Bullshit

I'll refute your thesis right here:

-What happened? WTC7 fell like a brick
-How did it happen? Controlled Demolition
-Why did it happen? Dunno exactly. And I don't really care.

So stuff it.

shows us that the perpetraitors are fearful of us. More and more every day.

We'll be keeping an eye on Jerome Hauer, Billy Schneider, etc.
Tell him for us......ok?

You can smell a hack a mile away.

Government needs to get some new lines.

If you ever took more than a moment to actually read some of the posts on this blog, and maybe even do a little bit of your own independent research, you would realize that there was ample time and opportunity for devices to be placed in the WTC buildings.

There are weaker strawman arguments you could have chosen to attack. Looks like you may be in too deep here. Why don't you bone up on your facts, and then come back with some real arguments.

"Conspiracy theories are the only theories for which evidence against them is actually construed as evidence in favor of them."

Wrong, "conspiracy theory" is, first and foremost, a conformity device used to ostracize and isolate certain theories, whatever they maybe, but usually, political ones. This doesn't mean the "theory" itself is being unjustly (or justly, for that matter) ridiculed, the merit or absence of it is unrelated to the fact that it is considered a "conspiracy theory".

No, the character the conspiracy theory possesses that makes it a target for that labelling is the fact that it challenges strongly held beliefs of the analysts. The fact is, ideas which are very far away from one's conventional wisdom require an extraordinary amount of evidence to convince oneself, while theories which support one's already perceived ideas hardly require any proof at all to be accepted.

This shouldn't be criticized, in our day-to-day life you have limited time, so you do some form of filtering of the information that reaches you to dedicate the time to the information that you do perceive as valuable.

After some time, you begin creating your own common-sense, your own table of relationships between past causes and consequences. You start building an understanding of this relations. Because it is the "why" that you really look for, not the how or what. These are the building blocks which you look for in order to build the "why". The answer for "why" allows you to imagine the "why not" or the "how to", that is, the way to avoid repeating the same experience or the way to replicate it.

With this map, or table of relations, you start giving more weight to relations which you experience over and over again. Eventually they'll form your personal convictions and belief.

[I will finish my post in a few hours, to be continued...]

Anonymous wrote:
no one has explained how the conspirators were able to remain undiscovered while placing explosives in the buildings.

What, do you think the 9/11 criminals were dumb enough to advertise to everyone that they were entering the buildings to plant explosives? Use your brain. They had operatives disguise themselves as workers. Here's an example of how this operation may have been achieved:

From A&E network, "Anatomy of 9/11"

Narrator: The New York Times has reported that the foam fell off (the steel) easily. And the Port Authority had been fixing and replacing missing sections in the months before September 11th.

The quote can be found at 5:31 into Part 2 of the documentary (but I recommend starting the video at 5:15).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3qIKVRT4tU&mode=related&search=

Seems like a convenient enough cover story to use -- pretending to replace foam insulation on the *steel* -- but really placing explosives on 'em.

Then there's the "power down " condition at the WTC the weekend before 9/11, the removal of bomb sniffing dogs at the complex, the unusually high number of evacuations that took place in the months leading up to the attack, etc..

So yes it's plausible that people could enter those buildings undetected, especially with a guy named Larry Silverstein owning the lease to the WTC complex. He's the Clay Shaw of the 9/11 conspiracy.

Man, I've often wondered what creatures they might be. I'd actually pay to see some of them - you hear me? If you get fired, found a zoo! I mean...do they do it for purely ideological reasons, or for money - if so, how much? How much are your souls? And how do they hire? Approach the MickeyDee rejects in gloomy alleys? Or maybe they grow them vegetables somewhere - MK ULTRA style? I'd sure like to know...