Ex-CIA Man Warned Top Executives To Leave New York On 9/11

Ex-CIA Man Warned Top Executives To Leave New York On 9/11

Report: Warner Bros. senior executive told staff “something big is happening that day”

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Monday, November 3, 2008

According to a report by Jeremy R. Hammond of the Foreign Policy Journal, senior executives of a major U.S. corporation were warned by a former CIA operative to leave New York on September 11, 2001, the latest smoking gun to add to a bulging stack of examples concerning specific prior knowledge of the attacks.

The article cites an anonymous source who worked under a managing director as number two at a European branch of the media giant Warner Bros. The source’s boss was close friends with a senior executive who worked at the head office in L.A. and had also formerly worked for the CIA.

During the memorial arrangements for a senior director from a foreign office who had died, the L.A. executive rejected September 11th as a date for the service because “something big is happening that day” and the top executives from the New York office would all be traveling out of the city.

When asked further about this big event, the executive replied that it was a confidential matter and disclosed no further details, except to say that it was “not corporate”.

The source told the Journal, “I had no reason to think that the ‘event’ could be anything more than perhaps a junket, an out of town think tank exercise or whatever – I remember that these possibilities ran through my mind.”

But after 9/11, thinking back upon the conversation, he grew more curious and tried to ascertain where the board members had been that day. They had indeed been out of New York, he says, traveling not to one location, but each to their own destination. Destinations included overseas locations such as Paris, London, and Amsterdam.

Foreign Policy Journal has not been able to verify the location of individuals on 9/11 or other aspects of the story concerning any potential warning received or given by any Time Warner executives, but did confirm the source’s position at the foreign branch office, the name and position of that office’s managing director, and the name and position of the senior executive from the Los Angeles office.

The corporate media has given limited coverage to reports of general prior knowledge about 9/11, while almost universally ignoring specific examples of foreknowledge.

Perhaps the most blatant example of specific prior knowledge is the fact that, as Newsweek reported in its September 13th 2001 issue, top brass Pentagon officials were warned the night before the attacks and cancelled a trip scheduled for the next day.

Warnings about a big event happening in New York were widespread in the weeks and days before the attacks.

In a story entitled Some Got Warning: Don’t Go Downtown on Sept. 11, the New York Daily News reported, “Some Middle Easterners in the New York area were warned ahead of time to stay out of lower Manhattan the morning of Sept. 11,” noting that federal investigators received tips about overheard conversations in which people were “boasting about or warning about coming attacks.”

Another case involved a Palestinian boy at the New Utrecht High School in Brooklyn. On September 6th, 2001, the boy looked out of his classroom window towards lower Manhattan and said, “Do you see those two buildings?” while pointing at the WTC twin towers. “They won’t be standing there next week.”

This was not an “urban legend” as some have claimed, it has been proven in triplicate by numerous mainstream media reports and acknowledged by federal authorities and the FBI.

This was just one example amongst several reports of schoolchildren in the New York area circulating knowledge of the attacks before they happened. If school kids knew that a major attack was about to take place, how on earth could the most sophisticated intelligence apparatus in the world have failed to pick up on it?

German police confirmed that an Iranian man frantically tried to warn U.S. authorities of an attack on the eve of 9/11, attempting to call them from his deportation cell.

Another proven example of specific prior knowledge that the establishment has attempted to sideline as an “urban myth” is the story concerning the Israeli instant messaging company, Odigo.

A report by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, which was later confirmed by the Washington Post, related how employees of Odigo were warned specifically about the attack via instant messages two hours in advance.

Mayor of San Francisco Willie Brown was set to fly into New York on the morning of September 11. However, he got a call from what he described as his ‘airport security’ late September 10th advising against flying due to a security threat. Brown awoke on September 11th to scenes of the WTC on fire and his flight was cancelled.

A record number of ‘put’ options, speculation that the stock of a company will fall, were placed on American and United Airlines in the days preceding September 11th. This despite a September 10th Reuters report stating ‘airline stocks set to fly.’

Between September 6 and 7, the Chicago Board Options Exchange saw purchases of 4,744 put options on United Airlines, but only 396 call options. On September 10, 4,516 put options on American Airlines were bought on the Chicago exchange, compared to only 748 calls.

The investigation as to which criminals benefited from advance knowledge of the terrorist attack led straight to Alex Brown/Deutsche Bank - chaired up until 1997 by executive director of the CIA, Buzzy Krongard.

About Foreign Policy Journal


About Foreign Policy Journal

Foreign Policy Journal is an online publication dedicated to providing critical analysis of U.S. foreign policy outside of the standard framework offered by government officials and the mainstream corporate media. FPJ offers readers a collection of headlines from the U.S. and international media, including both mainstream and alternative sources, as well as original news, analysis, and commentary from perspectives all too lacking in the public debate on key foreign policy issues.

FPJ is particularly focused on the U.S. "war on terrorism" that was declared following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and U.S. policies in the Middle East and Central Asia. FPJ scrutinizes events in and policies towards Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Iran, Israel, and the Palestinian occupied territories to present a clearer picture to its readers of events and how the regions are affected by U.S. policies.

The FPJ homepage is designed to be your one-stop source for information on U.S. international relations with that focus in mind. Here you'll find links to important headlines and great stories from around the web, as well as original news, analysis, and commentary. By offering focused content on important events and issues around the globe, FPJ readers are better and more conveniently able to gain different perspectives on events in the news at the touch of a fingertip.

Research Archive


FPJ also provides multimedia resources, such as news and recommended documentary films and videos.

RSS and Newsletter


Reprint Permission

FPJ is primarily the effort of one person, but I am always looking for other individuals who might be interested in contributing. If you are interested in writing for the site or otherwise contributing in some way, please contact FPJ. Authors who submit content that is published will be featured amongst the contributing writers, and frequent contributors will have the option to add their own bio page, like this one. For more information, please see here.

Thanks for visiting!
Jeremy R. Hammond

Owner and Editor of Foreign Policy Journal

THis has zero credibility

Unfortunately. But Mr Hammond, who is just a guy with a website, does not have the credibility to use an anonymous source and expect sane people to believe it.

His source may be telling the truth. But there's no way to determine it from this post.

Maybe someone can get someone to back up this claim. Until then, it's just more internet noise.

Sorry. I had my hopes up for a minute.

You're right.

This is weak tea. I'm going to move this to the side blog.

good move

I really didn't expect to see this on the front page, just posted it here to see what everybody thought. Peer-review, baby.


know where the Warner Bros. offices might have been?

Three are listed

but I'm guessing the central office is:

110 W 57th St

According to Google, that is in Manhattan but not near the WTC.

I'm guessing it doesn't matter whether the office is actually in the WTC area, because all that was known was "something big" was going to happen in NYC.