Diagonal cut Support Column at WTC
DIAGONAL BEAM CUT
Thought I would share this here, posted this response on a local forum group.
Any metal smith/iron worker/torch cutter can confirm this analysis as well. I couldn't figure out how to show the photo so it is attached:
The problem is, of course, all evidence is debatable and can be supported from both sides.
Government supporting story would be that the supporting column (one of the 47 that the 9/11 Commission Report claims doesn't exist) was cut by iron workers clearing debri.
Could be supported by:
-testimony from steel worker who cut it (none known)
-testimony from eyewitnesses who saw him cut it or gave the order to cut (none known)
-looks similar to molten slag from a blow torch cut
-Photographer testifying that it was done after iron workers got started cutting steel (not known)
Our story claims it was cut by thermate charges to relieve the strength of the supporting columns.
Could be supported by:
-Shows classic dripping slag from thermate melting
-the perfectly angled cut is a classic characteristic of a demolition application to relieve the central support columns
-there are piles of rubble everywhere, the metal smiths would not likely be hacking at an undamaged beam to rescue people
-any metal smith can tell you that slag does not drip like shown since most slag is blown away and only a ribbon of slag remains above and below the cut typically with maybe a short drip or 2..
-any metal smith can also tell you that any cut would have been traced completely around the outside of the column, torch cutting does not leave slag on the outside of a cut, only on the backside. YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE SLAG dripping on the outside. This proves it was not torch cut and that it was Thermate, with no air pressure behind it which is why there is slag "running" down the inside and outside.
-any metal cutter would also question why the rear cut is not a straight line, or why the cuts are not straight or horizontal all the way around. The thermate theory can explain that more concentration in that one spot in the back for some reason would melt more steel away, like the edge of a candle melting more than the rest.
-additional supporting evidence includes molten steel found in the rubble for 12 weeks after 9/11. To date, only thermate explains this, the government provides no explanation for this, which makes this valid supporting evidence for us.
Just present this analysis to any metal smith/torch cutter, which I am, and he can confirm it. Your only supporting evidence would be an eyewitness report from the cutter or other to confirm. None exists that I know of. Or, you could ask the government to answer the question. Think you'll get an answer? Why don't you write the White House and demand that they release all evidence to shut us up if they really have it? Think they will? They won't for us who are demanding answers, and they won't for you. So now what? You going to sit there and claim that a government "for the people, of the people, and by the people" doesn't have to answer to anyone? Even if you don't believe 9/11, there are many other things they are lying about. If they aren't, then why do the refuse to answer questions? No American should have to accept that the government hides what ever they
|Cut beam.jpg||68.76 KB|