911 government conspiracy official story

Anti-Muslim 9/11 Propaganda in Full Swing

The 9/11 Mosque’s Peace Charade
By Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer

A massive fifteen-story mosque and Islamic Center going up in what was once the shadow of the World Trade Center claims to offer “the opposite statement to what happened on 9/11.” The Center organizers, the America Society for Muslim Advancement (ASMA), have worked hard in the media to portray themselves as Islamic moderates working for peace on the exact spot where their belligerent coreligionists perpetrated murder and mayhem in the name of their religion. But the words and deeds of the leader of the effort, the Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, suggests a more ominous reality: Abdul Rauf is a master of deceptive, Orwellian use of language, manifesting a deep contempt for non-Muslims and full accord with the supremacist goals of the 9/11 hijackers.


MSNBC poll - 66% dont believe official conspiracy theory

This poll indicates not only that 66% dont believe the official story, also now the ones that do believe it are only 29% with 5% undecided. 85,948 votes. The truth is winning folks so keep your eyes on the real perps and dont let em squirm out of responsibility


And the moon is made of green cheese.

The government would have us believe that they themselves were both incompetent and brilliant within the same 8 hour period on September 11, 2001.

8:14 to 8:20 a.m. - American Airlines Flight 11 goes off course and is hijacked.

9:37 a.m. - Pentagon gets hit.

(Timeline information courtesy of http://www.911timeline.net/)

That’s an hour and 17 minutes (77 minutes) between the time the first plane was hijacked and when flight 77 allegedly hit the pentagon.

Smirking Chimp publishes fair "9-11 skeptics" analysis

American Thinker says 9/11 skepticism "extremely dangerous"


by PositronicDave | Dec 3 2006

This just in...

AmericanThinker.com's Michael Lopez-Calderon thinks that people who don't buy the government's line about 9/11 are "extremely dangerous" because they might "undermine our democratic nation's war against the theocratic forces of radical, Jihadi-driven Islam".


You can read the full article here:


Changing the Terminology of Engagement

Just like we have managed in coining the phrase “911 Truth Movement” which sounds great compared to “911 conspiracy theorists” we must also change the terminology when it comes to the story.

I have heard many many truthers say the “official story”(me included) and I think that lends the idea too much credence.

We need to change the term to “government story” and get away from that word official. You ask why?

Well, nobody trusts government, everyone hates government, government sounds more shrill and projects a better point.

Official sounds too official. The real truth is not the “official” story, so wht are we all calling it that?

Change the word to government please.