If anything ever looks like it's being paid for by the CIA, then this is. Since you met the guy, I'd like to know what your assessment is?

I mean, "deceptive elements"? Isn't it glaringly obvious that every single letter of the article is, from start to end, bullshit ? I mean, this is really overkill. This is very obviously designed to invoke outrage, and is designed to connect us to outright mentally sick bullshit by association.

I think the best thing to do is to ignore it, because sending it around to other activists in "disgust" would only serve to amplify, provide a podium and further strengthen this attempt on the truth movement.

On the other hand, you could do the truth movement a favor and approach this man and have him fess up who paid/requested him to write this crap. It could then be turned into something at least remotely useful.

It appears they are attacking the 911 Truth from several angles at once. I deduce from this that we must be making headway. People are seeing through the bullshit, so they are shoveling in some fresh pies. I hate these bastards.

The smart thing to do is to preempt it. Thanks for this though Jon, because many lessons can be learned from studying disinformation. I guess Webre has been doing it for a while:

“Fellow Citizens... 9/11 was a false flag operation by an international war crimes racketeering organisation to provide a pretext to engage in a genocidal and ecocidal depleted uranium bombing of central Asia, Afghanistan and Iraq in order to secure vast oil and uranium reserves; to roll out a terror-based national security state system worldwide and ... to implement the final stages of a world depopulation policy.” There are two more “false flag” operations in the pipeline, he says. The first is the war against asteroids, the second the “war against the evil aliens”.

http://911blogger.com/node/16005

Sigh.

Just a cursory read of the blog you've recommended reveals just how 'careful' the research is:

"No one needs to make 9/11 Truth look bad. Truthers do that all on their own. Even many of the more "mainstream" Truthers insist upon associating with Holocaust deniers, making bizarre and insupportable accusations, and ranting about Zionism or Freemasons. And let's not even go into the Truthers who demand full disclosure of the government's role in reverse-engineering UFO technology, or the Truthers who subscribe to fundamentalist Christian lunacy, or the Truthers who think that zero point energy is being suppressed, or the Truthers who freak out at the mere mention of the word "tapwater"."

Yet more disinfo tactics, extensively described by Reprehensor in the article "On Disinformation and Damaging Associations"

Even though I strongly disagree with Alex Jones on many topics, I can tell you are mixing with the wrong crowd, Richard. Excuse me while I take your assessment of Alfred Webre with a rather large grain of salt.

(With friends like that, who needs enemies, right?)

the sudden influx of people who remind us of the so-called 'importance' of disinfo? The 'opinions' of Fetzer and Webre don't need to be examined at all. They're utter clowns; I'm sorry, but that's just the way the cookie crumbles.

Barrett, I don't find particularly interesting, and Jones, well, to each his own.

Less than a few hours ago, somebody posted a link to no plane material. One must wonder if this disruptive activity is increasing on 911blogger because 9/11 approaches?