Notice in this video, at around 13:50 the camera is showing the inside of one of the indentations supoposedly made by the wings as the plane crashed into the ground. Yet you can clearly see at 13:50 that THERE IS GRASS GROWING INSIDE THE INDENTED PIECE OF LAND. LOL. Really, how stupid do they think we are? Oh... I know, it's magic grass, like the grass from the Amazing Pentalawn (TM)! Why doesn't anyone ever talk about this?

The reasons the mainstream media are loath to report any 9/11 truth are:
1. They were force-fed the “official story” by the gov’t starting from 9/11/01 onward, so for any news outlets to buck the “official version” would bring them all sorts of troubles and scorn.
2. Loads of key witnesses are under gag orders, effectively rendering them useless to reportors & the truth movement.
3. Many gov’t moles were put into high places throughout all media long before 9/11.
Most media is owned by ultra-wealthy corporations or individuals who don't want 9/11 truth to be revealed.

This video leaves out WTC-7, of all things!

Why do most truth videos have someone (who really looks like he or she should now better) playing devi's advocate against the truther? (In this video, the smart, older gray-haired guy should see for himself that his points are feeble compaired to the young truther's)

Is it just me, or does he look frustrated and ashamed during this piece? IMO there are moments when he appears as if holding back a Tourette's-esque episode... stopping himself blurting out what he really believes.

His claim... that his paper is too small for such a BIG issue sounds like him parroting someone else’s words. Referencing of the New York Times (like they could or would do anything about 9/11) is disingenuous. It must be evident that all U.S. MSM news outlets are compromised… That they can't report freely any longer (if ever they were able). Not just about 9/11… but anything the Bush administration deems as compromising.

NOTE: U.S. now ranked 53rd in World re: the Press Freedom Index according to Reporters Without Borders: http://www.rsf.org/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=639

If every small media outlet in Europe began to cover 9/11 truth the New York Times & other majors would have to follow suit. Quite frankly, exposing the nakedness of the emperor in this manner is likely the only way the lies of 9/11 will be exposed.

I have to wonder at what point the Dutch, Swedes or Canadians, or whomever will allow themselves to recognize that what the U.S. does on the World stage effects them all - at home?

I am reminded of the initial reactions to AIDS. Most people didn’t want to think about, let alone discuss the disease. But eventually the world community recognized it for the serious and devastating disease it is. We don't pretend the disease does not exist. We promote awareness, education & research. Why…? Because anyone or his or her family member can be afflicted… it is VERY personal. 9/11 on the other hand is seen as an American problem... and… in the past.

Folks don't connect the dots... the wars... the thousands of dead, the torture & imprisonment of innocents... losses of basic freedoms & liberties... They wait for these to effect them personally before they can give them the same respect or fear they have for Cancer or AIDS.

At what point will people expend the energy to question, to learn, and ultimately summon the courage to recognize the lies?

This is a bit late as this interview was broadcasted in the week before or on 11 september 2006..

I felt free to sent Mr. Broertjes from Volkskrant a mail:

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/October2006/301006_b_Dutch.htm

Ze rangschikken de feiten rond ee hypothese, die mij niet
bevalt.

Frei übersetzt:

Man sucht sich Tatsachen für eine Hypothese, die mir nicht gefällt.

...ze gaan ervan uit dat het op een bepaalde manier
gebeurt moet zijn en daar zoeken ze dan de feiten bij.

Frei übersetzt:

Man geht mit einer schon vorgefassten Meinung an die Sache ran und sucht sich nur Fakten, die dazu passen.

[IMG]http://www.volkskrantblog.nl/pub/mm/tempest/4786/Image/Broertjes.jpg[/IMG]

Pieter Broertjes, Chef-Redakteur Volkskrant auf TweeVandaag, 1.9.2006
http://www.gatago.com/nl/politiek/29811022.html

Lieber Pieter Broertjes, diese beiden Sätze zeigen doch eindeutig, wer eine vorgefasste Meinung hat,
zu der er keine anderen Fakten in Betracht zieht. Ihnen gefällt es nicht, dass der 11.9.2001 möglicherweise ein „Inside Job“ war, und deshalb werfen sie den „Verschwörungstheoretikern“ mittels Projektion vor, dass diese erst eine vorgefasste Meinung hätten und dann die Fakten dazu „passend“ zusammenzusuchen. So wie Sie es mit dem offiziellen Mythos tun. Wenn Sie schon mal mit einem „Verschwörungstheoretiker“ gesprochen hätten, wüssten Sie, nichts könnte mehr von der Wahrheit entfernt sein. Es ist genau andersrum: Weil eben so viele Fakten der offiziellen Version, an die auch sie wie einen Mythos glauben, schlichtweg unstimmig und zumeist gelogen sind, kann man zu keinem anderen Schluß kommen, als das der 11.9.2001 ein gewolltes, konstruiertes, inszeniertes neues Pearl Harbor war, welches aus bestimmten Kreisen der USA gedeckt / unterstützt / ausgeführt wurde.