O'Reilly Revived "Wall" Falsehood To Suggest Holder, Not Bush, Should Be Prosecuted

Summary: Bill O'Reilly falsely claimed "Eric Holder and Janet Reno put the wall up between the FBI and the CIA." In fact, the guidelines to which O'Reilly referred had no impact on communications between the FBI and the CIA, the Department of Defense, or any other agencies.

Source: (video at source)


The Beast tries equating 911 "truthers" with dope smoking terrorists

New A&E show The Beast attempts to smear 9/11 truth seekers as crazy dope smoking terrorists with access to RPG launchers.

The "truther" is an undercover cop trying to find out if the other undercover cop is worthy of an even deeper undercover operation.

This is being indoctrinated into the new homeland security generation.....

Friend or Foe?

How about a Jehovah's Witness? How about the guy who introduced himself to me, and tried to sell his God to me? We just met. Please consider how you feel when this happens to you. Are you open to them? Do you trust them?

This is a matter of awareness on how much one listens to a stranger, or who has not yet opened their personal doors to them; with open ears and open mind, at least to hear what one has to say.

I want to tell you about a huge success I recently had exposing an entire discussion forum to Yes, you can always lead a horse to water, but can you make it drink?

Sometimes 911 Truthers appear to have rabies on the matter of interpersonal communications, and that is when they scare people. As they say in network marketing, "is it duplicatable?" This is a central concept in all Network Marketing: People have to see themselves duplicating the behavior of the person that turns them on. While I am thankful for all of the work of every 911 Truther, I also find wars amongst strangers that amount to so little, and in some cases, who may even be capable of producing negative results.

Kevin's Paper gets and entry in the OP-ED News and lots of comments of course

Kevin Ryan's paper was articled in the op-ed by Josh Mittledorf

The anti-truth police were really quick to jump on this one early in the comments and more than one showed up. I wonder if they'll get this article passed up the gatekeeper chain and start a small panic. Here's the entire article:

Headlined on 8/5/08:
Chemical Traces of High Explosives in WTC Debris

by Josh Mitteldorf

The standard way to demolish a steel-framed building is to apply cutter charges to the supporting beams. The cutter charges consist of finely-powdered aluminum mixed with iron oxide, with added sulfur. This mixture contains both fuel and oxidant – it needs no air – and it burns hot enough to melt steel. The trade name for this product is “Thermate.”

There is a science to placing the charges in such a way that the building falls inward. It requires a great deal of expertise to keep a tall building from toppling over sideways.

Mindless "Patriotic" Email - A Glimpse at the "Other Side"

What sort of reality do people who circulate this stuff live in? I can only imagine.

Here is the full text of an e-mail I received today from a Grandma aged person I know. I don't fault this person because I honestly feel that age is a real obstacle in having an open-mind, but I can imagine that there are plenty of younger people out there who still live in a complete fantasy world of patriotic idiocy, sensationalism and mindless sentimental gestures.

Here is the email:

Subject:USS New York

Here SHE is, the USS New York, made from the World Trade Center !

Free Image Hosting at

USS New York

It was built with 24 tons of scrap steel from the World Trade Center

It is the fifth in a new class of warship - designed for missions that include special operations against terrorists . It will carry a crew of 360 sailors and 700 combat-ready Marines to be delivered ashore by helicopters and assault craft. (...continued)

Loose Change Skateboarding Cameo

So I just noticed in the latest "Transworld Skateboarding" magazine there is an article with Ted Newsome and on his desk is a copy of LC2E. Thought it was very interesting.

link to pic

tried to get the best quality...when you have the actual magazine in your hands you can easily see it's a loose change dvd

Was This The Appropriate Response For Abby Scott?

During the rally at Ground Zero, there were three invidivuals who were going around, telling everyone that everything we say is a lie, that we're nothing but nuts, and so on.

One of those individuals was Abby Scott. The same individual who frequents, and the same individual who recently made a movie called, "9/11 Conspiracy Wars", where she made sure to focus on those of us with the most outlandish theories, and acted as if they represented us all.

She claims that she confronted me with 9/11 Truth, but the only thing she said to me was, "Are you John Doe?"

Apparently, she's infatuated with me because she kept asking me that all throughout the morning.

When I was relaxing with a cigarette, Abby Scott decided to take my picture. Knowing who she is, I decided to let her know what I think of her, and her kind.

Was it the appropriate response?

[dz: innapropriate image removed from blog, left the link.. we can't have ppl post images like this and not expect others to come here and do the same]