C-SPAN

Lee Hamilton - the debate about WTC 7 continues

Lee Hamilton -- Vice Chairman of the 9/11 Commission -- admits that the debate about what destroyed WTC 7 on 9/11 still continues when he's asked about it on C-SPAN's Washington Journal on September 12th, 2014.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56_aoSO6pi4

C-SPAN Washington Journal: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

August 1, 2014

Richard Gage talked about his group, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, which claimed that the World Trade Center was brought down by explosive demolition on September 11, 2001. The group was founded in 2006 and said its mission was to “expose the official lies and cover-up surrounding the events of September 11, 2001 in a way that inspires the people to overcome denial and understand the truth.” Mr. Gage spoke via video link from San Francisco, California.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zY9HfwzGPg

http://www.c-span.org/video/?320748-5/washington-journal-architects-engineers-911-truth

Are You New to the Evidence? Below is a summary of information that we feel you need to know regarding the events of September 11, 2001, in New York City.

http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/906-are-you-new-to-the-evidence.html

Rep. Jim McDermott -- questions about Building 7 are legitimate and merit further investigation

Representative Jim McDermott (D-WA), while a guest on C-SPAN's Washington Journal on April 3rd, 2014, answered a question from a caller about Building 7's destruction on 9/11 and the evidence that explosives of some kind brought it down. The Congressman said that he has seen videos covering the issue and that the questions surrounding it are legitimate, meriting further investigation.

"...one day we will have further examination of that issue...I think the sooner the better, but that's just my personal view".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ng9SEB7N-yc

Melanie Sloan, Executive Director of C.R.E.W., agrees to review the evidence

On January 21, 2014, Melanie Sloan, Executive Director of the Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington (CREW) was a guest on C-SPAN's Washington Journal:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjQRHHFWZQo

Melanie Sloan is the Executive Director of Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington, and said she would look into a callers claim regarding the collapse of WTC Building 7 while on C-SPAN Tuesday morning.

Melanie Sloan serves as CREW's Executive Director and is a nationally recognized expert on congressional ethics. Prior to starting CREW, she served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the District of Columbia where, from 1998-2003, she successfully tried cases before dozens of judges and juries.

info@citizensforethics.org
http://www.citizensforethics.org/pages/staff/

See here:
http://www.journalof911studies.com/resources/2014JanLetterPepper.pdf

Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) informed on C-SPAN about WTC7 omissions

http://youtu.be/2zNPeMudzMg

Or fast forward to 41:01 in this video:
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/DOHon

    Transcript of the exchange:

Caller:

"Congress's refusal to investigate the evidence that Building 7 was brought down in a controlled demolition on 9/11 is based on its blind trust in NIST's WTC 7 report, which has now been found to contain incorrect data about the building design that, when corrected, renders NIST's fire collapse conclusion impossible. As appropriations committee member would you be willing to review the errors in NIST's report and help in seeking accountability from NIST for its errors considering that NIST has spent over 20 million dollars of taxpayers money to produce this erroneous report? "

Representative Marcy Kaptur:

"I would be more than happy to receive information from you sir and turn it over to those who have that particular agency under their jurisdiction. I have seen some of the callers who have called into programs and I think you're getting your message through, and as I said earlier, 'Truth will out'...sometime the government doesn't have all the facts, or there is an effort in some matters to not reveal the facts, for whatever reason, but ultimately if the American people are persistent the truth will be revealed. So you certainly can send me material and I will discuss it with those who are in charge of funding those agencies."

    Link to the evidence and complaint:

http://911blogger.com/news/2014-01-05/letter-us-department-commerce-inspector-general-concerning-structural-feature-omissi...

http://www.journalof911studies.com/resources/2014JanLetterPepper.pdf

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) informed on C-SPAN about WTC7 omissions

http://youtu.be/yrhImtryoyQ

Representative Adam Schiff (D-CA), a member of the House Select Intelligence Committee says he "would be happy to review the letter" sent from lawyer, Dr William Pepper, to the office of the Inspector General outlining errors and omissions contained in the NIST report into the collapse of WTC7. You can find the letter here , and so can he.

Link to C-Span full video skip to 10:10 for the WTC7 part.

PART 5: Legislators, Pundits & 9/11 Controlled Demolition Questions

Federal legislators and pundits are asked questions about the 9/11 controlled demolition evidence on C-SPAN's program "Washington Journal".

This is Part 5 in a series.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCLpELlZr9g

Highlights include:

*Positive responses from Reps. Diana Degette and Charles Dent.

*Rep. Cuellar is called out for eluding a Building 7 question during a previous appearance on the show. Cuellar then denies he did it.

*Caller stands up for Building 7 callers and criticizes the corporate media during an open lines segment.

*Duncan Hunter confidently stands by all the government 9/11 investigation reports and believes they're adequate even though he's never read them.

*Caller told that he's being disrespectful to the CIA.

*Maj. General McConville asked why soldiers should obey orders from the government in a war based on avenging 9/11 when they haven't been given the full story.

"Congressman The Evidence That WTC Building-7 Was Brought Down With Explosives Is Real And Proven!"

http://youtu.be/JbnW_NoiUTM

A common theme seems to be that the people who do not support a new investigation either have never read any 9/11 building reports, have no opinion, or have no idea of what WTC 7 even is.

Here is another LEADER who has never read any of the reports but firmly believes that the reports cover information substantially.

Recently I've seen McCain plead ignorance, Chomsky plead no opinion, and now this Congressman pleas that the investigation has adequately shown the facts but admits to not have actually read any of investigations himself.

The congressman was asked a question on WTC 7 and the Congressman says that radical terrorists brought it down; not fires..... But then again he hasn't read any of the reports so he doesn't know the actual NIST story is ordinary office fires.

"Then the truth will come out" (Legislators,Pundits & 9/11 Controlled Demolition Questions PART 3)

Federal legislators and pundits are asked questions about 9/11 controlled demolition evidence on C-SPAN's program "Washington Journal".

http://youtu.be/sqWmOUUHeY0

Highlights in this series of calls include:

*AE911Truth is mentioned and its webpage is displayed on Washington Journal.

*Senator Roger Wicker admits he has close, personal friends who question 9/11.

*Stuart Reid of the CFR's Foreign Affairs magazine uses a question about Building 7 to make a jab at Rand Paul.

*Congressman Alan Grayson's gives a diplomatic response to a caller's question about Building 7.

This is Part 3 in a series.

To view Part 1 go to:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qnVZovV5dyw

Jon Gold's C-SPAN Collection

For the last year or so, one of my "pet projects" has been to search the video archives of C-SPAN for statements made about different people, different events, and make short movies out of them. They cover a multitude of topics, including NORAD's response, Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, the Israeli Art Students, Saudi Arabia, and many others. Here is my C-SPAN Movie Collection, in the order they were created.

Praise For The 9/11 Report



Kristen Breitweiser's Testimony Before The Joint Congressional Inquiry Into 9/11 - 9/18/2002



People Need To Be Held Accountable For 9/11



Opening Statement Of Eleanor Hill At The Joint Congressional Inquiry Into 9/11 - 9/18/2002

Ex-FBI agent [Ali Soufan]: Waterboarding produced ‘no actionable intel’

C-Span video at article link below; for more info on FBI Agent Ali Soufan and how he figures into the 9/11 investigation, see his profile: http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=ali_soufan_1

http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/05/13/ex-fbi-agent-no-actionable-intelligence-from-enhanced-interrogations/
Ex-FBI agent: Waterboarding produced ‘no actionable intel’ BY DAVID EDWARDS

Published: May 13, 2009
Updated 11 hours ago

A former FBI agent who interrogated suspected terrorists told a Senate panel Wednesday that no actionable intelligence was gained from “enhanced interrogations” such as waterboarding.

“I strongly believe that it is a mistake to use what has become known as enhanced interrogation techniques,” said Ali Soufan who worked for the FBI from 1997 to 2005. “These techniques, from an operational perspective, are slow, ineffective, unreliable, and harmed our efforts to defeat al Qaeda.”

C-SPAN & YouTube are partnering in a voter generated video project

C-SPAN & YouTube are partnering in a voter generated video project to hear voices from around the country. Beginning Monday, April 7th and continuing through April 22nd we are soliciting videos to answer this question: “What issue in this election is most important to you, and why?” Selected videos will air on C-SPAN beginning Sunday, April 13th.

Submit videos here