Niels Harrit is the Associate Professor for the Department of Chemistry at the Copenhagen University in Denmark, who has published a large number of scientific papers with a special focus on nano-science. He was part of the scientific team which discovered nanothermite in dust samples from the 9-11 World Trade Center attack. In the first hour, he’ll discuss his scientific opinion on the collapse of the WTC and also WTC building 7. Niels tells his story as an independent researcher investigating 9-11 wreckage. He explains why he thinks nanothermite was at work. In the second hour, we discuss the official scientific report of the 9-11 disaster. He speaks more on the strange materials found in the rubble. Later, Niels discusses the loss of civil rights due to the events on 9-11. As a Danish citizen, he talks about the obstacles he faces when discussing the truth about the 9-11 attack.
Red Ice Radio - http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2013/05/RIR-130528.php
Massimo Mazzucco is an award winning filmmaker, screenwriter and journalist. He is arguably one of the foremost 9/11 "truthers" in Italy. His website is Luogocomune.net,-- a news website that grew out of his investigation of 9/11. Currently the website covers all the most important issues at stake in the new millennium, from Big Pharma to world economics...alternative energy to the attacks on civil liberties.
In this episode he talks with Andy Steele about the real 9/11 crime and the how he believes perception of the issue by the public and media will change over time.
Hi, I started a new White House petition asking to reinvestigate the collapse of WTC Building 7 on 9/11.
Please sign the petition, and spread the word.
AE911Truth Newsletter Vol. XXXX
Wayne Coste is an electrical engineer with about thirty-five years of professional practice, as well as a dedicated volunteer for Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth on its Congressional Outreach and Presenter teams. Recently he's been bringing the scientific evidence for controlled demolition to civil liberty activists and presenting the information on TV as a result of another unknown activist's 9/11 Truth graffiti, which caught the public eye. In this episode of 9/11 Free Fall he discusses latest his work.
Wayne's appearance on the news can be viewed here:
Article mentioned on show:
November 28, 2012
(Sacramento, CA) 9/11 Truth activist Mark Graham sent a letter to the 12 insurance companies for the airline defendants sued by Larry Silverstein informing them about evidence of controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and Building 7 and offering to put them in touch with building experts who could provide expert testimony.
In 2004 Larry Silverstein, who owned Building 7 and had signed a 99 year lease on the Twin Towers just six weeks before 9/11, sued United and American Airlines 1 and companies providing security at the airports (the "airline defendants"). Silverstein claimed that the airline defendants 2 had been negligent in allowing the hijackers to board and hijack the planes and fly them into the Twin Towers. He claimed that the plane crashes and fires "proximately caused the total destruction" of the Twin Towers, Building 7 and the other buildings in the World Trade Center. (Complaint in Case 1:08-cv-03722-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/17/08, page 2) 3
No mention has been made of the fact that it would have been impossible for those plane crashes and fires to have destroyed the buildings or the abundant evidence of controlled demolition. The defense attorneys could make an affirmative defense of this argument and exculpatory evidence.
Graham sent his letter via certified mail to the heads of 12 insurance companies who insured the airline defendants including Lloyd’s of America, Travelers Cos, Swiss Re, Zurich American, Global Aerospace and U.S. Aircraft Insurance Group and to their attorneys.
In this special episode of 9/11 Free Fall he talks about the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC 7 on 9/11, about upcoming 9/11 Truth events he will be involved in, and speaks directly to any and all U.S. government officials who may know about the controlled demolition evidence but are choosing not to act.
9/11 Free Fall is on No Lies Radio every Thursday night at 10PM EST, 7PM PST. www.noliesrado.org
To listen to previous episodes go to www.911freefall.com
CBS Sunday Morning features Ed Asner questioning 9/11 and showing WTC 7’s free fall on national television
Fox News’ Allan Colmes also covers Asner’s views on 9/11
Help us push this media wave even higher!
Dear AE911Truth Supporter,
Over the past several days you have helped us regain the slipped ground at on PBS’s website since we achieved #1 Most Watched and Most Shared rankings with Colorado Public Television (CPT12)’s showing of “9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out.” Thank you so much! As of this writing, your efforts have pushed us back up to the #2 Most Watched spot, after dropping for a time to #8.
We have always retained the "1 “Most Shared” spot, suggesting that people who see the explosive evidence are much more motivated to share it with others than are those who watch other PBS online previews and programs. That certainly does not surprise us … and it’s another point we can all make to help encourage the media to give us more and better coverage.
Wed July 11th -- 7pm Pacific * 10pm Eastern * 2:00 GMT (Thu)
Click here to watch the live Video Stream
WORLD PREMIERE OF DOCUMENTARY–9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out — FINAL EDITION!
No Lies Radio News is proud to announce that we will be live video streaming Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth landmark documentary, 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out. The Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth have already taken this film on the road on their Whirlwind World Premiere Tour across the US to over 30 cities where AE911Truth founder and CEO, Richard Gage, AIA, the director, has shown the film, personally introduced it, and has answered the tough questions that are always raised.
By Josh Mitteldorf
Even among progressive news sources on the web, most sites will steer clear of 9/11 Truth. Huffington Post won't touch it. CommonDreams will occasionally flirt with the edges of "conspiracy theories"; Truthout has printed attacks on 9/11 Truth . OpEdNews is one of the few places where readers and authors who believe the outline of the Bush Administration's version of the events of 9/11 and those who think the Bush Administration was itself responsible for the attacks can hang out together and hold heated debates. (The Editorial Board here at OEN is also split. For disclosure, I've been the Board member leading the charge for more coverage.)
You may suspect the heavy hand of censorship, or you may think that these well-established liberal sources are sensibly avoiding speculation and superstition. But whatever your beliefs, you'd have to think that the Wall St Journal is the last place you'd look for revelations about a 9/11 cover-up.
In a surprising reversal the managers of the petition website Avaaz.org have restored a petition asking NIST, Congress and President Obama to acknowledge what the free fall descent of WTC Building 7 means. This was due to a poll of randomly selected Avaaz members, the majority saying they wanted the petition to be restored.
On May 7 I rewrote the petition and gave it a new title: "Revise the U.S. government final report on the collapse of Building 7".
844 people signed the petition by the evening of May 22. (One friend told me he had seen 883.) Avaaz did not help AT ALL with this petition. They never featured it or made it available on their website. Every one of those 844 individuals who signed it found out about it through a friend. Hundreds of people shared it via facebook, twitter or email.
To all Readers of 911blogger,
Avaaz has still not responded to my message to them about removing my petition about Building 7. I wrote to them last Thursday, as soon as I realized they had taken it down. I also mailed them a letter in the U.S. mail that went out Saturday or today.
They have falsely told other Avaaz members that I did so.
They have removed the petition from my account too so that it says that I have not created any petitions.
Will you help me?
Please write to Avaaz and ask them to reinstate my petition.
You could write a 2 line message; copy and paste the following:
"Please reinstate the petition about World Trade Center Building 7 that was at
Here's the web page to use to write to them.
University of Florida - Rudy Giuliani Confronted on Building 7
January 26th, 2012
Bob Tuskin of The Bob Tuskin Radio Show confronts Rudy Giuliani over Building 7 and his possible role in 9/11.
This was covered in the local mainstream news paper:
The Gainesville Sun: http://www.gainesville.com/article/20120126/ARTICLES/120129608
Milo is the host of Touch, a daily program from 5:00-6:00 PM Pacific on The Bridge, 95.1 FM in Guerneville. Milo has invited me (Brian Romanoff) to be a regular guest on his show to try to bring more light into the events of 9/11. I appreciate the opportunity and I hope you enjoy the show.
This week we discuss the big NIST lie of finding no evidence for explosions during the WTC collapse investigation.
Available as a live-stream every Monday 5:00-6:00 PM Pacific at the website provided below:
The World Trade Center Buildings were built to last. Plane impacts and fires alone could not have accounted for the destruction in New York at the WTC complex.
This version in 6 parts has well synchronized audio - video.
The film features Richard Gage AIA, Dr. Stephen E. Jones, David Chandler and members of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, with original music courtesy of Eva James.
The presentation proves the world trade center buildings were demolished with explosives. It shows why a new scientific investigation and judicial inquiry is needed.
This edited compilation is presented under terms of "Fair Use". The intention of this creation is for non-profit, educational and personal use. Portions of copyrighted material may be included under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976. Allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and research. Any other use may require that permission be obtained from the original copyright owner.
The Science of 9/11
This original compilation has a running time of 55 minutes.
If you would like a free DVD quality down link that does not have a problem with the video-audio synchronization, send an email to
Current download links include:
You Tube link
QuickTime .mov file
This film features Richard Gage AIA, Dr. Stephen E. Jones, David Chandler and members of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, with original music courtesy of Eva James.
The presentation shows why a new scientific investigation and judicial inquiry is needed.
See below for the download link to save the DVD ISO file (over 3.1 GB).
After it is saved on your computer or flash drive, you can burn it to a DVD using a program such as ImgBurn.
You can get this at http://ImgBurn.com
You can also download a MP4 file, using You Tube Downloader software, using this link:
"Hellerstein said it was not reasonable for Silverstein and Citigroup to foresee the 'strange, improbable, and attenuated chain of events that led to 7 World Trade Center's collapse and the crushing of Con Edison's substation.' He added: 'Nothing in common experience of history could give rise to a reasonably foreseeable risk relating to the chain of events flowing from the terrorists and their hijackings to the destruction of the Con Edison substation.'"
Citing scope of 9/11, NY judge tosses 7 WTC suit
September 23, 2011 7:21 PM
(AP) NEW YORK — In tossing out a negligence lawsuit, a judge on Friday cited the "strange, improbable" events that destroyed a 47-story World Trade Center building a decade ago on Sept. 11, several hours after the 110-story twin towers fell.
The claims by the Consolidated Edison Co. of New York were "too farfetched and tenuous" to survive, U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein said.
This is my suggestion for a mp4 (mpeg4) video that can run on IPOD and go viral. It runs 25 minutes, and can be downloaded at this link.
By World911Truth.org | September 15, 2011.
In less than one month, this important video narrated by American actor Ed Asner, and produced by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth.org), got over 500,000 views on YouTube. This group of over 1,500 professionals are calling for a real scientific investigation into the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.
We invite you to share this important video on Facebook, Twitter and other social forums so more people can watch it. Let's go viral with this 15-minute documentary and it will hit 1 million viewers soon.
If you are an architect or an engineer and feel like we need a new investigation into Building 7's collapse, please sign their petition. If you know an architect or an engineer, send them this video.
If you support a new Building 7 investigation, join the Remember Building 7 campaign led by 9/11 family members, first responders and survivors and backed by AE911Truth.
This is my suggestion for a 40 minute remix edit of 911 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out.
The official pre-release version is over 2 hours long and contains redundant material.
AE911Truth plans on releasing their final, high quality DVD in October. I URGE YOU TO BUY IT WHEN IT IS RELEASED.
My edited remix includes low quality footage of Steven Jones from the San Francisco press conference, where he describes the red-gray chips. I hope the editors of the final DVD release decide to include the original footage.
Circuit Revives Negligence Suit in 9/11 Substation Destruction
Mark Hamblett, New+York+Law+Journal, June 22, 2011
The insurer for Con Edison can sue the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey for negligence in connection with the destruction by fire of 7 World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001, a federal appeals court ruled yesterday.
Reversing a lower court's grant of summary judgment, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit said the Port Authority can potentially be held liable in the $314.5 million suit for the installation of diesel fuel tanks at 7 World Trade.
Aegis Insurance, Con Edison's insurer, claims the presence of the tanks accelerated and ultimately caused the destruction of the building, which housed an electrical substation that powered the World Trade Center.
New Poll: 48% of New Yorkers Support a New 9/11 Investigation into Building 7's Collapse.
As the 10 Anniversary of the 9/11 attacks approaches quickly, a new Siena poll shows that half of New Yorkers today are in support of a new probe into the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.
The poll shows that 1 in 3 New Yorkers were unaware of Building 7's collapse, and despite the importance of the events of that day, only 25% have ever seen video footage of Building 7's collapse. Only 30% could identifty the name of the skyscraper. Moreover, the poll shows that only 40% of New Yorkers believe the official explanation that office fires were responsible for the collapse of this 47 story steel-framed structure.
Preface: This essay does not question whether Bin Laden and Al Qaeda attacked us on September 11, 2001, or whether Iran, Saudi Arabia or another nation-state had a hand in the attacks. It focuses solely on a peripheral issue regarding the third building which fell on that terrible day.
Former commander-in-chief President Bush said:
"Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories."
Senior Bush administration officials sternly cautioned the 9/11 Commission against probing too deeply into the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, according to a document recently obtained by the ACLU.
The current commander-in-chief, Barack Obama, has also warned against questioning 9/11:
As anyone in the military knows, you can't give your opinion unless you get first "permission to speak freely".
We're not in the military. However, I am not entirely sure that matters, given that speaking out against government policies may be considered a type of terrorism in America today.
Many hundreds of high-level military officers, intelligence officers, congressmen, legal scholars and experts have broken the commander-in-chief's orders not to question the government's official narrative regarding 9/11. And see this and this.
But neither Bush nor Obama has instructed us not to discuss World Trade Center Building 7. Indeed, they have never once mentioned the fact that a third building collapsed on 9/11 (and the 9/11 Commission never mentioned it either), even though that building was not hit by a plane.
I'm interested in developing a database that could serve as the back end for a site dedicated to documenting and organizing facts, questions, and arguments related to the science of the destruction of WTC7. I am not a scientist, but I'm interested in doing this so that I can nail down the main points of contention about the destruction in context and in an organized fashion. I find this to be the most problematic thing about discussions which many times just jump from one topic to the next, with participants only hoping they've made a point, without any real idea if they have. I'd like to be able to clearly point to a node in the argument and say "here's where we disagree. are there any related (parent/child) arguments? can this argument be verified? what other information do we need to verify this argument?"
Let's get back to what is really important: Building 7 and the (un)controlled demolition of the WTC on 9/11
With all the hullabaloo around the "alleged" (and if so illegal) assassination of Osama bin Laden we have almost lost sight about what is the real important issue at hand: The unexplained collapse of WTC 7 and the improbable collapses of WTC 1 and 2 as a result of planes having been flown into them.
While the White house has done everything it seems to convolute the information about what did or did not occur in Abbottabad (which for some reason reminds me uncomfortably of the word Abattoir) it seems to me that we have temporarily lost sight of what is the real issue here. Whatever the role of Osama bin Laden we have a very serious problem which no matter whether he got killed last week or 9 years ago has not been addressed with his death.
Some persons have dodged truth movement problems by exaggerating the amount of scientific expertise needed to ponder them. Even in relatively advanced truth movement products are problems (for the media and government) that are found via simple methods, e.g. just reading the official reports. Lets consider naming explicitly varied categories of problems according to how simple were the methods used to see them.
"Inside The 9/11 WTC Building 7 Truther Conference: [Insert Motive Here]"
-By Christopher Robbins in News on March 28, 2011 11:30 AM
Direct Link: http://gothamist.com/2011/03/28/inside_the_911_wtc_building_7_truth.php
(ON FRONT PAGE As of 3:30 PM PST)
Another Building 7 Article posted on the Gothamist. This time it's on the front page at the top.
We should attempt to find a few comments and "Like" them together so they are voted up to the top.
I suggest the recent comment made by "jaffsickle"
***Event Turnout Numbers
I called Mike DeRosa from WWUH Radio to get a QUICK estimate on the turnout at the Hartford CT event and how it went because I have been dying just to hear something about it.
Mr. DeRosa said:
~260 People Total
~40 of which were presenters/helpers
~80 were still there at the end of the event
~The Event was filmed from multiple cameras. He is working on trying to get it released and ready for youtube.
All in all the event "went very well" and the guests were "excited and impressed" about the information being presented.