love,
~Markov

Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
~George Orwell

using a red herring as a diversion tactic

Hey Justin,

Great question.

It is ironic that she cries "spin" when spin is her job. She is a professional liar.

When she repeats that "we have not been attacked since 9/11, and that is no accident" it is totally irrelevant to the question. Her implication is that not being attacked since is confirmation that the official conspiracy theory is correct. That is a red herring, a fallacy, flawed logic.

We have not been attacked since 911, except for the Anthrax letters and the Beltway Snipers, because the insiders have chosen not to pull another large false flag operation yet. They are the reason alright. They pulled off 911 and they haven't done another on our US soil since. They have prevented another attack by deciding not to do another attack. This is like the rapist expecting to be commended for rape prevention because he chose not to rape again, yet. How Machiavellian can you get?

As you probably know, there was another false flag attack on 7/7/05 in London.

squirming liar

This is the woman who had no idea what the Cuban Missile Crisis was, and she's telling YOU how to be a good journalist. HA! I also agree there was a vaguely threatening tone to her remarks.

Fantastic job handing her her ass - very nicely done! She appeared right on the edge of panic.

Keith Olbermann would have a

Keith Olbermann would have a field day with this.

Something to think about.

/////////////////////////////////
Great minds ... think for themselves.

It's almost laughable

It's almost laughable because it's just so unbelievable. These terrorists have not hit us once since 911?? You think that's because our homeland security is doing such a good job? They don't have to do anything... we have already been sold.

These terrorists are so darn crafty. They are so good at making car bombs... but not once has one gone off here in the US? Not ONCE? These terrorists hate us so much that they are willing to strap bombs to themselves and walk into a crowded place and blow themselves up (with explosives that they got from Iran?)... but NOT ONCE here???

___________________
Together in Truth!

More questions?

What would be the best question you would ask given this chance?

I would ask if George Bush did get a briefing on Aug 6th 01 and what was it about?

Maybe we can get the best questions among us so we are prepared..

That was so good...

I kept thinking it must be fake. But then she "answered" your questions. It's still a beautiful country when we can get this type of access? How did it occur? This is awesome. She knows we're coming. That's all I can say. And good work on the sources too.

Ultimate spin

Good job bringing truth to power. I'd like to make a suggestion for the future which I've made to the WeAreChange crowd, as well:

People like Perino are the masters of spin. They are hired precisely because of their ability to deflect controversy. When confronting people like her, it's best to not ask questions that require listing so many background points, most of which are speculation, opinion or interpretation. Rather, pick ONE point and drill it home leaving no room to answer one part of your question while avoiding the meat. Deflectors are always looking for something you say to stray from the main point. The temptation when confronting high-level players is to "support" your argument with as much "damning" info as possible. This only works against you and you're supplying them with a way out of answering your questions.

So, in this case, your final question was, "Why the secrecy?" Characterizing the White House position as being "secretive" is an opinion and/or an interpretation, not a fact and certainly something a secretive cabal is not going to admit. You should assume the response will be as it has always been, "national security," and it will continue to be. In any event, the question is too general. A better question might be:

"The Bush administration refused the Taliban's offer to extradite Bin Ladden (citing date and location, etc) because we had no evidence of his guilt. After seven years, the FBI still has no hard evidence (according to its website, spokesman and even Meuller, himself [citing date and location of quote]) linking al-Qaida or Bin Laden to 9/11. Who else is a possible suspect and shouldn't we have hard evidence before we blame and attack another country?"

By leaving the question simple like this she has to answer you or some part of the question and hence, go on-record for something, which is the best we can hope for to ultimately catch them in a lie. If she is good, she will answer a question you didn't ask, which you have every right to interupt her and get her back on track. She could just not answer the question at all and risk looking "boxed in" as Silverstein did when WAC cornered him, asking, "What was the name of the fire commander you talked to about 'pulling' Building 7?

Keep questions short, simple, direct, fact-based and potent.

Anyway, thanks for your courage and for being respectful in your confrontations. You're a great spokesperson for the students of the movement and for the movement at-large.

The thing...

That urks me to no end... Neither Justin or myself are what might be considered "rocket scientists", however, we easily put pieces together that the media seemingly can't.


Why isn't Dick Cheney in prison?

Because Dana Perino's check writers are NOT for your agenda!

Dana Perino does NOT put things together because she is NOT SUPPOSED to put things together. She does not serve the public but instead the rulers and interests who control her regular employment and lifestyle.

Minds are NOT supposed to be shaped by truth and reality. The world controllers know exactly what they are doing through the "mainstream" media and their puppet governmental administrative reps.

Dana Perino gets her money from the beasts that write her regular paychecks. Therefore, Ms. Perino is NOT going to say the things she is NOT supposed to say. Welcome to Planet Earth.

Understand...

That most things I post are not for the choir.


Why isn't Dick Cheney in prison?

You sure aren't a rocket

You sure aren't a rocket scientist! Or a guy that can spell "irk" right. ;-)

But I still love you.

/////////////////////////////////
Great minds ... think for themselves.

Justin, you should've said at the end...

You're wrong bitch!!!!!! We have been attacked since 9/11! What do you call all the white powder that was sent in the mail killing a bunch of our citizens and almost killing some senators and others? Anthrax poisoning using our U.S. postal system is a terrorist attack and it did happen AFTER 9/11/01. The criminals are still at large ma'am, and that's a fact. So, maybe you need to check your brainwashed sources and come back to join us with a shred of reality. Quit being a puppet, bitch!!!!!!!!!!!

I wish you responded more like that. But at least you're getting out there and bringing up the subject, while I sit here cowardly behind the keyboard. I appreciate your efforts!

Shouldn't this......

...have the option of being dugg? Great work guys she was noticeably nervous by the exchange.

"Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government." -The Declaration of Independence

Oops...

WRong thread...

on

on digg

http://digg.com/political_opinion/Dana_Perino_Meets_the_Student_Scholars...

/////////////////////////////////
Great minds ... think for themselves.

www.sst911.org

Great job. Is the www.sst911.org web site having technical difficulties?