911Truth-Tucson Polls Congressional Candidates Regarding 9/11

Four U.S. Congressional Candidates from Arizona Support a Truly Independent Reinvestigation of All 9/11 Evidence and Events - Press Release (PDF attached to this post)

Tucson, AZ, Oct. 22, 2006 - Statewide results of the 2006 Congressional Candidate 9/11 Truth Poll are in. The survey was conducted by 911Truth-Tucson by mailing questionnaires to the winners of the recent Arizona primary races for US House and Senate in all Arizona congressional districts. The surveys were provided by 911Truth.org -- a leading national 9/11 Truth group. The survey asked candidates for their opinions regarding the attacks of September 11 and the official investigations that followed.

Five candidates responded to the poll:

Richard Mack Senate Libertarian
Mark Yannone CD3 Libertarian
Don Karg CD4 Republican
Warren Severin CD5 Libertarian
David Nolan CD8 Libertarian

(more after the jump, be sure to download the original PDF attached)

Do you believe that government truth issues – ranging from 9/11, anthrax, and the Patriot Act to the Iraq war, surveillance encroachments, legislative deceptions, and other administration initiatives – may all be significantly related? (YES - Yannone, Karg, Severin, Nolan; UNCERTAIN - Mack)

If you are successful in November, would you support a truly independent victim-family supervised and subpoena-empowered re-investigation of all the 9/11 evidence and events? (YES – Mack Yannone, Severin, Nolan; NO - Karg)

Given the evidence for, and the significance of, potential government involvement, are you willing to make the demand for a new 9/11 inquiry an important issue in your campaign? (YES - Mack, Yannone, Karg; NO - Severin, Nolan)

Would you accept campaign volunteers largely motivated by our democracy's tactical and strategic need for 9/11 truth? (YES – Mack, Yannone, Nolan; NO – Karg, Severin)

Would you be willing to accept and endorse the distribution of well-documented 9/11 Truth materials in your electoral district? (YES – Yannone, Severin; NO – Mack, Karg; MAYBE - Nolan)

911Truth-Tucson is a non-profit, non-partisan association whose mission is to increase public awareness of the omissions and distortions in the official explanations of the attacks on September 11, 2001. 911Truth-Tucson advocates a criminal investigation of these attacks and the associated crimes that is consistent with all substantive evidence and the laws of physics.

More from 911truth-Tucson:

Sunday, November 12, 911Truth-Tucson presents James Fetzer, a founder of Scholars for 911 Truth and Dustin Mugford, creator of September 11 Revisited at the Rialto Theatre. Tickets available at the Rialto, Antigone Books, and Bookmans. (details)

Big thanks to Bob for the heads up!

AttachmentSize
Press Release re 9-11 AZ political poll 061030.pdf19.25 KB

Tucson, not Tuscon

A quick fix in the title of this article.

Should also mention that Fetzer will be in Tucson on Nov 12.

got it..

got it..

i'll add the event to the calendar as well.. in the future you can add these yourself by logging in and creating a new event.
EDIT: nevermind, see it was already there.

thanks!

paranoia? lol

No

I just had to crack up to the way this has been edited:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8wsRK9G5IQ

Malloy is back on...now

These two answers crack me up

If you are successful in November, would you support a truly independent victim-family supervised and subpoena-empowered re-investigation of all the 9/11 evidence and events? (YES – Mack Yannone, Severin, Nolan; NO - Karg)

Given the evidence for, and the significance of, potential government involvement, are you willing to make the demand for a new 9/11 inquiry an important issue in your campaign? (YES - Mack, Yannone, Karg; NO - Severin, Nolan)

 

So, he's willing to make a demand for an inquiry in his election campaign, but unwilling to act upon it if elected... Fuckin' politicians.

that's not surprising from a

that's not surprising from a Repulican.. screw him..

Maybe he does support an

Maybe he does support an investigation by not a "victim-family-supervised" investigation but rather by a third party . Those questions are very hard to answer because if you say no to just one point you have to say no to all the question.

Where is the pdf?

Why only Arizona?

Why have these questions not been asked of candidates in other states. Only a week before the elections. I know Susan Davis, Democrat San Diego. Will not take a position on the issue of a new investigation.

Are WE not part of the conspiracy?

maybe the same people that plotted the 911 events also plotted the 911 truth movement

maybe things are not as black and white as they seem

You've been watching too

You've been watching too much South Park.

Obviously the conspirators wanted an in on the ground floor

Of the truth movement--how else would they plant the seeds of its demise? I mean, that was their plan anyway, and I think everyone has their suspicions, but it's irrelevant and even harmful to dwell on that--just focus on the issues and don't let anyone try to throw their weight around to try to influence other truthers. Focus on facts, not personalities, and the infiltrators are neutralized and make themselves pretty obvious to boot. The no-planers may seem like the most likely candidates and may well be, but no conspirators worth their salt would pin their hopes on them. More likely is that the no-planers are the straw men for the real infiltrators to knock about in order to achieve credibility without discussing real issues. Each and every truther has to take it upon themselves to winnow out the WHOLE truth and make sure it sees the light of day, while at the same time not allowing things to devolve into sectarian bickering. This is best done by always being polite even when disagreeing on topics of real importance. Let the facts speak for themselves--don't be baited into ugly confrontations, etc. Constantly ask yourself--What would David Ray Griffin say/do? :)

____

Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force

 

Wow!

*Five* candidates responded? Big deal! Five out of how many?

RSS