Two new papers at the Journal of 9/11 Studies
Two new papers have been published at the Journal of 9/11 Studies. The first is an article by Frank Legge, called "9/11 and Probability Theory". Here is an excerpt.
"If we compare these two explanations for the collapse of the towers it is immediately apparent that they are different in a particularly significant way: the fire based official explanation is a series of events, like links in a chain, while the explosive based explanation is a parallel set of scientific studies of evidence."
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/911andProbabilityTheory17...
The second paper is a letter from Kevin Fenton, entitled "WTC Collapse Initiation Floors: What They Were And How Much Damage They Suffered".
"It is interesting to compare the collapse initiation floor in WTC1 to the central impact floors in terms of three of the main aspects thought to have influenced the collapse: impact damage, jet fuel spilled, and debris available to remove fire insulation."
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/FentonWTCInitiationFloors...
- Kevin Ryan's blog
- Login to post comments
Reddit
http://www.reddit.com/info/6nrzx/comments/
Alot of people on Reddit will vote this down (since they vote down anyone who raises controlled demo). Will only be visible on Reddit if people vote it up.
These papers are really great reference materal, & perspectives.
Thanks for posting these. The details contained in papers such as these help me to sort out any false data or assumptions that I just 'dubbed' in. They help me have precision information when I present 9/11 TRUTH in the college classroom, and they also bring up perspectives that I would not ordinarily consider. Thanks to all you folks at J of 911 Studies.
If one does not thoroughly LOOK, the TRUTH is not visible.
Thank you, Kevin!
I was not even aware of the phenomena of "work hardening" provided in #3 of the Alternative Theory list.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_hardening
Now my battle sword (pen) is that much more sharpened!