Hypocrite Brzezinski Slams “Conspiratorial View” Of History While Highlighting 50’s Iran Overthrow

Hypocrite Brzezinski Slams “Conspiratorial View” Of History While Highlighting 50’s Iran Overthrow


Declares American people “skewed” for questioning government

Steve Watson
Monday, June 8, 2009

During a discussion with MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow last Friday, Trilateral Commission co-founder and top Obama advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski spoke of those who question the official version of events on 9/11 in the same context as those who deny the holocaust.


“He took time to debunk both 9/11 conspiracists and deniers of the holocaust,” Maddow said to Brzezinski, “…is there a reason to believe that he thinks those issues are holding back political progress, those specific conspiracies and misconceptions of our modern political history are part of the problem in terms of moving forward?” she asked, wearing what can only be described as a painfully rehearsed puppy dog face of false concern.

“There’s no doubt over recent years, both many Americans viewed the world in a very very skewed fashion,” Brzezinski replied, “and many outside of America, had a totally conspiratorial view of America, including even the idea that 9/11 was somehow or other a put up job and really wasn’t done by Osama Bin Laden and others, so I think president Obama is breaking through a whole mythology that has paralysed American dealings with the world.”

Watch the video of the exchange:


The Orwellian doublespeak on display here is astounding, given that almost in the same breath Brzezinski and Maddow allude to the fact that in the same speech Obama also admitted that the U.S., via the CIA, played a role in the overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian government in 1953, a fact that the criminal intelligence apparatus then attempted to bury and keep secret for decades.

How on earth do the two expect to get away with denouncing the American people as “skewed” for not swallowing the official government line on 9/11 when said government has been engaged in such criminal actions for generations?

Indeed, Brzezinski himself has even previously warned of false flag attacks being used to kick start wars, yet here he is now comparing such lines of thought to holocaust denial. The total hypocrisy of the man defies belief.

“It was a gutsy speech… In effect what he was saying was if we are to go forward, if we are to have a normal relationship, we cannot re-hash the past… Let’s not exchange accusations” Brzezinski gushed.

“By redefining what America means to the world, and how America views the world, and how Islam and America should view each other, I think he has laid the basis for a much more constructive, much more effective American foreign policy.” Brzezinski said.

Meanwhile, unmanned drones continue to drop more and more bombs on precision targets in Afghanistan and Pakistan, pounding innocent civilians into the dust by the scores almost everyday.

Former Reagan White House official Paul Craig Roberts hits the nail on the head in his latest piece, emphasizing the abject hypocrisy of Obama’s words:

Obama said that “the events of 9/11” and al Qaeda’s responsibility, not America’s desire for military bases and hegemony, are the reasons America’s commitment to combating violent extremism in Afghanistan will not weaken. Will Muslims notice that Obama’s case for America’s violent extremism in Afghanistan and now Pakistan is hypocritical?

Al Qaeda, Obama says, “chose to ruthlessly murder” nearly 3,000 people on 9/11 “and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale.” These deaths are a mere drop in the buckets of blood that America’s invasions have brought to the Muslim world. Moreover, the overwhelming majority of the Muslims America has slaughtered are civilians, just as are the unarmed Palestinians slaughtered by the American-equipped Israeli military.

Against al Qaeda, whose “actions are irreconcilable with the rights of human beings,” Obama invokes the Koran’s prohibition against killing an innocent. Does Obama not realize that the stricture applies to the US and its “coalition of forty-six countries” in spades?

Brzezinski’s words, and his desire to see the exercise of a “constructive” foreign policy, ring hollow, especially when it is understood that it was the former National Security Advisor to Carter himself who was responsible for drawing up the plan to arm and train the Islamic fundamentalist mujahideen at the end of the 70’s and groom Osama bin Laden as a client of the U.S.

In addition, in his 1997 book The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geo-strategic Imperatives, Brzezinski calls for the U.S. to install itself as the world’s only superpower by taking over the Middle East and using it as a lever to control what he terms the “Eurasian Balkans”.

Similar to the infamous PNAC yearning for a “new Pearl Harbor,” Brzezinski concludes that the realization of such an agenda will only be accomplished with the aid of “a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat,” which was helpfully provided by the events of 9/11.

Yet, now we are supposed to shut up and swallow it as he declares his great concern that the U.S. is “becoming bogged down militarily” in the middle east.

To do so would require a myopic leap of logic that completely omits the past history of Brzezinski’s rampant warmongering.

Of course, Obama would love to see questions over 9/11 shut down for good, only that way will he be able to carry out his stated goal of changing the law for the military commissions at Guantánamo to clear the way for detainees facing the death penalty to plead guilty without a full trial.

Those who seek to expose the truth behind the events of September 11th 2001, and counter the hellish road toward tyranny that has been paved in the years thereafter, are not the ones “holding back political progress” as Maddow so disgustingly suggests.

It is the indentured elitists, such as Brzezinski himself, who have continued to use the American military industrial complex as an engine to wage an endless war on the rest of the world that most certainly shoulder the blame for that.

Re the overthrow of Iranian Prime Minister Mossadegh in 1953

For anyone unfamiliar with the details, here is a link to a good online article that summarizes the events leading up to the coup and explains the cooperation of MI6 and the CIA in organizing the coup and also explains how the coup was carried out. I am sure it's not necessary to point out to this audience that this plot involved multiple parties, (i.e. The CIA, MI6 and the Shah and his supporters) engaging in a CONSPIRACY to overthrow a legitimate government, and for the icing on the cake, the conspirators used false flag terrorism against civilians as one of the tools to achieve their goals. It's all explained in the article linked below.

A 'great venture':overthrowing the government of Iran
by Mark Curtis From Lobster 30

This is a slightly abridged version of part of chapter four of Mark Curtis's book The Ambiguities of Power: British Foreign Policy since 1945 (Zed Press, 1995).

In August 1953 a coup overthrew Iran's nationalist government of Mohammed Musaddiq and installed the Shah in power. The Shah subsequently used widespread repression and torture in a dictatorship that lasted until the 1979 Islamic revolution. The 1953 coup is conventionally regarded primarily as a CIA operation, yet the planning record reveals not only that Britain was the prime mover in the initial project to overthrow the government but also that British resources contributed significantly to the eventual success of the operation. Two first-hand accounts of the Anglo-American sponsorship of the coup - by the MI6 and CIA officers primarily responsible for it - are useful in reconstructing events. (1) Many of the secret planning documents that reveal the British role have been removed from public access and some of them remain closed until the next century - for reasons of 'national security'. Nevertheless, a fairly clear picture still emerges. Churchill later told the CIA officer responsible for the operation that he 'would have loved nothing better than to have served under your command in this great venture'. (2)


I don't think that's what Obama meant

"During the speech Obama said “I am aware that some question or justify the events of 9/11,” suggesting that anyone who asks questions about the attacks also somehow justifies them."

The some who "question" 9/11 are us, 9/11 Truthers. The some who "justify" 9/11 are basically people who accept the official version but believe the attacks were justified on the basis of American imperialism (the so-called blowback theory).

Agreed, simuvac

That's exactly how I understood that sentence from Mr. Obama.

I'm getting the impression that the elites now consider 9/11 truth to be a serious threat to their imperial ambitions.

It's time for the truth movement to realize its true size and strength and start using the real power we have.

It's time to get really organized, brothers and sisters, let's get busier!

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.


is a dangerous man.

"I'm getting the impression that the elites now consider 9/11 truth to be a serious threat to their imperial ambitions."

Yes they do.

"It's time for the truth movement to realize its true size and strength and start using the real power we have."

The heart of the matter is the matter of the heart itself.

Where are our hearts in all of this.....
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

You bet con911

Brzezinski is a dangerous man. So is Obama. And the elites fear the truth movement more than anything else. Our movement is spreading like wild fire. Very soon all people will know the truth about 9/11 and the rest of the NWO agenda. The day of reckoning is at hand. Keep plugging away truthers, we will not fail. Always go with love.


As clever as these hawks are, I don't think they understand the rising tide of anti-authoritarianism. Telling people not to question something is like telling them not to look in a sparkly box that is shaped like a car.


Maddow's puppy-face...

"“He took time to debunk both 9/11 conspiracists and deniers of the holocaust,” Maddow said to Brzezinski, “…is there a reason to believe that he thinks those issues are holding back political progress, those specific conspiracies and misconceptions of our modern political history are part of the problem in terms of moving forward?” she asked, wearing what can only be described as a painfully rehearsed puppy dog face of false concern."

haha, she makes that face lots. well rehearsed indeed, but I like Maddow sometimes. not this time.

also, once in a while one of the Watsons cranks out a crackerjack piece. this is one in my opinion. thanks for the post.

3 honest liars

Olbermann, Obama and Maddow are probably three of the most "honest" progressives on the scene today. All 3 avoid the issue of 9/11 Truth. These are not ignorant people. Not one of them. In fact, they are all brilliant. Yet they remain MUTE on this one critical issue. The primer, if you will... the lynchpin. 9/11 Truth. It makes one wonder... what else might they know that we have yet to find out, that compels them to turn a blind eye on this issue? And how will history judge them while they stand by silent as evil triumphs?
"Cogito ergo sum"

Sort of

but I wouldn't put Olbermann in that category too quickly. He skirts 9/11 just as most journalists do, in other words, he doesn't go beyond accusations of gross incompetence. However, he does do something. I agree it is not enough, but I believe he does the maximum possible without getting fired. Notice what he is doing in this video, notice how he mentions the energy policy meetings. He wants you to connect the dots yourself. You have to recognize these sorts of subtle hints, anything beyond that means Olbermann goes. This is how communication works in totalitarian states. Things that are left unsaid are "suggested" instead. There will come a day when all of us will be jailed and tortured for what we are saying and doing now. (or then...) I feel it. The only thing that will stop that is an uprising against and purging of the power structure.

Keith Olbermann - 8 years in 8 minutes

I am sorry to have to say this but

telling a half-truth to me is the same as telling a lie. I just wish and pray that someone like Olbermann would grow some balls and tell the whole truth. He knows exactly what happened on 9/11. He knows it was an inside job. When on God's Earth will someone with some real balls stand up and tell the whole truth? Look at Randi Rhodes. Once I liked her but now she turns my stomach. Mike Malloy is the only one left that I will listen too.

has Olberman ever been

has Olberman ever been successfully approached in the manner Wearechange is known for? I'd like to see a little offset conversation with Keith and what he'd be willing to say or acknowledge. Politely of course.

Thanks for posting this, constitutional911

I caught this on the last replay of the night and kicked myself for not recording it.

There seems to be more and more effort made to support the government's conspiracy theory and cast aspersions on anyone who questions the approved version of history.

I see this as a clear indication of the impact the truth movement is having and the ever less subtle ways the elites are using to combat the rising tide of truth.

They found that ignoring us didn't work.

They found that outright ridicule only brought more attention to the true facts of 9/11.

They quickly realized that the facts were not on their side, so it was pointless to try and argue the facts.

Thus, they have retreated to these carefully nuanced forms of ridicule, bold statements of the official fable as fact and completely opaque conflations of 9/11 truth with holocaust denial.

As the eleventh day of each month passes and more people are openly embracing 9/11 truth, their desperation grows.

The present flurry of neutral or even positive media attention to 9/11 truth can only increase their panic.

Thanks again for all you do.


The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.



Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

"done by Osama Bin Laden and others" AND OTHERS

So let's have an accounting of the evidence 9/11 was done by Osama Bin Laden AND OTHERS:

Complete 9/11 Timeline

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

And while we're at it, let's have a look at the evidence that Osama Bin Laden's responsible for 9/11- is there ANY besides the "confession" tapes? Let's have look at the authentication process for the supposed confession video tapes- the Establishment has never revealed its "authentication" process and in the case of some of the tapes has never even claimed they WERE authenticated. And the 9/11 cOmission Report's narrative is largely based on testimony obtained by torture, besides ignoring 70% of the families very reasonable, obvious questions and ignoring the testimony of whistleblowers like Sibel Edmonds, Robert Wright, Coleen Rowley and Behrooz Sarshar, while accepting it without question, despite false statements and contradictions, from prime suspects like Myers, Rice, Rumsfeld, Bush and Cheney.

Brzezinski is also the same treasonous CFR snake that made this confession, which was kept out of the US Mockingbird Media:

How Jimmy Carter and I Started the Mujahideen

Interview of Zbigniew Brzezinski Le Nouvel Observateur (France), Jan 15-21, 1998, p. 76*

Q: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs ["From the Shadows"], that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?

Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.

Q: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke it?

Brzezinski: It isn't quite that. We didn't push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.

Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn't believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You don't regret anything today?

Brzezinski: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter: We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.

Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic [integrisme], having given arms and advice to future terrorists?

Brzezinski: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?


Boy, that got me steamed- just sent a long email so I

turned it into this open letter:

Open Letter to Rachel Maddow on Obama, Brzezinski and 9/11 Conspiracy

EDIT- send yours: rachel@msnbc.com



for putting these facts in one place. It's a pretty devastating bit of truth for our conniving imperialist agitator Brzezinski.

By the way, do you know why Brzezinksi has so much contempt for Russia? He's Polish. The Polish absolutely despise Russia.

This is BIG!

Soooooooooo............ Obama needs to debunk us. Why, you might ask? Duh, because the message is making its way to Pennsylvania Ave. Because he can't step foot outside this country without being confronted with the 9/11 problem. Because we are winning, gaining ground all the time. Because Gage is on the news in Fresno. Because Jone's research is being verified around the world. Because Press for truth in on PBS. Because Europeans are flocking to 9/11 truth films in droves. Because WAC keeps asking the tough questions. Because we're doing our own investigation and getting closer to unmasking the true culprits. Because ALL OF US are so persistent.

And he needs to equate us with Holocaust deniers? That's so 2006. That's all he can come up with? OK, put Brzezinski front and center. Sure, a Carter-era policy hound supporting the debunking should do the trick. Not.

Take heed bothers and sisters, we've got Cheney on one side and Obama on the other side shaking in their boots, coming up with anything to perpetuate this myth and protect the cover-up.

Like I always say at times like this........let's crank it up a notch.

....and they can't even waterboard us because even we don't know why we're so successful...it's out of our control. They must be pissed.


We are living in very serious times. Our destiny as a race of human/spiritual beings is at stake. Obama has taken the wrong side on this issue. It is time for ALL men of courage, honor and conviction to take a stand... NOW.
"Cogito ergo sum"

Down with Obama!

Wait 50 years for an acknowledgement of well known facts...that sort of "change" is the reason we are here today!

Down with Obama!

9/11 24/7 UNTIL JUSTICE!!

Hey, President Obama


I'm no Rosa Parks, but if there's a bus of people who challenge the Official 9/11 story, I will get onto that bus, and there will be many buses, and we will do it regardless of your treasonous words. I do not know the answer to 9/11, and I am not espousing violence. What I espouse is the effort to find the truth: namely, a new independent investigation.

Why don't you allow an independent investigation? What are YOU afraid of?

Yes what are you afraid of ? Yes he can see us if we stand up !

Obama Bans Signs From Rally To Be Watched By Millions
Does not want a repeat of 9/11 truth sign incident
Steve Watson
Monday, July 22, 2008
Barack Obama's campaign has banned all signs and posters from his upcoming Berlin Rally in Germany, an event expected to be attended by millions and watched by millions more around the world.
Though billed as a security precaution, the decision to prohibit signs will prevent a repeat of an infamous occurrence at an Austin, Texas rally last year when several 9/11 truth signs were prominently visible during Obama's speech.
According to the German media, the order has been issued by Obama staffers, despite the fact that German forces will be in charge of the event's security this Thursday.
German newspaper Berliner Morgenpost reported that the presumptive Democratic nominee's "supervisors" have demanded no signs be present at the speech.
A further headline in the German Daily Bild read "Barack Obama forbids protest posters".
The article reads:

Obamas Organisatoren wollen nichts dem Zufall überlassen. Auf Handzetteln, die seit Montag für die Rede im Berliner Bezirk Tiergarten ausgeteilt werden, heißt es: „Plakate oder Transparente sind nicht gestattet.“
Aus Sicherheitsgründen sollen die Besucher auch keine Taschen und Rucksäcke mitnehmen dürfen.
Which Translates as:
Obama’s organization is leaving nothing to chance. As of Monday flyers are being passed out near Berlin’s Zoo that read “Posters & banners not allowed.” For security reasons visitors should not take purses or backpacks.
Two other German newspapers, Zeit Online and Berliner Zeitung, also ran the story, explaining that the decision to ban signs and banners came directly from the Obama campaign.
Obama's official campaign website also carries an announcement asking those attending the rally not to bring signs:
"For security reasons, do not bring bags. Please limit personal belongings. No signs or banners permitted," the announcement reads.
The move will ensure that any dissenting signs or protest material, such as 9/11 Truth signs, will not be permitted and will be treated by authorities as a possible security threat.