WTC Collapse Video
Here is some collapse footage shown by the BBC in a programme ‘9/11:The Twin Towers’, broadcast in the UK on 7 September 2006. I hadn't seen it before, so thought I'd post it in case others hadn't seen it as well. Notice how the second building flares up during the collapse of the first building:
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-5860825099435530591&q=9
- Login to post comments











flare up in other building
that's really something sbg. the 'first' tower (WTC2) collapsed only twenty minutes before WTC1. That flash in WTC1 could be plausibly the beginning of the end of the second collapse?
Or more likely...
it's the rush of oxygen rich air being pushed/forced out by the explosions occuring in WTC2. The air acts as fuel for the fire in WTC1, causing it to flare up.
Just my hypothesis.
rush of oxygen
Chris, why are there explosions in WTC2? are they the natural consequence of a plane hitting the building?
Did WTC7 collapse because of explosions from air pulled in from a block and a half away?
in my opinion it reminds me
in my opinion it reminds me of when you force air into a dying campfire...there was obviously an overwhelming force of air rushing all about the collapse which can "breath life" back into a seemingly dead fire remnant.
Just for your
Just for your information:
Air is mostly nitrogen, and about a quarter oxygen or so. For the purposes of describing a combustion reaction you'd describe it as (O2 + 3.76N2) ...
That's for all you nerds :P
Imagine no more of your nonsense
http://richarddawkins.net/images/RDFflyerIMAGINE_V3.jpg
?
?
It's very quick stuff. I
It's very quick stuff. I don't know what to make of it. The oxygen hypotheses doesn't work for me. However, the autofocus hypothesis does. The red fire comes into view right as the cameras brain brings the details of the entire scene into view. There is footage of the second plane hitting the south tower that suggests they waited to detonate the charges in the north tower until the moment the second plane hit, so in a slight of hand sense, this might be the way they were thinking. I don't know. The cumulative evidence however, suggests, huge cover up. Inside job.
I have seen this video
I have seen this video before but this has been altered. The Color on this version is enhanced/altered. I don't have the version i have seen before handy, but I am sure someone else can look at them side be side and verify the color in the older version is washed out a great deal.
Chain of custody?
old video, altered audio
View the original here: http://www.terrorize.dk/911/wtc2dem12/911.wtc.2.demolition.south.below.mpg
The audio has clearly been replaced with a recording from a conventional demolition.
chain of custody? is RIGHT!
But it also begs the question, which (if either) is the original?
If the clip with the claimed altered sound is from the BBC, I'm left to wonder what overdubbing a CD sequence would do for them? How could it possibly help the official story?
Do we know who shot this video? Although not a guarantee of honesty, they ought to know what it sounded like!
You can cleary see squibs at least 40 floors below collapse
In the quicktime you posted.
You can cleary see squibs at least 40 floors below collapse
In the quicktime you posted.
thanks for the
thanks for the post...anyone notice the immense amount of white smoke at the BASE of the tower prior to collapse (almost at the point where the camerman runs away...)
good stuff..
archive.org link
http://web.archive.org/web/20060514064612/http://www.terrorize.dk/911/wtc2dem12/911.wtc.2.demolition.south.below.mpg
Anyone know the ORIGINAL source?
Jumbo Jets Can Not Demolish Skyscrapers.
Plausible but...
It seems possible and maybe even probable that the perpetrators of the WTC demolitions would attempt to disguise the explosions of cutting charges (in the North tower)... by using the collapse of the South tower to distract. Illusionists practice this all the time.
It is also probable that we're seeing in the video is an oxygen-starved fire being affected by the South tower's collapse.
The cascading wave of detonations traveling top down would have created HUGE positive pressure pulses... Each explosion would have sent a wave of rapidly expanding air outward in all directions – away from the explosion. This rush of air past the North tower would have fed the fire oxygen, causing a short-lived flare up.
What's of most interest to me during this clip is the sound... it oscillates in time with the formation of the dust clouds. There is a very distinctive segmented percussive roll...
I can now say that I understand EXACTLY what the firefighters in the Naudet film were describing.
I watched the clip 3 times just now, paying specific attention to the top right portion of the building, and just below the collapse zone dust.
This is powerful stuff. I hope the video & audio was not compromised in any way.
Prior to this clip Rick Siegel's film was the only video in which I heard distinct explosions. Now I have another.
This brings up the recurring question:
WTF happened to the sound in all of the MSM news feeds?
Faked Sound
Well, no I'd have to disagree.
I'll state openly that I *do* think that that the towers were brought down by controlled demoltiion. Yet this video is utterly useless as evidence because it has clearly been tampered with.
Firstly the sound. I too have seen the original of this, and it does *not* have the sound sequence we are hearing here. Secondly, this is proved precisely by your own observation that the sound oscilates in time with the dust clouds. Science tells you that sound has to travel from the collapsing tower to the camera... and consequently what we are hearing *cannot* be genuine.
As far as the visual evidence, well that is at best inconlusive. That *could* be what you think it is, but equally well one might argue for it just being an oxygen-starved fire being affected by the wave of air and pressure from the neighbouring tower. Witnesses in the tower, as I recall, told that the effects of this first collapse were not insubstantial where they were in Tower 1.
So this clip, I'm sorry to say, is utterly usesless from a 911 Truth point of view. It is compromised and inconclusive as proof.
I completely agree with you.
I completely agree with you. Might possibly be another "false bait" for the truth movement.
It's the Kansas City Shuffle.........
Everybody looks left.... You go right....
/////////////////////
911dvds@gmail.com - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info
110 stories collapsing in about 10 seconds = 11 stories per
second!!!
As we see the buildings fall at a rather uniform rate of speed, what could be causing 11 stories to collapse per second???
(Put another way, each story was about 12.4 feet tall x 11 stories = 136.4 feet per second of building gone!)
Quarter Mile = 1320 Feet
source : http://www.web-cars.com/math/qtr_mile.html
Results
We are talking about acceleration due to gravity here, not of
combustion engines of cars.
There was little or no exceleration due to gravity demonstrated during the fall of the towers! This is impossible if the towers had collapsed according to the "official story."
Dr. Steven Jones is absolutely correct. The towers did not fall in a gravitational collapse alone. They were brought down with incendiaries & explosives!
sorry: "acceleration" due to gravity
"acceleration"
Fall Time in Car Terms
The is a simple illustration of why the collapse times can be used to pry open peoples minds to the absurdity that is the OCT:
Quarter mile = 1320 feet
WTC1 = 1368 feet
WTC2 = 1362 feet
According to the OCT the top floor of each tower fell THROUGH hundreds of feet of Structural steel and concrete faster than ->
What happened to acceleration due to gravity? Why did the
towers fall at a relatively constant velocity? They should've started very slowly & accelerated greatly near the end?
All sorts of elementary physics were violated in the "official story."
The pancake collapse, in
The pancake collapse, in addition to requiring over 30 seconds to occur, also leaves the core columns standing.
I think 10 seconds is too short
It took a few seconds longer than that:
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/timeline/videos.html
The 'squibs' as ever are
The 'squibs' as ever are interesting. The first one blows out way below the point of collapse.
The second much higher up.
And as that one blasts a third larger but more of a smokecloud than a squib appears on the skydeck.
Also...
The Google video clip has obviously been filmed by someone point a camera at their TV. The pictures cropped and the sound may have been redubbed to hide background chatter picked up by the camera.
911: who dunnit?
http://www.wingtv.net/911evil.html
What does Thorn's book do that all the other voluminous examinations of 9/11 don't do?
It points the finger squarely at the Mossad, at Israel, and Jews in general. The crime of the century has many co-conspirators. - John Kaminski
[Well, I would DISAGREE with Kaminski about "Jews in general" since a majority of Jewish Americans do not support the Israel Lobby. Presumably, they do not support the Mossad. Otherwise, worth considering. Concrete man]