which of course I think is bogus, is that building 6 was LITERALLY pulled down with cables attached to the frame.

____

♠

Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force

Benjamin Chertoff, Researcher for Popular Mechanics, on Coast to Coast AM - March 5, 2005

"I'm glad somebody brought up the Larry Silverstein comment, because we certainly looked at that... What he says is "they decided to pull" which is referring to the fire department. And of course in some circles of the controlled demolition industry 'Pull' is used to mean that you actually demolish a building."

Audio:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/4524

And this...

"This is work of man. This is a hired job. (Silverstein) said it himself. You hear him saying "Pull it" down."

-Controlled Demo Expert Danny Jowenko

Forward 2 minutes to hear him say the comment above:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=u0scE7bQWdk

Entire interview with Mr. Jowenko here:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/3231

____________
"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!" -Dan Wallace

By viewing the relevant part of the America Rebuilds documentary, one can see that building 6 was literally pulled down with cables attached to the frame.

Considering that Larry Silverstein is old enough that most of the experience he had with any type of demolition when he was younger (pre-1960's) was before "Controlled Demolition", and the primary method of demolishing buildings was to, literally, pull them down with steel cables and earth moving machines and tractors, it simply makes sense that the old timers would refer to controlled demolition by using the old term "Pull". (sometimes simple common sense and the "ring of truth" is necessary to work intelligently in the real world -- which is greatly lacking in too many people)

Someone who is able to do so needs to look at Silverstein's history and find out if he ever worked in demolition back in the old days, if it is possible to find out that information at this late date. But I would be surprised, considering his vast experience in "real estate" and related areas, if you discover that he had no such experience. (and even lack of direct experience does not belie the fact that he is from that era)

----
Ad hominem per factum, beyotch!
You are undeservedly egotistical.... often laughably so.
Pseudo-intellectuality does not behoove you.