29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition in Collapses of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11

More than 700 architects and engineers have joined call for new investigation,faulting official collapse reports

Gregg Roberts and Staff

The facts are in. The evidence is conclusive. These experts lay it all out.

For Some, the Doubts Began Early

“Something is wrong with this picture,” thought Nathan Lomba, as he watched replays of the Twin Tower collapses on television on September 11, 2001 A licensed structural engineer trained in buildings’ responses to stress, Lomba saw more on the screen than you or I. He puzzled, “How did the structures collapse in near-symmetrical fashion when the damage was clearly not symmetrical?”

Lomba was hardly alone in his discomfort. Most structural engineers were surprised when the towers fell.1 They mainly kept their misgivings to themselves, though, as Scientific American and the Journal of Engineering Mechanics, BBC, the History Channel and government agencies such as FEMA and NIST offered varying and often imaginative theories to explain how fires brought the towers down.

Full article in PDF format at:
http://www.ae911truth.org/downloads/29_Structural-Civil_Engineers_2009-0...

Per Griffin, There are ONLY 3 engineers who (having studied the evidence) publicly support the official government story (and their pays depends upon the government), while 700 INDEPENDENT Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth say the government's story is a "crock".
http://community2.myfoxdfw.com/_911-Truth-The-evidence-is-clear/audio/46...

How many Architects and Engineers who signed the petition BEFORE NIST's final report on building 7 have since withdrawn their names because they are NOW satisfied with NIST's final report? Please list the names of any of those people, and their statements explaining why they have withdrawn their support for the AE911truth.org petition.