Federal legislators and pundits are asked questions about 9/11 controlled demolition evidence on C-SPAN's program "Washington Journal".
Highlights in this series of calls include:
*AE911Truth is mentioned and its webpage is displayed on Washington Journal.
*Senator Roger Wicker admits he has close, personal friends who question 9/11.
*Stuart Reid of the CFR's Foreign Affairs magazine uses a question about Building 7 to make a jab at Rand Paul.
*Congressman Alan Grayson's gives a diplomatic response to a caller's question about Building 7.
This is Part 3 in a series.
To view Part 1 go to:
By Stephen C. Webster
Saturday, August 21st, 2010
The debate over a planned Islamic community center several blocks from New York City's World Trade Center site is a "distraction," according to Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL).
Instead, the debate should shift in focus to an examination of the administration which "let it happen."
'It,' of course, being the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
The remark was made during a Friday appearance on MSNBC's The Ed Show with former liberal talk radio host Ed Schultz.
“If we are going to talk about 9/11, why don’t we talk about how not so much the people who died on 9/11 were disgraced by the possibility of an Islamic athletic center several blocks away; how about the fact that they were disgraced by a president who let it happen?" he asked. "Who went on vacation for the entire month of August after he was warned in writing that Osama bin Laden was actually finding targets in NYC and learning how to take these planes and do terrible things with them? The thing itself said ‘hijacking’ and they did nothing about it."