Truthmobile Rides Again - Takoma Park MD Fourth of July Parade
For the fourth year, dc911truth participated in the Takoma Park Fourth of July parade. The group consists of about 30 activists who are dedicated to spreading information about the events of 9/11 and lobbying for a re-investigation of the events of that day.
For the last three years the DC “truthers” have sponsored a float in the Takoma Park, Maryland Fourth of July parade. The group decorates a pickup truck and turns it into the “Truth Mobile” for the event. The theme, “Truth is Patriotic” is meant to remind citizens that there is nothing more patriotic than seeking truth and justice; it’s the American way.
According to Lydia Riley, Takoma Park resident and member of dc911truth, “It’s great to celebrate the 4th of July in a patriotic way and nothing in our day is more patriotic than speaking and spreading the truth. We have found participation in the parade to be a fun and productive way of conveying what the organization wishes citizens to understand.”
In addition to the float, the group passed out 2,000 9/11 flyers and almost 1,000 copies of a special Fourth of July edition of the Rock Creek Free Press newspaper to Takoma Park citizens.
Along with the “Truth Mobile,” an information table was setup where visitors interested in learning more about 9/11 and the dc911truth group can find books, DVDs and other resources.
You can find out more about the DC 9/11 truth group on the web at www.dc911truth.org.
- Matt's blog
- Login to post comments
That is one beautiful Truthmobile! Great job dc911truth!
Truth Is Patriotic....perfect sign.
More photos of the Truth Mobile in the parade here
http://www.sheilacasey.com/2009/07/911-truth-marches-in-takoma-park-md-on-july-4th.html
It was fun and the crowd seemed more receptive than last year. Lots of thumbs up and "we're with you." To which I replied "hop on!"
I found that the best thing to say as I handed out our brochures was "We're trying to save America. Here's some information for you." With that opener, everybody was eager to see what we had.
Bumper Sticker
We Are Trying To Save
AMERICA! . 9/11 Truth
Almost like one of our banners
http://photos1.meetupstatic.com/photos/event/8/b/a/7/event_8615751.jpeg
"What You Are Not Supposed to Know About 9/11"
http://www.711911.webs.com/
Thank you dc911truth
This is how the info-war will be won.
FANTASTIC EXPOSURE to 1,000's !! ...and 3,000+ flyers!!
You DC folks kicked-butt with 9/11 Truth exposure!! The more we repeat the subject of "9/11 Truth", the more approachable the subject becomes for the broad public. Like Coke or Pepsi, eventually 9/11 Truth will be the real thing.
-PS... Are you guys noticing that a HUGE number of folks know about 9/11 Truth ? We in Texas are running into a vast number of people on the street who strongly side with 9/11 Truth. http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/2744396
Thank You DC Truth-
You are doing what has to be done. We can not change direction sitting on our butts.
I also saw that Cincinnati participated in a 4th Parade.
N. Texas prepares for an All Day Symposium on July 11!
http://www.711911.webs.com/
Heart of the military industrial complex
Thank You DC for having the courage to raise awareness about 911 in an environment where the community is so much a part of the establishment.
Yes, but . . .
It's great to do this type and amount of outreach, but I am concerned to see "CIT National Security Briefing" at the top of the page of the dc911truth website, also heavily promoted in Shiela's articles in RCFP.
CIT openly claims that a witness to the events of the attack on the Pentagon is an accomplice to the attacks. What proof is there? He told them one story when they recorded him on tape, and a different story when they recorded him without telling him they were recording him. Neither story included anything like, "I faked evidence because I was part of it" or "they told me to pretend a lamppost hit my car". He makes several broad statements that have nothing that state he was involved in the attack.
The suggestion that a commercial jet flew over the Pentagon and no one noticed has long ago been debunked --
Pentagon Strike Theories
Ambiguous Evidence Spawns Proliferation of Theories
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/theories/index.html
and recently as well --
Flight path misinfo
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/07/pentagon-flight-path-map-perfec...
Eyewitness testimony
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/03/pentagon-eyewitness-testimony.html
What they described
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/04/911-and-pentagon-attack-what.html
"a commercial jet flew over the Pentagon and no one noticed?"
This is the opposite of what CIT's evidence shows. All of their eyewitnesses saw a big, low flying plane head towards the Pentagon -- except for Pentagon Police Officer Roosevelt Roberts who saw it after the explosion, banking over the parking lot.
I do not consider Arabesque a credible source. I have parsed his essays on CIT and find them woefully lacking. HIs insistence on supporting the OCT in this regard is hurting the movement.
For those in the DC area, this Saturday CIT is giving a free presentation from 10-2:30 at the NRECA center in Arlington. Sponsored by The Wisdom Fund. Rob Balsamo of Pilots for 911 Truth and Shelton Lankford, Lt. Col. USMC (retired), a fighter pilot with over 300 combat missions, 10,000 hours of flight time, and a recipient of the Distinguished Flying Cross, will also be speaking. More info here.
Sorry, Victronix
but the anonymous spook "Arabesque" has NOT debunked the admirable work of two men who have taken an enormous amount of risk by putting their real names and faces to their investigation and activism.
His anti-CIT blog has more red herrings than the Popular Mechanics book.
And in the last blog entry here a few months ago devoted to this topic, when these red herrings and non sequiturs were pointed out, the CIT attackers would just close their ears and go "la la la la la I'm tellin' ya this has all been debunked in Arabesque's blog" and slap the link down one more time.
I think CIT deserves a Pulitzer Prize for their investigative journalism.
Sheila I look forward to coming to DC and attending the Pilots/CIT conference as well as AE911truth next week. :-)
EDIT: For the double standard employed by CIT detractors, check out the final post in the last thread devoted to this topic:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/20035#comment-208139
>>but the anonymous spook
>>but the anonymous spook "Arabesque"
Like I said on another thread, if Arabesque is a spook, then it looks like the agents have finally joined our cause! This is wonderful news, to know that some in the bureau or the agency are working to expose the strong evidence of inside job and debunk the nonsense right alongside us. It's hard to imagine this could have happened, probably a first time in history, but it gives me new hope that we can win this thing.
If only! But dream on . . . Arabesque is only being attacked now in this crass way because he does a great job debunking this crap. As you know, calling someone an agent only exposes the person who is making the baseless claim . . . just like CIT.
"Anonymous" "spook" here
Thanks for the laugh, and some good points too. I hope that the moderators on this site will take these attacks seriously as they are a transparent attempt to create a hostile environment on 911blogger and turn the discussion into a flame war. This is a common tactic by people who refuse to actually debate the issues and it is very transparent coming from people who have never addressed my articles in ANY significant way.
CIT's Deceptive Flight Path Argument: "North" or "South"? What about "Hit the Pentagon"?
"The CIT flyover (what I correctly rename to the "mass hallucination theory") largely depends on dismissing hundreds of witness accounts, and deceptively insinuating that the widespread and unanimous reports of the plane hitting the Pentagon do not count as evidence of the "flight path"."
This should be blatantly obvious, but apparently it is not to CIT and their supporters: When witnesses describe the plane striking the Pentagon, that is in fact part of the "flight path". There is a name for this logical fallacy and it is called "Special Pleading".
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2009/07/cits-deceptive-flight-path-argu...
A Response to Misleading Claims About the CIT Flyover Debate
Not only did Lagasse get the light poles wrong, he was adamant that the light poles knocked down on 9/11 were not knocked down! He also misplaced the location of the Taxi cab which can be seen in the illustration above. This hasn't stopped CIT repeating the claim that this witness is part of the "smoking gun" evidence that the plane flew North of the CITGO. CIT has refused to acknowledge in any clear way that Lagasse is not a credible witness based on the mistaken testimony he has given and clearly this is deceptive.
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2009/07/response-to-misleading-claims-a...
_______________
A 9/11/2008 Resolution: Start Your Own 9/11 Blog
"anonymous spook"
So, it's OK to call other users agents on this site now?
Seems like a bad policy.
EDIT: I've been informed that snitchjacketing is still against the rules here.
The Eleventh Day of Every Month
"What proof is there?"
Watch the video Vicky. It's all spelled out for you right there. Cabbie's story is physically impossible.
If you still have questions, come back. But I don't think you will.
>>Watch the video Vicky.
>>Watch the video Vicky. It's all spelled out for you right there. Cabbie's story is physically impossible.
Unfortunately, I've watched it. All it means is that CIT thinks they have ESP to read someone's mind, and that an elderly man is confused and will respond differently when he has a camera pointed at him. Can't imagine why anyone in DC, at the Pentagon, might be concerned about what's captured on video about themselves. It must mean he's a criminal.
What's more fascinating than the cabbie soap opera though, is how CIT pretends that no humans existed on the other side of the building, hundreds of humans with functional eyes -- afterall, many were on a highway and driving -- who would have seen the plane flying away.
I read somewhere that CIT claims that there's no point in asking the people on the other side of the building what happened because they probably would have confused the two planes -- AA77 and the C-130. Wow, I guess hundreds of people were fooled on BOTH sides of the buidling, even when a commercial jet would have been roaring just above them, they'd have thought it was the Cargo plane that came afterward, flying much higher.
But as it turns out, unfortunately for CIT, some of the people who saw the explosion and the approach were the air traffic controllers at Reagan National Airport. Would air traffic controllers -- not one, but several -- who reported seeing the plane approach, seeing the fireball and explosion, not be capable of noticing a commercial jet fly away from the scene? Oh that's right, they were "in on it"!!
There are so many ridiculous claims that are wrapped up in the sappy melodrama of "the cabbie is in on it!!!" and other emotional diversions to avoid the gaping holes in basic logic, that it's beyond embarrassing at this point, seriously.
Today's event was very good.
Today's event was very good. I appreciate the hard work and courage of the Citizens Investigation Team. They are on the ground and they are not anonymous. Same with Pilots. We Are Change Virginia was there too, as well as some pilots in the audience. It was a good day.
CIT has a new website.
http://citizeninvestigationteam.com/index.html
911 Truth Ends 911 Wars
Yes.
And, somewhat to my surprise...
...NOT ONE SINGLE detractor of CIT/PfT showed up in person to challenge their findings.
It was a full room of people. Given the resistance CIT receives here, and even at such places as Prisonplanet, I expected at least one detractor to speak up. During the Q/A session, I took the microphone and asked the audience: "Let's do something Richard Gage does at the end of his talks. Let's have a show of hands: Are there any truthers in this room who believe a large airliner hit the Pentagon?"
Not one single person raised their hand.
Second question: "Does anyone here believe CIT's work has been refuted?"
Not one single person raised their hand.
By the way, they are now up to FOURTEEN (not thirteen anymore) north side witnesses and THREE flyover witnesses.
Now I understand why you
Now I understand why you took the mike and asked those questions. I looked around and no one spoke up. I was the one who asked what was under that tarp being carried out of the Pentagon. It was a tent to be set up on the lawn. One of the carriers of that thing is one of the witnesses of the North path. He works at the Navy Annex and the plane went overhead of him. I've seen most of the CIT material but I learned a lot today by having this discussion.
I brought a woman to this who had finally gotten turned on by Richard Gage being on Coast to Coast. She still has a lot to learn but she went home with a dvd and is willing to share with others. She knew someone who had seen the plane but she never realized the flight path by the government is a LIE. A big fat lie.
It is nice to now know who you are too. Thanks for being there. nancy
p.s. And now we have the architect convention with Richard Gage on thursday as well as public events at a big coffee house in DC (Busboys and Poets). Hopefully more to report later.
911 Truth Ends 911 Wars
Yup, I'll be around all week...
...mostly helping out at Gage's booth at the convention. Catch me again this week, it would be great to chat.