Recent Headlines

Carlyle, Kissinger, SAIC and Halliburton: A 9/11 Convergence
Investigate Waste, Fraud & Abuse at NIST
Entire February 2010 Issue of the American Behavioral Scientist Devoted to State Crimes Against Democracy: The Case of 9/11/2001
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Taboo News and Corporate Media by Peter Phillips
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for U.S. until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

WTC Collapse Video

Here is some collapse footage shown by the BBC in a programme ‘9/11:The Twin Towers’, broadcast in the UK on 7 September 2006. I hadn't seen it before, so thought I'd post it in case others hadn't seen it as well. Notice how the second building flares up during the collapse of the first building:

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-5860825099435530591&q=9

flare up in other building

that's really something sbg. the 'first' tower (WTC2) collapsed only twenty minutes before WTC1. That flash in WTC1 could be plausibly the beginning of the end of the second collapse?

Or more likely...

it's the rush of oxygen rich air being pushed/forced out by the explosions occuring in WTC2. The air acts as fuel for the fire in WTC1, causing it to flare up.

Just my hypothesis.

rush of oxygen

Chris, why are there explosions in WTC2? are they the natural consequence of a plane hitting the building?

Did WTC7 collapse because of explosions from air pulled in from a block and a half away?

in my opinion it reminds me

in my opinion it reminds me of when you force air into a dying campfire...there was obviously an overwhelming force of air rushing all about the collapse which can "breath life" back into a seemingly dead fire remnant.

Just for your

Just for your information:

Air is mostly nitrogen, and about a quarter oxygen or so. For the purposes of describing a combustion reaction you'd describe it as (O2 + 3.76N2) ...

That's for all you nerds :P

Imagine no more of your nonsense

http://richarddawkins.net/images/RDFflyerIMAGINE_V3.jpg

?

?

It's very quick stuff. I

It's very quick stuff. I don't know what to make of it. The oxygen hypotheses doesn't work for me. However, the autofocus hypothesis does. The red fire comes into view right as the cameras brain brings the details of the entire scene into view. There is footage of the second plane hitting the south tower that suggests they waited to detonate the charges in the north tower until the moment the second plane hit, so in a slight of hand sense, this might be the way they were thinking. I don't know. The cumulative evidence however, suggests, huge cover up. Inside job.

I have seen this video

I have seen this video before but this has been altered.  The Color on this version is enhanced/altered.  I don't have the version i have seen before handy, but I am sure someone else can look at them side be side and verify the color in the older version is washed out a great deal.

 Chain of custody?

old video, altered audio

View the original here: http://www.terrorize.dk/911/wtc2dem12/911.wtc.2.demolition.south.below.mpg

The audio has clearly been replaced with a recording from a conventional demolition.

chain of custody? is RIGHT!

But it also begs the question, which (if either) is the original?

If the clip with the claimed altered sound is from the BBC, I'm left to wonder what overdubbing a CD sequence would do for them? How could it possibly help the official story?

Do we know who shot this video? Although not a guarantee of honesty, they ought to know what it sounded like!

You can cleary see squibs at least 40 floors below collapse

In the quicktime you posted.

You can cleary see squibs at least 40 floors below collapse

In the quicktime you posted.

thanks for the

thanks for the post...anyone notice the immense amount of white smoke at the BASE of the tower prior to collapse (almost at the point where the camerman runs away...)

good stuff..

archive.org link

http://web.archive.org/web/20060514064612/http://www.terrorize.dk/911/wtc2dem12/911.wtc.2.demolition.south.below.mpg

Anyone know the ORIGINAL source?

Jumbo Jets Can Not Demolish Skyscrapers.

Plausible but...

It seems possible and maybe even probable that the perpetrators of the WTC demolitions would attempt to disguise the explosions of cutting charges (in the North tower)... by using the collapse of the South tower to distract. Illusionists practice this all the time.

It is also probable that we're seeing in the video is an oxygen-starved fire being affected by the South tower's collapse.

The cascading wave of detonations traveling top down would have created HUGE positive pressure pulses... Each explosion would have sent a wave of rapidly expanding air outward in all directions – away from the explosion. This rush of air past the North tower would have fed the fire oxygen, causing a short-lived flare up.

What's of most interest to me during this clip is the sound... it oscillates in time with the formation of the dust clouds. There is a very distinctive segmented percussive roll...

I can now say that I understand EXACTLY what the firefighters in the Naudet film were describing.

I watched the clip 3 times just now, paying specific attention to the top right portion of the building, and just below the collapse zone dust.

This is powerful stuff. I hope the video & audio was not compromised in any way.

Prior to this clip Rick Siegel's film was the only video in which I heard distinct explosions. Now I have another.

This brings up the recurring question:
WTF happened to the sound in all of the MSM news feeds?

Faked Sound

Well, no I'd have to disagree.

I'll state openly that I *do* think that that the towers were brought down by controlled demoltiion. Yet this video is utterly useless as evidence because it has clearly been tampered with.

Firstly the sound. I too have seen the original of this, and it does *not* have the sound sequence we are hearing here. Secondly, this is proved precisely by your own observation that the sound oscilates in time with the dust clouds. Science tells you that sound has to travel from the collapsing tower to the camera... and consequently what we are hearing *cannot* be genuine.

As far as the visual evidence, well that is at best inconlusive. That *could* be what you think it is, but equally well one might argue for it just being an oxygen-starved fire being affected by the wave of air and pressure from the neighbouring tower. Witnesses in the tower, as I recall, told that the effects of this first collapse were not insubstantial where they were in Tower 1.

So this clip, I'm sorry to say, is utterly usesless from a 911 Truth point of view. It is compromised and inconclusive as proof.

I completely agree with you.

I completely agree with you. Might possibly be another "false bait" for the truth movement.

It's the Kansas City Shuffle.........

Everybody looks left.... You go right....

/////////////////////
911dvds@gmail.com - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

110 stories collapsing in about 10 seconds = 11 stories per

second!!!

As we see the buildings fall at a rather uniform rate of speed, what could be causing 11 stories to collapse per second???

(Put another way, each story was about 12.4 feet tall x 11 stories = 136.4 feet per second of building gone!)

Quarter Mile = 1320 Feet

source : http://www.web-cars.com/math/qtr_mile.html

Car weight: 2000 lbs.
Horsepower: 500 hp
Configuration: Front Wheel Drive

Results

Quarter Mile Acceleration: 10.130 seconds.
Terminal speed: 147.4317 mph.

 

We are talking about acceleration due to gravity here, not of

combustion engines of cars.

There was little or no exceleration due to gravity demonstrated during the fall of the towers! This is impossible if the towers had collapsed according to the "official story."

Dr. Steven Jones is absolutely correct. The towers did not fall in a gravitational collapse alone. They were brought down with incendiaries & explosives!

sorry: "acceleration" due to gravity

"acceleration"

Fall Time in Car Terms

The is a simple illustration of why the collapse times can be used to pry open peoples minds to the absurdity that is the OCT:

Quarter mile = 1320 feet

WTC1 = 1368 feet

WTC2 = 1362 feet

According to the OCT the top floor of each tower fell THROUGH hundreds of feet of Structural steel and concrete faster than ->

Immediately the muted idling rumble from the V-12 opens up fully and emits a snarl that grows to a higher-pitched thumping note. The prancing horse gulps in as much air as possible and turns all those air molecules into 650 bhp and 485 lb.-ft. of torque. The rear tires spin momentarily, and fight to bite into the asphalt. Easy and smooth on the throttle here because too much wheelspin slows the car down and loses precious time on the clock. Just before the first shift at 44 mph, get to full throttle. In Race Mode, the F1 transmission will swap gears in as little as 150 milliseconds.

Zero to 60 mph: 3.3 seconds.

Quarter-mile run: 11.1 sec. at 133.0 mph.

Unbelievable.

The Enzo has just recorded the best Road & Track acceleration run ever for a road car. Its 0-60-mph run equals the fastest time logged just a month ago by the all-American Saleen S7. And its quarter-mile time and speed pulverize the mighty McLaren F1's numbers of 11.6 sec. traveling at a mere 125 mph past the quarter-mile mark. Wow!

source : http://www.roadandtrack.com/article.asp?section_id=3&article_id=627&page_number=5 

What happened to acceleration due to gravity? Why did the

towers fall at a relatively constant velocity? They should've started very slowly & accelerated greatly near the end?

All sorts of elementary physics were violated in the "official story."

The pancake collapse, in

The pancake collapse, in addition to requiring over 30 seconds to occur, also leaves the core columns standing.

I think 10 seconds is too short

It took a few seconds longer than that:

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/timeline/videos.html

The 'squibs' as ever are

The 'squibs' as ever are interesting. The first one blows out way below the point of collapse.

The second much higher up.

And as that one blasts a third larger but more of a smokecloud than a squib appears on the skydeck.

Also...

The Google video clip has obviously been filmed by someone point a camera at their TV. The pictures cropped and the sound may have been redubbed to hide background chatter picked up by the camera.

911: who dunnit?

http://www.wingtv.net/911evil.html

What does Thorn's book do that all the other voluminous examinations of 9/11 don't do?

It points the finger squarely at the Mossad, at Israel, and Jews in general. The crime of the century has many co-conspirators. - John Kaminski

[Well, I would DISAGREE with Kaminski about "Jews in general" since a majority of Jewish Americans do not support the Israel Lobby. Presumably, they do not support the Mossad. Otherwise, worth considering. Concrete man]