A Challenge To The Media

Dear Media,

Within the last few months, you've given a lot of attention to the 9/11 Truth Movement. In rare circumstances, we've even gotten a "fair shake."

However, your guests have consisted of Dylan Avery, Corey Rowe, Jason Bermas, James Fetzer, Kevin Barrett, Dave Von Kleist, Charlie Sheen, Alex Jones, Dr. Robert Bowman, Michael Berger, Paul Thompson and Dr. David Ray Griffin.

We don't know if you're aware or not (you haven't reported on it), but the original members of the 9/11 Truth Movement have been busy as of late.

On August 4th, 2006, 9/11 family members Lorie Van Auken, Patty Casazza, Mindy Kleinberg, and Monica Gabrielle released a statement that questioned the "entire veracity" of the 9/11 Commission's report.

On September 5th, 2006, a documentary endorsed by the families that fought for the creation of the 9/11 Commission was released entitled, "9/11: Press For Truth."

On September 11th, 2006, at the National Press Club in Washington D.C., family members Donna Marsh O'Connor, Michelle Little, and Christina Kminek asked for, "a new investigation into the events of September 11th, and this time, a truly bipartisan, global, with families invested from the beginning, middle, and throughout the end."

On October 14th, 2006, Monica Gabrielle, Lorie Van Auken, Mindy Kleinberg, and Patty Casazza released a petition that calls for, "the immediate declassification and release of all transcripts and documents relating to the July 10, 2001 meeting that took place between former CIA Director George Tenet and then National Security Advisor, Condoleezza Rice" as well as "the declassification and release of both the redacted 28 pages of the Joint Inquiry Into The Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001 (JICI) and the CIA Inspector General’s report, "CIA Accountability With Respect To The 9/11 Attacks". In the span of three days, they've managed to get 2041 signatures.

Considering all of the nice publicity you gave to Ann Coulter, don't you think it's time you started giving OTHER members of the 9/11 Truth Movement a "fair shake?"

We do. You have been challenged.


The 9/11 Truth Movement

This time the new commission needs all the time it needs

This time a NEW IMPARTIAL commission should be alloted all the time it needs to get to the bottom of all of this.

There must be no pressure from the government to shut anyone up either.

Let the Truth come out. The Truth will set us free!

RE: This time the new commission needs all the time it needs

... unless the truth happens to be exactly as the 9/11 commission reported, in which case lets just keep spreading our bull crap.

Bull Crap

He who knows nothing is closer to the truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors. ~ Thomas Jefferson

How About it

My question to all those in the media, would you stand in the way of a investigation into the mass murder of 3000 US citizens? I suspect you have limited powers as to determining if 911 info will be covered to the degree at which it should be, but certainly you have it in your powers to publicly state that you would not get in the way of an investigation.

But he that doeth truth cometh to the light . . .

Imagine the msm when it's is too late and they have not done their job. Who amoung them will change direction first? I really wonder . . . when the lights come on, what will they say?

lights on the MSM

when (if) the lights come on, they will scurry like cockroaches for the nearest corner or crack to hide in.

The 'MSM' is not to blame so much as the puppeteers who hold the strings of the mainstream media. The editors are the strings that control which way the puppet dances. But who holds the strings, they are accountable for our collective reality.

Perfect Out

That sounds like a perfect way for media professionals who are awrae of the 911 Truth yet are not in a position to speak on the air. It's great, no one is pointing a finger at the government, we just want to investigate. Let the investigation decide who is guilty.


The investigation will find the criminals guilty, whoever they are. It's just that is damn likely that all of our suspicions are correct. I hear a bunch of kids singing a song in front of the Super Market which sums it up quite well: Bush Knocked Down the Tower



If You Are A "Newcomer"...

Ask yourself if any of these stories are "newsworthy." The very fact that the media won't cover these stories speaks VOLUMES. Maybe the 9/11 Truth Movement isn't so crazy after all.

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

There is no media

This nation does not have a national news media. I challenge anyone to debate me on this. What we have is a system of information control. Only officially sanctioned history receives attention (focus) even if it slips into the reporting. This is easy to spot when you know what to look for. I teach this.

The media is the single buffer between the criminals in the ruling class and justice. The media hide the control and conspiracy related to control of our society. From the sham of the Federal Reserve system to the fixed elections in our nation our media is currently operating as a hyponitic distraction device that is designed to keep people concerned about issues that appear to be the most important issues but are in fact trivial when compared to the real issues.

Put me up against the media...use me as a speaker. I'll expose them for what they really are...America's number one enemy.

Jesse - Editor, TvNewsLIES.org

I agree 100%

Thier is no media here...it is all a well scripted thought out process. Sometimes they slip or thier are exceptions like Kieth Olberman on Msnbc, or accidentally bringing on a guest who is actually OUTSPOKEN as compared to O'Reily or Hannity and Colmes. I watch the MSM and look at CNN everyday to see which way they are leaning and it is really scarey to me how nothing of any real "Meaning" is covered. 84% of the US think the Gov't is hiding something with 9/11??? Is that not front page news capable?? I just hate to believe that they are all involved and censored so much, but it is impossible to think otherwise.

DZ.....you missed one little one....and that was on OCT 5th 2006 thousands of people were in the streets in 234 cities protesting the Bush Regime.

I try my best to be in the middle, and I read CNN, MSNBC for the MSM news, then I come here, and Infowars.com to grab the links on what is really happening. What really Pissed me off the other day is when Youtube and Google pulled all of the Iraq videos that I had "Favorited" These were the ones that showed the USA getting its ass kicked by sniper fire. I can not believe they pulled all of them!! Thank God one guy here on this web site has saved them, and archived them..... I will grab the link for you to see....

Here is the Video that was pulled from Youtube and Google..


Thanks Jon for saving this......If every American saw this...we would be OUT of Iraq...Now

Thank you

Great link......now we see real war and not CNN crap

Media control - any hope?

How about Democracy Now?
Why is it that Amy Goodman can take on every other issue of concern (even Palestine) except 9/11?
Yes, she did have Dylan and Jason on on 9/11 under the excuse of a debate with the jokers from Popular Mechanics and even showed some sympathetic smiles for our guys, but NOTHING since.
Was she possibly told that she would be silenced if she touches 9/11 again?
Maybe told by Larry Silverstein?!
Who the hell is pulling the strings?!
And how do we break the media silence?
Kevin Barrett is talking about a '9/11 Truth Revolution' but we cannot even manage a Million People March for 9/11 Truth...

You Could Get A Million

You could get a million to march on DC simply in the name of opening an investigation. It's probably a little too soon to start waving and pointing fingers, a true independent investigation will be the best means of dicovery, judgment, and sentencing. All of us will need to be weaned into the Truth thoughout the trial as investigative reports divulge to us the details of who did what, where and when. Then we'll wave and point our fingers, and probably a bit more than that. What is clear is there's not a person who will say they'd stand in front of a 911 Investigation. The public has nothing to lose by opening an investigation into the mass murder of 3000 of our fellow citizens. Aside from seeking justice into a horrendous crime against our fellow US citizens, we just as well could say, why the hell not? The only people possibly suffering from the investigation, any investigation, are the criminals, whoever they might be. One thing is absolutely sure, an investigation would provide lot's of new information, even more than what has already been established. If the media went legite on 911 coverage, there'd be a media frenzy erupting. Paris Hilton and Michael Jackson step aside, Judgment 911 will be the media topic of the world, intensely so, and for a sustained amount of time. An audience like never before in history. There are at least a million people who know that already, and tapping into that Judgment 911 mass, means big buisness can thrive for many. I want an investigation.

Problem is, a truely

Problem is, a truely independent investigation will be impossible or very difficult while the current jokers are still in power. Similarily it is very difficult for leaders (and even media) in other western countries to blame Bush for 9/11 while he is still president of the USA.

Barrett - '9/11 Truth Revolution' ?

Where can I hear Kevin Barrett is talking about a '9/11 Truth Revolution' ?

Jesse's correct. Well said!

Jesse, just after 9/11, I was told to go online and report my inside story to Art Bell. He didn't impress me for 10 minutes, so I hung-up in the cue. That's when I discovered Rense, and Alex Jones, and then I discovered your site. In theory, you've fully covered the issue to the core. Unfortunately, we need readership, with big, big numbers, as does Alex today.

*Do take a minute to delve into Jesse's site. It's a bit ambitious for one guy to do on his own (as I've learned the hard way,) but it's built on a great concept. In time, I learned I could not 'back' some of the pundits he likes, but this ain't about personal opinions, and/or dress codes.... I'll give it: Two Ariels Up!!

I agree

I agree, and the CFR was instrumental in bringing this about a long time ago. A good documenterary: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3533643957232437789&q=jbs+behin...

By the way, I launched a new site, www.Utah911truth.com this week

VIDEO: Metal of Honor ironworkers on WTC anomalies...

Excellent 4 minutes of clips from the Spike TV video of 9/5/06: http://prisonplanet.com/articles/October2006/171006_b_anomalies.htm

More 9/11 stickers on-point like these, please!

That is great!!


That is great!!

Ya think the paper guy is going to stop to try to pull that thing off? hell no...

A little trick I learned is to make some "X"s on the sticker before you take off the backing, that way if someone tries to take it off it will rip...


Where can I get a ton of these stickers????

Seriously, if all the

Seriously, if all the movement did was plaster the entire country with those stickers, we'd have won by now...

those stickers are from


Now you've done it,

Looks like I'm going to be a bad girl...

Isn't That Vandalism?

The only thing this will accomplish is society loathing you "Truth Seekers" even more than they already do now.

Was Poor Richard's Almanac vandalism?

The effect that this Ben Franklin publication was immeasurable during the first American Revolution. Outlawed by King George, none the less it was plastered where ever a spot to hold it could be found. Vandalism laws are the least of my worry. I will plaster these stickers around the world if I have to.

You Creep

People have lost loved ones, children now without mothers and fathers, and now mothers and fathers without children. Countless freinds have mourned the loss of these victims of mass murder. These are the people you loath and claim the rest of the world feels as you do. You're not only a creep, you're actually demented. We have experienced for the overwhelming part nothing but support in the pursuit of truth and our demand for justice. This is America and not some rinky-dink nation run by crooked law. Here, ignorance does not take the lead. Would you stand by and do nothing if it were your loved ones murdered on 911 and you discovered that there will be no real investigation into their deaths? You'd probably sit on your ass and watch a some crappy re-runs on television.

huge list of media contacts to email...


911dvds@gmail.com - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

list still has Peter

list still has Peter Jennings on there...

nothing's perfect

911dvds@gmail.com - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

Have anyone thought of

Have anyone thought of sending a 9/11 truth DVD through mail to every household in US?
If enough people participate and organize correctly, it might work.

to every household sounds

to every household sounds like quite a mission. But, how about a donation system, where we can donate money that will be used to finance free 911-press for truth dvd's for others. Has somethin like this been done before?

Or how about taking a trip

Or how about taking a trip through your local area and drop one in every mailbox? Just write "DVD" or something on them. Some will like it, others will be pissed, but at least it will be noticed.

some people already doing this

While giving out DVDs in the street I've had people ask me if I was the one who put a DVD in their mailbox. Nope, but obviously we are a growing band of patriots!


Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force


How about making 9/11 truth

How about making 9/11 truth DVDs and then donating them to charity shops/goodwill stores? As long as you make the packaging professional I'm sure they would sell them. That would be a great way to get them out to people.

We need a section on this

We need a section on this site where people who could give their creative ideas on how we can spread the truth everywhere. I realize that we talk a lot about the problem we are facing, but not enough of what we can do to fight these problems. Some people feel powerless and don't know how to help, I think if we have a section here that dedicate on ideas that would be great. What you guys think?

If I Caught Someone Putting a Loose Change DVD in My Mailbox

I'd grab them and call the police.

Keep the hell away from my mail, truthies.

If I found loose change in my mailbox

I would laugh aloud and say: You punks! -How can two kids from the city make such huge inroads in the film industry, with so little down? Even the title sucks, much to it's credit, but hey, that's entertainment.

Remember when you first heard, that:

"They were giving away loose change at ground zero?"

Awesome concept. Try that at work, anon.

How about

if we put it on your doorstep instead? And since I like you, I'd give you 911 Mysteries: Demolition!


I have thought of this. I'm still waiting on the DVD's I ordered, but I thought about doing this. Why not?

Pre 911 Speech (9/10/2001)

Pre 911 Speech (9/10/2001)

The topic today is an adversary that poses a threat, a serious threat, to the security of the United States of America. This adversary is one of the world's last bastions of central planning. It governs by dictating five-year plans. From a single capital, it attempts to impose its demands across time zones, continents, oceans and beyond. With brutal consistency, it stifles free thought and crushes new ideas.

Perhaps this adversary sounds like the former Soviet Union, but that enemy is gone: our foes are more subtle and implacable today.

The adversary's closer to home. It's the Pentagon bureaucracy.

Just as we must transform America's military capability to meet changing threats, we must transform the way the Department works and what it works on.

Let's make no mistake: The modernization of the Department of Defense is a matter of some urgency. In fact, it could be said that it's a matter of life and death, ultimately, every American's.

That's why we're here today challenging us all to wage an all-out campaign to shift Pentagon's resources from bureaucracy to the battlefield...

We know the adversary. We know the threat. And with the same firmness of purpose that any effort against a determined adversary demands, we must get at it and stay at it.

Some might ask, how in the world could the Secretary of Defense attack the Pentagon in front of its people? To them I reply, I have no desire to attack the Pentagon; I want to liberate it. We need to save it from itself.

Above all, the shift from bureaucracy to the battlefield is a matter of national security.

Business enterprises die if they fail to adapt, and the fact that they can fail and die is what provides the incentive to survive. But governments can't die, so we need to find other incentives for bureaucracy to adapt and improve.

Today's announcements are only the first of many. We will launch others ourselves, and we will ask Congress for legislative help as well.

...this effort demands personal and sustained attention at the highest levels ...leaders are experienced, talented, and determined. I am delighted they are on our team. I would not want to try to stop them from what they came into this Department to do. I expect them to be enormously successful...

To transform the Department, we must look outside this building as well.

Let me conclude with this note. Some may ask, defensively so, will this war on bureaucracy succeed where others have failed? To that I offer three replies. First is ...Change is hard. It's hard for some to bear, and it's hard for all of us to achieve.

...there will be real consequences from, and real resistance to, fundamental change. We have brought people on board who have driven similar change in the private sector. We intend to do so here.

...this effort will succeed because it must. We really have no choice. ...And let there be no mistake, it is a matter of life and death. So today we declare war on bureaucracy...

...there are those who will oppose our every effort ...Well, fine, if there's to be a struggle, so be it. ...if you do something, somebody's not going to like it, so be it. Our assignment is not to try to please everybody. A cab driver in New York City ought to be able to feel...

I have confidence that we can do it. It's going to be hard. There will be rough times. But it's also the best part of life to be engaged in doing something worthwhile.

Every person within earshot wants to be a part... I know it. You know it. Let's get about it.

Remarks as Delivered by Donald H. Rumsfeld, The Pentagon, Monday, September 10, 2001

Donald H. Rumsfeld's Pre 911 Speech

The next morning, September 11, 2001, The Pentagon as well as the WTC Towers in NYC came under attack.


Allow a person to speak -- and listen carefully, they will tip their hand.

great find

this is almost too good to be true:

"Some might ask, how in the world could the Secretary of Defense attack the Pentagon in front of its people? To them I reply, I have no desire to attack the Pentagon; I want to liberate it. We need to save it from itself."

- and he's using the word "liberate"...

The whole thing of "Bush in office before 9/11" has been exceedingly ignored by many. The more one looks at it, the more of a foul tomato he turns out to have been before it. In 2000 Bush promised to give "the country a fresh start" - what absolute bulls***** this guy told is amazing.

Ice-cold chilling effect of the Mil. Comm. Act of 2006 - NOW LAW

With the Mil. Comm. Act of 2006 now law, the media WILL NOT do anything to give credence or open time to the Demand for 9/11 Truth movement. Do you really think journalists and their employer corporations are going to be tempting the Administration to come knocking on their doors?

The possible scenario and message from the Administration:

You will either shut your mouth about questioning what we've told you about 9/11 OR you will be arrested, detained, and tried without habeas corpous because you are acting in ways becoming of an "unlawful enemy combatant". You are NOT protecting America. You are hereby notified that you are aiding and abetting the terrorists and interfering with the objectives of the U.S. global War on Terror. Cease and desist.

Do you really think people in the traditional media are going to risk arrest and indefinite detainment? I don't think so.

I'd almost be tempted to

I'd almost be tempted to send the local rag something that said just that, as official looking as possible, just to make them publicly take a stand when they found out it was fake.

But I'm too busy to get that cute; stickering news-stands is all I've time for.

That's a fantastic idea! If

That's a fantastic idea! If I was in the US I would do it myself! Either about 9/11 or about some other subject.

Send one to everyone, even FOX. Make sure they can't backtrack it though.

FOX would never buy that....

FOX would never buy that.... they get all their info from the government via the "Direct Line"...

I think they have one of those red phones with the big blinking light

red phones with the big blinking light


My earliest telly memories are Adam West's "BATMAN". Maybe that's why I'm using a super-hero's name to sign off. I clearly have issues.

Actually, I was thinking more of starting at the local level, with your crypto-fascisct daily and maybe working up through radio and TV. Sort of a grass roots approach. But hey, whatever you can get away with, eh?

The media weren't covering it before...

If they don't cover it after this, it won't be because they're intimidated, it will be because they STILL don't WANT to cover it. This will just serve as a better excuse than "well, we like the status quo so why print anything that challenges it."

I call BULL!


Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force


the media's problem with 9/11 truth

It very much seems to me that some in the media just don't know how to "handle" the whole matter with 9/11 truth. There are some that are ready to give it airtime, e.g. CNN with the coming out of Charlie Sheen, to make a "special" about it, titled "conspiracy theory", but "what then" ? Then the show is over and they return to their business as usual. It's for some part then not their fault that "nothing happens" with it, because we all know that the Bush admin. has established many political and psychological "roadblocks" to make sure nobody questions them too much. They've done that among others by declaring the "state of war" after 9/11, causing a sort of "soft" martial law, with military law "only for terrorists", but then vaguely defining terrorists (according to the new bill) as as anyone the president declares to be one.

I'd highly recommend for those not familiar with it yet to research Watergate, because it gives many answers to what should long have happened:
"…our long national nightmare is over. Our Constitution works. Our great republic is a government of laws and not of men. Here, the people rule." U.S. president Ford on August 9, 1974

They've taken the cover up

They've taken the cover up to far, The 9/11 comission report was such a cover up there smply has to be a fresh new independant, the commission was such a sloppy job it has to be re-opened, it's raised more questions thats it's answered.

RE-OPEN 9/11- But this time don't have Condi friend and the Bush admins man on the inside Phillip Zelikow as executive director.

the questions put to the

the questions put to the commission by the Jersey girls were brilliant, they had really done their homework, asking the questions that can only mean it was an inside job/inside help. The commission then used the well known fraud of "filling in the blanks" with 'something', only this 'something' is far from what can be called an 'answer' - but who's there to judge, so 'officially' they heroically did the job and could have their photo-op, case closed.

I want the media to detail

I want the media to detail the measures taken to cover this up by our government. There are obvious questions and even more evidence pointing towards the blatent cover-up and complete disregard for an investigation.

How much prodding did it take just to get an investigation? How long did it take? How much contradictory evidence was overlooked? How was the investigation run and who was in charge?

Maybe they could do a story about who really benefitted from 9/11? Perhaps a story about how the NeoConservative agenda has now been adopted and propelled by this administration since 9/11 as well as their beliefs prior to 9/11.

There are meny avenues that could be explored

Mainstream media

For those on this blog who might be unfamiliar with Operation Mockingbird, I recommend a Goooglefest.

This will also shine some light into the lair:

Need Sponsorship

If the 9/11 Truth Movement would like to Sponsor me in the next World Series of Poker I would guarantee that I would get on TV and I would donate whatever Winnings to Publishing our own story in the New York Times and Chicago Tribune.

Could you imagine me in a gorilla suit with a shirt on that says "9/11 TRUTH" on the front and "Wouldn't you like this MONKEY Off Your BACK?" on the back with a picture of GW

This reminds me. I know a

This reminds me. I know a lot of people focus on activism in DC, NYC or their hometowns. If anyone goes to Las Vegas, a prime spot to pass out DVDs and do 9/11 Truth activism would be on the corner outside of New York New York. There is a little September 11th memorial on the walkway in front of the Statue of Liberty there. It would be perfect to educate people. And you should be able to get away with it because there are guys passing out, erm, uh, call girl type literature all over the place.


Speaking of Las Vegas.... were the Twin Towers worked into the Collage of buildings incorporated into the New York New York Casino and Hotel?


you know what..... I don't see it.

Weird... one of the most prominent features of the New York Skyline....and very easy to represent in the collage.... but it's not there..... hmmmm

guessing this was designed and built prior to 2001

Judge allows 9/11 lawsuits

Judge allows 9/11 lawsuits to go forward.
NEW YORK - The city and its contractors are not immune from lawsuits brought by emergency workers sickened after toiling amid toxic dust at ground zero, a judge ruled, clearing the way for what he said should be the speedy resolution of thousands of claims.

Speedy trial, no media coverage, move along, nothing to see!

Isn't this the same judge who's being stovepiped every single 9/11 related case? Now why on earth would that be necessary? Afraid of too many different judges getting their hands on this material? I think maybe!


Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force



Does anyone have a list of people who believe that 9/11 was an inside job or questions the official story??

I'm looking for how many scientists or engineers are on our team... But also knowing how many other govt. officials support us is helpful too.


Here's a list:

Here's a list: http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/WhoAreWe.html

but often it seems there's too few Steven Jones -type scientists supporting the whole thing. We need more, much more. Jones has been taking all the heat for what every other scientist could have concluded aswell.






Agian with this joke,

Agian with this joke, totally irrelevant "PDB"

Don't the Jersey Girls know about controlled demolition...... by now?!!!

No offense ladies..... but I

No offense ladies..... but I know very few women who ever took interest in psysics.....

have they been made aware? do they understand enough to argue these points?

I think they are sticking to the things they know.... If this ever goes to trial or gets a new investigation.... I think this is something that can not be avoided in testimony

"No offense ladies..... but

"No offense ladies..... but I know very few women who ever took interest in psysics....."

I'm not offended, but I think you need to get out more. Or meet different women.

I was reading and enjoying "The Elegant Universe" by Brian Greene.(before I got distracted by the whole we're-loosing-our-civil-rights thing) I know many women interested directly or tangentally with physics, mathematics and earth sciences.

I think you'll find it 's cutesy, ultra-femme women you're thinking of.

As to the Jersey Girls, I think they're just sticking with a strategy that's the most accessable. Their arguments are strong and will get people interested. They'll get to CD in time; how else do you explain that micro-particulate soup at ground zero?

I am a lady

and no, I wasn't much good at physics in college, but I still "get it"

However, don't expect these women to take up 911 truth theories. Their stated goal is to get the government to do a real investigation into what happened, not hypothesize about same.

If they can accomplish the formation of a truly independent, bi-partisan (or non-partisan is better) investigation, that is good enough for me.

Judge OK's Trial?

The problem is the same today as Spitzer faced then.

Bush, et. all, have used every aspect of 9/11 to blatently shift America's agenda, literally, To attack the World! Not one thing Bush has done was actually done 'for the American people,' as he has so frequently implied.

A real Court, (such as the US Supreme Court,) with real Judges, (those having body temperatures approaching 98 degrees) would have said long ago; You can't 'hide' this information from the public. This was a civic event and Everything should be de-classified, everty tape released, etc. There are guilty parties within the Gov, or there are not, but the Buildings and especially the Pentagon tapes should have been the subject of these 'Judges,' by day 3. They know, according to their creed of office, that they are obstructing the Law!

The problem streches back to World War II, whereas the Bush Family still have the smell of gasolene on their hands. I was always taught- that War was totally unnecessary. What sort of alliance are this Bush/Blair/BinLaden?

Anyway, 'public consensus' is not the same as Law, otherwise we would all be drinking 'hemlock,' or using heroin to cure our toothaches, which is exactly what Bush is doing about our 'security.'

ironworkers speak out on WTC anomalies


"I didn't think they were gonna fall. After being there in '93 and seeing the damage that was done, at the bottom of those columns ... that was some blast! And I didn't think so at all."

"When we were putting those towers up, in our wildest dreams those towers were built not to fall."

"We saw some of the thickest steel I have ever seen, bent like a pretzel. And you just couldn't imagine the force that that took."

"I don't know if a person who has never been an ironworker could imagine, but uh ... all of this massive iron, I mean pieces that weigh 20 or 50 tons, were all mangled and just crumpled up.

"You couldn't have paid a demolition company to take'em down straighter. You know, it was amazing, didn't really damage .. if they had fallen over sideways, could you imagine the damage to Lower Manhattan."

more quotes

"As time went by you realized everything was pulverized. There were no desks, there were no phones...

"There wasn't a computer screen, a laptop, there was no office equipment.... Two 110-story buildings of office equipment.... It's just beyond comprehension."

"The grapplers were pulling stuff out, big sections of iron that were literally on fire on the other end. They would hit the air and burst into flames, which was pretty spooky too see."

"These underground fires were just... like the fires of Hell."


COMMENT: That's some of the best quotes ever, and from people you can trust, for a change.


Joseph Keith

"Every video that shows impact shows a plane flying through the tower wall the same way it flies through thin air: no cratering effect, no pushing parts of the building in, no crunching of the airframe as it hits resistance, no reaction from the heavy engines and hidden landing gear, no parts breaking off, no outer 30 feet of the wing breaking off, no bursting, shredding or bending of the wing. No nothing."



The Secret History Of 9/11


CBC (Canadian Public Television). Basically the Canaidan version of 'Path to 9/11' . Except our version actually contain truth and interviews with Richard Clark, Thomas Kean, the F16 figher pilots, and many more.

check out my list of free movies... lots of great ones here:

- http://truth911.net

Do you remember...

When John Conyers tried to get 100,000 people to sign a petition to investigate the Downing Street Minutes?

He ended up getting 1000's upon 1000's more than he needed.

Tell me Anti-War Movement... do you think this petition MIGHT just be a little more important than Rep. Conyers'?

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."


I have been a member of the "Anti-War Movement" since day 1 of the Iraq War and I'm on your side. I'm just a peon, but I'm on your side.


Please get your brethren to join us.

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

I have none!

I am a movement of one out here! I have been and remain a lone wolf. Nobody wants to get near any of this stuff. They're scared. I can't "unscare" 'em with my wit and wisdom. They don't want to be bothered. This is why I have been forced to go "underground" blogging, making donations, buying DVD's and sharing them. I have ZERO support. You can check that on my blog, ZERO, with the exception of my family.

Yours truly,
Peon Truther

PS - I didn't post this to get sympathy. I am hoping there are others out there just like me who might read this and understand that they are not alone and, hence, be a little less afraid.


Amy Goodman covered 9/11 truth on the 5th anniversary to cover her own behind: from the truth movement. Do you think she doesn't feel its heat? She's very aware that we are on her about this and that's the only reason she covered this topic last month. Her rationale was "They won't be able to touch me for awhile now". But little did she know that safety net of hers would only last a few weeks. Apparentley she thought we would decline after the 5th anniversary. LIttle did she know we aren't going anywhere. Next time we need to pressure her to have someone on (perhaps Webster Tarpley?) where he or she gets to lay out their views WITHOUT HAVING TO DEBATE anyone, especially someone as pathetic as those who speak for Popular Mechanics. Besides, it's not like they wouldn't have to debate anybody, they'd have to debate Ms. Goodman herself, who is obviously not in favor or the 9/11 truth movement, nor calling for a new investigation.

Perhaps that should be our new platform: calling on people, especially "gatekeepers" to call for another investigation, without throwing out accusations. Just letting the investigation itself do the talking. If you're innocent of any misdoing, why would you oppose another invesitagion? At very least to shut the 9/11 truth movement the fuck up once and for all, right? No matter where you stand, just call for a new investigation.


. . . wouldn't kill them to point out the fact that the 911 Commission was an abject failure. As we all know, a new petition for release of 911 documents has been started up by the Jersey Girls and last I read, it had over 2,000 sigs (I think that's right). That, I believe, is news worthy of print & broadcast.

I think Amy Goodman has been told to shut up and say as little as possible about this. Other progressives, like Cockburn or Matthew Rothschild, take it step further and attack the movement. But regardless of their passive or aggressive stance the fact that progressive publications and media personalities are so afraid to address this one issue (the event from which all other progressive concerns sprang forth: Iraq, erosion of habeas corpus, torture, warrantless spying, etc.) is, in itself, evidence of conspiracy afoot.

I think that's changing as the "truth" seeps into the American consciousness. I see it as a sort of "osmosis" by YouTube type of thing.

PS - With regard to your ending statement, I concur completely - again, press for a new investigation - that should be the first order of the day for 911 truth. Stop exhausting your energy debating the "no planers" (on the blogs anyway) and tell them to take it up with the new commission once it is formed.

People I don't want to be

People I don't want to be the profit of doom but I have a very strange feeling that something very big is coming soon .A change of consciousness is taking place and trust me these basterds are watching they need to tame the masses so be prepared for some more bombs going off very soon ...

that would be the economic

that would be the economic meltdown...

Word to the wise, get rid of all your debt!  Do not use your credit cards this holiday season at ALL. 

Thanks Janice...


Much love...

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

As I was saying...



"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."