cgi

Whether wide-body jets were used is unimportant. CGI Fakery is Already Fact

Just like controlled demolitions, CGI is already fact given that...

an aluminum airplane will not slice through 100s of feet of structural steel and reinforced concrete, not show any signs of crushing, breaking, bending, and have it's delicate nose pop out the otherside. And on top of that, not have an exit hole in the building.

Also, different flight paths prove TV Fakery as well.

People must know that this technology exists and is in the hands of TV Networks, and that improvements are being made all the time.

Any news, even live news, from Iraq could all be fake!

 

Quotes from a Founding member of S.P.I.N.E., and retired Software Engineer in the Aerospace Industry:

 

"The video is phony because airliners don’t meld into steel and concrete buildings, they crash against them!"

Open Letter To Paul Joseph Watson (regarding your article on infowars.com)

in regards to this article

 

Mr Watson:

I ask that you follow Alex Jones' advice and look at the data.

You claim the fuselage of flight 175 poked through the opposite side of the south tower. If so, where is the exit hole? An exit hole is not visible in any of the photographs.

What you see on the film footage is a CGI fuselage, a "special effect".

 

This video shows what happens when an F4 slams into a concrete wall at 500MPH. Note that F4s are built to much higher standards than wide-body aircraft, and are designed to fly 1500MPH. You'll see the F4 pulverizes into dust.

 

What happens on 9/11? The flimsy wide-body "airplane" penetrates the structural steel / concrete building just as it glides through the air! Wing tips don't break off, tail doesn't bend, the "plane" doesn't even change direction. It shows no change at all.

News Footage From Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. Could All Be Fake

The fake "War on Terror" is being driven by public opinion it seems. Whenever the mainstream media televises their propaganda events from the Middle East, Americans seem to stand behind it.

We have no proof that any of these "videos" are of real events...

 

People need to understand that ANY video - EVEN LIVE VIDEO - can be fake. This article from Technology Review explains all the details about realtime, live, on-the-fly video manipulation, deleting/editing/inserting prerecorded footage into live feed as it's happening.

 

If ANY Real Airliners Were Used On 9/11, Where Are The Parts' Serial Numbers?

This article explains...

 

Aircraft Parts as a Clue to their Identity by George Nelson Colonel, USAF (ret.)

 

 

Notable Quotes:

"It will soon be five years since the tragic events of 9/11/01 unfolded, and still the general public has seen no physical evidence that should have been collected at each of the four crash sites, (a routine requirement during mandatory investigations of each and every major aircraft crash.) The National Transportation Safety Board has announced on its website that responsibility for the investigations and reports have been assigned to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, but there is no indication that mandatory investigations were ever conducted or that the reports of any investigations have been written."