I hope no one thinks I'd risk my reputation on such a controversial subject if I didn't think it had merit!

I'd have to say a CGI pierced through it!

Photo

There is clear (negative) evidence that no hijacked airplanes were involved in 911:

1. There should be considerable amount of airplane wreckage found atthe crash sites but there was very little.

2. No damaged parts of the alleged four airplanes involved in 911 have been found anywhere at or in vicinity of the crashe sites. The authorities have not presented any such identified parts as evidence of an
airplane crash at the various sites.

3. Some alleged airplane parts were actually found in vicinity of crash sites but apparently do not belong to the airplanes suggested to have
been involved in the events.

4. The proposal by the authorities that most wreckage parts were destroyed due to fire and explosion is incorrect as there was not enough energy (J) involved in alleged crashes to 'evaporate' complete airplanes and
wreckage parts. No airplane in history has ever 'evaporated' at a crash.

5. There have been 10 000's of airplane crashes in the world since aviation took off around 1910 and at every crash there was plenty of wreckage. 911 is the first and only time when four airplanes have crashed on the same day without leaving any wreckage ... at all! What a coincidence!

Conclusions (based on negative evidence):

A. The alleged hijacked planes did not crash at the various sites.

B. Whatever caused damage at the various crash sites was not a hijacked airplane.

Comments:

The conclusions seem evident for crashes at Pentagon and in Pennsylvania as much other evidence on these locations support evidences 1-5.

The conclusion also seems valid for the first WTC crash, as evidence to the contrary (a video film) is very weak. No reliable evidence actually exists that a real airplane would have flown low over Manhattan and caused the
first WTC crash, the smoke and fireball, more fire (and later collapse of building). No wreckage was observed after crash and before/after tower collapse.

The second WTC crash is interesting. An airplane is alleged to have suddenly appeared from nowhere and disappeared (crashed) into the building 'live', as later shown on various videos, causing a fireball, etc., but without leaving any wreckage anywhere after crash and before/after tower collapse. You would evidently have expected that some airplane parts would either bounce off the wall or fly through the building and out of windows on the other side, but no such wreckage has been found for that or the other WTC tower or is recorded on any videos. All wreckage parts disappeared inside the building, we are told to believe!

Few videos record the second crash at WTC and they are very strange - a plane slices into the WTC building at high velocity and disappears - and no wreckage parts come out on the other side. It is suggested that all parts of
the plane are stopped inside the building itself (within less than 80-90 meters). There are no solid walls inside the building, only weak partitions as decorations. We are told that there were 48 inner, very solid steel support pillars, which should first have stopped all wreckage and then would have collapsed due to heat after 30-80 minutes. A big fireball develops and it is suggested, without any evidence, that all airplane wreckage parts were
arrested, consumed by fire and explosion inside the building.

The fireballs evidently disappeared after a few seconds and the fire also appears to have diminished fairly rapidly. Human beings are soon seen in the
damage openings of the building walls and in windows and there is no visible external damage to the buildings caused by fire - only some damage to the walls. There is no sight of any airplane wreckage parts in the wall openings
caused by the alleged planes or in damaged windows on the other side. Or anywhere else. And suddenly the buildings collapse.

The lack of any real damaged parts of the alleged hijacked airplanes at any four incident locations is clear evidence that hijacked planes were not involved in the incidents.

---

And then there were no accident investigations by FBI, FEMA or NTSB. Not even a manipulated one! Just a big report describing various events leading up to the incidents - planes crash. A similar incident (a ship sinking) took place 9/28/1994 in the Baltic - 852 dead at least or perhaps a little less. The authorities immediately invented the background and the cause of the incident supported by the media. Later a final report was produced - not describing why the ship actually foundered. All essential information was falsified. And so far they have got away with it. But the case rolls on
http://heiwaco.tripod.com/news.htm and
http://heiwaco.tripod.com/disasterinvestigation.htm .

What can we learn from above? That it is very difficult to reveal the true cause of terrible incidents covered up by immoral authorities. One way is to insist on proven facts and evidence, e.g. wreckage parts that prove the one
and only proximate cause.

So how was WTC done?

As there were no planes hitting the WTCs at any time (no airplane wreckage anywhere before or after building collapses), any evidence to the contrary is false ... and quite simple to reveal (apart from asking FBI, FEMA, NIST
or NTSB for any proven wreckage parts).

i. No plane - thus not AA11 - hit the North Tower from the north side. Nobody saw a plane flying over Manhattan direction south to hit the North Tower. The video taken 'by mistake' by somebody on the ground of that crash is a planted fake - to mislead the public to believe otherwise. Quite easy to make. The fireball and damage of the North tower were thus arranged from inside. Most people escaping from inside the North Tower can only have experienced a big explosion not knowing what happened at all. But soon the
rumour spread that a plane had hit the North tower. Any witness in the South Tower could have seen nothing as they could not see the north side of the North tower and were apparently told to remain calm - no risk that another
plane would hit the South Tower.

ii. Thus media started to film the North Tower - mainly from the North side I assume. Very few was filming the North Tower from the south side as the South Tower was in the way. People on the ground were looking at the North
Tower. And why would anybody at this instance film the South Tower?

iii. Suddenly there was a big fireball/explosion in the South Tower and it was later suggested that another plane - UA 175 - had hit it from south.
I doubt very much that there are any eye witnesses seeing this plane sneaking up from behind ... but amazingly (or just very conveniently and not so amazingly) there is a number of videos filming a plane hitting (or slicing
into) the South Tower (without any wreckage being produced). I would conclude all these latter videos are fakes ... for the simple reason that there was no plane wreckage. So also the South Tower damage/fireball was
arranged from inside. Probably most witnesses inside the South Tower thought it was an internal explosion.

iv. What you see on any video of the latter event taken from outside is thus just trick filming. Apparently quite easy is to do with modern technology.

v. I assume that the faked films were generally done beforehand with a possibility to adjust for weather, etc. and were then distributed to media (as if shot by the media, etc). It seems also that most other films of the
'incidents' were conveniently confiscated by the FBI to secure evidence (for the invented scenario - because the whole 911 is a written play by Hollywood).

vi. The probability/risk that anybody was filming the south side of the South Tower at the time of the 'incident' and recording no plane at all was slim.

vii. What happened then was that the public was bombarded with the message that two planes had hit the WTCs, conveniently backed up with faked videos that
nobody bothered to check, and then the Finale! - the collapses of the towers 30-60 minutes later - evidently done from inside using some very effective demolition technology. But officially initiated and caused by the planes ... that never existed ... and some very hot fires ... that also didn't exist.

viii. So no air plane wreckage was produced. What you see on the ground (of alleged air plane parts) is just more fakes.

ix. So the case is very easy - if FBI, FEMA, NIST, NTSB or anybody can produce just one piece of air plane wreckage of AA11 or UA175 collected at WTC it is possible that these planes hit WTC (the real parts could of course
be planted). But ... if any air plane wreckage part found at WTC does not belong to AA11 or UA175 (and apparently has been planted), then the official story collapses. KISS. No need to explain why WTC1/2 collapsed.

x; I doubt very much that all these four flights ever existed. So you wonder where the unfortunate passengers ended up? Most of them seem to have been relatives of people in DC that maybe collected nice insurance from
their deaths? In shipping many 'incidents' are plain insurance fraud.

Anders Björkman, Heiwa Co, European Agency for Safety at Sea -
http://heiwaco.tripod.com

PS. As a shipbuilder since 40 years I am quite familiar with steel structures, e.g. Very Large Crude Carriers, VLCC. Many VLCCs have caught fire ... but none has evaporated. And no steel has ever melted in a VLCC. OK,
deformation due to heat has occured - but no collapse. Local collapse may occur due to brittle fracture at room temperature and/or buckling, but with inbuilt redundancy global collapse is rare. But WTCs did not collapse due
brittle fractures.

There was more energy (J) involved when the US VLCC 'Exxon Valdez' ran aground 1989 than when a plane allegedly hit a WTC tower. The result was that the bottom of the tanker was ripped open (and oil flowed out causing pollution) and all kinetic energy was transformed into buckled and ripped
apart structure (no fire). Why the oil tanker was 10 miles off course for 40 minutes heading up on land has never been explained.

9/11/01 I was at Freiberg, Saxony, Germany. My daughter called and asked me to watch TV news. But we had no TV in our old house built 1590 ca. Only later I had the opportunity to watch the 911 crash sites on video. And it
was quite evident to me that due to lack of any airplane wreckage anywhere that no airplanes ever caused the incidents. Furthermore - the structural damages at
WTC and Pentagon and the hole in the ground at Pennsylvania cannot have been caused by airplanes for more reasons thab that there are no airplane wreckage parts anywhere.

Keep it simple re 911. Just ask for one wreckage part that belonged to the missing planes so it can be properly analyzed. The authorities cannot present any. The official reason is 'national security' - the real reason by
negative reasoning must be that the authorities did it and now protect themselves. It seems to happen all the time.