Building 7

Message From Bob McIlvaine: Join the “Building What?!” Campaign

Click To Sign Up

“Building What?!” is a phone and fax campaign aimed at helping the New York City Council become aware of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, The Salomon Brothers building, and amplifying the request from more than one thousand architects and engineers that a new investigation be opened into the destruction of this building.

Niels Harrit in scientific debate on WTC Building 7

Wendsday 10th March 4:30pm at Copenhagen Universtity,CU.
A debate arranged by the influential Danish newspaper Politiken and CU labeled "One tower - two views". The topic in debate was the science behind 9/11, with the WTC7 collapse as pivotal subject.
The dueling banjos consisted of Niels Harrit and Prof.of Physics at Niels Bohr Institute of CU, Per Hedegaard.
Each had 20 minutes of solo presentation on the WTC7 collapse. This was followed by a debate between the duelers with questions from the audience.

The Washington Post on ‘Lunatic’ 9/11 ‘Conspiracy Theorists’

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24952.htm

By Jeremy R. Hammond
March 9, 2010 "Information Clearing House" -- An editorial in the Washington Post yesterday slammed Japanese member of parliament Yukihisa Fujita because he "seems to think that America's rendering of the events of Sept. 11, 2001, is a gigantic hoax." His "ideas" about the terrorist attacks "are too bizarre, half-baked and intellectually bogus to merit serious discussion."

Fujita, the editorial added, is a member of "the lunatic fringe" who "have spawned a thriving subculture of conspiracy theorists at home and abroad", and "his views, rooted as they are in profound distrust of the United States, seem to reflect a strain of anti-American thought". The piece closes by suggesting that the "fact-averse" Fujita should be removed from office.

Daniele Ganser - part 15: 9/11 as difficult subject for european academics

Here is the fifteenth video of several in a row. Dr. Daniele Ganser is an academic historian from Switzerland who has researched false flag terrorism in Europe. Besides his publicity around the 9/11 truth movement, I think also his historical work about the so-called "secret armies" is extremly interesting.


More videos coming, in unchronological order from now on. Sorry for spelling mistakes.

The Ultimate proof NIST is lying about WTC7

The Ultimate proof NIST is lying about WTC7 Over 1,000 Professional Architects and Engineers agree that the mysterious collapses of WTC Building 7 and the Twin Towers on 9/11/01 need to be re-examined and investigated. The NIST report is proven to be unscientific and false, using evidence NIST either ignored or gathered and used itself. I used the public domain video created by NIST, available here: http://www.youtube.com/user/usnistgov http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEsc Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth: http://www.ae911truth.org FireFighters for 9/11 Truth: NFPA 921 on High Order Damage: http://firefightersfor911truth.org/?p=221 Shear Studs: A Case Study: http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/sixty-state-street/construction.htm Van Ramiro's SuperThermite experiment was courtesy of Jesse Ventura's "Conspiracy Theory" TV Show on TruTv (formerly CourtTV) from Episode 2 on 9/11 Conspiracy Theories.

Building 7 Reporter Byron Pitts: "A number of things don't add up."

Byron Pitts is the CBS reporter who, on 9/11, said: "About an hour ago World Trade Center Building No. 7 collapsed. A 42 [sic] story building, weakened by the devastation that had occurred earlier today... This was the one calamity that was not a surprise."

It is quite interesting that Pitts would have said this given that no steel framed skyscraper had ever collapsed from a fire. Anthony from Ohio, along with members of WeAreChange Chicago, spoke with Pitts at a book signing in a Chicago Borders store, and mentioned Pitts' report about how the building's "collapse" was not a surprise. I started to type an essay here but I just deleted a bunch of text, shall keep this short and just say: watch. :-) But basically, he maintains his allegiance to the OCT (and also the greatness of American Freedom of Press) while letting a few kernels of truth out, particularly about the present day corrupt nature of the media, here and there. He's very friendly and non-defensive, and doesn't get nervous over a bunch of truth activists showing up and raising legit points, which is at least a good thing. I wonder what kinds of things he would say on the subject at a party with no camera rolling.

Two Hit, Three Down - The Biggest Lie

In the February issue:



National Academy of Science member and Distinguished Professor endorses
David Ray Griffin's work exposing the truth of 9/11

By Lynn Margulis

I comment here on the nanotechnology aspect of Jerry Mazza’s masterful review (Rock Creek Free Press, January 2010, page 6) of David Ray Griffin’s extraordinary 2009 book, The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report about 9/11 is Unscientific and False.

World's Tallest Building to Soon Open in Dubai--(think they've accounted for Thermal-Expansion?)

I was wondering if anyone here has the expertise or knowledge of new building construction since the discovery of "Thermal Expansion," which, according to NIST, of course, can bring down a building in a symmetrical, free fall speed collapse, due to small fires only.

Have new construction codes been put in place? I have yet to hear of any.

Asia Digest Tells the Truth About 9/11

By Jeffrey Orling,

Half way around the world in a publication from Sri Lanka, November's edition of Asia Digest, the feature story is "9/11 — Has America been Told The Truth?"

Asia Digest begins their feature with a brief introduction by Richard de Zoysa which sets the stage for the two following articles by Johnny Christy which include a thorough presentation of the mysteries and problems with the conventional story told.

Christy's first article is titled September 11, 2001 — Was America Under Attack or Was the World Being Hoodwinked? The author asks the question: What really happened (the story the world was told)? He then follows with a bullet list of points; What's Wrong With This Story?

Christy follows this setup with an interview done in November of 2009 with Richard Gage, AIA, founder of Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth, in Expressing My Conviction. Through his answers to the questions posed to Gage, lays out the history of AE911Truth, what they are doing and what they hope to accomplish. Gage is optimistic that a new investigation revealing the truth about the events of September 11, 2009, will be inevitable, as the calls for one are growing in numbers and the momentum cannot be stopped.

Nivac Nhajal writes the final article which is called Demolition and Deception: The Destruction of WTC 7 on 9/11. In his well written and researched article with 52 citations and references, Nhajal carefully presents the case for controlled demolition as the only possible cause for the destruction of WTC 7, also known as the Solomon Brothers building. His article reads more like an article one would find in a peer reviewed journal than a magazine and the references alone are a treasure trove for those interested in drilling down into the disturbing story which reveals the deception by NIST in portraying the destruction as a structural failure from office fires. For those sitting on the fence, a read of this article will bring them over to the side demanding a new fair, honest let-the-chips-fall-where-they-may investigation.

Two major stories on 9/11 truth printed today in the Sydney Morning Herald

These stories were printed on p.9 of the SMH today. Together they occupy a full half page on the newspaper, including a large photo of the WTC7 debris pile as you can see in the image below:

Sydney Morning Herald 25 November 2009 - articles about Jan Utzon, Richard Gage and the 9/11 truth movement

This is pretty significant in my opinion.

It is the first time to my knowledge that the Sydney Morning Herald (one of the top broadsheets in the country) has covered the topic.

http://www.smh.com.au/world/fire-not-a-government-plot-felled-third-tower-20091124-jhf8.html

RICK FENELEY
November 25, 2009

NO PLANE flew into Building 7 at the World Trade Centre. But seven hours after the Twin Towers collapsed in flames on September 11, 2001, this third skyscraper fell too.

Like its larger neighbours, it fell rapidly, vertically, almost symmetrically, like an implosion. It took 5.4 seconds for its 47 storeys to complete their fiery descent.

Better Bad News on Diet Soap

This week's Diet Soap podcast features an interview/panel discussion with the fine people at Better Bad New on the subject of WTC 7, the controlled opposition to US Empire, and May 1968 in Paris. It also features a podcast sound collage with Slavoj Zizek, Jason Horsley, Robert Scheer from Truthdig, and his holiness Osho Rajneesh. Mother Teresa should jump in a lake. Also there is Gracie Coates singing Twisted Truths, Chris "Isto" White singing Black Orpheus, and a Titanic factoid from Miriam.

http://dietsoap.podOmatic.com/entry/eg/2009-10-21T01_37_46-07_00

Adam Syed discusses David Ray Griffin's WTC7 book on Cincinnati TV

First of all, I am pleased to mention that Cincinnati 9/11 Truth's hour long TV show on cable Public Access (Media Bridges), which used to be just once a month, has quadrupled its output to once a week (every Wednesday night, 7-8 p.m.). According to our producer who handles the bureaucratics with the studio owners, this is due to viewer demand. So even though it's "only" Public Access, which is often derided in our culture as the channel no one watches, it is clear that the demand is there. And this, in one of the most notoriously right wing, blindly nationalistic pockets of the country, Cincinnati Ohio!

FDNY 9/11 Reports: WTC 7 'Collapse' Foreknowledge

These are quotes that reveal foreknowledge of the collapse of WTC 7- from FDNY reports in the 9/11 Commission records, in Box 18 of the Team 9 (aka Team 8)/New York City Series.

"Ordered to evacuate 7 WTC because of collapse hazard." (pg 2)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/17627275/NY-B18-Division-8-Fdr-Operations-Summary-121

"Ordered to assist with hose stretch and operation in 7 WTC until ordered out of building due to possible collapse." (pg 2)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/17627436/NY-B18-Reserve-Apparatus-Fdr-Summary-Operations-Reports-126

"Lad. 85 then ordered to West & Vesey for extrication duties.Ordered to evacuate this
position due to 7 WTC instability. Lad. 85 took a standby position pending this collapse
on West St. Upon collapse of 7 WTC Lad.85 deployed on Greenwich St. extingushing
numerous auto & debris fires making a way to the north side (see page 2)" (pg 45)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/17627299/NY-B18-Division-8-Fdr-Report-of-Services-Company-Operations-Reports-111

"We supplimented with another hydrant and supplied TL 119 in extinguishing the fire @ 5 WTC Until 7 WTC was in danger of collapsing" (pg 7)

Superb Interview with David Ray Griffin on the Collapse of WTC 7

On a related note, Cincinnati 9/11 Truth's hour long public access show (which used to be once a month but has quadrupled to once a week due to viewer demand) focused a sizable segment on DRG's WTC7 book two nights ago; hope to post that here asap. - Adam

Superb Interview with David Ray Griffin on the Collapse of WTC 7
by Elizabeth Woodworth

A compelling interview of David Ray Griffin by George Kenney of Electric Politics is now available for downloading (or streaming).

The interview is 1 hour and 8 minutes long, and should be heard by everyone interested in the state of democracy in America:

The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7

The fact that "Seven", a 47-story building with a base the size of a football field, was in freefall collapse for 2.25 seconds, has now been admitted by NIST, the U.S. National Institute for Standards and Technology. This admission has enormous implications for the whole official story about September 11, 2001.