Building 7

500,000 Views for New 9/11 Mini-Documentary on Building 7 in 4 Weeks

By World911Truth.org | September 15, 2011.

In less than one month, this important video narrated by American actor Ed Asner, and produced by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth.org), got over 500,000 views on YouTube. This group of over 1,500 professionals are calling for a real scientific investigation into the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. 

Take Action

We invite you to share this important video on Facebook, Twitter and other social forums so more people can watch it. Let's go viral with this 15-minute documentary and it will hit 1 million viewers soon.

If you are an architect or an engineer and feel like we need a new investigation into Building 7's collapse, please sign their petition. If you know an architect or an engineer, send them this video.

If you support a new Building 7 investigation, join the Remember Building 7 campaign led by 9/11 family members, first responders and survivors and backed by AE911Truth.

Experts Speak Out Abbreviated Remix Video

http://www.archive.org/details/EvidenceOfWorldTradeCenterDemolition-ExpertsInterviewed

This is my suggestion for a 40 minute remix edit of 911 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out.

The official pre-release version is over 2 hours long and contains redundant material.

AE911Truth plans on releasing their final, high quality DVD in October. I URGE YOU TO BUY IT WHEN IT IS RELEASED.

My edited remix includes low quality footage of Steven Jones from the San Francisco press conference, where he describes the red-gray chips. I hope the editors of the final DVD release decide to include the original footage.

Why the NIST WTC 7 Report is False

Few people seem to know why the official report for World Trade Center building 7 is false and unscientific. Some might have heard that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (or NIST) has admitted that the building fell in free-fall acceleration for a period of time. But the fact is that the building could never have begun to fall the way NIST said it did. Here’s why. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArnYryJqCwU

WTC7: Diesel Fuel Tanks Claim Still Worth Millions in NY Courts

Circuit Revives Negligence Suit in 9/11 Substation Destruction

Mark Hamblett, New York Law Journal, June 22, 2011

The insurer for Con Edison can sue the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey for negligence in connection with the destruction by fire of 7 World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001, a federal appeals court ruled yesterday.

Reversing a lower court's grant of summary judgment, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit said the Port Authority can potentially be held liable in the $314.5 million suit for the installation of diesel fuel tanks at 7 World Trade.

Aegis Insurance, Con Edison's insurer, claims the presence of the tanks accelerated and ultimately caused the destruction of the building, which housed an electrical substation that powered the World Trade Center.

Poll: 48% of New Yorkers Support Building 7 Investigation

Photobucket
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/532-wtc7-poll.html
http://www.world911truth.org/new-poll-48-of-new-yorkers-support-a-new-911-investigation-into-building-7s-collapse

New Poll: 48% of New Yorkers Support a New 9/11 Investigation into Building 7's Collapse.

As the 10 Anniversary of the 9/11 attacks approaches quickly, a new Siena poll shows that half of New Yorkers today are in support of a new probe into the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.

The poll shows that 1 in 3 New Yorkers were unaware of Building 7's collapse, and despite the importance of the events of that day, only 25% have ever seen video footage of Building 7's collapse. Only 30% could identifty the name of the skyscraper. Moreover, the poll shows that only 40% of New Yorkers believe the official explanation that office fires were responsible for the collapse of this 47 story steel-framed structure.

Engineers Request Permission to Speak Freely Regarding World Trade Building 7

Washington's Blog

Preface: This essay does not question whether Bin Laden and Al Qaeda attacked us on September 11, 2001, or whether Iran, Saudi Arabia or another nation-state had a hand in the attacks. It focuses solely on a peripheral issue regarding the third building which fell on that terrible day.

Former commander-in-chief President Bush said:

"Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories."

Indeed, the 9/11 Commission was warned not to probe too deeply. For example, ACLU, FireDogLake's Marcy Wheeler and RawStory reported (quoting RawStory):

Senior Bush administration officials sternly cautioned the 9/11 Commission against probing too deeply into the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, according to a document recently obtained by the ACLU.

The current commander-in-chief, Barack Obama, has also warned against questioning 9/11:

As anyone in the military knows, you can't give your opinion unless you get first "permission to speak freely".

We're not in the military. However, I am not entirely sure that matters, given that speaking out against government policies may be considered a type of terrorism in America today.

Many hundreds of high-level military officers, intelligence officers, congressmen, legal scholars and experts have broken the commander-in-chief's orders not to question the government's official narrative regarding 9/11. And see this and this.

But neither Bush nor Obama has instructed us not to discuss World Trade Center Building 7. Indeed, they have never once mentioned the fact that a third building collapsed on 9/11 (and the 9/11 Commission never mentioned it either), even though that building was not hit by a plane.

WTC7 Question-Argument Database Web App Ideas

I'm interested in developing a database that could serve as the back end for a site dedicated to documenting and organizing facts, questions, and arguments related to the science of the destruction of WTC7. I am not a scientist, but I'm interested in doing this so that I can nail down the main points of contention about the destruction in context and in an organized fashion. I find this to be the most problematic thing about discussions which many times just jump from one topic to the next, with participants only hoping they've made a point, without any real idea if they have. I'd like to be able to clearly point to a node in the argument and say "here's where we disagree. are there any related (parent/child) arguments? can this argument be verified? what other information do we need to verify this argument?"

Let's get back to what is really important: Building 7 and the (un)controlled demolition of the WTC on 9/11

With all the hullabaloo around the "alleged" (and if so illegal) assassination of Osama bin Laden we have almost lost sight about what is the real important issue at hand: The unexplained collapse of WTC 7 and the improbable collapses of WTC 1 and 2 as a result of planes having been flown into them.

While the White house has done everything it seems to convolute the information about what did or did not occur in Abbottabad (which for some reason reminds me uncomfortably of the word Abattoir) it seems to me that we have temporarily lost sight of what is the real issue here. Whatever the role of Osama bin Laden we have a very serious problem which no matter whether he got killed last week or 9 years ago has not been addressed with his death.

Remember Building 7 Event Front Page on Gothamist.com + Event Turnout Numbers

"Inside The 9/11 WTC Building 7 Truther Conference: [Insert Motive Here]"
-By Christopher Robbins in News on March 28, 2011 11:30 AM
http://gothamist.com/

Direct Link: http://gothamist.com/2011/03/28/inside_the_911_wtc_building_7_truth.php
(ON FRONT PAGE As of 3:30 PM PST)

Another Building 7 Article posted on the Gothamist. This time it's on the front page at the top.

We should attempt to find a few comments and "Like" them together so they are voted up to the top.

***Event Turnout Numbers

I called Mike DeRosa from WWUH Radio to get a QUICK estimate on the turnout at the Hartford CT event and how it went because I have been dying just to hear something about it.

Mr. DeRosa said:
~260 People Total
~40 of which were presenters/helpers
~80 were still there at the end of the event
~The Event was filmed from multiple cameras. He is working on trying to get it released and ready for youtube.

All in all the event "went very well" and the guests were "excited and impressed" about the information being presented.

Hopefully some more official numbers and a better summary of the event will come out in the coming days.

AE911Truth "The Blueprint" Semimonthly Newsletter - Mid-March 2011

Newsletter not displaying correctly? View it on our website
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth / Blueprint Newsletter
AE911Truth Blueprint Newsletter | Vol. XXI | Mid-March 2011 
Mid-March Newsletter banner

AE911Truth will join other prominent activists in Connecticut for the “BuildingWhat?” National Conference at the University of Hartford’s Millard Auditorium on Saturday, March 26.

Contents
• 9/11 Controversy Strikes Again at UC Boulder Face-Off
• Upcoming Events: AE911Truth Springs Into Action
• New AE911Truth Marketing Materials Empower Activists
• Make the Difference: Write a Letter to the Editor

Buildingwhat banner/Signature

I put this together -I don't know how it will be received. But if anyone wants to use it, please do.

This is a Fair use, non-profit, educational tool.

NIST WTC 7 FAQ alterations revealed

Initial discovery

On NIST’s current WTC 7 FAQ page, the headline reads: (emphasis mine)

Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation (Updated 09/17/2010) [1]

In order to preempt further alterations, I cached this version.[2] When I noticed the date of the update, I first tried to look for previous versions of the FAQ in the Wayback Machine.[3]

I was in for a disappointment: previous versions of the page had curiously vanished from the archive. Normally this means game over: there are no cached versions. To my knowledge, there is no alternative for the Wayback Machine. I tried to look for alternatives nonetheless.

Rosie O’Donnell Talks 9/11 Truth

Source: 9/11 Truth News
Category: SUPPORT

Last week Rosie O'Donnell hosted 9/11 family member Bob McIlvaine and engineer Tony Szamboti on her Sirius XM radio show to discuss the buildingwhat.org campaign. A full description of the discussion can be found here and the show can be heard here.

Thanks to Jon Gold for providing the audio.

http://911truthnews.com/rosie-odonell-talks-911-truth

Join 9/11 Truth News on facebook and twitter.

Judge Andrew Napolitano on WTC7

Alex Jones interviewed Judge Andrew Napolitano and asked him about his views on World Trade Center Building 7:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/24/andrew-napolitano-fox-bus_n_788219.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cf2VP9b-tak