Support 911Blogger


9/11 Widows Lash Out Over Tenet, Rice Meeting

The Jersey Girls are lambasting the administration and the 9/11 Commission for failing to prevent 9/11 and then covering up what really happened.

Raw Story has the 9/11 Widow's statement:

"Statement Regarding al Qaeda Threats
October 5, 2006

Astonishingly, five years post 9/11 the public is made aware about an urgent July 10, 2001 meeting that took place between former CIA Director George Tenet and then, National Security Advisor, Condoleezza Rice. This information comes from Bob Woodward's newly released book, "State of Denial".

Despite this Administration's rhetoric that they had "no warnings" leading up to 9/11, it has become abundantly clear, that key Administration officials were made aware of the vast array of Al Qaeda threats and warnings that existed in years prior, and more importantly, in the weeks leading up to September 11, 2001.

When we add the July 10, 2001 meeting to the plethora of other clear warnings that our government had, a very concise view of the al Qaeda threat emerges. Those other warnings include, but are not limited to:

(More after the jump..)

• Warnings from leaders of other nations and foreign intelligence apparatus' of terrorist threats

• June 30, 2001 Senior Executive Intelligence Briefing (SEIB) entitled "bin Laden Threats Are Real"

• The threat of President Bush's assassination at the G-8 Summit by al Qaeda in July of 2001 – using aircraft to dive bomb the summit building

• July 2001 Phoenix memo, which told of potential terrorists taking flight lessons

• 52 FAA warnings – five of which mentioned al Qaeda's training for hijacking

• August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Brief entitled "bin Laden Determined to Strike in US"

• National Intelligence Estimate (NIE)entitled "Islamist Extremists Learn to Fly"

• Intelligence agency heads describing themselves with their "hair on fire" to characterize the imminent nature of the threats they were intercepting from Al Qaeda and their sense of urgency in relating them to the Bush Administration

• The arrest of Zacharias Moussaoui in August of 2001

• FBI Agent Harry Samit's 70 unsuccessful attempts to get a FISA Warrant to examine Moussaoui's belongings

Aside from scheduling a National Security Council meeting on September 4, 2001, two months after the July 10 "connect the dots" briefing from CIA director, George Tenet, the abundance of post 9/11 reports and commissions found no evidence of any action taken by appropriate officials. The 9/11 Commission itself concluded that in spite of an unprecedented attack threat in the months before 9/11, US "domestic agencies never mobilized in response to the threat. They did not have direction, and did not have a plan to institute. The borders were not hardened. Transportation systems were not fortified. Electronic surveillance was not targeted against a domestic threat. State and local law enforcement were not marshaled to augment the FBI's efforts. The public was not warned."

While certain members of the 9/11 Commission recalled a January 28, 2004 closed session meeting with former CIA Director, George Tenet, where this urgent July 10, 2001 meeting was discussed, this meeting was not referenced in the Commission's final report.

In the transcript testimony, the former CIA Director described the non-routine meeting that he and Cofer Black called for with then National Security Advisor, Condoleeza Rice as one of the "starkest warnings" ever given by the CIA to the White House on Al Qaeda.

To our continued dismay, both the Bush Administration and the 9/11 Commission have consistently failed to give a complete and honest accounting to the American public with regard to their actions and inactions leading up to the devastation of September 11, 2001.

The inexcusable result of this less than truthful accounting has resulted in America making important national security decisions and passing legislation using the 9/11 Commission's conclusions and recommendations. Chillingly, these decisions appear to be based upon an unclear combination of partial truths mixed with distortions and omissions of important facts.

Incredibly, five years post 9/11 we have come full circle. In spite of all the clear warnings that our government received, why did those in power fail to invoke any defensive measures to protect our nation from the attacks of September 11, 2001?

We demand the immediate declassification and release of these latest documents and transcripts. The American public has the right to know what their government did or did not do to protect us from terrorist actions.

Finally, instead of reorganizing an entire intelligence community because they "weren't sharing information", and rather than telling us that "9/11 was a failure of imagination", what we needed was for the 9/11 Commission to state the truth and hold those responsible to account. The most effective change for America would be to have a National Security Council that understands that it is their job to translate vital information into action."

Count how many...

Media outlets find this to be "newsworthy."
___________________________________

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

I guess...

Since the widows can no longer sell their pain to the media, they're no longer "newsworthy."
___________________________________

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

Things are getting scarring

The end of the Bill of Rights is here. This article is frightening.

And why...

Were wargames mirroring the day's events scheduled for that timeframe?
___________________________________

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

C'mon Motherf*ckers....

ANSWER OUR GOD DAMNED QUESTIONS!!!
___________________________________

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

easy - they were there to be

easy - they were there to be prepared for the upcoming attack. They just didn't expect it to happen during the drills. They just didn't admit it to the 9/11 commission, out of security concerns. Etc. etc. etc.... .... ...

this is great, they need to

this is great, they need to push this hard and plug their new movie at the same time.

The...

Rawstory article has a clip from 9/11: PFT...
___________________________________

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

Al Qaeda agrees with Bush, stay the course.

Al Qaeda agrees with Bush, stay the course.

Is/was Kristin Breitweiser a

Is/was Kristin Breitweiser a member of he Jersy Girls?
KB is very articulate but on Larry King or other shows I have never heard her mention anthing about WTC 7 or the "collapse" of the towers. Anyonre know wher she stands on this?

she doesnt. she regularly

she doesnt. she regularly plays it safe enough to get invited on Chris Matthews and Larry King so as not to be labeled a dreaded "conspiracy theorist". she is always very vague and never gets specific with allegations/evidence. i respect her but shes no Donna Marsh.

The two battlefronts

Some people are focused on the collapse of the towers.

Some people are focused on the administration's willingness to overlook the al_Qaeda threat.

It's two different battle fronts.

We need to prove both MIHOP and LIHOP and find how they mesh. There seems to be clear evidence of both.

The Truth about the War on Terror