Support 911Blogger


Randi Rhodes Questions 9/11 'Collapses' During Segment on Bush Administration Lies

 

In the third hour of her January 2nd radio show, Randi Rhodes discussed Bush senior's recent odd behavior - referencing the Warren commission report and JFK conspiracy theories during his speech at Ford's memorial. Randi drew comparisons to his recent breakdown while giving a speech regarding his son Jeb. She questions whether his recent strange behavior is due to a forthcoming wave of questions by the incoming democratic majority. Amongst this segment Randi quite bluntly questions the collapses of the twin towers as well as WTC7.

Let's hope that Randi will continue to voice her concerns over what really happened on 9/11, and that her voice won't fall on deaf ears with the incoming democratic majority.

Check out the first segment - about 12 minutes - in the MP3 linked above.

Thanks to randirhodesarchives.com for the archive!

"...Bush senior's recent odd behavior - referencing the Warren

Commission report and JFK conspiracy theories during his speech at Ford's memorial."

I too found it very bizarre how Daddy Bush stated something like, the Warren Commission was right because Pres. Gerry Ford signed it & he was a good man. What utter bullshit!

Anyone with an IQ over 90 sees that our gov't murdered JFK, Robert, & John-John, Jr.!!!

Not to mention...

Bush Sr. crying like a bitch a couple of weeks ago... when speaking about the "the good son" Jeb.

Makes you wonder what he knows???

I'm sending Randi Rhodes $20 bucks

I wonder if Randi Rhodes has seen $20 bucks on google video, it is an excellent eye-opener for anyone in the dark about WTC 7. It's short, simple and direct.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2364206678564389150&q=%2420+buck...

send $20 bucks to everyone you love

like it...

like it...

The House of Bush Falls

And oh what a fall it had.

Rumour has it that after an extensive investigation by Ratisinger into the inner workings of the Knights Templar order of Freemasonry, for which Bush Sr. was purported to be the Grand Master, that they (the Knights Templar) were "relieved" of as much as 4 trillion dollars, emptied from secret bank accounts around the world, bank accounts which the Chief Financial Officer for the Vatican, the Rothchilds, would certainly have access to. It is rumoured that since this occured, Bush Sr. has been very unstable, as evidenced by his recent public speaking engagements.

It should be noted that in his Jeb Bush speech, Bush Sr. gave the uptilted head with a blink sign before offering his little "parable" amid that crying fit, and that he was most certainly delivering a coded message which he has prepared, which had nothing to do with either Jeb, who looked rather shaken by it, nor Bush Jr (Dubya).

I noted a veiled reference to Christ in that little segment, in reference to Jeb as the good son. Note that at the beginning, Bush almost seemed to say Sig Heil or some sort of German thing about Victory, and then he corrected himself and said "Heil Victory" totally out of context (ghost of Hitler perhaps?). I suspect he was trying to make emends for all his Satan worship and evil deeds over the years, and was delivering a message to his victors, a message of repentance, and so it's possible that even his tears were insincere, and were intentionally put on display in the hopes of recieving forgiveness from the Vatican.

That's my take on it.

Great Call Greenback.

I sent $20 bucks to TrueMajority, MoveOn, and DemocracyForAmerica, among other organizations and some skeptical family friends. I thought it was a great way to listen to some classical music :) Peace.

"The Truth is an Offense, but not a Sin" ~ Bob Marley

Ford Admits Falsifying Warren Commission

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/JFK/ford.html

This just resurfaced, and now Ford dies, and daddy Bush mentions it at his funeral.

Bush unconsciously admits to his involvement in death of JFK?

Furthermore, a second reading between the lines of his address at Gerald Ford's State Funeral, is highly suggestive of Bush Sr. inadvertantly offering up a veiled confession of his own personal involvement in the assassination of JFK. A close look at Bush's history shows that he was in Dallas that day, and that his own rise to power began immediately thererafter.

Yes, watch "JFK II"...you

Yes, watch "JFK II"...you can download it at question911.com

"JFK II" -- Google Video

The greatest friend of truth

The greatest friend of truth is Time, her greatest enemy is Prejudice, and her constant companion is Humility. - Charles Caleb Colton

JFK assassination and 911

I have researched the JFK assassination for years and in the last few had lost hope that we would ever get official truth on that matter. The coverup and stonewalling were effective enough to keep the public at bay. However, with the Internet coming into its own I think it was a big goof to pull another stunt like it when 911 was done. I have a feeling that those who planned 911 underestimated the Internet and it may just open up the whole dirty room full of lies we have been told for the last 40 years.

Arthur C. Clarke made a good

Arthur C. Clarke made a good point when he said that the effect of technological advances tend to be overestimated in the short term and underestimated in the long term. The shift in political thinking and knowledge due to the Internet is on pace to be at least on par with the invention of the moveable type printing press so many years ago. Lets hope this time we are smart enough to be able to evade the hundred years or so of bloody wars that go with the shift.

As for Bush Sr.'s recent instability, didn't he say something like, "If the American people ever found out what we have done they would chase us down the street and lynch us." to Sarah McClendon? I think he sees that day coming, at least for his family as the real elites hang them out to dry in an attempt to hold onto power. The beauty is that each "out of no where" attach or limited hangout given by those same elites gives us credibility in the minds of the "couch groove" public.

Its good to see Ms. Rhodes talking about this stuff. Incorporating these topics into her show might have kept Air America from going into bankruptcy but I'll wait to see if it continues and spreads with their on air "talent". I doubt this is going to continue but perhaps it will.

Tony

I too have followed the JFK puzzle,and it makes me sick.
Yes the internet has proven to be our biggest asset,but i fear they know this ,and as we speak their trying to control it like they do the major media.
Now people can see why they classified it under national security till 2029.Ford is gone,and the others involved will be to by then.I hope that's not the case.

JFK & Lincoln Assassinations

I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. (Thomas Jefferson)

If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. (Thomas Jefferson)

Abraham Lincoln

During the Civil War (from 1861-1865), President Lincoln needed money to finance the War from the North. The Bankers were going to charge him 24% to 36% interest. Lincoln was horrified and went away greatly distressed, for he was a man of principle and would not think of plunging his beloved country into a debt that the country would find impossible to pay back.

Eventually President Lincoln was advised to get Congress to pass a law authorizing the printing of full legal tender Treasury notes to pay for the War effort. Lincoln recognized the great benefits of this issue. At one point hi wrote:

"... (we) gave the people of this Republic the greatest blessing they have ever had - their own paper money to pay their own debts..."

The Treasury notes were printed with green ink on the back, so the people called them "Greenbacks".

Lincoln printed 400 million dollars worth of Greenbacks (the exact amount being $449,338,902), money that he delegated to be created, a bebt-free and interest-free money to finance the War. It served as legal tender for all debts, public and private. He printed it, paid it to the soldiers, to the U.S. Civil Service empoyees, and bought supplies for war.

Shortly after that happened, "The London Times" printed the following:

"if that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in th history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe."

The Bankers obviously understood. The only thing, I repeat, the only thing that is a threat to their power is sovereign governments printing interest-free and debt-free paper money. They know it would break the power of the international Bankers. ---
http://www.prolognet.qc.ca/clyde/pres.htm

Now, we all know what happened to Lincoln.

JFK

On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. The Christian Law Fellowship has exhaustively researched this matter through the Federal Register and Library of Congress. We can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid.
http://www.john-f-kennedy.net/thefederalreserve.htm

http://www.john-f-kennedy.net/executiveorder11110.htm

And we all know what happened to JFK.

G. Edward Griffin disputes that Kennedy....

....was taking power away from the Federal Reserve.

Griffin wrote "The Creature from Jekyll Island", a very authoritative study of Central Banking and the Fed.

Anyway, I just thought I'd post this so people get both sides of that:

http://www.freedomforceinternational.org/freedomcontent.cfm?fuseaction=j...

No, He didn't take power away.

However, It did mean that the printing of paper money could again be carried out without any reliance on the Federal Reserve System. & we all know what happens when you try to cut in on a mob ruled extortion racket.

Personally, I think JFK was assassinated for a mixture of posturing against the FED, the nixing of Operation Northwoods & threatening the dismantling of the CIA.

Here's an excellent documentary for anyone interested in this topic.

JFK 2 - The Bush Connection
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6154414093967508621&q=jfk+2&hl=en

And don't forget...

Don't forget also the lies about Pearl Arbour... and Station H. Check it out... they knew well in advance that Japan was coming... check it out.

GHWB's comments at Ford's funeral

"After a deluded gunman assassinated President Kennedy, our nation turned to Gerald Ford and a select handful of others to make sense of that madness. And the conspiracy theorists can say what they will, but the Warren Commission report will always have the final definitive say on this tragic matter. Why? Because Jerry Ford put his name on it and Jerry Ford’s word was always good."

Does seem like the crazy old bastard is trying to get the last word before he dies.

I think there's a parallel with Junior's bizarre comments a few months ago:

“For example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks of buildings inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people. He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high – a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping.”

George W. Bush
September 15, 2006

This is great

This makes me happy and renews my optimism to some extent. Whats the line on whether or not she gets fired? (not to be cynical but I gamble on most things)

I'm only a quarter into this and.....

.....Randi's rockin'.....will the left stand up?....

Like the Count of Monte Cristo, I hope and wait......

You guys don't understand.

George H.W. Bush was directly involved in the Kennedy assassination. Herbert Hoover's memo, found after Hoover's death, names Bush of the CIA and the Cuban guerillas in Hoover;s inquiry the day after the JFK assassination.

The Nixon-Bush Connection
To The Kennedy Assassination
http://www.john-f-kennedy.net/thenixonbushconnectiontothekennedyassassin...

Zapata Corporation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zapata_Corporation

Bush JFK Zapruder Film
http://www.archive.org/details/Bush_JFK_Zapruder

"However Bush denies his connections with the CIA. Yet a November 29, 1963 memo from FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover to the State Department’s Director of Intelligence and Research uncovered through the Freedom of Information Act describes a briefing given to “George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency.” The memo was written after Lee Harvey Oswald was interrogated about his connections to the Cuban exile community and the CIA.[32]
For his part, Bush claims he never worked for the Agency until he was appointed Director in 1975, and CIA spokesman Bill Devine would “neither confirm nor deny” Bush’s role to reporter Joseph McBride of The Nation. Yet when the memo was published, the CIA did an about-face when Agency spokeswoman Sharon Basso told Associated Press that the memo actually referred to a George William Bush, who was a CIA night watchman at the time (hardly a man who would be given such a briefing!). When located and contacted by McBride and Nation editor Victor Navasky, William Bush confirmed that he was definitely not the Bush referred to in the memo. He had simply worked for the CIA for about six months as a coast and landing beach analyst—not a night watchmen—at the time, with a rank of GS-5. In response to questions about the Hoover memo, he replied, “Is that the other George Bush?”[33]

Yet Bush had maintained a personal relationship with Lee Harvey Oswald’s alleged handler, CIA “asset” George DeMohrenschildt, who carried Bush’s name and telephone in his address book until his supposed suicide. DeMohrenschildt gave only the vaguest explanations for his frequent trips to Bush’s home town of Houston in his testimony before the Warren Comission.[34*]

Now deceased Army Colonel, CIA operative and NYPD detective “Big Al” Carone stated that “George Bush was CIA prior to the assassination of John Kennedy in 1963.” Carone told his subordinate William Tyree that he “had taken money to a female named Ruth Paine in late 1956 on orders from William Casey (OSS/CIA operative who was CIA Director from 1981 to 1987).”

According to a lawsuit filed by Tyree, “Carone said that Paine was approached by the CIA to find and recruit an individual that was expendable, with communist ties and some type of anti-American background...

“Carone said that when Ruth Paine found the individual, she notified her CIA contact, identified as George de Mohrenschildt, who in turn contacted his CIA supervisor, identified as George Bush. Carone said that George Bush was the same George Bush that was CIA Director. Carone said the individual located by Ruth Paine was identified as a Mr Lee Harvey Oswald.

“FBI records/reports within 14 days after the assassination of President Kennedy will reflect that Mr George Bush met with J. Edgar Hoover, as Bush was trying to ascertain what the FBI might have stumbled onto by mistake in regards to the Ruth Paine - Oswald connection.”[35*]

When appointed CIA Director in 1975 by President Gerald Ford (a former member of the Warren Commission), Bush conveniently headed off inquiries by Senator Frank Church into the CIA’s various assassination plots which DCI William Colby had been cooperating with. Colby would later wind up dead under suspicious circumstances. (See Chapter XX)

In fact, Bush had been a top agent of the CIA since at least 1960, when he recruited Cubans for the Bay of Pigs invasion. Given the Bush family’s oil interests in the region, this is hardly surprising. As Anthony Kimery writes in Covert Action Quarterly:

“Veteran CIA operatives in the war against Castro say Bush not only let the CIA use Zapata as a front for running some of its operations (including the use of several off-shore drilling platforms), but assert that Bush personally served as a conduit through which the Agency disbursed money for contracted services.”[36]

It was at that time that Bush met Felix Rodriguez, part of a CIA shooter team coordinated out of a training base in Mexico supervised by the FBI’s Division Five (domestic counter-intelligence).[*] Rodriguez would later become Bush’s main liaison to Oliver North’s Contra drugs-for-guns pipeline when Bush served as Vice President."

http://www.voxfux.com/features/bush_world_class_criminal.html

Crimes of the State
http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/

Hoover/Bush memo

Hear hear, the Bush crimes unraveling--but what lies beneath?

I recently picked up a copy of Final Judgement by Michael Collins Piper and must say--wow. GHWB's involvement is likely, and probably had much to do with the creation of the Bush dynasty.

Now, Bush père knows the way the wind is blowing. He sees that W will be the last Bush elected to anything. It may or may not be the case that W accepted a role offered to him by the 9/11 conspirators in exchange for bringing in their collaborators (Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Feith, et al) and that that is how he managed to upstage Jeb, but either way, daddy B feels for Jeb, who unlike W probably never challenged him to go mano a mano in a drunken rage.

So the Bushes are but the first to fall from grace, not by any means the leaders of anything,, and.9/11 will be what blew the lid off the whole enchilada. Are we ready to see what's inside? Let's (un)roll!

____

Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force

 

"Sorcha Faal" now on globalresearch.ca

Thanks Randi. Now for an off topic comment:

Does anyone else have issues with globalresearch.ca? I used to think that it was a legitimate 9/11 truth site. However, on 18 December they posted a phony article (supposedly from Pravda Online, but actually not) from "Sorcha Faal" (aka David Booth):

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20061218...

This "Sorcha Faal" character of Booth's has been known to be phony for a couple of years:

http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a1874.htm

http://www.zetatalk.com/index/sorcha.htm

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/bbs/message.php?messageid=138309&mpage...

http://www.rense.com/general63/sorcha.htm

http://www.mail-archive.com/political-research@yahoogroups.com/msg06508....

I have emailed both of the site editors. They have continued to update the site daily for over two weeks. No response, and "Sorcha Faal" remains on their front page. Shall I assume that Global Research is a disinfo operation or are they just incompetent?

Global Research

Why use them when you can add your own research to WikiProtest without having the editors blacklist you (like Wikipedia)

Feel free to sign up and contribute freely.

http://www.wikiprotest.com/index.php?title=Main_Page

A couple good discussions on this:

One at DemocraticUnderground;
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&fo...

(Octafish's journal is outstanding;
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Octafish )

One at the Randi Rhodes show forum;
http://forums.therandirhodesshow.com/index.php?showtopic=104407

I recommend joining both forums and bustin' some moves.

The RR 9/11 threads;
http://forums.therandirhodesshow.com/index.php?showforum=127

The DemocraticUnderground 9/11 ghetto;
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&...

And, I'll plug Peter Dale Scott's talk, "JFK and 9/11 - Insights gained from Studying Both" one more time, currently on the front page at Michel Chossudovsky's globalresearch.ca

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=SCO20061220&...

Randi's Audience

I believe she has a huge audience. Making money is back now that the power structure that created alternative incentives collapses.

Truth Presented In These Forums Warms My Heart..

and makes optimism seem less insane.

I'd like to see where we stand in a new poll.

We must be the change we wish to see in the world. M Gandhi

The progressive media and

The progressive media and the CIA

Bob Feldman
Online Journal
Thursday, January 4, 2007

Although the Guerrilla News Network [GNN] may claim to be an anti-corporate media group, it was given a grant of $62,500 in 2006 by the multi-billion dollar (and CIA-connected) Ford Foundation, (also see "Alternative Media Censorship") whose board of trustees chairperson, Kathryn Fuller, has also been sitting on ALCOA's corporate board since 2002.
http://infowars.net/articles/january2007/040107progressive.htm

yeah, ive read that before,

yeah, ive read that before, very interesting. GNN is one of the first websites i really starting paying attention to for news a few years ago when i finally woke up. the more i got into researching 9/11 the more i could tell that GNN wasnt completely on the up and up. Ian Inaba was just on CNN the other day by the way........

GNN

Interestingly, the same time that Reprehensor's study came out, GNN terminated my own account without explanation.

I had nothing to do with the inquiry into intelligence connections to GNN, but I can see how they may have considered me one of the troublemakers.

I emailed them for an explanation. No response.

I guess I was profiled out of GNN. I still don't know exactly why.

Crimes of the State Blog
http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/

Pretty damn strange

to go from questioning 9/11 in 2003 to promoting 911myths on thier front page in 2006.

are you friggin serious?

are you friggin serious? they were actually promoting 911myths.com? jesus, its worse than i thought. i havent been there in a very long time. fake opposition like GNN want nothing more than for 9/11 truth to go away. GNN has done some good work, the ammo for the info-warrior DVDs are quite good, but promoting 911myths.com says it all about their true motives. not to mention they have the same allergic reaction to talking about Israel that the MSM has.

totally serious

Last time I checked they had 911myths.com parked at the top of their blog links on the front page. I refuse to open that site ever again so I don't know if it's still there.

yep, still there, right at

yep, still there, right at the very top of the list above 911truth.org interestingly enough. covering their own asses with that one i guess.

the fake stuff is always the first to get popularized

One apparent strategy of the faux-alternative scene is that it always insists on being first to market. Of course, they aren't ever the first of anything, just the first that gets a lot of attention. MoveOn, Air America, GNN, Indymedia, Wikipedia--they always seem to make sure they get out there first with their brand of dissent. It's always pretty tight compared to the REAL dissenters' work so naturally people who don't know better (i.e. all of us) gravitate to them until we wise up to their real agenda.

____

Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force

 

New postal law lets Bush peek through your mail!!!

President Bush added a "signing statement" in recently passed postal reform bill that may give him new powers to pry into your mail - without a warrant. http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/485561p-408789c.html

bombs inside the pentagon? 9:32 am

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ql3HNwviedU&eurl=

has anyone seen that or heard of any more information regarding the subject?

What he meant

was Ford did a good job covering it up.And i loved the way he moved the bullet hole to JFK's back up about four inches to help with the magic bullet conspiracy theory.Yes daddy Bush knew more than you know. After all he was CIA.
Yes JFK was no saint ,but he was a good man.They point to the bay of pigs,and pissing off the mob,but i think his death was attributed to him trying to take away the global elite's cash cow.
THE FEDERAL RESERVE

JFK was moving in the right

JFK was moving in the right direction in a very concrete way on many fronts and he was moving way too fast. i feel that he must have known on some level that it was career suicide, if not real suicide. as soon as he came into office he was confronted with the horrors and criminality of the CIA with the bay of pigs. you dont threaten to dismantle the CIA or confront the federal reserve and encourage the media to dig deeper into real issues and get away with it. imagine a president threatning to reign in the CIA today and threating the federal reserve. it just wouldnt happen. not to mention Vietnam. i know there is an argument as to if Kennedy really was going to draw down troops or not. i tend to believe he was based on all of the evidence, despite his contradictory public statements. JFK was no saint, he was only human, but he was moving in the right direction and got killed for it. the killing of JFK sent a message to all future presidents.

IF $$$$

If a President wanted to continue the work of JFK..... he'd have to surround himself with people that he knew and trusted..... then lock himself down.... never leave the confines of the White House Bunker..... no one in or out without presidential order.... Attend everything via teleconference..... because he would be killed.

Either that or lay it all down..... tell everyone the truth and what you plan to do to change this country for the better..... but you are going to have to FUCK the banks to do it.... and that's big money and power.

I have a plan that would make money worth half it's value.... but if done properly would make the dollar twice as strong as it currently is in 5 years.... it would screw the banks..... technically they would be just fine..... just a bit pissed... but in 5 years the money that they recieve will increase in value dramaticly over the 5 years..... businesses and homeowners would be able to pay off their debts twice as fast... making the country rich again. The Government would be able to pay off it's debt much quicker... making our dollar stronger still.

and all they would have to do is admit that inflation exists and take advantage of it...... the main problem with inflation is that the rich take advantage of it.... sperating themselves furrther from the middle and lower classes..... because as prices escalate.... salaries don't normally keep pace.

They want to weaken the dollar but they want to profit all the way..... that's not the way to solve any problem....

over the past two to five years the dollars value has been halved..... if they admitted it..... they could simply halve the value..... have everything instantly double in value..... salaries would have to double..... making quick work of home loans and debt..... taxes would essentially double... making quick work of the national debt..... when everything is paid off.... the dollar will reigtn again.

Who would get screwed? Banks and foreign investors holding huge stakes in the dollar..... but they will be fine if they just wait it out... they will be very fine.

They can do this or let us be sold off as the dollar dies..... we will lose everything in the process..... but this is all part of our lynching.

If we did this we may not need banks anymore

In case you don't have 12 minutes...

Start listening at about the 10:30 mark for the 9/11 comments.

Go Randi!

Randi's been a Truther for a

Randi's been a Truther for a long time. Each time she mentions it, I send a short, polite email thanking her for her willingness to bring it up despite the heat she may take from certain quarters. I think we should do that every time we hear or read of anyone willing to toe-in on the subject. It's easy to complain about gatekeepers, but we need to commend people in writing for ANY efforts.

Randi's show is excellent, and I highly recommend people listen, download, or podcast it. If she believes that talking about 9/11 boosts ratings, she may be further emboldened.

i agree, and even without

i agree, and even without her bringing up 9/11 truth, she still gets it right on most of the issues and hits harder than most "progressives" on the radio today. her show is the best liberal show ive heard by far, not counting Mike Malloy of course. its too bad they cancelled her in my area, i used to always listen to her. she may not be willing to go all out on 9/11 truth, but shes clearly not willing to lie to herself about it and thats better than most in her position.

Nice topic DZ

Thanks DZ. I am sure the dirt of today started back around that time.The TRUTH is comming!

9/11 Theatre Performance to open in NYC!

Action alert: International Delegation Travels to Guantanamo,

Cuba to Protest Infamous US Prison January 9-13! Delegates include mother of current prisoner, former Guantanamo detainee, and high-level US peace activists:

“I am traveling all the way from Dubai because by heart is overflowing with grief over the abuse and ongoing detention of my son,” says Zohra Zewawi, who claims her son has been tortured and blinded in one eye during his detention, and has never been charged or tried. Her son was imprisoned in September 2002 and is still a prisoner in Guantanamo. Asif Iqbal, a former detainee who was freed on no charges after years of abuse, is coming to show his support for the basic rights of detainees.

"How do you think I feel thinking of my son Omar in a cold narrow cell without sunshine or fresh air? The tears pour out and I cannot stop them. When his little son Suleiman comes to me and asks, 'Where is my daddy?', I feel the world is pulled from under my feet. My heart is ruptured with sadness."

Zohra Zewahi, mother of Omar Deghayes, Guantanamo Detainee
http://www.codepink4peace.org/article.php?id=1400

Democrats are fake opposition. Pelosi says she will not cut-off

funding for Iraq nor bring impeachment charges against Bush! This a the 2-party system at work??? The NeoCons own the Republicans & most of the top Democrats too!

One of the Dems' top priorities is to make sure that the

9/11 Commission recommendations are implemented, thus lending their support & credence to that fraudulent report!

Randi

Alright Randi, now all you have to do is bring this up every show you do. Every interview you do. And just put it plain and simple. Here is how you do it.
Americans will never believe that 2 planes knocked down 3 buildings.
Then go on to remind the media elites that their continued coverup of this crime makes them accessories after the fact. And they will be prosecuted accordingly.

Randi Rhodes: Truther!

On another recent Randi Rhodes show, she interviewed James Petras about the power of the Israel Lobby, as well as how the liberal left of which she is firmly ensconced is also firmly under the control of Zionist lite Jewish liberals, who dare not breath a word about that taboo topic and how it is scuttling the anti war movement. Way to go Rhandi! (just kidding).

Contacting the MSM, and momentum.

Great pick up DZ!!!! This is a great inroad into the MSM for our movement and questions. It makes me optimistic that our emails and phone calls are working.. We have to work within our current government and media structure. Pick the Democrats that are progressive and flood them with support. The others will die away. I suggest this spurns us on to contact other MSM contacts with our information like Anderson Cooper of CNN http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5.html?10

And even Chris Matthews and Olbermann over at MSNBC. Who would have thought Randi would bring this up a few months or years ago.

Regardless don't lose faith or fall to pessimism. Peace.

And thanks DZ and RAndi!!!

"The Truth is an Offense, but not a Sin" ~ Bob Marley

If I were religious...

If I were religious I'd say God bless Randi Rhodes.

this lady is just trying to

this lady is just trying to get the "911truther" demographic

she has been stringing yall along forever
--------------------------------

just like how republicans always hint that theyre against abortion, but then never do anything about it
------------------------------------------------------

this chick is scum

Shut up you asswipe,

Shut up you asswipe, COINTELPRO agent

look dumbass.... randi

look dumbass....

randi rhodes is cointelpro---

fucking moron

Intrested in JFK?

go to jfkmurdersolved.com....This is a web page by Wim Dankbar. It is amazing.
Check out this video on you tube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdGBL8SuF7I&NR

hey guys, this is by far not

hey guys, this is by far not Randi's first time questioning 9/11... I listen quite a bit. She use to really come down on callers who mentioned it but some time earlier in 06 she started to flip and often suggested inside job when the topic came up.

Exactly! She has had Paul

Exactly! She has had Paul Thompson on twice and recommended PFT several times. She has brought up the NORAD anomolies many times (she is former Air Force herself), and the problems with the OCT of the Towers and WTC7.

She didn't recommend Loose Change because she thought there was too much speculation in it -- but I believe she is an accurate judge of her audience and knows how to lead them to water.

She is an asset.

She sadly thinks Dems will investigate

I love that she has brought up 9/11 many times. I seriously applaud her. But we are deluding ourselves if we think she gets it at a deep level. I listened as was saddened at the extent to which she repeatedly reinforced the idea that the Dems are really going to do something, really be different. It is her reinforcement of this type of false fantasy that endears her to the power structure. First and foremost they are fighting to keep the illusion/matrix in place, and Randi's words and emoting are ultimately supportive of reinforcing the matrix I think, if you really listen. She expends way more emotional energy in ways that reinforce the fantasy than the small percentage of words she speaks that relate directly to 9/11. So, her 'meta-message' is basically 'The two party system is legitimate.' This does not really help us, imho.

People need to wake up and smell the tyranny. And tap into their/our own real power to change our reality. Call it spirituality, call it what you will, but we need to break out of the narrow confines of 'reality' we have been conditioned our whole lives to live in. Peace.

She sadly thinks

Well said "Critical thinker". This is to be expected and you not see Rhodes exposing the Zionist Lobby issue, since she is probably a part of it!

The Dumbocrats are owned lock stock and barrel by the Zionists, why would anyone be promoting them unless they were a Zionist agent or just extremely stupid?

By the way, here is a great interview with the maker of 911 Mysteries!

A must see video and a must hear interview:

http://www.iamthewitness.com/mp3/Hufschmid_Sofia_26Oct2006.mp3

While I agree with your

While I agree with your overall assessment, I respectfully disagree with your conclusion that her references to 9/11 are unhelpful.

I don't think that media personalities have to shout "9/11 was an inside job!" to be instrumental, I don't think they have to make 9/11 their sole focus, and I don't think they have to swear a blood oath to MIHOP. When people are instructed to "Ask questions, do your research, look it up, watch these films" they either will or they won't, but many who have the cognitive ability will do so. She has turned many people on to 9/11. I understand your impatience, but I'd like you to understand that if my first exposure to 9/11 truth was Alex Jones bullhorning "Inside Job" and "New World Order," I would have rejected it entirely. I had to spend time learning the nature of the cover-up, and then reading and researching further to give myself the necessary context to give a rat's ass what some loud, self-described paleo-conservative from Texas has to say . (And I'm an Independent.) I now admire much of his work, listen to the show, and recommend his film, but that didn't happen overnight.

I don't have faith in the Democrats to fix anything, but I do like having at least some tension between the parties and some promise of investigative energy. It's not much, but it's more than we had two months ago. Plus, if she makes people feel too cynical and defeated, they might turn off and there will be NO pressure applied.

Just my .02

Randi sells out 1/29/07 - denies WTC7, 9/11 - Iraq connection

I was pretty excited to hear this segment when it originally aired since I like Randi for the most part, but was always frustrated with her mainstream, dismissive attitude toward 9/11 Truth. She would regularly refuse to discuss Loose Change and WTC7 as well as any "conspiracy" theories. Wow, I thought, she must be fed up with the BS and ready to take it on. Last night, all that changed. Sounds like a sell out to me....

Last night (1/29/07, last 5 minutes of the 3rd hour) someone called in and commented about Iraq and also WTC7.

Caller - "Have you watched any of the footage on YouTube of WTC7 collapsing?"
Randi - "Hmmmm, no."
Caller - "Have you seen the way the building collapsed? It didn't collapse in a, any type of a fashion from a fire. It was destroyed by a fire. I urge everyone to take a look at it."
Randi - "I don’t know what that has to do with Iraq. But, Deborah in Pheonix…” (goes to the next caller.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oe47PVu6lo

I wonder if this has to do with the recent bankruptcy bailout of Air America. I know another host got the boot for talking up 9/11 too much.

Technically, maybe she’s not “lying.” Maybe she never WATCHED the clips ON YOUTUBE specifically. Maybe she TiVOed it off of CNN and watched that. So what – it’s clearly a step back from her comments on 1/2/2007. It’s also the sort of selective speech we would expect form BushCo. You’re either in or you’re out, Randi. You KNOW what this has to do with Iraq. That was the whole pretext. Also – this occurred immediately after one of her rants about honesty and the Bush Administration. Go figure. She lost a lot of credibility for me on this one.

Thanks Ratt

Do you mind if I start a new blog about this using your youtube vid and what you've written here?

Randi Rhodes

Sounds like we need to send Randi a hell of a lot of YouTube and Google Videos of Building #7 coming down.

rrhodes@airamericaradio.com

maybe explain what 9/11 has to do with Iraq while we are at it too. Peace.

Great Graphic of WTC #7

You can copy and paste the first graphic on the following web page

http://www.911truestory.com

into emails and the receiver of the email won't even have to open a link to view the incredible collapse of WTC Building #7. Great graphic for cutting & pasting.

I heard that too, and I was

I heard that too, and I was shocked that she seemed to be backsliding. I can't even give her the benefit of the doubt, because I know she has seen Loose Change, so she's seen video of WTC7 imploding. She could have legitimately said that it was off topic, but lying about seeing it? Maybe she was parsing because she hadn't seen specifically it on YouTube???

BTW, the guy who is buying Air America is a rich commercial real estate honcho in NYC. Wonder if he's friends with Pullerstein.