9/11 Accountability Conference

Howard Zinn confronted by 9/11 truth activist's in Montreal

After viewing the disappointing and disrespectful comments made by Howard Zinn on 09/10/08 in Colorado, responding to a request for help in spreading 9/11 awareness, Howard Zinn stated that he does not care about criminal accountability for the crimes of 09/11/01, because it is in the past. So we decided to attend his recent lecture at UQAM university to spread 9/11 truth, and welcome him to Montreal on behalf of the 9/11 victims, family members and the selfless 1st responders, for whom this attack will NEVER be in the past.


Just What Was Cheney Doing on the Morning of 9/11?

In this hour-long lecture recorded at the Arizona 9/11 Accountability Conference on February 25th, 2007, researcher Peter Dale Scott presents a host of contradicting accounts describing the actions of Vice President Cheney on the morning of 9/11, and how the 9/11 Commission cherry-picked its way through this minefield of contradictions, including contradictions by the Vice President himself!

Scott points out timeline gaps where simultaneously, Cheney & Rumsfeld can't be accounted for, and suggests that it is no coincidence that these old Cold Warriors were nowhere to be seen at a critical juncture on that morning. Rather, it's probable that they were discussing a variety of things, including highly classified procedures dealing with Continuity of Government and that this has been the springboard for the assault on the Constitution, and the roll-out of macabre plans like the establishment of KBR detention camps that go without comment or scrutiny by the Congress.

Scott calls for the questioning of Cheney under oath regarding his actions on the morning of 9/11, and suggests that this could lead to his impeachment.

9/11 Accountability Conference - Credibility In Our Message

Click Here (11MB MP3)

The point I was trying to convey is that the families' message is powerful, and we should try to promote it at every opportunity. This is from the Grassroots Workshop.

Donna Marsh O'Connor gave me a speech to read in her stead. That's at the end.

They Would Never - 9/11 Accountability Conference

A while back, I wrote an article entitled, "They Would Never" which tackled the idea that the Bush Administration isn't capable of something like 9/11.

Ken Jenkins and Janette MacKinlay did a talk on "The Psychological Implications Of 9/11." I thought my piece would be a good addition for that subject, so they were kind enough to let me tag along. Because I wasn't listed as being apart of that talk, the good people at 911TV.org didn't include this speech with the DVD collection. Ken Jenkins and hummux were kind enough to send me a DVD with this speech on it.

All sources for this information are available in the original article.


Devy Kidd's newest article, "911 Accountability Frustration Grows", can be found here:


Kidd is critical of certain aspects of the Chandler conference. Keep in mind that not all criticism is necessarily bad.

Follow the link above for the entire article. I have copied three paragraphs from near the end of her article here:.

"One thing for certain: a large number of participants at this conference belong to organizations that intend on taking this to the streets to build a big enough momentum that the 911 cover up can no longer be ignored by the political animals in Congress. They aren't afraid to get out there in the public's face to let them know there are serious questions regarding who was responsible for 911 and why we need a real investigation into the events of that day. Translated that means the ability of a grand jury or congressional committee to issue subpoenas and get to the real meat of the entire scenario including Enron, the anthrax attacks and Flight 93. The show down is coming and one can put money on the fact that Michael Chertoff, one of the most dangerous, evil men ever to head up any cabinet, is just lying in wait for the opportunity to unleash his dragoons on anyone who exercises their First Amendment rights.

12 News: What if everything we thought we knew about 9-11 was wrong?

12 new report


azcentral.com, 23.02.07

Hundreds of people from across the country descend on a Chandler resort to challenge popular beliefs about 9-11.

What many people consider to be the most devastating attack ever on Americans is also the government's greatest lie, according to many attending the 9/11 Accountability Conference.

One person told us she feels like they get nothing but lies and propaganda from the government when it comes to seeking answers about the attack.

Eric D. Williams Still In At 9-11 Accountability Conference?

According to Dylan Avery at his blog:

'Louder Than Words LLC will no longer be able to participate in the upcoming 9/11 Accountability Conference in Arizona on February 23rd - 25th, due to the involvement of Eric D. Williams who has authored a book promoting Holocaust denial, entitled "The Puzzle Of Auschwitz."'

Dylan has more at the Loose Change Forums:

"Eric is still attached to the conference. And apparently Kevin Barret has made some off-color remarks concerning the Holocaust as well. It's a very unfortunate situation for all involved."

This confirms what New Times blogger Stephen Lemons reported when he covered local ACLU honcho Alessandra Soler Meetze's withdrawal:

"PS: Meetze also let me in on the fact that recent e-mails from Knudson to her were cc’d to none other than Holocaust denier Eric Williams, who is supposedly no longer a part of the Chandler 9/11 conference."

Eric D. Williams: 9/11 Accountability Conference Director and Holocaust Revisionist!?

Sorry if you find this "divisive," but I think it's an important issue, and one that seems to not have been addressed by the movement.

Does anyone else find it a little disconcerting that the director of the this conference has a new book of Holocaust revisionism called "The Puzzle of Auschwitz?" His prior books were on 9/11, fascism, the matrix, etc., yet his latest release is on a topic that can taint anything connected to it. Even if the information is accurate, it is not a subject or association that is going to advance our cause.

So how did this happen? Someone should have taken issue with this and at the very least asked Williams to play a less visible roll.

Williams' site:

Sorry to point you to Screw Loose Change, but you can see how this might be something the "skeptics" and "debunkers" could use against us very effectively.

A post on TruthMove about this: