100%

3,300 innocent civilian deaths in Iraq since Obama took over.
Hundreds more dead in Afghanistan.

All in the name of corporate profits, aka the military-industrial complex.

Obama is on pace to out-do Bush in body count, but nobody is paying attention anymore.

www.obamabodycount.com

That's an entire 9/11 right there.

you make it seem like if he wanted to make the big change, he could.. but with the evidence of bush sr. cia-jfk assassination-banking connections.. bush sr. is the head of the public snake in the actions of the u.s. government since ww2.. but yes.. obama can be so deceptive, smooth talking.. so lies are not that apparent.. which means more work for us.. but what changes are in store for us.. a global collapse, depopulation, martial rule, or a genuine improvement for as many people as possible.. time is approaching swiftly, and our efforts with 9/11 truth is to force obama to deal with reality and real justice. Surviving Bush is not something to sneeze at, either.. jerry is a writer with a conscience.

jonathan
www.FlybyNews.com

corporation.

We shall see how it all play's out & it does seem like O is unwilling to go after previous criminals & do the right thing in Aghanistan.. but there is no way he's worse than W.

"This response goes to the heart of the contradiction between Obama as an iconic symbol of a more democratic and hopeful future and the reality of an administration that is capable of reproducing some of the worst policies of the Bush administration."

Obama is merely a figurehead for a gatekeeper administration, imho.

I read the caption and thought - right, Obama is better at manipulation than Bush because he's so charming and intelligent. Then I see "better" is used to compare their "goodness" or lack thereof.

Your take is correct, imho.

There are two reasons why Obama's charm diversions create a bigger risk for The Money Party. First, you can promise a lot but when your promises are to to a lot of people in real need, then failing to deliver will be noticed across the board. Second, it's one thing to get screwed by a truly vulgar person like GWB. That makes sense. But conned by a charmer provokes a real sense of betrayal.

I'm hoping that the Obama experience will end, for a good while, the politics of personality. It's dangerous and can't be tolerated.

I have an alternative. Politicians need to be given numbers and required to wear athletic jerseys like basketball players. They would only be referred to by their numbers and the jerseys would bear the logo of their three top corporate donors. Obama would be #1, of course, and have a Goldman Sachs logo, plus a couple of others. Then we could all go into the business of retiring jerseys.