London Evening Standard and Daily Mail: An Explosion of Disbelief - Fresh Doubts Over 9/11

Thanks Carlos for the image!
An explosion of disbelief - fresh doubts over 9/11 - (Daily Mail)

The official story of what happened on 9/11 never fails to shock. Four American airliners are hijacked by Osama Bin Laden's terrorists in an attack on the heart of the Western world on September 11, 2001.

Two are deliberately flown into New York's famous Twin Towers, which collapse. A third rams into the United States defence headquarters at the Pentagon, in Washington D.C.

The last goes down in rural Pennsylvania, 150 miles north of the capital, after a tussle between the hijackers and some of the passengers onboard, whose bravery was recently portrayed in a Hollywood film, United 93.

Nearly 3,000 ordinary, decent Americans die in the attacks, provoking the U.S. President George W. Bush to mount a global war on terror, which leads to the invasion of Iraq, with Britain in tow.

Or that's how the official story goes.

Yet today, more than five years on, this accepted version of what happened on 9/11 is being challenged by a 90-minute internet movie made for £1,500 on a cheap laptop by three young American men. The film is so popular that up to 100 million viewers have watched what is being dubbed the first internet blockbuster.

The movie was shown on television to 50 million people in 12 countries on the fifth anniversary of 9/11 last autumn. More than 100,000 DVDs have been sold and another 50,000 have been given away. In Britain, 491,000 people have clicked on to Google Video to watch it on their computers.

Called Loose Change, the film is a blitz of statistics, photographs pinched from the web, eyewitness accounts and expert testimony, all set to hip-hop music. And it is dramatically changing the way people think about 9/11.

A recent poll by the respected New York Times revealed that three out of four Americans now suspect the U.S. government of not telling the truth about 9/11. This proportion has shot up from a year ago, when half the population said they did not believe the official story of an Al Qaeda attack.

The video claims the Bush administration was, at the very least, criminally negligent in allowing the terrorist attacks to take place. It also makes the startling claim that the U.S. government might have been directly responsible for 9/11 and is now orchestrating a cover-up.

Unsurprisingly, the film's allegations have been denied, even roundly condemned, by White House sources and U.S. intelligence services.

Only this week, the letters page of the Guardian newspaper was full of discourse about Loose Change, which was made by a trio of twentysomethings, including a failed film school student and a disillusioned ex-soldier.

Indeed, the movie's assertions are being explored by a number of commentators in America and Britain - including the former Labour Cabinet Minister Michael Meacher - who are questioning the official account of 9/11.

Mr Meacher, who last year proposed holding a screening of Loose Change at the House of Commons (he later changed his mind), has said of 9/11: "Never in modern history has an event of such cataclysmic significance been shrouded in such mystery. Some of the key facts remain unexplained on any plausible basis."

These words were written in a foreword for Professor David Ray Griffin's bestselling book, The New Pearl Harbour (a pointed reference to the conspiracy theory that President Roosevelt allowed the Japanese to assault the U.S. fleet in 1941, in order to force America into World War II).

Griffin, now nearing retirement, is emeritus professor at the Claremont School of Theology in California and a respected philosopher. While Loose Change is capturing the interest of internet devotees, Professor Griffin's equally contentious theories are receiving standing ovations in book clubs across the U.S.

Together, the book and the movie have raised the question: could the attack be a carbon copy of Operation Northwoods, an aborted plan by President Kennedy to stage terror attacks in America and blame them on Communist Cuba as a pretext for a U.S. invasion to overthrow Fidel Castro?

In other words, on a fateful September morning in 2001, did America fabricate an outrage against civilians to fool the world and provide a pretext for war on Al Qaeda and Iraq?

This, and other deeply disturbing questions, are now being furiously debated on both sides of the Atlantic.

Why were no military aircraft scrambled in time to head off the attacks? Was the collapse of the Twin Towers caused by a careful use of explosives? How could a rookie pilot - as one of the terrorists was - fly a Boeing 757 aircraft so precisely into the Pentagon? And who made millions of dollars by accurately betting that shares in United and American Airlines, owners of the four doomed aircraft, were going to fall on 9/11 as they duly did?

An extremely high volume of bets on the price of shares dropping were placed on these two airline companies, and only these two. In the three days prior to the catastrophe, trade in their shares went up 1,200 per cent.

Initially, like most people in America, Professor Griffin dismissed claims the attacks could have been an inside job.

It was only a year later, when he was writing a special chapter on American imperialism and 9/11 for his latest academic tome, that the professor was sent a 'timeline' on the day's events based entirely on newspaper and television accounts. It was then that he changed his mind.

And one of the most puzzling anomalies that he studied was that none of the hijacked planes was intercepted by fighter jets, even though there was plenty of time to do so and it would have been standard emergency procedure in response to a suspected terrorist attack.

Indeed, it is mandatory procedure in the U.S. if there is any suspicion of an air hijack. In the nine months before 9/11, the procedure had been implemented 67 times in America.

Readers of The New Pearl Harbour and viewers of Loose Change are reminded that it was 7.59am when American Airlines Flight 11 left Boston. Fifteen minutes later, at 8.14am, radio contact between the pilot and air traffic control stopped suddenly, providing the first indication that the plane might have been hijacked.

Flight 11 should have been immediately intercepted by fighter pilots sent up from the nearby McGuire Air Force Base in New Jersey. They could have made the journey to the World Trade Centre in three minutes.

But, surprisingly, F-15 fighter jets were instead ordered out of an airbase 180 miles away at Cape Cod. They appear to have flown so slowly - at 700mph, instead of their top speed of 1,850mph - that they did not arrive in time to stop the second attack, on the South Tower of the World Trade Centre. They were 11 minutes too late.

And this is not the only worrying question. Incredibly, the attack on the Pentagon was not prevented either. The defence headquarters was hit by the hijacked American Airlines Flight 77 at 9.38am. But fighter jets from Andrews Air Force Base, just ten miles from Washington, weren't scrambled to intercept it.

Instead, jets were ordered from Langley Air Force Base in Virginia, 100 miles away. By the time they arrived, Flight 77 had already hit the Pentagon.

So what of the fall of the Twin Towers?

The official version is that the buildings collapsed because their steel columns were melted by the heat from the fuel fires of the two crashed planes.

It is a mantra that has been repeated in White House briefings, official inquiries into 9/11, leaks by the American intelligence services and almost every TV documentary on the attack in the U.S. and Britain.

But, according to the allegations of Loose Change (which are endorsed by Professor Griffin), the science does not stand up. Steel does not begin to melt until it reaches around 2,800 degrees Fahrenheit, but open fires of jet fuel - such as those in the Twin Towers inferno - cannot rise above 1,700 degrees.

Professor Griffin and the makers of Loose Change are convinced the Twin Towers were deliberately blown up.

The film shows clip after clip of the towers coming down in one fell swoop to loud and distinct booms. Were they the sound of detonators being set off?

And the Pentagon attack? The hotly disputed theory of the film and Professor Griffin is that a passenger plane never hit the building at all.

The terrorist pilot, Hani Hanjour, was so slow to learn the fundamentals at flight school that his tutors reported him to the authorities for his incompetence five times.

How could he have guided the huge aircraft in such a complex manoeuvre into the building? And if he did, what happened to the aircraft?

The Loose Change narrator says: "The official explanation is that the intense heat from the jet fuel vapourised the entire plane. Indeed, from the pictures, it seems there was no discernible trace of a fully loaded Boeing 757 at the crash scene.

"But if the fire was hot enough to incinerate a jumbo jet, then how could investigators identify 184 out of 189 dead people found at the defence headquarters?"

Intriguingly, the narrator adds: "The only visible damage to the outer wall of the Pentagon is a single hole no more than 16ft in diameter. But a Boeing 757 is 155ft long, 44ft high, has a 124ft wingspan and weighs almost 100 tons.

"Are we supposed to believe that it disappeared into this hole without leaving any wreckage on the outside? Why is there no damage from the wings or the vertical stabiliser or the engines which would have slammed into the building?

"Remember how big the engines were," the film adds persuasively.

"If six tons of steel and titanium banged into the Pentagon at 530mph, they would bury themselves inside the building, leaving two very distinct imprints. And yet the only damage to the outer wall is this single hole."

And what of the Boeing's 40ft high tail? "Did it obligingly duck before entering the building?" asks Professor Griffin.

So if a commercial aircraft did not hit the building, what did? The wildest of all the theories in Professor Griffin's writings - echoed in Loose Change - is that the Pentagon was attacked by a military missile of some kind. Certainly, several onlookers quoted in the film claim that they saw a tiny aircraft piercing the defence HQ.

Another witness says it made a shrill noise, quite unlike a giant passenger plane.

So if it wasn't hijacked and flown by a terrorist into the Pentagon, what happened to Flight 77, last heard of on its way to Ohio?

No one knows. But one thing is sure, asserts Professor Griffin. Dick Cheney, the U.S. vice- President, and Condoleezza Rice, at the time President Bush's national security adviser, were in the White House bunker as the drama unfolded.

They, and their advisers, knew a hijacked aircraft was heading towards Washington. The obvious target was the White House, not the Pentagon. Yet Cheney and Rice were never evacuated from the White House. Did someone in high places already know that they were safe and that it was the Pentagon that was going to be the target?

Of course, no account of 9/11 by the conspiracy lobby is complete without a minute-by-minute observation of President Bush's behaviour.

He was hundreds of miles away in Florida, about to read a book to primary school children when the worst terrorist attack of the modern age happened.

The President reportedly showed little reaction when an aide told him that the first plane had crashed into the Twin Towers. Why not?

He, apparently, told the school's principal: "A commercial plane has hit the World Trade Centre, but we're going ahead with the reading thing anyway."

Then President Bush, who is also the commander-in-chief of the American military, settled down to recite My Pet Goat to a group of seven-year-olds.

He was interrupted a few minutes later by a whispered message in his ear from an aide that a second aircraft had hit the Twin Towers.

The President's face, captured by photographers at the school, remained completely passive. He showed no sign of emotion.

Now it must have been obvious a terrorist maelstrom was being unleashed on his country. But three days later, back in the American capital, he was a different man. By now he was certain that Osama Bin Laden and his Al Qaeda henchmen were to blame.

Surrounded by the Christian evangelist preacher Billy Graham, a cardinal, a rabbi and an imam, the President delivered a sermon in America's national cathedral in Washington.

The words he uttered are recounted by both Professor Griffin and the makers of Loose Change.

President Bush announced: "Our responsibility to history is already clear: to answer these attacks waged against us by stealth, deceit and murder and rid the world of evil."

The scene had been swiftly set for the West's war on terror.

911_dailymail.jpg45.52 KB

still evading 9/11 Mysteries

Not bad. But still, the MSM NEVER want to talk about the film 9/11 Mysteries. That has been endorsed by Steven Jones and David Griffin as the best 9/11 film.

But what we really need is to understand who pulls all the strings. Clearly Dubya is nothing more than a puppet. Here is a clue:

Show "nah man... this is the best video right here..." by DHS
Show "screw you whoever gave this a - rating..." by DHS

it's not that funny

making light of the movement is not all that funny. whoever made this, it's a piece of shit either way.

International Truth Movement

DIGG These too

Please digg these 4 stories as well if you can:


the last ring of

the last ring of defense----trying to blame it only on american govt officials

too much evidence on the internet for that to work

it's over----

the people on their computers did a great job

Explosive stuff! Has this

Explosive stuff! Has this been an excellent week for the 9/11 Truth Movement or what?

BBC News 24 just exposed this in a late night review of the nation's early morning newspapers. Reviewed by Michael White of the Guardian, the Daily Mail's exposé was subject to some half-brained 'bashing' by said reviewer.

Here's how the story was 'reviewed':

MW: I have a grudge against the Mail. I often say: Daily Express...a terrible newspaper, but the Daily Mail invests a lot of money in journalism...some of it, good journalism...but on page 18 and 19, to my astonishment, they've devoted 2000 words to pumping up this ridiculous notion that 9/11 may have been a conspiracy involving the US government.

PRESENTER: But are they saying that?..Aren't they saying that parts of it are very difficult to actually substantiate?

MW: I think, if you read the article, you'll come away with the impression's a prob...a real problem with this story...afterall, Mr Bush, when he was remember the infant school?..he was told that this was happening...he didn't blink, and the implication is that he didn't blink because he knew it was gonna happen...and when you say things like that, that's pretty scientists, serious people say, it happened because of that...they flew a big plane into the Pentagon...and the twin...'owers.........right [moving swiftly on]


This is HUGE.
Just checked the alexa ranking for the thisislondon website, and its in the 5,000s!

MILLIONS of people saw this article.

Lets get 911 Mysteries in their hands next!

Giuliani Alert - Sacramento, Sat.

off topic. Ghouliani will be keynote speaker at the California Republican Convention in Sacramento tomorrow.
It's a little too far north for me. Anyone know if he's coming to LA? I heard something about Obama coming to LA on the 20th ... "Obama, will you find Osama?", "How did you know the towers were coming down Rudy? Why did you destroy the crime scene evidence Rudy?" "Stop The 9/11 Cover-up". Even if it's a tough ticket to get in, we can still give 'em a big welcome, wherever they go

Please ask Rudy who told him the World Trade Center was going...

Please ask Rudy who told him the World Trade Center was going to collapse.  Who knew what ahead of time?  Ask that lying prick.  There I said it.

Then ask him if he was promised the 2008 Republican nomination for his cooperation on 9/11.

I'm on it

I'm in Sac, and fortunately I woke up early and checked for 911blogger updates. People are meeting at 11:00, so I have 3 1/2 hours to get ready.

I'll put the question on a sign, and make CD-ROMS of the video clip that backs it up.

The Eleventh Day of Every Month

Awesome. Give 'em hell, Zach. Thanks!

Awesome. Give 'em hell, Zach. Thanks!  Anybody else out there in Sac to support Zach?

Sign is made

It says in big black letters "RUDY, WHO TOLD YOU THE TOWERS WOULD FALL?",and below in smaller letters is "Search YouTube for 'Giuliani 9/11' "

Unfortunately, my CD burner picked the wrong day to go kaput. :-( If anyone else can make CD's of the Giuliani foreknowledge statement and bring them, that would be awesome. Our audience is the other protestors whom Christine Craft is gathering.

The Eleventh Day of Every Month

Way to go Zach!

more stops

Ghouliani to be in Calif. for a few days. Also stopping in Silicon Valley and at an annual agriculture expo in Tulare. Maybe someone will toss him in the pig pen. Still haven't heard about LA.

Is this the kind of reportage we can hope for here when....

.....Loose Change Final Edition hits American theaters in a few months?

Not so far-fetched now, is it?


Is it that far away?

Originally, LCFC was due out on 9/11/06. Then they pushed it back to the end of January 07. Then it was March. Now it's still "a few months" away?

I'm sure it will be excellent and worth the wait, but we need it soon!

Loose Change FINAL CUT

Loose Change FINAL CUT Theatrical Release?

Will they get a Palme d'Or in Cannes, like Michael Moore?

Will it happen before the aggressive war on Iran?

I have the funny feeling that Bush fill fall into a sword before this year is out.

OTOH, don't rush it

I think it's more important that they make sure there is nothing to debunk this time, without having to resort to straw man tactics. And so much is happening right now with witnesses coming forward etc., that it would be a shame if they rushed it and missed some important info. But of course, important info is probably going to come out forever, so there has to be a deadline at some point.

The thing that has me most geeked about LC Final Cut is...

....that the script is being vetted by David Ray Griffin....

....this movie is in good hands....

Show "griffin is in bed with the cfr" by wolfowitz in sh...

And, who's 9/11 Truth work/associations do you.....

.....endorse, respect or trust again? Just wondering.....

Real Truther and Ryan Dawson...

to name a couple


yep! i was also very happy to hear that itll feature an interview with Ray McGovern ... an excellent spokesmen for the truth, imo.

Critical mass?

This is a terrific article.  It's been a terrific week.  Have we reached critical mass?  Does the MSM sense defeat and are they taking steps to avoid complete and utter embarrassment?  Are they afraid of accusations of complicity?

Whatever the reason, it is good. Very good.

It certainly looks that way.

It certainly looks that way. Amazing.

A sea of troubles...

MALCOLM X: I read once, passingly, about a man named Shakespeare. I only read about him passingly, but I remember one thing he wrote that kind of moved me. He put it in the mouth of Hamlet, I think, it was, who said, "To be or not to be." He was in doubt about something -- whether it was nobler in the mind of man to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune -- moderation -- or to take up arms against a sea of troubles and by opposing end them.

And I go for that. If you take up arms, you'll end it, but if you sit around and wait for the one who's in power to make up his mind that he should end it, you'll be waiting a long time. And in my opinion, the young generation of whites, blacks, browns, whatever else there is, you're living at a time of extremism, a time of revolution, a time when there's got to be a change.

People in power have misused it and now there has to be a change and a better world has to be built and the only way it's going to be built with -- is with extreme methods. And I, for one, will join in with anyone -- I don't care what color you are -- as long as you want to change this miserable condition that exists on this earth. Thank you.

///////////////////// - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

Show "SELF PROPELLED momentum" by u2r2h

Get away!

Get away from us, and from the spread of truth no planer.

You are irrational and deluded. You've got the WNPD (Webfairian No Planer Disorder) bug, and it's been quaranteened. It's going nowhere.

This is GREAT News!

This is fantastic. Between this and Rosie's comments on The View, we expanded our sphere of truth markedly yesterday. Total critical mass here we come. Bring on LCFC!

“We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth”
~ George W. Bush

Show "** fearful and cowardly." by u2r2h

1st of all, I'm Canadian,

1st of all, I'm Canadian, and 2nd, what did that video have to do with, "no planes" at the WTC?

C'mon, get it together. Drop the no plane nonsense and re-join the truth movement!



“We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth”
~ George W. Bush

"so typically american" huh?

"so typically american" huh? what exactly does that mean u2r2h? and why do you bash all americans so much? go away you piece of shit, you wont even tell us where your from yet you have no trouble pretending that ALL americans are the same. where are you from? when you tell us that, then you can go back to painting all of us americans with such a broad brush. so typically foreign of you. HA.

Never saw this photo before.

Twin towers
///////////////////// - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

three days later?

bin laden was blamed very quickly.

With the intelligence all pointing toward bin Laden, Rumsfeld ordered the military to begin working on strike plans. And at 2:40 p.m., the notes quote Rumsfeld as saying he wanted "best info fast. Judge whether good enough hit S.H." – meaning Saddam Hussein – "at same time. Not only UBL" – the initials used to identify Osama bin Laden.

Now, nearly one year later, there is still very little evidence Iraq was involved in the Sept. 11 attacks. But if these notes are accurate, that didn't matter to Rumsfeld.

1620 days later... Here we are.

///////////////////// - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

Yes! Yes ! Yes!

It's a great day for London.

Check out this song which has just been posted on


It's in the Daily Mail too...

Circulation 3.1 million


Rank of 1000

Loose Change may see #1 tomorrow in google

not even 3 hours

If you believe Richard Clarke, Al Qaeda was identified as the culprit before 10am on 9/11. Forget 3 days: The FBI had a suspect before the last plane crashed! Damn, those guys are good...

Not surprisingly, the Iraq intelligence was cooked by PNACer Douglas Feith.

yeah this is REALLY BIG!!!!

great article

I got a feeling that it gonna be like dropping a stone in a pool, the waves travel outwards, hit the wall and come back to wher it started.

In other words, it's gonna breakthrough over here in UK, and europe before it will breakthrough back in U.S.

Cannes and loose change final, will be a huge turning point i feel.

yes LC2E has speculations, and doesn't stick right to the absolutely hard evidence, but I also feel that is why it has caught on so much, they make a strong case based on physical evidence but also circumstantial evidence.

can't wait!!

Hello Truthers!

we need more comments there.

Ore are they censored? My last one did not make it to the page, though submitted a few hours ago!

I'm pretty sure they are censoring...

and only allowing negative comments through...

It looks pretty obvious to me, but we should not stop bashing at the brick wall.

Best wishes

looks so

my first one to The Evening Standard mentioned WTC7,
the forgotten money trail, the saudi ties of Al-Midhar and Al-Hazmi, the Mossad next door to Atta story, the Norman Mineta testimony, the forwarnings of all the FBI field agents.
(Coleen Rowley, Harry Samit, Kenneth Williams, Robert Wright, Nancy Floyd, John O'Neill)

Maybe that was just too much truth for them...


The Daily Mail comments are just bull...

I watched Loose Change about a year ago, after a Muslim friend recommended it. It's pure bunk. What kills the conspiracy theory, utterly and totally and beyond any and all doubt, are at least two Osama Bin Laden videos in which Mr bin Laden happily takes credit for 9/11.

- Michael, Leatherhead, Surrey

My reply was that Osama first denied any guilt in Pakistani newspaper Ummat, that the "evidence" was a Pentagon found video of Jalalabad, of poor quality, with a fatty Osama and flaws in the translation, the FBI not wanting OBL for 911... and the rest of the story, once more put together here:

I'm fed up with the comments

please send and double-post L'sTTE!!!

Daily Mail

Evening Standard:

New comment...

Do you censor comments?

If I take a look at, there were several double posted comments alone still missing here.

What do you think you'll archive with that? More anger? Less readership?


maybe they're thinking if at first they attract many readers to this only to let them find near consensus on the "laughability" of the claims afterwards, the social pressure can be kept up? Just a thought.


also post your own comments.

Loose Change presents a tiny portion of the ever growing mountain of irrefutable evidence that show 9/11 was orchestrated by "insiders".

There must be hundreds of other video and audio.

This site has a huge collection:

Start with: 911 Mysteries

Then view a presentation by David Ray Griffin (theologian)

Then listen to Rudolf Giuliani tell how he knew in advance Bldg 7 was coming down.

Then keep going....

and spread the word.

We must be the change we wish to see in the world. M Gandhi

Just think, in one day, more

Just think, in one day, more people will read this article than there've been hits @ 911blogger since its inception. That's big time progress, in very short order, and it's a damn fine article! Just wait 'til Loose Change Final Cut is released. Who knows, maybe it'll be as big as Star Wars, and at the very least bigger than Michael Moore's F911.

You know, I think we're starting to win this info war, this psych-war/spiritual war, and that is what it is. "All war is based on deception" Sun Tzu "The Art of War"

“We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth”
~ George W. Bush

One Glaring Error

Together, the book and the movie have raised the question: could the attack be a carbon copy of Operation Northwoods, an aborted plan by President Kennedy to stage terror attacks in America and blame them on Communist Cuba as a pretext for a U.S. invasion to overthrow Fidel Castro?

The article pins the blame for the Northwoods plans on Kennedy rather than the Pentagon's Joint Chiefs. It was actually the Kennedy White House which apparently refused to go along with the Northwoods plan and put the kibosh on it.

I posted a comment with this clarification and also linked to this mainstream sourced article on Northwoods, , which clearly indicated that the plan came from the Pentagon and that it was the White House who squashed it. This was about 2 hours ago and their comments still haven't been updated.

kennedy not above black ops

Yes, he did say Northwoods went too far and he did clean house at the cia, but Bobby K ran all kinds of dirty tricks going after Cuba. It wasn't until they backed down over the missile crisis that they stopped all the black ops targeting castro. Of course, the likes of Nixon (who was convinced Kennedy stole the 1960 election) and GHW Bush (who ran the Bay of pigs and other operations) must have felt kennedy needed to be eliminated at that point, for the good of the country, of course.


just been out and bought the Daily Mail:
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

here is the Daily Mail's article, as you can see it's a 2 page spread with an amazing headline!!!!!

The daily mail is one of the bigeset papers in UK, millions read this everyday - especially on a Saturday!!! This must be one of - if not the biggest, poisitve exposure of 911.

many people who would never ever have been exposed to his will now have been.

can't thank the journalist enough.


I only wish that their comment admins were a bit more honest and fair...

Thanks for that Carlos !!!!

I think everyone should post a "Are you censoring pro 9/11 Truth comments ?"

Link : Daily Mail Article and Comments

Best wishes

I just did that!

I just did that!


That's huge! Thanks for the pic, Carlos. 

The Eleventh Day of Every Month

Daily Mail

The Daily Mail has the largest quality readership in the UK, according to its editor Paul Dacre. Quality here means middle-class with surplus funds. The readership is predominantly female. Apart from the Sun, it's the daily paper with the most sheeplike readership.

The Mail is generally conservative and pro-American, but otherwise xenophobic.

I note that most of comments in the Mail are currently of the most dismissive kind.

Nevertheless, this has to be seen as more significant than the Guardian's recent coverage.

Congress going home

Feb. 19 through 23, Members of Congress will be in their home districts for a Home District Work Period. This is the time to make an appointment to meet with your Reps. Also, I think this would be a good time to send mail to their home states, especially since I understand that mail to DC is much delayed due to security screening.

Good goin' ZachM and everyone up in Sacramento welcoming Ghouliani (11 AM Hyatt Regency)

Meet our reps...

And let's put on our best clothes for it too! Be polite, be nice, but tell all...

if they are censoring

if they are censoring comments

that means something is amiss---

there is a hidden agenda going on with this----probably the cfr trying to cover it's ass and only blame the u.s.

screw them

Yo, what's up with the digg

Yo, what's up with the digg votes? How come it's gone down to like 18 from 160 something?

we switched it out with a

we switched it out with a different digg link because the one with 100+ was 'buried'.. trying again.. you can find that here:

What's up with that "buried"

What's up with that "buried" sh!t? How can a page with over a hundred votes not get on the front page? I don't get it.

Was the site getting dugg

Was the site getting dugg hardcore or somthing and it crashed the blogger's server?



if anyone knows how to get a list of the high traffic fake msm board----we can all nail their threads with youtubes and smoking guns

msnbc----we coulld all have daily groupings of the paul revere society===and nail em en masse with 911truth

we could fake like we're skeptics and lose arguments(to each other)

all i'm saying is if they put a list up at this site----and we could actually really hit something

instead of just kissing diggs stupid ass

great things are coming about!!

Hey they featured my comment!

Thank you.

It's important that this vital issue gets the coverage it deserves and warrants, so that the truth about 9/11 will emerge, and the historical record about that terrible event, set straight, for the sake of all future generations, as a point of great learning, and God willing, historical transformation, not in military affairs, as outlined in that PNAC document, but in human affairs.

Good for you for having the courage to present an honest and open minded look at the serious questions that remain unanswered.

Thank you again.

- Robert Rice, Orillia, Ontario Canada

“We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth”
~ George W. Bush

thanks fo adding my pic...

but it's from the Daily Mail, and not evening standard - the article was in 2 PAPERS on the same day!!.. evening standard is a London newspaper, and the Mail is a national. They are run by same news outlet I believe

maybe put the link up to the daily mail page in your blog Brian

Thanks for the Daily Mail link

Not me who added the photo - must be a site administrator. But what a great photo! Also the Mail seems to have more comments. I added one and the emssage came back that my submission would be reviewed and my be edited and not all submissions would be published. Looks to me that may be censoring 9-11 Truthers. Anyone had their comments censored?

I will see if I can edit the bog to add the Daily Mail link as well.

cool got the link to mail

cool got the link to mail up...

yeah i reckon they are covering their back witht the comments...
but at least the editor gave the go ahead, and couldn't have mucked around with it too much.

Negative reader comments

Only a few positive among the mere 16 comments.

By the way, commenting doesn't seem to require registration...

you know how you can really tell this is a psyop??

point blank---you know it's b.s, it they dont say this

this is controlled opposition fake 911truth

sorry...but it's true

True, the Lack of WTC7 is Unfortunate

...but this is really, really incredible, fair coverage nonetheless.

Erm, why does it call

Erm, why does it call Northwoods 'an aborted plan by President Kennedy'? It wasn't Kennedy's plan at all, it was put forward by some DoD officials, approved by Lyman Lemnitzer, and shot down (as it were) by JFK or his officials at the first opportunity. Kennedy moved Lemnitzer from his job shortly afterwards.