Arizona State Senator Karen Johnson Honors Blair Gadsby & Brings 9/11 Truth to the Arizona State Senate - June 10, 2008.

Much better quality video

" particular, I would like to introduce to you a very courageous man named Blair Gadsby. I'm going to ask the folks with Blair to help him stand, as I tell you just a little bit about him. Blair is very weak, because he has been fasting for more than two weeks to try to bring attention to the cause of 9/11 Truth. This is the 16th day that Blair has gone without food, and spent his day outside the office of U.S. Senator John McCain, pleading with the Senator to take a look at new evidence of the 9/11 crimes.

We have one man here, who is sacrificing his own personal needs and desires, to stand boldly, pleading for the world to take notice, to question, to research, and not place their lives in the hands of media sound bites. To think for themselves, consciously and critically.

Blair is an educator, and to me this is what great educators do. Thousands of people all over the country, and actually, around the world have been watching on the internet as this hunger strike progresses here in Phoenix. I want Blair to know that I am one of his biggest fans, and that good people everywhere admire him for his courage and determination.

Please give a warm welcome to Blair Gadsby and the 9/11 Truth movement."

- Senator Karen Johnson, June 10, 2008.

I'm sure there will be better video soon...

DON'T BE AFRAID TO DIGG! The Digg is linked to the DU version of this post:

I'm sure there will be better video soon...
But this is what I have for now.

Vote it up, leave a comment and add to your favorites at YouTube, let's see if we can kick it viral:

It's a great little speech.


........You are a very exceptional woman ! .....Although i don't know your middle name I am sure it's HOPE.
Thank you Karen !

better quality video

And so

it begins..............

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

What a beautiful sight to see

This needs to go viral. I'm sending this video everywhere.

Couldn't agree with you more.

Lets make this a BIG ISSUE for the Arizonan Presidential Republican candidate - McCain.

FORCE him to address what is being discussed in his own State Legislature.


Frankly i believe this is the biggest political break we have got in a long long while and with Kucinich's impeachment move, albeit very late, is good fuel for the Truth Movement.

Now or Never.

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Reddit Submission...

Karen Johnson - Additional Media


Fantastic. This is great activism at work.
Arabesque: 911 Truth

Pinch me

Now there are elected officials in Japan (Yukihisa Fujita), USA (Karen Johnson) and Canada (Libby Davies) who have read doubts about the official 9/11 story into legislative assemblies. Also, Italian EU MP Giulietto Chiesa hosted a screening of 9/11 truth movie Zero in EU facilities.

If you have a website

why not embed this video somewhere prominent? It's easy - it must be - I just did.

Video Here Also

Hi Everyone – Thanks to everyone who came to the Arizona Senate today to lend their support to Senator Johnson for her Floor speech on 9/11. She is most appreciative and expresses her thanks to everyone. Thank you also to all those who are on this list who have called or emailed. It’s nice of you to take the time to do that. There have been a number of media calls this afternoon. Some will turn out to be negative, but I think the majority will be positive.

One of the main goals of the Floor speech is to provide a video so that other state legislators can see that it’s not so scary to speak out on this issue. So do take a look at the video ….

Click on “video” on the line for June 10/Senate Floor.

… and share it with legislators in other states.

I’m enclosing a copy of her Floor speech, and also a picture of all the supporters who came to the Senate today – along with our hero, Blair! Blair is still doing well, and we are glad we had an excuse to get him inside even for a few hours today. It was supposed to be 107 degrees here in Phoenix today – beastly hot.

<<9-11 Floor Speech.doc>>

Thanks again …!

Karen Winfield

Assistant to …

Senator Karen S. Johnson


The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Sen. Karen Johnson Rocks!

left a msg at her office praising her integrity and common sense, and thanking her for her support for the issue of 9/11 Truth

9/11 Family Steering Committee Review of the 9/11 Commission Report:

Complete 9/11 Timeline

I commend Senator Johnson

I commend Senator Johnson for bringing this issue forward, however, I do not feel that making Controlled Demolition the focus point of her presentation was a good idea. The suspcious activites of the Bush Administration and conflicts of interests within the 9/11 Commission, which I outlined in the this video:

are enough to warrent a new investigation. I believe that the points Dennis Kucinich made last night in Articles 33 and 34 in his call for the impeachment of the president should be the focus of the call for a new investigation. Do I believe the collapse of the towers should be reexamined? Yes. However, I just feel that with the efforts by popular mechanics and others to "debunk" the theory of controlled demolition will be looked to by those looking to calm their nerves, thus immediately halting all progress, if CD is the focus point of the call for a new investigation. Mind you, some of us will turn to books like Debunking 9/11 Debunking and examine both sides, but most will not. Most will say, and already have said, "Oh the 9/11 Truth Movement? They're main belief is that the buldings were blown up? Yeah, Popular Mechanics debunked that, so there's nothing to examine there." The obstruction of justice and the failure to prevent the attacks CANNOT be debunked, and therefore, are the most solid things to use when demanding a new investigation.

Many of you will not like what I just said, but I believe it has been a grave error on the part of the movement to make controlled demolition the "main" issue.

Justin A. Martell

In a soldier's stance, I aimed my hand at the mongrel dogs who teach! Fearing not that I'd become my enemy in the instant that I preach! My pathway led by confusion boats...mutiny from stern to bow!

Controlled demolition is what sold me on 9/11 truth...

... and I'm not particularly bright. Simply focusing on Bush's delay tactics could suggest government incompetence, however controlled demolitions clearly show government malfeasance. The main reason I want a new investigation is to know who knocked down those towers and killed all those people.

"Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government." -The Declaration of Independence

It's what sold me as well.

It's what sold me as well. However, prior knowledge and obstruction of justice CANNOT be legitimately refuted. CD can be argued ENDLESSLY, and if someone is not willing to believe it, they never will. I can PROVE government cover-ups, etc. but CD canot be proven without access to the physical evidence.

Justin A. Martell

In a soldier's stance, I aimed my hand at the mongrel dogs who teach! Fearing not that I'd become my enemy in the instant that I preach! My pathway led by confusion boats...mutiny from stern to bow!

Well said, Justin

The fraud of the investigation is a crime that can be proved to even the most skeptical person. Nobody is saying "don't talk about CD," but I would say, "Don't rest your entire case on CD."

How those buildings came down...

Is a legitimate issue. I've spoken to a family member who I will not mention who thinks thinks the wounds their loved one received coincide with the wounds someone would receive from explosions.

However... it is ONE issue. One of 1,000,000 issues. One of 1,000,000 issues because the investigation we got was a complete, and total farce. From beginning to end. Shouldn't the "issue" of the movement be that we DESERVE to know what happened on the day that created the "Post-9/11 World?" A world where our civil liberties are disappearing. A world where our country can be bankrupted. A world where wars can be fought pre-emptively. A world where over a millions innocents have been slaughtered. A world where our own people are sacrificed in foreign lands. A world where Executive Power can be expanded upon, and abused. A world where torture is legitimate. A world where evidence obtained through torture is considered legitimate. A world where 9/11 First Responders are sick and dying. A world where a good portion of 2,973 families don't know the who, how, and why their loved ones were brutally murdered.

I VERY MUCH admire Blair Gadsby for what he is doing as well as Sen. Johnson. I think her speech was very good. It just wouldn't have been my speech.

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

My sentiments exactly,

My sentiments exactly, Jon.

Justin A. Martell

In a soldier's stance, I aimed my hand at the mongrel dogs who teach! Fearing not that I'd become my enemy in the instant that I preach! My pathway led by confusion boats...mutiny from stern to bow!

CD is a manner of introduction with minimal time ...

In my opinion, Senator Johnson's speech was just opening the door. She had limited time, so trying to dive into the million other valid issues was not practical for this limited purpose, in an environment that most likely did not open it's arms or ears to any desire to expose the truth.

I completely agree.

I completely agree. Recently I tried to talk to my parents for the first time about 9/11, reeling off all these contradictions in testimonies, withholding of evidence etc, and they weren't up for it at all, just made excuses for it and shrugged it off. I was surprised, since both are generally well-informed on history and politics. So I figured they had probably rarely seen the collapses since the week of 9/11 when it was played so much in the context of the official story. They weren't aware of WTC7, so when I showed them the collapses, I could see the sudden doubt in their faces, and with regard to WTC7, the first they said was, 'no, fire just doesn't do that'. It's the most direct way of placing doubt I believe. Something you can SEE is far more effective that listing details which are hard to digest of a moment. That initial doubt in many cases will lead to people looking further into the issue and discovering all the other anomalies in the story. These will make a lot more sense, and be a lot more powerful, once the doubt has been planted. Well, this is the case in my experience anyway.

Controlled Demolition

The science of the "collapse" of the three towers is hard and compelling evidence.

Thank you so much, Senator Johnson, for your clarity and courage.

Senator Johnson, Naomi Klein and Naomi Wolf are three modern American female heroes.

It's a 10.

There we go...

As you - Justin - as well as you - Jon - know, I couldn't agree more with what the two of you are saying here.
Glad we can finally agree, again, Jon. :-)

Edit: I won't lie, this speech was pretty good. Almost as good as Kucinich's last three articles of impeachment... :-)

Mark in Philly

Going to the heart of the Big Lie

I long disbelieved the official story, with all its talk of 'failures' and 'negligence'; but being convinced of CD at the WTC, after having long dismissing it, was like having my eyes opened all over again.

Of course we encounter people who put up psychological barriers against even considering these arguments, but for those who open their minds even a bit, CD brings people to the question that's at the heart of the matter: Who did this? What even many in the truth movement fail to appreciate, it seems to me, is that you can demonstrate atrocious government conduct to your heart's content, can even convince people of it (heck, they might have even reached this conclusion on their own already), and still, so long as the basic characterization of the purveyors of the crime goes unchallenged, then dread fear takes over and they will put up with this administration--atrociousness and all--for the sake of uniting against this terrifying foreign enemy.

Great Speech ! Great Lady !~ CD all the way!

It's controlled demolition all the way ... let the chips fall where they may ! ! ! I am not a gambling man but I would bet it all on controlled demolition, and why not tell it like it is. Sure we don't have all the answers but let's not beat around the BUSH ! Never mind the debunkers the truth is on our side, we have nothing to fear and we need to wake people up. When they have heard the controlled demolition story enough they will start checking it out for themselves. BELIEVE YOUR EYES NOT THE LIES!

Show "It's a theory, not a fact." by jamartellxiv

'The only reasonable theory available'

As DRG has stated it on more than one occasion, CD is 'the only reasonable theory available' for accounting for all the evidence at the WTC on 9/11. The official theory for why the buildings fell is preposterous, and we shouldn't hesitate to say so. Popular Mechanics defense of it was purely political and un-scientific. To shy away from this glaring problem with the official story is to act as if we've been effectively rebutted on this point, when we really have not been at all.

And again, you can demonstrate cover-ups to your heart's content, and you still won't fundamentally weaken the Bush/Cheney administration, and all the forces of militarism and authoritarianism, so long as you leave untouched the basic premise of a terrifying foreign menace as being ultimately responsible for 9/11.

It's the cover-up...

That kills you. Not the crime. For every scientific find Dr. Jones makes regarding the collapse of those towers, another scientist will refute it, and we will spend an eternity arguing back and forth about how those towers came down, ultimately, accomplishing nothing. I'm not here to accomplish nothing.

One of the reasons the idea of Controlled Demolition is so popular is because it's EASY. It requires no reading of any kind. As Allen Dulles once said, "Americans don't read." Personally, I wish the entire movement would start to read. Would start to research, and not depend on videos to tell them what's going on.

I like to focus on things debunkers and the media refuse to focus on. The movement has been turned into an easy to deal with, defined by the media "movement that thinks the towers were brought down by Controlled Demolition", and I think it's a shame.

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

Good point about the cover up,

I agree about your idea that the cover up is the issue, however without an insider exposing the truth, the chance that more research is going to result in criminal prosecution is minimal. How many people have done great research on the JFK, RFK and MLK murders? People inherently know that the collapse of WTC 7 is only possible with demolition, the videos are strong historical documentation that people can relate to.
In the end there will never be a credible alternative to controlled demolition provided for Bldg 7. Perhaps if enough of us start shouting loud enough and demanding a new investigation then some on the inside will
provide the evidence needed out of a sense of justice or to save their own skin. If a state senator is willing to stand up and say it looks like controlled demolition then I for one am willing to support her and back her 100 percent.

Insiders like...

John M. Cole, Bogdan Dzakovic, Sibel Edmonds, Behrooz Sarshar, Melvin A. Goodman, Gilbert Graham, Coleen Rowley, Joe Mansour, John Vincent, Robert Wright, Mark Burton, Mike German, Larry Cruse, and Dick Stoltz that were censored by the 9/11 Commission (with the exception of Sibel who they were forced to listen to by the families) even though the Commissioners promised the families that each and every whistleblower would be heard?

Or alleged insiders that allegedly took part in 9/11? Good luck waiting for them to come forward.

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?


The media never appeal to the veracity of the 911 Commission as a talking point, because they know it was a fraud and can't easily generate a talking point that refutes its fraudulent nature. All the more reason to focus on the commission.

I think another area the movement has not exploited sufficiently is the money trail. Americans hate getting cheated out of their money, and appealing to this sentiment (in the case of pre-911 stock trades and the financing of the attacks) will probably generate more actual investigations than appealing to CD, which will forever be mired in he said/she said politicking. Follow the money.

Exposing the Big Lie is not 'nothing'

'One of the reasons the idea of Controlled Demolition is so popular is because it's EASY. It requires no reading of any kind.'

No--it's 'popular' because it shines a light into what has been obscured by a thick fog of lies. It's 'popular' because it goes beyond the notion of the government 'failing to protect us' from 'our enemies' to a new appreciation of just who 'our enemies' really are, and of the bogus nature of the 'clash of civilizations' thesis which 9/11 was supposed to place beyond dispute in the minds of millions.

For me, it's leaving the notion of the Al Qaeda bogeyman intact that would be 'accomlishing nothing.' Too often, I find that lines of argument that avoid the physical implausibilities of the official explanation don't do enough to dislodge this notion.

'we will spend an eternity arguing back and forth about how those towers came down'

It depends on how long defenders of the untenable official explanation for how they came down are willing to look like jackasses.

What debunker is going to make Steven Jones look silly?

While I like your work and think very highly of your efforts, obstruction of justice, prior knowledge, and cover ups are common everyday crap that most Americans accept as part of government corruption. They feel they can't do much about it and History seems to indicate they probably can't. I stand by my statement that I don't have any doubts about putting my money where my mouth is on controlled demolition. Sometimes when I am in a discussion with people in denial I actually use that phrase and guess what? They don't want to bet, and they know I 'm not just talking theory it's what I believe. The trouble is they don't know what to really believe. I don't think it even qualifies as a gamble. It is a fact we have eyewitness and physical proof and the fact is there is no other explanation that can hold up. So bring the debunkers on! When Bill Clinton says " How dare you" I say How dare YOU, you're a smart guy why don't tell me How WTC 7 came down at virtual free fall speed into it's own footprint? I 'm mad as hell and it's time for in your face sound bites and controlled demolition does the job. Karen Johnson tells it like it is. Believe your eyes not the lies.

I bet my boss, 100k two years ago!

He's got it to?

Regards John

9/11 24/7 UNTILL JUSTICE!!

Controlled Demoliton sold me and many of my classmates.

Being a Science major, many of my college classmates were sold on the idea of a new investigation when they looked at the physics of freefall collapsing into own footprint, Building 7, the forensic thermite evidence, etc. Even a group of construction workers around campus (who had at one time teased my signs "9/11 Was An Inside Job" ) suddenly and excitedly, started telling me about the controlled demolition and how 9/11 was an inside job after viewing a couple DVDs. They know about the construction of buildings. ae911truth and Jones are my best selling points. It closes people who can look. Controlled demoliton and science work well for me. ha!...You can't argue with Newton and win.

If one does not thoroughly LOOK, the TRUTH is not visible.


The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

The demolitions are very important..... buts. It's the demolition theory that got me rethinking 9/11. I already hated this administration and didn't (and still don't) need another reason to do so. But that's just me. There are a couple of very serious reasons why repeating the CD theory is important. First, it constitutes a single location where most of the deaths and fallout illnesses occurred and it's the event that most people are familiar with. It's the crime that everyone remembers. Second, the question of whether or not the buildings were demolished is not and should not be a political or partisan issue. Because it is a scientific and engineering question, CD theory has and always will have a good shot at being resolved or gaining prominent acceptance outside of the political arena, especially with people who are apolitical, non-political or middle of the road.. We could make huge leaps if we wanted, in advancing the science of CD theory without even mentioning Bush, Cheney, Mousad, Silverstein, yadda, yadda. A bigger problem we have is the way truthers politicize the CD theory and the general public, including the media, sees right thru that and plays into it, often not to our liking. The CD theory also segways organically with the plight of the living victims -- especially the first responders -- which needs immediate attention.

So yes, obstruction of justice is the litigating focal point which could be targeted to any number of people and/or govt. agencies. But a huge part of our job is to counter the myth(s) about the murderers and the murder weapon and sufficiently articulate in a non-political or governmental context, what the major problem is with "official" theory the public has come to know.

Sen. Johnson did a good thing by elaborating on the example of CD. It's a difficult topic to talk about and she did it gracefully and respectfully. There is nothing political about it, and she made that clear. It's a distinction that needs to be repeated, especially in formal political settings. If more of us followed her model and articulated ourselves as well as she, I say we'd be a little further along right now.


Now we're getting somewhere. Thank you Senator Johnson and Blair Gadsby. The Dam is indeed breaking.

I was practically in tears at the end there...

...a very moving speech by Senator Johnson. I am so proud of her and the 9/11 truth movement today.

"Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government." -The Declaration of Independence



My eyes started to water at that one point also....

Yes, Senator Johnson delivered an emotional impact along with an extremely well-done presentation of facts. Improbable Collapse is a wonderful DVD to give out!!
If one does not thoroughly LOOK, the TRUTH is not visible.

It worked!

This is a historic moment. Yes... this video WILL go viral! Buzz it HERE

McCain has already set a precedent. He can't say that he doesn't meet with 9/11 Truthers...

"Cogito ergo sum"

I hate this picture

I hate this picture.

Thanks again to Senator Johnson and Blair!!!!!!!

I think

I really feel like McCain is just stupid enough to buy the official story. He really wouldn't need to be in on the cover-up.

Might want to give him an aptitude test prior to explaining the evidence just to get a gauge on how much he could possibly understand.

Building go BOOM! Iran Baaaaad. Wife pretty. Cooookie?
Together in Truth!

Senator Johnson and Blair Gadsby the best of what we are ...

Seeing this on the Arizona state senate floor in real time made me cry – with pride – as these two Arizonan represents what is best in America: freedom, liberty, and willing to stand up and speak truth to power.



Karen Johnson-- 911 Truth Hero

WOW! Excellent presentation. I am really impressed with her courage to speak out for 9/11 truth. Keep up the great work!

I believe that CD is the best introduction to 9/11 research. It was the first aspect of 9/11 that caught my attention last year. I have been studying 9/11 everyday since. Testimony of NY Firefighters, William Rodriguez, and all the videos of explosions, dust , and squibs. CD gets peoples attention because the WTC collapse still mystifies many people.

Blair Gadsby-- 9/11 Truth Hero

Blair, thank you for your devotion to 9/11 Truth. I believe the hunger strike has already attracted the much needed attention of presidential hopefuls. You are making a huge contribution to 9/11 Truth. We love you!

Excellent, excellent, excellent

Great activism, great speech, great people. Thanks Sen. Karen Johnson & Blair Gadsby!!!

Let's keep the momentum UP people!

Very moving. It's nice that there are still emotionally intelligent, and therefore OUTRAGED Americans out there! I am with you ALL THE WAY!

Violence can only be concealed by a lie, and the lie can only be maintained by violence.

~Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

Red herrings, conflicting collapse theories & redundant systems

Sorry for the previous incomplete post. This is my first try on 911blogger and I barely know what the hell I'm doing. This is what I meant to say.

The war among backers of various alternative collapse theories is getting in the way of the main message.

Well over 50 percent of Americans still believe or at least don't overtly question the OCT. That's a number that says it all. We need buy-in from significantly more than half the adult population of this country if this regime is ever going to face the consequences for their two-term crime wave.

We're not going to achieve that critical mass unless we stop bickering over the cause of the collapses and start uniting behind a simple idea that everybody can understand.


The towers exploded into a powder so fine that New Yorkers are still wiping it off every flat surface in their houses, apartments and businesses. Seven years later and there's still pulverized concrete seeping through minute cracks in window casings, door jambs and anywhere else there's a micron-wide gap.

What caused the complete disintegration of concrete slabs and massive structural steel beams? I have no idea and neither does anybody else except the perpetrators and the professionals they hired to do the actual work. Everything else is theory and speculation, some more believable than others, but theories nonetheless.

I've always thought the point isn't to claim we've got all the answers. The point is to discredit the OCT by hammering on its idiotic dependence on coincidences so improbable that mathematicians use a ton of zeros when calculating the odds against.

The further point is demanding a new, impartial, non-manipulated investigation featuring sworn testimony of people deliberately excluded from the 9/11 Commission report. And this investigation is to be heard by a panel composed of people who known their areas of expertise, unlike the blithering idiot politicians and professional fixers who comprised the previous panel.

Am I wrong in this? Is the point of all this investigation simply to put out paper after paper in journal after journal to secure more research grant money and enhance reputations? If that's in fact the idea, then we're going about it exactly the right way.

If the point is getting to the bottom of this mass murder and nailing the perps to the wall, maybe we're screwing up by creating internal conflicts when we should be presenting a united front to a skeptical world. We should be thinking of ever more creative ways to get people to understand that three high-rises, two planes and one delusional OCT don't add up the way they're supposed to.

Particularly when that OCT served and continues to serve as the Bushies' ultimate justification for everything from imperialist invasions and occupations to spying on the entire US population. All's fair in the "war on terra."

Multiple redundant systems:

Why not consider the possibility that more than one system was in place that day to bring those buildings down. After all, redundancy is a guiding principle in assuring that all complex systems perform as required, whether it's mirrored servers, two kidneys or dual hydraulic braking systems.

Consider that this was a mission that absolutely couldn't fail. It had to come off as scripted, complete with those astonishing videos of planes crashing and exploding, then two of the tallest buildings in the world coming apart at the seams and crashing to the ground.

That means the technicians had full protection from above, an infinite budget and the authority necessary to close buildings, disconnect electrical and infrastructure systems and, at bottom, create any conditions that they required to fulfill their assignments.

So before we slice and dice mini nukes and thermate cutter charges and DEWs and planes or no planes -- that's all fine but it detracts from the message and warps the discussion.

Personally, I don't care if some genius used seven million cherry bombs wired in series, with different fuse lengths determining the sequence and timing of the explosions. As long as it exposes the OCT, great. We need to get back to the basics.

A group of PNAC-inspired thugs in $4,000 suits served as general contractors, subbing out the demolitions setup and backup systems deployments to professionals with intel backgrounds and top-notch expertise in various technologies used to destroy high rises.

Physical evidence suggests that these methods probably included precisely placed cutter charges, wiring them into the demolitions grid so the detonations could be timed to the millisecond. They did the work during periods that the towers were closed for alleged cable upgrades.

Others have developed theories that involve the use of minute nuclear explosives or directed energy weapons. Some speculate that this was the coming out party for previously unheard of weapons developed by DARPA or another such advanced weapons research lab. Still others suggest green lizard men or spiders from Mars.

With the possible exceptions of the lizard men and the spiders, I can think of no good argument against the hypothesis that two or more technologies were in place that day and were used to produce what we all saw on TV.

But again, the point of all that isn't to declare a winner in the alternative conspiracy theory sweepstakes. The point is getting the bored, apathetic, uninformed CNN watcher to sit up and pay attention for once. We can certainly shove them in the right direction if we hammer on the key points steadily enough. And if we're extremely lucky, enough of them will create enough of a stir to compel a real investigation.

If that ever happens, the entire Bush international crime syndicate is finally going face accountability for their eight-year campaign of murder, treachery, terror, grand theft on a cosmic scale and so many more reasons to put them away for life.

And I maintain that recognizing the need to unite behind the main message and allow for the possibility of redundant systems are critical steps to take if we're ever going to get the kind of public backing we need to push this movement ahead.

Thanks for taking the time to read through all this. And pardon the inevitable typos.


Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice

What I like to see!

It's great to see the support on this blog entry with over fifty comments! Karen Johnson represents the movement well!

Karen Johnson
...don't believe them!

Sorry to be late to the party

This got covered in local AZ press:

Also, even though the Gannet owned AZ Republic newspaper has tried for about a year to make a pariah of Karen Johnson. she co-sponsored a bill that prohibits AZ from participating in the federal Real ID act (Just like the Patriot Act, It's just an act!). It passed! She's no pariah politically.

I have met one medium level democratic party official in Arizona who is a 9/11 truther. All the Dems in the AZ house and senate have been provided materials on the subject. Many have expressed concerns, doubts and outright alarm, but, predictably, most have no backbone.

We should stage an event w/ Karen Johnson. Anybody remember Barbara Boxer's roses? (

In 2005, activists filled Barbara Boxer's office w/ roses for signing to acknowledge the fraudulent Ohio vote. Though it was not acknowledged by the MSM, you can bet it had an effect on the other senators.

If Karen Johnson will speak again, we should fill her office w/ ... *something*. Something good. Make those applause-seeking politicos *covet* her.
Know what I mean?

Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
~George Orwell