The 9/11 Truth Movement. Please take note!

You can buzz this story here.

I have to say that despite all the hurdles which have tripped up various folk in the movement to uncover the real events of 9/11, we have gotten one thing right, and that is laying claim to the title "Truth Movement". This is a very effective psychological plus, and one of which Karl Rove would have been proud, that is, if he was on our side of the fence! Just a couple of short years ago, the phrase "nutty conspiracy theorists", rather than "9/11 Truther" was the operative descriptor for anyone who doubted the official version to any extent.

To many in the mainstream, that may still be true, but judging by a number of recent opinion polls, exactly what is the mainstream position of the American public on the government's 9/11 explanation? In a recent CBS poll, only 16% implicitly believed the government's story: 53% believed they are covering up something, and 28% believe they are outright lying, while 3% didn't venture an opinion. An MSNBC poll found 62% of those polled thought that the government were covering up the truth. Although not strictly a scientifically rigorous poll, the sample size was significant, with over 70,000 respondents! If the poll had been done to scientific standards, the percentage of those believing the government story may have been larger.. but it might also have been smaller.... one never knows! A recent CNN poll yielded an extraordinary result, while other polls from Zogby and Scripps have also yielded quite a zing, albeit not quite so spectacular.

The mainstream of thought regarding the validity of the government's own conspiracy theory is thus now in some considerable dispute. Just from personal experience, I talk to people from all walks of life, and from all social , cultural and economic backgrounds, and quite often the subject of 9/11 comes up. A couple of years ago, my position would have been widely regarded as "weird", but now, I find many people are at least in some degree of concurrence, and some people even go further than my current position. I am finding more and more that the people are starting to be able to reflect on that day in a more rational and dispassionate light, now that time has rendered the raw edges of shock and emotion of that awful day a little less jagged. People are beginning, en masse, to realize the impossibilities, improbabilities, absurdities and bizarreness of the Bush Administration's wacko story, and not just in America, but all over the world. Even rural English market towns have their own 9/11 Truth branches! Here is one of many examples! The more digging that people do, the more convinced they become that the basic things that they learned from the mainstream media are not only very wanting, but also plainly bogus.

We are starting to circle the wagons. But there is one thing of paramount importance for anyone in the Truth Movement to be aware of, and this is as follows:

Don't publicly theorize with insufficient knowledge. We do not know for sure, and much of the necessary evidence has either been destroyed (illegally), or is being kept secret. The only people who know exactly what went down that day are the perpetrators, and of course they are not saying anything. We may have to wait for a "deathbed confession" for a full answer, and that may never be forthcoming.

If you start hypothesizing, armed with not enough of the necessary facts and figures to put forward a scientifically rigorous and unimpeachable theory, some other party, armed with the facts that you don't have, will punch holes in your case. This flawed approach is how the "turf" problems arise: Someone's "Theory A" is seen as flawed, or incomplete, by another party, who puts out their version, "Theory B", and insodoing, attacks the other theorist by default. Then a third party "C" puts out another version, with facts that have not been taken into consideration by either "A" and "B". And so on, and so on. When one realizes that the entire 9/11 scenario is multifaceted, and this petty squabbling is embroiling so many different parties, addressing all the numerous facets of 9/11, then one can appreciate just how complex this interparty petty battling and bickering has become. Disinformation from official parties is also a large part of the equation and has been used to inflitrate all aspects of the attacks, to further muddy the waters, or even poison the well. All this serves to take energy away from the researchers in the 9/11 Truth Movement; the parties who stand to gain by this petty squabbling amongst their nemeses, are the perpetrators, who calmly sit back in their well accustomed Macchiavellian way, and say "just perfect, let them fight amongst themselves".

The only surefire way of bringing down the mass murderers of 9/11, is to ASK THE DIFFICULT QUESTIONS, and keep on asking them. Be like an angry pitbull, and grab hold of any exposed and verifiable anomaly and absurdity, or lie, or contradiction, and bite as hard as you can, and don't ever let go. We have no shortage of issues and anomalies; there are literally hundreds of them. For some people, it maybe the issue of the presidential Secret Service detail's conduct, together with that of President Bush himself, and the truly extraordinary things Bush himself has said, on the record, about that day. For others, it may be the issue of why jets were not scrambled to defend the East Coast. For others, the blatant contradictions between the NTSB's FDR data for Flight 77, and the government's story of what happened at the Pentagon may be the issue that gets them at at.

We must not try to construct a story about any aspect of the attacks, unless we have all the facts about that particular aspect of the attacks at our disposal. And those facts have to be verified, or reported by a mainstream source, or be peer reviewed, or more. Without taking out these insurances, we are doomed to potential ridicule. The opposition is not only very powerful, but they are now very frightened by recent turns of events; unlike their heady days of 4 and 5 years ago, things are not going their way, and they will seize upon anything to discredit their opponents. So, now is the time to ask the questions, and not make up stories with incomplete evidence. At some point, the pressure of conscience will get one, or more of the perps to squeal and confess. Let them tell it the way it happened, prodded by relentless questioning, rather than trying to second guess them, based on an incomplete picture.


The only surefire way of bringing down the mass murderers of 9/11, is to ASK THE DIFFICULT QUESTIONS, and keep on asking them.

I'm glad that's my thing. I'd hate to think of this intelligent blogger coming down on me. ;)

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

not bloody likely

> At some point, the pressure of conscience will get one, or more of the perps to squeal and confess.

Extemely unlikely. As in the movie "The Bourne Identity", they will be made an offer they can't refuse:

"You have two choices: you can accept this $10 million and keep quiet or...
you can watch your kids be tortured before we kill you. The choice is yours."

(Cheney is desperate for the legal torture option in order to shut people up.)

"THE DIFFICULT QUESTION" that the Senate should ..

ask Mr. Gates is, in my opinion, "Do you believe the Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001?

Just wishful thinking I guess.

Awesome documentary, But I have something to add.

I have three pictures regarding the hit of Tower 2, which i was watching and saw something weird. I thought "What the heck?" So I went back and played it slowly and captured it. I enlarged it and, surely enough I saw a BULKHEAD on the "767". I can give you guys the link to the pictures.

Regular sized:
Big sized:
Super sized:

I don't honestly think bulkheads are a standard feature of a 767. (I should know, I know a LOT about planes)
(I totally dishonour to bush)

fake photoshop photos

If you look closely enough you can see Bush is actually flying the plane!  The "terrorists" must have trained his clone too!  Who cares that the terrorists couldn’t even fly a Cessna, and that one of the flight instructors described the terrorists as “dumb and dumber!”

[Note:  sarcasm]

Agree entirely. The most

Agree entirely.

The most effective pressure is just hammering them on the inconsistancies of their own story-- a la Goyette when he asked Davin how they got the DNA evidence to ID the highjackers.

The fact that the OV has so many holes and has been alowed to slide proves people in power(with a few exceptions like Cynthia McKinney) WERE NOT asking these questions, constantly and relentlessly, until we either had answers or had enough to start criminal proceedings.

We need a new investiagtion, YESTERDAY.

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Asking questions highlights the need for new investigations

and that is exactly what we want.

Unsupported speculation with fellow truthers can be fun, but we must maintain discipline and stay on message when doing educational work with the public and politicians we need to begin lobbying immediately.

One more point: The 9/11 Truth movement's grassroots diversity is its main strength. There is no efficient or effective way to counter so many groups coming from so many places with no single leader or defined group of leaders. This is why some moles are trying to get the Truth movement to organize around a definable group or single individual.

While we do need to become more organized and begin acting in concert with each other while increasing the tempo of our activities, we should always maintain a certain level of independence and self-reliance.

We are trying to counter "terrorism" after all. Thus a limited "cell" structure can be advantageous.

We have the truth on our side, stay strong and SMILE.

I hope that you and yours are well.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

New Study Shows God Is a 9/11 Truther

War brings out thieves and peace hangs them.



Sunday, November 19, 2006
The 9/11 Truth Movement. Please take note!

....People are beginning, en masse, to realize the impossibilities, improbabilities, absurdities and bizarreness of the Bush Administration's wacko story, and not just in America, but all over the world. Even rural English market towns have their own 9/11 Truth branches!... The more digging that people do, the more convinced they become that the basic things that they learned from the mainstream media are not only very wanting, but also plainly bogus.

We are starting to circle the wagons. But there is one thing of paramount importance for anyone in the Truth Movement to be aware of, and this is as follows:....

[This story can be "buzzed" (voted for) at ]



MICAH:::....Therefore I will wail and howl, I will go stripped and naked: I will make a wailing like the dragons, and mourning as the owls.... Who hate the good, and love the evil; who pluck off their skin from off them, and their flesh from off their bones; who also eat the flesh of my people.... That they may do evil with both hands earnestly, the prince asketh, and the judge asketh for a reward; and the great man, he uttereth his mischievous desire: so they wrap it up. The best of them is as a brier: the most upright is sharper than a thorn hedge.

HABAKKUK:::....regard, and wonder marvelously: for I will work a work in your days, which ye will not believe, though it be told you.... Shall they not rise up suddenly that shall bite thee, and awake that shall vex thee?...Woe to him that buildeth a town with blood, and stablisheth a city by iniquity!...

HAGGAI:::....and he that earneth wages earneth wages to put it into a bag with holes.


Clear Evidence 2006 Congressional Elections Hacked

by Rob Kall

Results Skewed Nationwide In Favor of Republicans by 4 percent, 3 million votes

A major undercount of Democratic votes and an overcount of Republican votes in U.S. House and Senate races across the country is indicated by an analysis of national exit polling data, by the Election Defense Alliance (EDA), a national election integrity organization.

These findings have led EDA to issue an urgent call for further investigation into the 2006 election results and a moratorium on deployment of all electronic election equipment.


Enforcers or Enablers?
Will the Democrats Become Part of the Problem?

....When, and only when, the Democrats have erased the Bush administration's police state legislation from the books, thus restoring the Constitution, they should clear the air on two other issues of major importance. The Democrats must convene a commission of independent experts to investigate 9/11. The 9/11 Commission Report has too many problems and shortcomings to be believable.

Recent polls show that 36 percent of the American people do not believe the report. Such a deficient report is unacceptable. 9/11 became the excuse for the neoconservative Bush regime to launch illegal wars of aggression in the Middle East....


Dear Some Of The Above News:



It is astounding that there is a actually a debate in this country about whether the law should be enforced or not, and not just the law, but the very Constitution itself.

If you believe there should be an immediate impreachment investigation of the Bush administration then vote "Yes".

If the president and vice president are guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors they MUST be investigated and prosecuted. Forget the fact that when the Republicans took over Congress in 1994 their primary agenda
was to launch a political persecution of Bill Clinton, and they did little else for the next 6 years. This is not about vindictiveness, though that was THEIR own motivation at that time....



[Should he be tried as an adult?]


10-Year Old Disciplined for Visiting 9/11 Website

Full article here:



There is help for you!

If you are among the 16% who still believe the Neonazicons' conspiracy theory about 9/11, YOU CAN BE HELPED! Simply click on the links below to read the scientific debunking of the Bush pseudoscience fairytale about the WTC 9/11 atrocity.


BREAKING: Housewives Exonerated in 9/11 Atrocity!

Subject: Re: Are You One of The 16% Who Still Believe Bush about 9/11?
9-11 DID HAPPEN !! it was not done by disgruntled housewives-- it was done by terrorists!!
would you like to fight the terrorists on the streets of NY or the beach in Miami ?
NO-- then lets fight them on their turf !
If you email me again with your garbage, I;ll report you as spam

[Cindy Rodriguez's column below is the most truthful and objective report on 9/11 investigation that Some Of The Above News has so far seen in the mainstream media.

Read entire column:



Literary giant says 9/11 allowed to happen, slams Bush administration coup de'tat of American freedom


Oct. 26/06


It can now be reported that a Federal Grand Jury in Virginia has indicted Israeli Spymaster Meyer Dagn on four counts of espionage, bribery, murder and RICO against the United States.

Bay Point Schools, Florida, was the launching point as the cover for the election fraud testing and....


James Petras' New Book -

By Stephen Lendman(SF Indymedia)

It was the OSP's job to cook the books, come up with the idea of weapons of mass ... In addition, it's believed its agents knew in advance about the 9/11 attack but ... USA Patriot Act passed in short order right after the 9/11 attack, ...


Scientific Poll: 84% Reject Official 9/11 Story

A monumental new scientific opinion poll has emerged which declares that only 16% of people in America now believe the official government explanation of the September 11th 2001 terror attacks....


Senior Military, Intelligence, and Government Officials Question 9/11 Commission Report

Many respected senior members of the U.S. military, intelligence services, and government have expressed significant criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report. Some even allege government complicity in the terrible acts of 9/11. Below are the highly revealing statements on this vital topic of over 50 prominent public servants with links for verification and further investigation.

The collective voices of these respected senior officials give credibility to the claim that the 9/11 Commission Report is tragically flawed....
To read full article and statements of senior officials: CLICK HERE



U.S. Being Awakened from Media-induced Coma by AIR
AMERICA RADIO: Find your station HERE:


To be removed from or to subscribe to this free
Enewsletter list please email with
REMOVE or SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
And if you don't like our news go make some of your

Founder 2002: Johannieson & Friends
Editor: Myra M. Jackson

Quantum 'Birrage' Theory

Here's a typical under-utilized 'forum,' used by Boeing, GE, -all the brightest engineers around. It's the sort of 'mainstream' outlet where a little sabre-rattling could go a long way. I just posted a question the moderator will doubtless hate:

Was it "Thermite," or "Thermate" used to demo WTC 1,2?

Will someone back me with an equally offensive question for America's resident sychophants? I'm sure there are many similar places where a sudden surge of opening topics will generate some backroom chatter.

I'd also hit the forums at the AMA, Yachting, Golf Digest, Famous Dental Impressionists, -you pick one!

Buzzflash Goes Apeshit!!!

The guy who runs "Buzzflash" recently put up a page where his readers can post articles and others can rate them up or down. Almost immediately, 9/11 related stories went to the top with many more "buzzes" (votes) than any other subject by far. Now he's complaining it's a "conspiracy" to take over his site. And he's selectively deleting 9/11 Truth related stories as soon as he becomes aware of them. And, to top it all off, he's begging his readers to go to the page and vote on what's left. See this headline on the main "Buzzflash" page below from Wed. AM 11/22/06 He's been going off like this for 2 days running now...
"Cast your vote on the news of the moment at! Vote on the Stories You Like Best. Submit Them Too. ( is Still Under Attack by People Who Believe the Mossad is Responsible for 9/11 (And, In Their Minds, is Also Related to Columbine), the CIA Killed RFK and JFK, Jewish Bankers Run the World, and So On. Most of Them Follow a Strategy Laid Out by a Guy who Spams .Net with a Link to His Own Website. Their Goal is to Post Both Crackpot and Legitimate Stories (the Latter to Build up Enough Voting Power to Hijack the Content of .net.) We Will Not Let This Happen, We Can Assure You. We Know Who They Are, and We Will be Keeping Them Off the Site as Best We Can. But, Alas, You Can't Swat the Flies Fast Enough.)"
Throughout the previous day, the headlines also included a rant that the Truth movement was somehow being run by the followers of Lyndon LaRouche, but that has now dissappeared.

Show "Polls are not evidence" by Anonymous (not verified)

Polls are not evidence. BUT THEY ARE!

No not physical evidence, but they are evidence of the change of opinion of most Americans. Right after the False-Flag attacks of 911 and being told whodunnit and how maybe 2 in a hundred people doubted the "official" conspiracy theory. Now after many years many millions have seen the PHYSICAL EVIDENCE the numbers have changed. The awakening goes one way. No one who was originally skeptical of the "official" story has changed their mind. Most of those believing what they were told who look a little deeper abandon their childish beliefs and admit that they were conned.


We must be the change we wish to see in the world. M Gandhi

Careful, Joe, this is

Careful, Joe, this is "Ernie", a semi-feral troll. Engage him if you must, but dont let him wind you up and dont take him too seriously.

I'm Cool, just presenting a Logical observation..

that we can all use.

We must be the change we wish to see in the world. M Gandhi

Show "You guys are nutjobs! Polls" by Anonymous (not verified)

Evidence like the evidence for WMD?

That seemed to work for lots of people, because a case was cleverly woven with lies for them.

While we absolutely DO have evidence, and will use it to obtain indictments and further evidence in the form of testimony, we will also make our case with the people not with lies but with facts.

Whether or not anyone can be ultimately proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt is not the point--that would be just for criminal charges anyway. Civil cases will be much easier to use to suck every last penny from the perps, a la OJ.

And just like OJ, people will know who really did what, and will adjust their world view accordingly. You simplify the scope of our efforts at your risk, shill. You have NO idea what you and the perps have gotten yourselves into!

Doesn't it suck when you have no idea what's going to happen to you because your delusions about absolute power have crumbled around you? For a time I actually felt bad for some of the perps' apologists, those who were truly deceived (or so I thought), now I realize that so many people must know and just don't want it to come out. I will always be strongly in favor of peace and reconciliation, but at this point it's hardly up to people like me--the holdouts are creating a very dangerous situation for themselves and those they think they are helping.

It's going to be the sad coda to this whole tawdry affair--the innocents who will, as usual, pay the price for the wicked deeds of others.


Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero - Harvard Task Force


Show "What evidence do you have," by Anonymous (not verified)

I was a CTer for a very long time...

BS. You're a ridiculous perps shill and everyone here knows it. Stop being so dumb, it's embarassing.

Show "Go F yourself, monkey boy." by Anonymous (not verified)

so you admit you

so you admit you flip-flopped on the most important issue in recent history? what does that say about you and your mental capacity? it says your pretty goddamn weak and gullible. im surprised you had the guts to admit that though. you say we think the big bad wolf is after us right? isnt the big bad "islamic terrorism" wolf after you? dont you live in irrational fear of cave dwelling "terrorists"?

Show "I didn't flip-flop...I woke" by Anonymous (not verified)

yes, but at some point you

yes, but at some point you were a "twoofer" as you put it. that speaks volumes about how easily you are swayed and how weak-minded you must really be. to be on both sides of this issue. i cant believe you admitted to that, hahaha.

So, Anon,--(and I'm

So, Anon,--(and I'm nominating this alledgedly former truther for the next name: Snuffy? Elmo? He should be dead easy to identify by the fact he claims to be a former truther)--Tell us what prescisely a) led you to the Truth movement and b) what prescisely made you think there was nothing to it.

No vagueries, no generalities; all our stories, WHEN GENUINE, are unique whether we agree or disagree.

So, come on, love, share if you care.

"Bugger this; I want a better world."

Grover, maybe?

You pick, Col. Jenny Sparks.

I am wondering if this is the same anonymous poster who candidly admitted he did not "think critically" for himself, preferring to leave critical thinking to "the experts."

Troll candidly admits: I cannot think for myself.

I'll go with 'Grover'.

I'll go with 'Grover'. Goes well with the warm and cuddly schtick--"I, too, was a Truther, but now I see the light."

I see you've got more material for that book:

"911Blogger OUT-takes: the Trolls speak--in their own words"...coming to a bookstore near you.

Seriously, could make a chunk of change on that if 911 wasn't so serious.

Not a half bad idea!

I actually thought about writing a paper on their rhetorical strategies, but focusing on the humorous side of their idiocy sounds like a lot more fun.

Anonymous-"i was a twoofer

Anonymous-"i was a twoofer before i changed my mind on the most important event in recent history. Fox and CNN set me straight". aint that right Anonymous? how could you possibly flip flop on an issue like 9/11? gullible doesnt begin to describe someone who can be on both sides of an issue like that. and again, i can TOTALLY see why you wouldnt use a name after admitting to something like that.

Show "I quite the movement because" by Anonymous (not verified)

hahahahahahahaha, i still

hahahahahahahaha, i still cant believe you admitted to it, hahahahahahahaha. classic.

exactly my point. You don't

exactly my point. You don't have anything to prove it.

I change because I elevated myself above your little circus. You have nothing and your inability to prove your case is exactly the reason I left your circus behind.

I made a mistake to believe in it...and I'll never be afraid to admit that.

and im so glad that you have

and im so glad that you have admitted it, i got a big laugh out of it. thanks for that. i would stay Anonymous if i were you. Anonymous says-"prove it, prove it, SQUAWK! prove it, prove it." you are on a 9/11 truth website with literally hundreds of links to various information and evidence. im not going to hold your hand, you little bitch, and do the research for you. you were a "twoofer" once, how about you tell me what info pulled you in(before you flip-flopped like the weak minded shill you are)? and also, what was your "eureka" moment when you realized all of a sudden that 9/11 was NOT an inside job, but it actually happened exactly as the government and MSM says. this should be good.

Show "I've spent a year looking" by Anonymous (not verified)

thanks for answering my

thanks for answering my questions. typical.

since you missed it the first time:

how about you tell me what info pulled you in(before you flip-flopped like the weak minded shill you are)? and also, what was your "eureka" moment when you realized all of a sudden that 9/11 was NOT an inside job, but it actually happened exactly as the government and MSM says. this should be good.

Ok. I saw Loose Change when

Ok. I saw Loose Change when it first came out and was intrigued. I never thought to question any of the ridiculous claims in that "movie" and believed it at face value. Mix that with the fact that I hated GW and his nitwit administration and I was instantly brainwashed. I kept visiting 911blogger and the Scholar's site and rarely looked elsewhere for information.

I started to change because I saw the movement start to eat itself from the inside. Twoofers against Twoofers. The movement was debating within itself and nobody could agree on what the Conspiracy actually was! Was it buildings, phone calls, arabs or no arabs, planes or no plane, missles or jets, bombs or lasers and on and on and on and on. Within your movement you have hundreds of different conspiracies...covering every single second of that day. Hundreds. You've torn apart every second prior to and every moment since and squeezed each minute to find something that proves 9/11 was an inside job. You don't care what it is that will prove this. I realized that not every second of that day could be called into questions...and since the movement couldn't even agree on which things to focus on...then perhaps nothing is questionable. I just happened the way it did. No reason to believe otherwise.

So then I started to realize that people who could prove your ridiculous claims...wouldn't. They just don't agree with you. REMEMBER...THESE ARE THE PEOPLE WHO NEED TO PROGRESS YOUR THEORY...AND THEY THINK YOU'RE NUTSO.

I woke up from the brainwashing of this site and others like it, started to look at all the evidence...not just the evidence you think fits into your circus tent...and came to the conclusion that the experts who proved...with actual facts, data and evidence...that this wasn't an inside job...were much more logical and analytical than a bunch a babies calling people names.

Case closed.

Troll comes clean!

"I saw Loose Change when it first came out and was intrigued. I never thought to question any of the ridiculous claims in that 'movie' and believed it at face value."

What a remarkably candid admission. Bert, you obviously have a problem with critical thinking skills. Maybe a little more time working on that and a little less time trolling would be helpful.

I don't think you, as a

I don't think you, as a twoofer, should ever refer to or use the words "critical thinking skills"...since none of you have them, use them or bother to sharpen them. If you'd realize that you have nothing in the way of evidence. I leave the critical thinking to the EXPERTS that have proven you wrong using real hard facts, data and evidence. Twoofer don't think at all...let alone critically or analytically.

Maybe we should get you a dictionary so you actually understand the words you use.

Now...give me one irrefutable piece of evidence that cannot/has not been debunked, that proves without a doubt that 9/11 was an inside job. Just one. Shouldn't be so hard since this is the crime of the century...right?

There's your problem, Bert

"I leave the critical thinking to the EXPERTS..."

So you admit that you yourself do not employ critical thinking skills. That's too bad.

Not in the areas that I'm

Not in the areas that I'm not educated in...such as Structual Engineering. This is an area that you twits claim to be expert...and clearly are not.

You still haven't answered my question: What is one irrefutable piece of evidence that cannot be debunked or misunderstood that proves that 9/11 was an inside job?

C'mon casseia...if this is such a HUGE EVENT, perhaps the biggest in the history of history, you must have something that is undeniable that proves 9/11 was an inside job...right? Just one. C'mon.

Just one Casseia? You

Just one Casseia?

You can't...can you?

That's your boring, predictable game.

I'm just happy we have you on record as not employing critical thinking skills. It explains a lot.

Exactly my point. You

Exactly my point. You can't.

If you used any sort of thinking, critical/analytical, or just plain'd be able to answer that question.

Me thinks you're a clown...which is critical for you sheepy.

Not can't -- won't. :)

What's the point? You've already admitted you don't engage in critical thinking for yourself. It's really not responsible to offer 9/11 material to someone who can't think critically -- just look at your experience with "Loose Change."

Really. You need to leave this to the critical thinkers.

Come on...Casseia. I'm

Come on...Casseia. I'm bowing down to your infinite wisdom.

Just give me one piece of evidence. Show me you're the thinker that I'm not.

Or are you just another talking looney tune crackpot who knows nothing and is nothing? Prove me wrong.

Oh...and I've explained my comments regarding critical your little bait game is just old...and it shows the mentality of you and your twoof movement. So...stop being a whiny little brat and show me your proof...if you have any. Perhaps you can change me with it.

Ok? Stop acting like a 8 year old girl and present one piece of irrefutable proof. If you can't...then you must hang your head in defeat.

If you're the critical

If you're the critical thinker that you claim to be...and that you claim I am should have no problem answering my question.

You said..."you need to leave this to the critical thinkers" I'm leaving it to you Casseia. That is if you're a critical thinker.

Just one piece of irrefutable evidence that cannot be debunked nor misunderstood that proves...without a doubt...that 9/11 was an inside job. You must have mounds of data...all I'm asking for is one.

Just critical thinking friend.

I didn't think you could.

I didn't think you could. See...this is why the world thinks you're all a bunch a freaks and liars. You demand answers...but can't give them when asked.

See ya later go get the turkey ready for tomorrow. Don't worry...I'll be back next week to continue beating your clown ass down.

Happy Thanksgiving everyone!

Well, I'm just glad

we got that critical thinking issue cleared up. You see, by definition, critical thinking is not something you can leave to an expert. It's strictly DIY. So rest assured that for the purposes of full disclosure, I will be citing your above post at every opportunity!

Do you brine your turkey (soak it in a salt/sugar/optional herbs solution overnight)? It really helps keep it moist.

How's the whole star wars

How's the whole star wars laser beam thing going?

Talk about critical thinking skills.

I think you guys should change the name of this site from to

What's was actually time traveling nazi aliens that swooped down and blew up the towers?

Nice "movement" you have here. It's a shame.

Is it 'Bert'? Well, forget

Is it 'Bert'?

Well, forget the nomination then. I hadn't read this far when I put it out. And he seems to have answered my question AND cooked his goose to boot, so I'll leave it out for now.

Why did you join in the mouvement in the first place?

You must have been presented with some evidence then.

P.S. Now, that's all of my valuable time I lost with you shill. So long.

Thanks for answering my

Thanks for answering my questions and proving my points for me, clownboy.

Typical Twoofer...just runs away without answering any questions. If it's such a HUGE EVENT of our lives and probably the BIGGEST EVENT of all times!...I would have thought you'd give me answers to such vital questions.

I just wanted one piece of irrefutable evidence and I would be a soldier for your truth movement for life. You can't give me that evidence...because it doesn't exist.

I think this the "twoof movement" is a waste of your time.

Building 7, wargames, Sibel

Building 7, wargames, Sibel Edmonds, General Ahmad and his $100,000 K.

Building 7 = Nothing proven

Building 7 = Nothing proven (you need evidence in this case)
Wargames = These happen all the time. Nothing strange here. Debunked.
Sibel Edmonds = Can't speak, therefore, irrelevant.
Ahmad = Need proof, paper trail, evidence. All speculative at this point. Can't be used.

None of these things are irrefutable evidence with hard data or facts. You want them to they'd all be thrown out in a court of law and circumstancial. A court of public opinion and a court of law are two completely different animals. You need better than this to prove anything.



Did you say those things out loud?


"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

Now, Jon, be nice. Gloating

Now, Jon, be nice. Gloating lacks class.


If you evidently didn't have anything positive to add

why did you bother making a fool out of yourself to those that are trying to seek the truth ?

Polls are still not evidence

I always have to educate you 9/11Deniers on logic and facts. Polls are not evidence of what happened on 9/11. We all know this and you can deny it all you want but it won\'t help you.

You\'ve committed a classic logical fallacy, Argumentum ad populum, Joe. It is one of the hallmarks of your 9/11 Denial Movement amongst all the other fallacious reasoning that goes on with you guys. See for your education.

BTW, the physical evidence remains as it always has and you haven\'t refuted any of it. It clearly refutes all of your claims. You\'re movement was dead off the launching pad.

Polls are just polls - they can measure

a selected body of people who vote on a particular question. Oops, did I say vote?

If I said "vote" then somebody must be counting the votes. I wonder if the Polls are accurate. I used to think my vote counted during political elections but then I learned that the voting machines could be manipulated. Polls have their uses but only if the questions are fairly worded and the counting is accurate.

Perhaps, Mr. Anonymous is just taking a cheap shot at the movement because he is afraid to BELIEVE THE VAST AMOUNT OF LEGITIMATE EVIDENCE THAT IS SURROUNDING HIM.

Looky at What Gravity Done!

We must be the change we wish to see in the world. M Gandhi

Show "It\'s perfectly logical for the 9/11 Truth Movement" by Anonymous (not verified)

What about the left

What about the left gatekeepers who are our main obstacle to reaching critical mass? Why is the 9/11 truth movement (for the most part) letting them get away with it? For example, not one blogger mentioned this gatekeeper movement in this thread until this one here.
We need to attack Amy Goodman as well as the mainstream media.

maybe because the lefft

maybe because the lefft gatekeepers have NO REAL POWER?!?!?!?!?! i get so sick of this bullshit argument. (is that you pocky?haha)BIll Maher or some other fake liberal could scream inside job tomorrow and the only thing that would change is that persons career. im not saying dont attack Amy Goodman and the rest for not being realistic about 9/11, please do, but dont expect that by changing their minds the general publics awareness of 9/11 is going to change. it wont. who controls and shapes the message? Amy Goodman? or Time Warner/Rupert Murdoch/NewsCorp/G.E./etc.? the MSM is anything but "leftwing", so clearly they are not our biggest problem. at least people like Goodman are right on some issues unlike the majority of the MSM. main obstacle? Amy Goodman? not by a long shot."GeorgeWashington" outed as a front for Professor Steven E. Jones



That doesn't mean that the admins should impose a registration requirement. Its easy enough to register many handles. It means that we are going to have to show some restraint, and not let these people bait us into wasting our time. That means you. Just don't respond unless you foresee some positive result.

If anyone demonstrates that they have an obvious bias against us, we should post a link to info and say no more. Of course, in some cases these exchanges help us to learn more about those who attack us. But we must not over-indulge in the entertainment value of those who overtly project their ignorance or fundamentalism.

Please, please please, stay on topic. ITS ONE OF THE RULES!

So for instance, I will now comment on the original post.

Great post! Very parallel with our thinking over at While the admins at 911Blogger could just collect and present the news, they instead take a stand for reason and progress. And the lot of them seem to have a fair understanding of the movements strengths and weaknesses.

We do have weaknesses. That means you. But in sharing our talents and working together, we overcome our personal weaknesses, and achieve something greater than any one of us alone could manifest. It is wise to know when to ask for directions.

Thanks Big Guy.

International Truth Movement

"That doesn't mean that the

"That doesn't mean that the admins should impose a registration requirement. Its easy enough to register many handles. It means that we are going to have to show some restraint, and not let these people bait us into wasting our time. That means you. Just don't respond unless you foresee some positive result."

I agree with the spirit of what you're saying. But in practice there is a difference between simple disagreement, vigorous debate, trolling and personal attacks. Yes, I put trolling above personal attacks because they are simply disruptive as opposed to attacks which in the face to face world could get you sued, arrested or 86'd.

You always confront people who attack you personally, especially if it would be criminal or border on criminal behavior. For instance, one troll asked me if I took it up the ass. Hello, sexual harassment--in the real world.YOU NEVER LET SOMETHING LIKE THIS SLIDE. You cooly confront them, point out what could happen in the real world, and if they don't stop, go to the administration. In my case I challenged him to a face-to-face. Shut him up right quick. And, no, I wasn't bluffing. With such people only an IMMEDIATE display of force will stop them.

As for the lesser baiters, sometimes what you suggest will work, sometimes not. Look at Bert and Ernie--anonymous trolls-- they got those names because they would follow Chris and Jon Gold EVERYWHERE with nothing remotely constructive to say but childish mockery. Jon and Chris DID NOT provoke this. Ignoring them WAS NOT working. But 'naming', mockery and exposure has helped others not to get sucked into their shite.

I agree we shouldn't let ourselves be baited. But, much as in real life, ignoring a bully doesn't make them go away unless you have MUCH MORE POWER than they do. They just keep pushing until dominance is established or they're stopped. That's their basic psychology.

So, what will work? Much as in real life, when someone is rude, out of line, or REALLY out of line, the first step is to confront them in anyway that will make it clear you are not an easy target. They refuse to stop their behavior? Point out it is against the rules and they need to stop or you will notify the moderators. Still don't stop? WITHOUT HESITITION notify the moderators. That seems like it'll cover all bases, right?

Wrong, Jules. It'll only cover the bases that are verified. It won't do bugger all to the unverified or the anonymous who are only here to cause trouble and waste time. It's a lovely idea but ignoring troublmakers, ALL BY ITSELF, doesn't make them go away. If it did, they wouldn't have a need to be troublemakers . And the fact they are anonymous and/or unverified proves they want to make it hard to be banned.

I will tell you what was working--actually I won't. I'm not going to broadcast to the trolls. I've emailed dz about it; haven't heard a response yet. I assume he's on holiday. Suffice it so say when it is hard to see your work, as a writer, it is very frustrating; and when the opinion of your work is low, people just don't read it.

That was working.

As for staying on topic, though it is true we should resist gratuitous games of "wack the troll", a little drifting is normal. As long as it adds to our understanding of the issue at hand.

Well, that was longer than I meant it to be...

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.