This is my theory regarding security, law enforcement, and potential for a False Flag in Indiana over the next several weeks.

The Indianapolis Star reported that a nuclear attack response drill will be taking place in Indiana, starting on April 30th and lasting about three weeks. Here's a comment from the article, followed by the link:

"The event will trigger the deployment of 1,000 Indiana National Guard troops, more than 2,000 active-duty military personnel, local and state police officers, and other officials."

http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070417/LOCAL18/7041...

That report came out about two weeks ago.

A week ago, a report came out in The Sunday Times that states the following:

"AL-QAEDA leaders in Iraq are planning the first “large-scale” terrorist attacks on Britain and other western targets with the help of supporters in Iran, according to a leaked intelligence report.

Spy chiefs warn that one operative had said he was planning an attack on “a par with Hiroshima and Nagasaki” in an attempt to “shake the Roman throne”, a reference to the West. Another plot could be timed to coincide with Tony Blair stepping down as prime minister, an event described by Al-Qaeda planners as a “change in the head of the company”."

Note the part where it says "other Western targets". Here's the link:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1687360.ece

Now, recall that the London subway bombing attacks on 7/7 took place at the same time that bomb response/rescue drill teams were assembling outside of each of the bombed stations. The response members were shocked that an actual event was taking place that was identical to their training exercise - even down to the specific stations chosen for the drill. Here’s a link to the story. It's an invaluable reference to actual events:

http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/uk/coincidence%20of%20bomb%20exerc...

And then, recall that during the attacks on 9/11, NORAD, NEADS, and other officials were confused because the terrorist attacks coincided with a NORAD drill called Vigilant Guardian, which simulated an air attack in the US. This coincided with Vigilant Warrior, which was a live-fly hijacking exercise. The following quote is from the following link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Guardian

"The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States investigated the possibility that Vigilant Guardian preparations compromised the military's response to the terrorist attacks on September 11. They concluded that the exercise may have had, in fact, the effect of expediting the response to the attacks.

FAA and military officials reported trouble discerning the war game operations from the actual attacks. After being notified of the first hijacking, General Larry Arnold originally thought it was part of the exercise,[1] [2] as did NEADS Commander Col. Robert K. Marr Jr.[3] and his deputy Lt. Col. Peter J. Milanoski, who said "everybody" at NEADS first thought the attacks were part of Vigilant Guardian.[4] On page 17 of the 9/11 Commission Report when Boston center calls NEADS (Northeast Air Defense Sector), the response from NEADS was "is this real world or exercise?". According to the 9/11 Commission's staff statement No. 17,[1] "During the course of the morning, there were multiple erroneous reports of hijacked aircraft in the system."[2] For instance, page 26 of the Commission's final report documents FAA's report of a "phantom flight 11" at 9:21,[3] 35 minutes after the real flight 11 crashed into the WTC and even longer after the war games are alleged to have been aborted. However, General Ralph Eberhart told the 9/11 Commission “it took about 30 seconds” to make the adjustment to the real-world situation (note 116 to chapter 1)."

There is more detail at the preceding link.

So, now we have a nuclear response drill in Indiana, we have reports that a "Hiroshima" type event will take place very shortly in the West - Blair is expected to step down in a matter of weeks and the report says it will happen BEFORE Blair steps down, and we have precedent for drills that coincided with the largest terror attacks on US and British soil.

Add the following to this mix:

From American Conservative Magazine:

"The Pentagon, acting under instructions from Vice President Dick Cheney’s office, has tasked the United States Strategic Command (STRATCOM) with drawing up a contingency plan to be employed in response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States. The plan includes a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both conventional and tactical nuclear weapons."

Here's the link:

http://www.amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html

Then there was the following recent testimony to Congress by Zbigniew Brzezinski. Link:

http://www.senate.gov/~foreign/testimony/2007/BrzezinskiTestimony070201....

"A plausible scenario for a military collision with Iran involves Iraqi failure to meet the benchmarks; followed by accusations of Iranian responsibility for the failure; then by some provocation in Iraq or a terrorist act in the U.S. blamed on Iran; culminating in a "defensive" U.S. military action against Iran that plunges a lonely America into a spreading and deepening quagmire eventually ranging across Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, and Pakistan"

And last January's unreported comments to Congress by GOP Presidential candidate Ron Paul - who is running on a Constitution platform:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6d8MIENVtKw&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Epriso...

"The truth is that Iran, like Iraq, is a third-world nation without a significant military. Nothing in history hints that she is likely to invade a neighboring country, let alone America or Israel. I am concerned, however, that a contrived Gulf of Tonkin- type incident may occur to gain popular support for an attack on Iran."

So, in summary, we're getting warnings from all directions on a pending attack. We have precedent for those attacks coinciding with planned drills that match the events, and we have precedent of government manufacturing a crisis to go to war (look up National security Archive "Gulf of Tonkin").

A lot of unnerving pieces seem to be falling into place, and it's worth keeping in mind over the next few weeks. I pray that my assessment is wrong, but I can't avoid considering that it's a possibility.

Additionally, the first part of the exercise began two days ago. That part is Indiana Gaurd and local officials only. Next week (May 7) is the portion where the US Military gets involved for the "10 Kiloton detonation in Indianapolis" simulation, which is being run by the Joint Chiefs and may include White House participation. This excercise includes Northern Command, Canadian participation, live-fly's, and a total of over 4,000 troops deployed. Northern Command has run several nuclear response drills since it's inception, but this is the first exercise that includes actual troop deployment and live-fly's. Other agencies involved include DHS, FEMA, Indiana DHS, State police, and local law enforcement.

Adding to my concerns is the fact that the Indiana General Assembly won't be in session next week. Also, Alberto Gonzalez made a "not so public" appearance here in Indianapolis yesterday. Local news didn't cover it. The local FBI field office (which is located downtown) announced a couple of months ago that they're relocating to the suburbs. And in the meantime, Iran has been reclassified as the largest supporter of terrorism, the media has been reporting that they refuse to "cooperate", and the rhetoric about Iranian IED's in Iraq has heated up in the last few months.

And then we have yesterdays post on this site regarding warning from the Council on Foreign Relations that such an attack is likely:

http://www.911blogger.com/node/8255

Please pass this message along. Get the word out ASAP. Let's hope I'm wrong, but we can't risk doing nothing if this is the next 9/11. A strong warning needs to go out.