I have a "Take the red pill...Loosechange2" license plate frame and would love one of these large window decals...but i live in socal, so its not really worth it---not too many english speakers here...

get it in spanish then... :D

As far as I know, socal is still in the US! 

¡Escríbalo en español!

Tome la píldora roja ... Loosechange911.com

w00t!

¿qué realmente sucedió?

abra de nuevo la investigación 911

¡haga pregunta, respuestas de la demanda!

911 eran un trabajo interior

911 = opperation del gobierno

I wonder, is 'trabajo interior' a too literal translation of 'inside job'? Is this expression actually used in Spanish, or do Spanish-speakers have some other phrase to express the same idea?

trabajo interior sounds weird, yes. like work done on the inside of a house.

I've seen "complot interno" used, but frankly spanish speakers in the US might find this a bit hoity toity. Every different Latino group depending on nationality probably has some good slang for something like this so best to ask a local. Also, Latinos in the US may be accustomed to reading about 9/11 as 11-S (onze septiembre)

Of course the term inside job is disputed within the movement since the dancing Israelis were not insiders.

11-S un acto de traicíon

might be a good one (9/11 an act of treason)

Arríba la verdad!!

V.V. (RT)

____

Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force

Haga preguntas, exíja respuestas! But doesn't roll very well...

Of course you could always direct them to

http://wtcdemolition.com/indexesp.htm

which is my spanish language version... :)

A shame my site seems to be persona non grata on the list to our left here--not sure why that is... :(

____

Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force

I made a bunch of Endless War with the endless ribbon (found them on Freeway Blogger's site)

http://freewayblogger.blogspot.com/

I've been putting them on buses, taxis, & cop cars!
http://psychomikeos.blogspot.com/

No one will REALLY understand what happened that day until we get a new investigation. If those websites will get people asking questions, well, that's the point!

The photo's were posted / choosen for just that reason...to get people looking. Peek their curiosity with a short easy to remember site like wtc7.net and the other that does have extensive easy to follow research for the novice. The concern for putting anything with 911 in the web link, etc... 911truth, 911blogger, physics911, etc... is when people see 911 they either have a pre conceived notion (and roll their eyes...and then shut down) that it's from a "conspiracy nut," or they know already about the real truth. The goal wasn't to reach the one already aware. The goal was to nudge the people either on the fence post or those who have never looked at this topic. To peek the curiousity of those who haven't looked. This doesn't offend because it stays away from 911 in the url address.... but still get's the point across. If anyone know of a better site that combines great info...without using 911 in the url address, let me know. I'll be back at Fast Signs tomorrow.

food for thought

excellent point...

wtc7.net is pound for pound the best all around website for accurate raw data concerning 9/11.

For those unsure about the whole pentagon/plane issue, guess what?  Its gonna be that way until we get a real investigation going, get used to it being contentious.

Pique there interest without setting off a knee-jerk reaction is always a good method to raise awareness. 

wtc7.net is about WTC 7. Argueably the one aspect of 9/11 that turns people around about the truth of that day.

• Introduction (original home page)
• What was Building 7?
  • What was in Building 7?
  • Building 7's position relative to the Twin Towers
• September 11th
  • The fires in Building 7
  • The vertical collapse of Building 7
  • Videos of the collapse
  • Building 7's tidy rubble pile
• The Aftermath
  • The media's silence about Building 7
  • The destruction of the steel
  • The failure to investigate Building 7's collapse
  • "And they made that decision to pull ..."
• The Official Explanations
  • FEMA's official report on Building 7's collapse
  • NIST's official report on Building 7's collapse
  • Severe damage claims
• What Made Building 7 Collapse?
  • The cause of the collapse
  • Fires and building collapses
  • Controlled demolition
• Ongoing Developments
  • The new Building 7

No mention of Flight 93, Pentagon, etc...

911research.wtc7.net does have information about Flight 93 - ending with the crash:

Crash

At 10:06 AM, Flight 93 was apparently shot down near Somerset, PA. The official story that it was flown into the ground as a result of a struggle to control the cockpit is contradicted by the reports of eyewitnesses on the ground, as well as the phone call attributed to Edward Felt.

The crash site, in a reclaimed strip mine, comprised a central debris field and several smaller debris fields some distance away. One of the engines was found over half a mile away from the main field. ⁷ Other debris fields were found 2, 3, and 8 miles away. This evidence is virtually impossible to reconcile with the official story.

No mention of this Might Zorlack :D

Ultimately it concludes Flight 93 was shot down - http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/analysis/flight93/index.html

And an interesting read as well concerning "DISINFORMATION" around Flight 93 is here : http://911review.com/errors/phantom/flight93.html 

and there debunking of 93 not crashing:

http://911review.com/errors/phantom/flight93.html

is appalling! The say "it left a crater with shrapnel, so it 'must' have crashed there"!!!

Why did they not mention the lack of fire damage to the grass outside the crater???

--------------------------------------------------------

Focus on the botched crash scene at Shanksville.

Would that indicate the plane was or was not shot down?

His theory encompasses all of the evidence, The passengers got control of the plane and was shot down to eliminate the possibility of their 9/11 LIE from being exposed. They did have a qualified pilot as one of the passengers.

If true, would give a short list of military pilots that were part of wargames... To be questioned and cross checked.

<edit: does not dovetail> Which btw, dovetails with the Mineta Testimony... Chain of command points DIRECTLY at Cheney...</edit>

That whole "Cleveland Airport" thing sounds like a cover story to me...

If the above is true, that Flight 93 was shot down, that would mean 9/11 was only 3/4ths successful.  What would have been the 4th target? Probably the Capital.  Purely speculating here but I think the anthrax attack was plan B to get thePatriot Act passed and allow the perps time and a cover story to get any planted explosives out of the building...

That missing 3 minutes of audio from the flight recorders would seal this up... although I suspect it has been permanently destroyed...

"FBI spokesman John Collingwood has explained their refusal to release the transcript to those who had relatives on the plane, saying, "While we empathize with the grieving families, we do not believe that the horror captured on the cockpit voice recording will console them in any way." That decision was made after FBI Director Robert Mueller listened to the tape."

source: http://911research.wtc7.net/cache/disinfo/deceptions/phildaily_whathiding.html 

I think John was telling the truth.