Do you work in a large office building? Then you should know about this recently discovered flaw in ALL EXISTING BUILDING CODES AND FIRE REGULATIONS that could cause the complete collapse of your office building. For more information on this phenonmenon, please email NIST at wtc@nist.gov

The last flight for the Plane Truth Project, REDUX , 11th of the month truth actions, will be taking place on September 11, 2008 in NYC.

The plane will be taking off from west of Asbury Park, NJ and will fly an aerial 9/11 Truth banner from the Batter Seas, NY to the George Washington bridge and back.

The flight time has not been determined yet. The weather that day may affect it.

The banner copy will read:

"SOS! BLDG 7 SMOKING GUN WWW.AE 911TRUTH.ORG"

Maybe we could alert some news outlets and get some media coverage of the banner and the AE911Truth website . . . ?

If anyone is in a position (literally) to videotape this this day and post it here, that would be great!

Thanks for all you guys (and gals) do -

Betsy Metz
Summer of Truth
Plane Truth Project, REDUX

Jon Gold
8/26/2008

As 9/11 Family Member, and "Jersey Girl" Patty Casazza said, "one of the reasons why we still continued to fight with... for the Commission, even as we knew it was a farce, is we wanted their words, their lies down on paper."

As most of you know, I have never been a huge advocate for the idea that a "Controlled Demolition" took place at the World Trade Center. Reason being, I'm simply not qualified to tell someone if that did, in fact, happen. Also, for years, the media has tried to paint us as a movement filled with "conspiracy theorists" that think "explosives brought down the World Trade Center", and a "missile hit the Pentagon" without mentioning the 1000's of other problems with the official account. As a result, I can't tell you how many times during activism I've had people come up to me and say, "you're one of those people that think explosives brought down the buildings" as if to say, "you're one of those crazy people that I should ignore." So, I've always tried to push other incriminating information that the media and others DON'T like to talk about.

I managed to capture NIST's video and upload it to YouTube. The video can be found on NIST's website here:
http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/wtc_videos/wtc_videos.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGASzUFO-v8

The source file (.FLV) can be downloaded here:
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=61O5NZDQ

Click Here To Listen -- http://noliesradio.org
LIVE BROADCAST - Technical Conference on Collapse of WTC7 - Building 7
Tuesday, August 26th at 8am Pacific - 11am Eastern - 15:00 GMT
Repeat Broadcast: Thursday, August 28th at 9am Pacific - 12 noon Eastern - 16:00 GMT
Will be archived here after the broadcasts.

The Infowars article on the NIST WTC 7 Report is available in A5 booklet form as a downloadable PDF.

I have added: a brief introduction, for people new to this information.
More images, to aid comparison of WTC 7's fires with more severe ones in other steel-frame skyscrapers, which did not collapse.
A note exposing the deceptive, restricted analysis performed by NIST to support their claim re. collapse speed.
Useful comments from 9/11 Blogger members and readers at Infowars.
Links to archives of the NIST news conference, the AE911Truth one, the No Lies Radio interview with Dr Sunder, the NIST Report PDF, Arabesque's roundup of responses to the report and the Journal of 9/11 Studies.
Eye-catching title graphics.

Download, free, from www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=ac1039fd00817eecd2db6fb9a8902bda

Enjoy.

Cheers,

www.BBC5.tv

NIST Concludes "Fire" Caused WTC 7 “Collapse” when FEMA Report Concluded Fuel Tank Explosion had "low probability” of Knocking Down Tower

NIST claims "fire" had better chance of knocking down tower than planted explosives in bizarre response to interview question

By Arabesque

Two important polls at http://www.opednews.com. You will need to login or register to participate.

http://www.opednews.com/Poll/WTC-7-Brought-Down-By-Fire-by-Gene-Cappa-080821-565.html
NIST Report on WTC 7 indicates "fire" alone collapsed the skyscraper building in a mere 6.5 seconds.

http://www.opednews.com/Poll/Poll-Anthrax-Attacks-Solv-by-Kris-Malmquist-080821-508.html
Do you agree with the government's conclusion that Mr. Bruce Ivins was solely responsible for the anthrax attacks of mid-September 2001?

Click Here To Listen -- http://noliesradio.org
Building 7 Collapse Interview with Dr. Shyam Sunder of N.I.S.T.
Coming up Sunday, August 24th at 1:30pm Pacific - 4:30pm Eastern - 20:30 GMT
Repeated Monday, August 25th at 1:30pm Pacific - 4:30pm Eastern - 20:30 GMT
Will be archived here after the broadcasts.

To gain perspective on NIST's report, lets look at the new WTC 7 building. In an article published about the new WTC7 building in Architectural Record, it states: "Less apparent in the building are the structural and safety innovations that have already affected skyscraper design. Silvian Marcus, the project’s structural engineer and the C.E.O. of Cantor Seinuk, designed the original 7 WTC as a total steel structure, but this time around he developed a robust concrete core and a perimeter of redundant steel columns—to address progressive collapse concerns—that leaves the interior completely open."

This means the same guy who designed the original WTC7 building structure that according to NIST succumbed to complete structural failure in less than seven seconds due to a previously unknown and undeclared phenomenon called "thermal expansion" designed the new building long before NIST's latest analysis and recommendations were made public. I guess that must make Lucky Larry Silverstein a little nervous that his brand new skyscraper may collapse should someone light a fart in the bathroom. Not.

In light of NIST's WTC7 report, it would be good to have a look at DRG's excellent debunking of the widely held misconception that a document by scientists makes it an ipso facto scientific document. From page 23 of "Debunking 911 Debunking:"
___________________________________________________________________________________

Having looked at two ways in which people, as illustrated by journalists, can avoid confronting the evidence that 9/11 was an inside job, I now look at a third: the assumption that if an explanation is given by scientists, it is a scientific explanation.

(blog updated 8/23/2008 - 1345 Central)

http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2008/08/two-powerful-forces-should-have-made.html

World Trade Center building 7 was not a square or a rectangle, but a trapezoid:

As such, the larger side of the building would be heavier and more massive.

NIST claims that column 79 collapsed, leading to the collapse of the whole building.

Column 79 was located towards the larger end of the building (towards the bottom of the following diagram):

Crimes of the State

With the release of the NIST final report on Building 7 we can safely say that the government remains committed to the ongoing cover-up, and that crucial evidence was simply ignored, fairy tales were manufactured, and that's good enough for a lot of media. Perhaps a super-majority of media.

As media, "the press," will not perform its function as society's government watchdog, and will not pursue the gaping holes in this wizard's curtain, it's basically left to us -- you and me -- to clear up this matter for our fellow citizens. We are at a serious disadvantage, and yet the task is not so daunting as rabid "debunkers" would have you believe.

Let's defer to one of their own, the former head of NIST's Fire Science Division (the federal government organization which produced the sham report linked above).

http://www.mikemalloy.com/live/viewblog.php?BID=140

"It's no wonder that truth is stranger than fiction. Fiction has to make sense."
-Mark Twain

Well, now we know. Thank goodness, too. For the past seven years it's just been driving me crazy. How in the world did WTC number 7 manage to collapse if it was not hit by anything during the 9/11 attack and no explosives were set deliberately. Sheesh, what a mystery . . .

Well, a report by engineers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology in suburban Washington was released today and the cause was . . . a fire 400 feet away. Yeah. There you go. A fire up the street a ways. Got it. Wow. So simple. How'd I miss it? I'm embarrassed. According to the New York Times today " . . . investigators determined that debris from the falling twin towers ignited fires on at least 10 floors at 7 World Trade Center, which was about 400 feet north of where the city’s two tallest buildings once stood. The blazes burned out of control for six hours, as the city fire department, devastated by the collapse of the twin towers, abandoned its efforts to extinguish the fire, and the sprinkler system was incapacitated."